Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees!" I expect we make more by selling weapons than it costs to house migrants. I doubt if the hotel industry, their staff, food suppliers, etc. are too cut up about it either. I also have no idea how we "stop wars" If we don't supply the weapons another country will. So it's a nice dream, but will never become reality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees!" Doubt very much they choose the Uk because we continue to supply weapons especially the Albanians who are increasing year on year. It’s a nice thought though about stopping wars. Problem is how do you stop it? Kicking off all over the place at the moment where do you start? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I believe the hotel bills are paid from the foreign aid budget. Therefore the bills are not costing the taxpayer any extra. Presumably the money given to hotels would then be subject to taxation in this country." It does indeed come from the aid budget. 400 million in 2016 3.7 billion last year. If not spent on housing the asylum seekers, refugees, illegal immigrants etc it would be spent abroad. So the irony is that for all the people saying we should be spending it helping people in the uk, to a certain extent we are! All those hotel workers, translators, support workers etc are all being employed indirectly via the aid budget. Plus some of it comes back into the uk budget through taxation of the staff and businesses | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I believe the hotel bills are paid from the foreign aid budget. Therefore the bills are not costing the taxpayer any extra. Presumably the money given to hotels would then be subject to taxation in this country. It does indeed come from the aid budget. 400 million in 2016 3.7 billion last year. If not spent on housing the asylum seekers, refugees, illegal immigrants etc it would be spent abroad. So the irony is that for all the people saying we should be spending it helping people in the uk, to a certain extent we are! All those hotel workers, translators, support workers etc are all being employed indirectly via the aid budget. Plus some of it comes back into the uk budget through taxation of the staff and businesses " Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure?" You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure? You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI. " Thank you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hadn’t realised France was a war zone. I’ve holidayed there a few times and found it quite pleasant. Maybe it’s gone down the drain since Macron has been in charge." I didn't realise it was a war zone either and I live on France. Perhaps you could elaborate on where you read that "France was a war zone"? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees!" Global migration of hundreds of millions via climate change will likely dwarf what we are currently seeing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees! Global migration of hundreds of millions via climate change will likely dwarf what we are currently seeing " Nah. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure? You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI. " Its actually 0.5%, not 5%. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9224/ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure?" "You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI." "Its actually 0.5%, not 5%. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9224/" I knew that figure looked wrong, but I couldn't see why. Thanks for the correction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"News in the last 2 days in Europe France to break ECHR rules and deport criminals and "dangerous individuals" before they can make ECHR appeal. Sweden to reduce benefits for non-European immigrants. Sweden foreign minister says they want to deport refugees who cannot be deported to a "third" country country(maybe Rwanda) So entire Europe is following Braverman's playbook now?" I believe that it was Denmark that first proposed sending migrants to a third country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"News in the last 2 days in Europe France to break ECHR rules and deport criminals and "dangerous individuals" before they can make ECHR appeal. Sweden to reduce benefits for non-European immigrants. Sweden foreign minister says they want to deport refugees who cannot be deported to a "third" country country(maybe Rwanda) So entire Europe is following Braverman's playbook now? I believe that it was Denmark that first proposed sending migrants to a third country. " I can't quite make head nor tail of the last paragraph. But if Rwanda agreed to take this who failed to gain asylum, I'd possibly support. Braverman is wanting to send everyone there. The second one isn't clear if it would apply to refugees... Or non-refugee immigrants. If it's non-refuees only, don't see an issue. The first is one that I can see many line up behind. Even I'm 80pc of the way there. I'm almost 100pc the way there of it's terrorism offences. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read today that the government are to stop using 50 hotels shortly but that still leaves a lot being used. It's not all great news for these hotels as some have had to lay off staff due to this and also the local economies suffer too as asylum seekers are not so likely to go to local attractions, gift shops and similar like holiday makers or other visitors" I can see a few of them going under to be honest, as there are about 3 hotels on the sea front that I know off were struggling financially after covid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hadn’t realised France was a war zone. I’ve holidayed there a few times and found it quite pleasant. Maybe it’s gone down the drain since Macron has been in charge. I didn't realise it was a war zone either and I live on France. Perhaps you could elaborate on where you read that "France was a war zone"?" I think it was a sarcastic way of saying “why don’t they all stay in France.” As in, unless France is a war zone then what are they escaping from by leaving France to come to the UK NIMBYism | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees!" That's a lot. About 7% of the daily cost of brexit. Still, at least it helps people in need, instead of flushing money down the Brexit toilet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees! That's a lot. About 7% of the daily cost of brexit. Still, at least it helps people in need, instead of flushing money down the Brexit toilet." How much has brexit cost us? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees! That's a lot. About 7% of the daily cost of brexit. Still, at least it helps people in need, instead of flushing money down the Brexit toilet. How much has brexit cost us?" Estimates vary of course. There seems to be some consensus that it's about £109,000,000 a day. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure? You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI. " How does that work with the figures given above? 2016 400m 2022 3.7billion Has GNI had a nine fold increase in six years or have they just moved the goalposts? S | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure?" "You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI." "How does that work with the figures given above? 2016 400m 2022 3.7billion Has GNI had a nine fold increase in six years or have they just moved the goalposts?" As someone else posted above, I meant 0.5% not 5%. I must learn not to post when I'm feeling unwell. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How does that work with the figures given above? 2016 400m 2022 3.7billion Has GNI had a nine fold increase in six years or have they just moved the goalposts?" "As someone else posted above, I meant 0.5% not 5%. I must learn not to post when I'm feeling unwell." I should also add that back in 2016, UK Foreign Aid was set at 0.7% of GNI, which is the international recommended minimum level. We lowered it to 0.5% in 2020 as a 'temporary' measure to help with the CoViD effort. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would I be right in assuming the foreign aid budget has increased in line with expenditure? You would not be right. UK foreign aid spending is fixed at 5% of GNI. How does that work with the figures given above? 2016 400m 2022 3.7billion Has GNI had a nine fold increase in six years or have they just moved the goalposts? S" The 400m and 3.7 billion I quoted was the amount of the aid budget spent on asylum seekers/housing refugees etc in the uk. It was not the total amount of the aid budget | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees! I expect we make more by selling weapons than it costs to house migrants. I doubt if the hotel industry, their staff, food suppliers, etc. are too cut up about it either. I also have no idea how we "stop wars" If we don't supply the weapons another country will. So it's a nice dream, but will never become reality. " Hotel staff lose their jobs,Serco bring in their own agency staff,zero hours minimum wage,mostly under the income tax threshold.The original hotel staff lose out as does all the businesses that rely on tourism in that area.If hotel capacity is reduced,tourism is reduced,revenue is reduced. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spent on hotels for migrants! Paid by the taxpayer... We need to stop this - not by closing borders but by stopping wars and as long as we continue to supply weapons and fund them (paid for my the taxpayer), we will continue to see refugees!" People will always war. If they can’t access guns they use swords if they can’t access swords then knives sticks and stones are plentiful. Many migrations are not fleeing war but are economic migrants looking for a better life. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
