Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act."" If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act."" Very strange.... The illegal migration bill, is clear in that it gives powers to not process any request for asylum if a person enters the UK illegally. I'm guessing that will replace this measure when /if, it comes into force. Very confusing... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. " I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. " I assume the people without documentation are 'put to the back of the queue' and now they're saying that won't be the case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. I assume the people without documentation are 'put to the back of the queue' and now they're saying that won't be the case." not sure how that makes the queue quicker to get through. Not how many in the queue have come in through regular means. Imo, it's BS spin to justify the unturn. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. I assume the people without documentation are 'put to the back of the queue' and now they're saying that won't be the case.not sure how that makes the queue quicker to get through. Not how many in the queue have come in through regular means. Imo, it's BS spin to justify the unturn. " Maybe it is bullshit. The proof will be in the pudding as they say. Let's see if we start to process quicker moving forward. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act."" Is this the proposed rule that says if you arrive by illegal means then you will automatically be rejected and banned from applying in the future? Has that bit been binned? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." Is this the proposed rule that says if you arrive by illegal means then you will automatically be rejected and banned from applying in the future? Has that bit been binned? " Honestly, no idea. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." Is this the proposed rule that says if you arrive by illegal means then you will automatically be rejected and banned from applying in the future? Has that bit been binned? " That is part of the new illegal migration bill. It has yet to pass the Lords but is on its way through now, I am assuming if passed into law this will then be scrapped as anyone crossing by boat will not be granted any access. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"as anyone crossing by boat will not be granted any access." Bit of a concern for anyone taking a day trip to Calais on the Ferry for a bit of shopping at the hypermarket. I think they might be miffed if they were not allowed back in. Mind you, ferries aren't exactly small boats, I suppose. Plus passports I guess. But if it says "Coming in by boat to the UK", then that means everyone. Letter of the law  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"as anyone crossing by boat will not be granted any access. Bit of a concern for anyone taking a day trip to Calais on the Ferry for a bit of shopping at the hypermarket. I think they might be miffed if they were not allowed back in. Mind you, ferries aren't exactly small boats, I suppose. Plus passports I guess. But if it says "Coming in by boat to the UK", then that means everyone. Letter of the law "oooh someone took an extra dose of pedantry today with their breakfast  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. I assume the people without documentation are 'put to the back of the queue' and now they're saying that won't be the case.not sure how that makes the queue quicker to get through. Not how many in the queue have come in through regular means. Imo, it's BS spin to justify the unturn. Maybe it is bullshit. The proof will be in the pudding as they say. Let's see if we start to process quicker moving forward." the flip side is that the government had been taking an approach that slowed the queue!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does this mean a slight roll back of the bill? Whatever it is, should hopefully speed things up and keep most people happy. It's likely gonna piss off the 'racists' though. "In a move to cut the asylum backlog, the Home Office said in a written statement on Thursday that it would no longer differentiate between people who arrived by irregular means, such as those who crossed the Channel, and other asylum seekers, as had been stipulated in last year’s Nationality and Borders Act." If it makes it quicker to process asylum claims, that's a good thing. Get people sorted out and into work, paying taxes, contributing to society. I'm sceptical that it will actually speed things up. But hopeful. As for the means by which people arrive. This is only important to certain sections of society. I can't see how it speeds up anything. Unless we are saying that for some reason those who entered irregulary took longer. The decision is no suprise to me. It always felt like a pseudo punishment and so I couldn't square with refugee convention. I assume the people without documentation are 'put to the back of the queue' and now they're saying that won't be the case.not sure how that makes the queue quicker to get through. Not how many in the queue have come in through regular means. Imo, it's BS spin to justify the unturn. Maybe it is bullshit. The proof will be in the pudding as they say. Let's see if we start to process quicker moving forward.the flip side is that the government had been taking an approach that slowed the queue!!" That's the really strange thing. The Tories usually try to exasperate any issues around immigration. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"oooh someone took an extra dose of pedantry today with their breakfast "Yup. There is a Kafkaesque pleasure seeing Governments squirm passing Byzantine Laws and then discovering the law of unintended consequences. It's probably more schadenfreude than pedantry. Not that I have anything against pedantry, and I find it quite refreshing and honest, compared to general sloppiness and laziness. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
