FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Rishi Sunak Speech in 10 mins

Jump to newest
 

By *ranny-Crumpet OP   Woman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

What will it be about ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotsguyyMan
over a year ago

Belfast and Fife

Pulling back on zero emmisions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornLordMan
over a year ago

Wiltshire and London

Short-term politics over the long-term survival of basically everybody.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exyLeeLeeWoman
over a year ago

leeds

I don't know. Don't care just get him the heck out.. he's bloody useless and full of false promises!. He doesn't know his arse from his elbow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 25/09/23 14:03:42]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hes just a puppet parroting things to keep him and his cronies in influencial positions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *haingscaringMan
over a year ago

winchester

He’s a slimy fake arsed prick .. conservatives need to go

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Think there will be some backlash from his comments:

"And we shouldn’t get bullied into believing that people can be any sex they want to be. They can’t, a man is a man and a woman is a woman. That’s just common sense.”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Think there will be some backlash from his comments:

"And we shouldn’t get bullied into believing that people can be any sex they want to be. They can’t, a man is a man and a woman is a woman. That’s just common sense.”"

There might be some backlash, but I think it'll win more Tory voters than it will lose them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton

Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists."

Context?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Context?"

Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists."


"Context?"


"Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors."

Got it. Thanks for the response.

Agreed, it does seem to be a foolish decision. Unless they've decided that she's already in the press spotlight, so they might as well use her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Context?

Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors.

Got it. Thanks for the response.

Agreed, it does seem to be a foolish decision. Unless they've decided that she's already in the press spotlight, so they might as well use her."

I would say ill judged. Sunak is on a hiding to nothing because he is rich. His wife is even richer. Father-in-law richer still. They are not like 99.9% of the people in this country because of their wealth. Most people know that they have no experience of normal life for most people in the UK. He cannot therefore really speak for them.

Trying to just paint him as a hard working family man is disingenuous and most people see through it.

I think the UK differs from the USA in this regard because Brits generally consider displays of wealth as vulgar. Sunak would probably do well in USA politics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"I would say ill judged. Sunak is on a hiding to nothing because he is rich. His wife is even richer. Father-in-law richer still. They are not like 99.9% of the people in this country because of their wealth. Most people know that they have no experience of normal life for most people in the UK. He cannot therefore really speak for them.

Trying to just paint him as a hard working family man is disingenuous and most people see through it.

I think the UK differs from the USA in this regard because Brits generally consider displays of wealth as vulgar. Sunak would probably do well in USA politics."

I don't see anyone trying to paint Sunak as a hard-working family man, nor do I see either of them displaying their wealth. Is this something that happened during the conference that I don't know about?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
over a year ago

Stockport

Whatever he says, within 24 hours the policy will have changed again. I say policy, but it's actually just whatever the hell happens to come out of his mouth on any given day.

- H2S is on.

- H2S is not on, but other connections will be.

- Other connections are not on, but H2S will join London to Birmingham.

- H2S will stop 20 miles north of Euston and 20 miles south of Birmingham New Street - it will be a railway that joins nowhere to nowhere.

You couldn't make this shit up on a political comedy series!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Context?

Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors.

Got it. Thanks for the response.

Agreed, it does seem to be a foolish decision. Unless they've decided that she's already in the press spotlight, so they might as well use her.

I would say ill judged. Sunak is on a hiding to nothing because he is rich. His wife is even richer. Father-in-law richer still. They are not like 99.9% of the people in this country because of their wealth. Most people know that they have no experience of normal life for most people in the UK. He cannot therefore really speak for them.

Trying to just paint him as a hard working family man is disingenuous and most people see through it.

I think the UK differs from the USA in this regard because Brits generally consider displays of wealth as vulgar. Sunak would probably do well in USA politics."

Not like previous Prime Minister were short of a few bob. Neither is Starmer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Context?

Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors.

Got it. Thanks for the response.

Agreed, it does seem to be a foolish decision. Unless they've decided that she's already in the press spotlight, so they might as well use her.

I would say ill judged. Sunak is on a hiding to nothing because he is rich. His wife is even richer. Father-in-law richer still. They are not like 99.9% of the people in this country because of their wealth. Most people know that they have no experience of normal life for most people in the UK. He cannot therefore really speak for them.

Trying to just paint him as a hard working family man is disingenuous and most people see through it.

I think the UK differs from the USA in this regard because Brits generally consider displays of wealth as vulgar. Sunak would probably do well in USA politics."
Why would any member of the public have the slightest interest in any of hid wealth or that of his wife. It is irrelevant.

What matters to most rational people are the policies he purposes and how they impact the country . He needs to aim his policies at core voters and cut Corporation Tax in the near future . It is hardly sensible to distract investment by having a high rate of Corporation Tax.

As things stand he and his wife pay a lot more in tax than most people.

In addition they are unlikely to be claiming benefits so are making a net contribution to society.

The taxes which he and his family pay help the less well off in society . We should be extremely greatfull for their contribution .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ustintime69Man
over a year ago

london


"Sunak’s is going to be so annoyed.

He hates it when people involve his wife in politics.

Guess that means she is now fair game for investigative journalists.

Context?

Previously he has stated that as his wife is a private individual not in govt, then she should not be under scrutiny.

But she gave a speech at the Conservative party conference. That brings her into political territory. She is now fair game. Sunak is either being really stupid (and trying to be rather “presidential” in approach) involving her or he has some poor strategy advisors.

Got it. Thanks for the response.

Agreed, it does seem to be a foolish decision. Unless they've decided that she's already in the press spotlight, so they might as well use her.

I would say ill judged. Sunak is on a hiding to nothing because he is rich. His wife is even richer. Father-in-law richer still. They are not like 99.9% of the people in this country because of their wealth. Most people know that they have no experience of normal life for most people in the UK. He cannot therefore really speak for them.

Trying to just paint him as a hard working family man is disingenuous and most people see through it.

I think the UK differs from the USA in this regard because Brits generally consider displays of wealth as vulgar. Sunak would probably do well in USA politics. Why would any member of the public have the slightest interest in any of hid wealth or that of his wife. It is irrelevant.

What matters to most rational people are the policies he purposes and how they impact the country . He needs to aim his policies at core voters and cut Corporation Tax in the near future . It is hardly sensible to distract investment by having a high rate of Corporation Tax.

As things stand he and his wife pay a lot more in tax than most people.

In addition they are unlikely to be claiming benefits so are making a net contribution to society.

The taxes which he and his family pay help the less well off in society . We should be extremely greatfull for their contribution . "

That’s very true Pat….the taxes that they pay are used for everyone’s benefit….it’s l just a shame that his wife didn’t pay her fair share in the past

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top