Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? Great news. Clearly makes sense. Shows that not everything connected with the EU is bad regardless of what hardline Brexiters would have had people believe. " Brexit will get 'softer' and 'softer' as the days go by. It makes sense. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day?" This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved." I was being facetious. It is good. It’s like a divorce that gets a bit heated and acrimonious (usually because of the solicitors) but eventually settles when people see that it is sometimes possible to remain friends (or friendly). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved." It is good to see it resolved. We played our part in losing access, let’s not pretend otherwise. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved." Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"UK will rejoin the Horizon scheme, after Sunak's intervention in the NI protocol. Good day for the UK." .yes Sadly we should have always been part. Windsor framework intervention was never necessary. Our participation was signed into the TCA sadly thr E.U broke this agreement. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? " That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. " The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. " Indeed, that's roughly my understanding too and as I say, this is the first time I heard the UK did not want to pay its way to be a member. Obviously only wanting to pay while allowed to be a member seems reasonable. To me anyway | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. " was it at the same time as we were talking about article whatsit? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. was it at the same time as we were talking about article whatsit? " Sorry Hovis, I'm not sure of the question. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. was it at the same time as we were talking about article whatsit? Sorry Hovis, I'm not sure of the question. " Is that hovis? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is Brexit getting “softer” by the day? This isn't a change in the tumescence of Brexit. We were always supposed to stay in the Horizon scheme, but the EU used it as a negotiating lever and refused us access. Good to see that the problem has been solved. Nice spin but not quite… because the UK became “3rd party “ the UK originally wanted to stay in but didn’t want to pay or contribute for access… Now they have agreed to do both… As well as horizon, they have also agreed to rejoin Copernicus, which is the earth observation satellite program Actually the most interesting bit is that the EU wanted the UK to rejoin Euratom, but the UK declined, Be interesting to see what is next, Euramus would make sense (but they probably won’t as the immigration zealots would have a field day!) Europol? Blue skies? That's the first time I have heard that the UK wanted to be part of it but did not want to pay. I think I heard a while back that the EU wanted the UK to pay the full amount despite being banned from it for a few years. Not surprisingly this was not popular. The original agreement goes back to the original brexit deal so not sure why it makes it appear softer. It does show a country can pick what projects it wants part of and say no to those it does not want. The UKs membership to Horizon was frozen due to NI Protocol disputes, I don't believe it had anything to do with money. was it at the same time as we were talking about article whatsit? Sorry Hovis, I'm not sure of the question. Is that hovis?" Yeah | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see Catherine McBride is retweeting posts that are critical of this Horizon deal. Must only be a matter of time before Morley starts doing the same " Yawn | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |