FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Anti Breaking Cameras.

Jump to newest
 

By *enSisko OP   Man
over a year ago

Cestus 3

Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?"

Would I support increased means of improving road safety?

Yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth

Nope. Speed cameras are nothing but cash cows.

If they really want to make the roads safe in terms of speed, they need to replace existing cameras with average speed cameras.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?"

This would never work. Any driver being caught by such a camera could simply say that he saw a small animal run into the road, and he braked heavily to avoid hitting it. Even if there were high-quality CCTV footage which showed that there was no such animal, the driver could just say 'well I can see that now, by at the time I was sure I saw something'.

If they really want people to slow down in a given area, they need to put average speed cameras in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
over a year ago

Colchester


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?"

Yes.

However it doesn't stop the driver from performing those actions in the first place.

I'd prefer zoned roads which send a signal to a vehicle and prevent it doing it in the first place.

I think cars of the future will be much more intelligent and self-aware, more so than their human drivers, and by that time the mechanisitic need to drive will be long gone.

Sure, there will still be race tracks for the petrolheads to bomb around if they want, but for public roads it'll all be automated vehicles and integrated systems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?

This would never work. Any driver being caught by such a camera could simply say that he saw a small animal run into the road, and he braked heavily to avoid hitting it. Even if there were high-quality CCTV footage which showed that there was no such animal, the driver could just say 'well I can see that now, by at the time I was sure I saw something'.

If they really want people to slow down in a given area, they need to put average speed cameras in."

*********************************

But.........

Average speed camera systems don't generate anything like the 'flash bang... we got ya' fixed cash gener...... oops, 'road safety cameras'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ike Hunt888Man
over a year ago

Lancashire.

Or maybe just make it that every vehicle , has to have a person with a red flag walk in front of it , don't think that's been tried before .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Or maybe just make it that every vehicle , has to have a person with a red flag walk in front of it , don't think that's been tried before ."

What I took from that post is " Nanny state won't allow me to drive at the speed I want"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ike Hunt888Man
over a year ago

Lancashire.

Not at all could also provide gainful employment for the recently arrived doctors , engineers , architect's etc from across the channel .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enSisko OP   Man
over a year ago

Cestus 3

The article I read, I search anti break cameras and the first hit for me was top gear but there are other articles as well, I don't really want to post a link as there were advertisements.

I say this as the article states that there has been successful trials in Spain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellhungvweMan
over a year ago

Cheltenham

To be honest I don’t care what type of cameras they use - if I am on a road where I am getting near the limit then I almost always drive with cruise control on so that I can _actively_ focus on the road and not worry that my speed is not too high. Never had a ticket in almost 30 years of driving so it clearly works.

There is a wider philosophical question as to whether we want to live in a society that is being watched so much but that is for a different thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London


"Nope. Speed cameras are nothing but cash cows.

If they really want to make the roads safe in terms of speed, they need to replace existing cameras with average speed cameras. "

Or forget about Nanny State revenue raising technology and get a police patrols.

Cameras only monitor speed, they don't monitor bad or dangerous driving.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"To be honest I don’t care what type of cameras they use - if I am on a road where I am getting near the limit then I almost always drive with cruise control on so that I can _actively_ focus on the road and not worry that my speed is not too high. Never had a ticket in almost 30 years of driving so it clearly works.

There is a wider philosophical question as to whether we want to live in a society that is being watched so much but that is for a different thread."

Not all old vehicles have this fitted. I find in its difficult to set up depending on the vehicles I'm driving and how often the limit,s change

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
over a year ago

Colchester

To be fair, if the government wanted to shut down the whole "Cameras are being used to generate revenue" argument, there's an easy way around that.

Ditch the fine. Double the points endorsement.

The only problem is, they'd need to raise taxes to then pay for the cameras.

One assumes the fines raised by cameras goes back in to the local policing authority, so they can maintain and commission new cameras ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"One assumes the fines raised by cameras goes back in to the local policing authority, so they can maintain and commission new cameras ?"

Most cameras belong to the local council, and they get the money from the fines. There are some cameras that are put in place by the police, and those fines go straight to the government. If the camera is yellow, the money goes to your local council.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
over a year ago

Colchester


"

Most cameras belong to the local council, and they get the money from the fines. There are some cameras that are put in place by the police, and those fines go straight to the government. If the camera is yellow, the money goes to your local council."

Ah, thank you.

So I suppose with the cuts to local councils, it's in their interest to raise enforcement and thus claw back missing funds another way. All legal to do so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'd prefer the majority of bad driving to be given attention instead.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Good luck arguing it in a court of law when it gets contested.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?"

There was a plan to fit GPS systems to cars, then it records when you speed. At an MOT or service, the information is downloaded, then you wait for your points.

The articles sort of hinted that the systems are already in the cars, it was just a matter of if they wanted to go down that route.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orleymanMan
over a year ago

Leeds


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?

Would I support increased means of improving road safety?

Yes."

Data relating to road safety please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustintime69Man
over a year ago

Bristol

So I cycle every day before work in a vain attempt to stay trim and most of the roads I travel on are 20 or at most 30 Mph and because I am usually riding from 7:15 to 8:15 I get a fair bit of rush hour traffic. This is mostly large SUVs, some vans and quite a few Porsches and Teslas. Now maybe I am old fashioned but when I see an SUV on the school run being driven anywhere between 40 and 60 on a 20 Mph road that cuts through the middle of a public open space I can’t help thinking that there are some thoughtless selfish cunts in the world

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?

Would I support increased means of improving road safety?

Yes.

Data relating to road safety please

"

https://www.rospa.com/media/documents/road-safety/speed-cameras-factsheet.pdf

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *orleymanMan
over a year ago

Leeds


"Just read a story on TopGear website concerning the title of this post.

A little snippet.

"New anti-braking speed detection cameras - which record if drivers brake harshly right before the camera or accelerate quickly afterwards - have been successfully trialled in Spain, with some warning these devices could soon head to the UK".

Would you support this?

Would I support increased means of improving road safety?

Yes.

Data relating to road safety please

https://www.rospa.com/media/documents/road-safety/speed-cameras-factsheet.pdf"

.doesnt prove your claim. You'd need the data from Spain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top