Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking." If we put forth our full military might it would be over in a day. We keep people in reserve to fight multiple theaters of operations. If we bear down on one target how do you think that will play out ? It's been over a year for Russia. That's like any conflict . We do not go full retard. We keep reserves to fight any other flareup. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking." I truly think he has a chance at winning. His strong points are economy and petrol prices which dipped at the end of his mandate, but tanked under Biden. Did you see how people laughed at his explanation of 'grab em by the pussy' quote? He had that audience eating out of his hand! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. I truly think he has a chance at winning. His strong points are economy and petrol prices which dipped at the end of his mandate, but tanked under Biden. Did you see how people laughed at his explanation of 'grab em by the pussy' quote? He had that audience eating out of his hand! " I live here I hear everyday on the radio how people are hurting and that their decisions were wrong .The policies worked it's just that he can't keep his big mouth shut. Is the issue. But Americans always love a rebel.If they didn't he would be gone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. I truly think he has a chance at winning. His strong points are economy and petrol prices which dipped at the end of his mandate, but tanked under Biden. Did you see how people laughed at his explanation of 'grab em by the pussy' quote? He had that audience eating out of his hand! I live here I hear everyday on the radio how people are hurting and that their decisions were wrong .The policies worked it's just that he can't keep his big mouth shut. Is the issue. But Americans always love a rebel.If they didn't he would be gone." And the best the Democrats can offer is 'Sleepy' Joe. I gotta admit, his sass was right on this zinger haha I actually believe he's going to stop the war and bring them both to the table. All he has to do is cut off the money/supply. I'm seeing an increasing number of seemingly American accounts on social media commenting about their disgruntlement with billions going to Ukraine. Trump is adept on tapping into the feelings of regular Jane and Joes. In conversations here, I constantly hear no way he's going to be elected again. But they fail to see that this is the same haughty elitist attitude we had in 2016! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. I truly think he has a chance at winning. His strong points are economy and petrol prices which dipped at the end of his mandate, but tanked under Biden. Did you see how people laughed at his explanation of 'grab em by the pussy' quote? He had that audience eating out of his hand! I live here I hear everyday on the radio how people are hurting and that their decisions were wrong .The policies worked it's just that he can't keep his big mouth shut. Is the issue. But Americans always love a rebel.If they didn't he would be gone. And the best the Democrats can offer is 'Sleepy' Joe. I gotta admit, his sass was right on this zinger haha I actually believe he's going to stop the war and bring them both to the table. All he has to do is cut off the money/supply. I'm seeing an increasing number of seemingly American accounts on social media commenting about their disgruntlement with billions going to Ukraine. Trump is adept on tapping into the feelings of regular Jane and Joes. In conversations here, I constantly hear no way he's going to be elected again. But they fail to see that this is the same haughty elitist attitude we had in 2016! " They were stupid enough to vote him in once, they'd be stupid enough to vote him in again. Even with his enthusiasm for sexual assaults. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. I truly think he has a chance at winning. His strong points are economy and petrol prices which dipped at the end of his mandate, but tanked under Biden. Did you see how people laughed at his explanation of 'grab em by the pussy' quote? He had that audience eating out of his hand! I live here I hear everyday on the radio how people are hurting and that their decisions were wrong .The policies worked it's just that he can't keep his big mouth shut. Is the issue. But Americans always love a rebel.If they didn't he would be gone." Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. If we put forth our full military might it would be over in a day. We keep people in reserve to fight multiple theaters of operations. If we bear down on one target how do you think that will play out ? It's been over a year for Russia. That's like any conflict . We do not go full retard. We keep reserves to fight any other flareup." Did that work in Vietnam? Or Iraq or Afghanistan? It will never happen in a day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. If we put forth our full military might it would be over in a day. We keep people in reserve to fight multiple theaters of operations. If we bear down on one target how do you think that will play out ? It's been over a year for Russia. That's like any conflict . We do not go full retard. We keep reserves to fight any other flareup." Whose side would you be on? Trump loves Putin, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. If we put forth our full military might it would be over in a day. We keep people in reserve to fight multiple theaters of operations. If we bear down on one target how do you think that will play out ? It's been over a year for Russia. That's like any conflict . We do not go full retard. We keep reserves to fight any other flareup. Whose side would you be on? Trump loves Putin, "Trump is a fanboy of strong autocrats... He defo aspires to be American version. It's a Catch-22 with Trump. Ideally, let's go all in before elections and put NATO boots officially on the ground in defensive posture and force Putin into negotiating a peace settlement. I doubt he'd push the button. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking. If we put forth our full military might it would be over in a day. We keep people in reserve to fight multiple theaters of operations. If we bear down on one target how do you think that will play out ? It's been over a year for Russia. That's like any conflict . We do not go full retard. We keep reserves to fight any other flareup. Did that work in Vietnam? Or Iraq or Afghanistan? It will never happen in a day. " I think Ukraine would struggle again Russia and USA combined. But it would still take more than a day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He also said that he would build the wall and Mexico would pay. (But there again, logic and reality isn't relevant to Trump supporters.)" But did you know Homeland Security, under the Biden Admin, continued to build that wall when media scrutiny subsided?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender" You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Gosh I thought there might be a topic from the OP then which didn't mention Brexit, but no! Just blew it at the end. All these simpletons with their single issue world view. Though I suppose you do have two (Brexit and Trump) so maybe your perspective is more complex than it superficially appears. As for Ukraine, sure just carry on with that war mongering. Just three more weeks to flatten the Russians!" Careful! You'll be branded a Putin Apologist with those views. Your right of dissent has been suspended until further notice.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So imagine if the house and the Senate was controlled by the Republicans and they go full on. It would be over in a day. "More likely to go the opposite way I.e stop all military support for Ukraine and end sanctions I doubt Ukraine would survive without American support, especially if China could support Russia without any comebacks | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there." Splitting hairs, ok, he has committed a sexual assault | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Gosh I thought there might be a topic from the OP then which didn't mention Brexit, but no! Just blew it at the end. All these simpletons with their single issue world view. Though I suppose you do have two (Brexit and Trump) so maybe your perspective is more complex than it superficially appears. As for Ukraine, sure just carry on with that war mongering. Just three more weeks to flatten the Russians!" Why do you keep harping on about Brexit? Brexit is done (apparently) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking." I reckon he would stand on the Ukrainian Russia border and dare Russia to fire. Simple solution | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Gosh I thought there might be a topic from the OP then which didn't mention Brexit, but no! Just blew it at the end. All these simpletons with their single issue world view. Though I suppose you do have two (Brexit and Trump) so maybe your perspective is more complex than it superficially appears. As for Ukraine, sure just carry on with that war mongering. Just three more weeks to flatten the Russians!" Why are you suggesting that "simpletons" are the only people who understand the impact of brexit? That's a pretty weird thing to say. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there." Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt?" That is true, the other posters comments were not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender" "You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there." "Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt?" Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. " Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted "Why would I do that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?"Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ? "Regular as clock work, boom! Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?"I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell, "You are "trying to explain...."??! What are you......... a psychiatrist...?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?
I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell, "The point I was making is, his supporters see him has the underdog, the man in the 2 tiered legal system and every slur stiffens their resolve. If the personal attacks stopped on tv channels and social media I genuinely believe it would weaken his hand. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell,
You are "trying to explain...."??!
What are you......... a psychiatrist...??"No, the poor bloke obviously has serious issues, he still thinks the 2020 election was a fraud, despite having no evidence , I hope he gets the help he needs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?
I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell,
The point I was making is, his supporters see him has the underdog, the man in the 2 tiered legal system and every slur stiffens their resolve. If the personal attacks stopped on tv channels and social media I genuinely believe it would weaken his hand. "Fair enough, I think he is unwell and is obviously delusional, the poor man needs help | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better." Thank you for the correction. That shall be his reference going forward. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better. Thank you for the correction. That shall be his reference going forward." 
I will put you down as undecided on Trump | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?
I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell,
The point I was making is, his supporters see him has the underdog, the man in the 2 tiered legal system and every slur stiffens their resolve. If the personal attacks stopped on tv channels and social media I genuinely believe it would weaken his hand.
Fair enough, I think he is unwell and is obviously delusional, the poor man needs help "Why do you think he is unwell? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?
I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell,
The point I was making is, his supporters see him has the underdog, the man in the 2 tiered legal system and every slur stiffens their resolve. If the personal attacks stopped on tv channels and social media I genuinely believe it would weaken his hand.
Fair enough, I think he is unwell and is obviously delusional, the poor man needs help
Why do you think he is unwell?"He is delusional, maybe it’s a type of dementia? Hopefully he can get some help, he doesn’t seem very happy , | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better. Thank you for the correction. That shall be his reference going forward.
I will put you down as undecided on Trump" he has absolutely no redeeming features/traits. His face just shouts “punch me” | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better. Thank you for the correction. That shall be his reference going forward.
I will put you down as undecided on Trump
he has absolutely no redeeming features/traits. His face just shouts “punch me”"Tbh, I don’t hate the guy, I pity him, he obviously has serious issues,  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I absolutely love how Trump has the power to get people so wound up, it's his super power and everyone feeds into it... For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If object A exerts a force on object B, object B also exerts an equal and opposite force on object A. Tell that to the women he sexually assaulted
Why would I do that?
Does Trump still think the 2020 election was a fraud ?
Regular as clock work, boom!
Why would you ask me your regular one liner? What do you want me to say to this?
I am trying to explain why trump has the power to wind people up. Tbh I feel a bit sorry for him, he is obviously unwell,
The point I was making is, his supporters see him has the underdog, the man in the 2 tiered legal system and every slur stiffens their resolve. If the personal attacks stopped on tv channels and social media I genuinely believe it would weaken his hand. "If being a sexual assault enthusiast didn't weaken his hand. I'm not sure a reduction in the amount of ridicule he gets on social media would make much difference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Can I call Trump a fat orange narcissistic misogynistic cunt? Yes. Though "misogynistic" technically means 'like a misogynist', so perhaps "a fat orange narcissistic misogynist cunt" would be better."
Using your powers for good this time. I approve. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible." Do they also love a man who has committed sexual assault? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible." It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible." Btw, why is he an ‘underdog’ he is a billionaire who inherited his money from his father ? Perhaps they think he is an underdog because of all his ‘ issues ‘ he has to deal with ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible." Isn't he a multi billionaire who inherited all his fortune? How does that make him an underdog? Is that more important to Americans than his horrendous record, abhorrent rhetoric, and his enthusiasm for sexual assaults? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. Btw, why is he an ‘underdog’ he is a billionaire who inherited his money from his father ? Perhaps they think he is an underdog because of all his ‘ issues ‘ he has to deal with ? "Snap! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. Btw, why is he an ‘underdog’ he is a billionaire who inherited his money from his father ? Perhaps they think he is an underdog because of all his ‘ issues ‘ he has to deal with ?
Snap!" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare " I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible." I think Trump's chances of winning in 2024 are increasing by the day. It's clear Biden just doesn't have the physical or mental acuity to be President. His inability to string a sentence together and clear mental malfunctions that he suffers regularly on camera are very worrying and it's bizarre that his family let him carry on. One answer to that of course are the revelations about his family's dodgy financial activities and influence peddling that the MSM and Big Tech managed to hide at the last election but won't be able to again. Too many people now know about the foreign payments to shell companies that have been circulating around the Biden Crime Family. But given how wide the financial tentacles spread within his family, they need to keep the "Big Guy" in place so the money keeps rolling in. And as for Ukraine we have been told for over a year now that Ukraine is winning. But still the war goes on. I doubt Americans have got the stomach after Afghanistan for another decades long war that they really have no strategic interest in, that they will probably end up losing anyway. I suspect that Trump's anti war message will increasingly resonate as the war drags on to no end. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. " Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) " The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader." Well, they do love a billionaire, sex pest, underdog , it’s a shame Epstein isn’t alive, he would be their perfect president | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader. Well, they do love a billionaire, sex pest, underdog , it’s a shame Epstein isn’t alive, he would be their perfect president " I doubt whether Biden knows what a woman is. Though he does like sniffing young girls' hair. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader. Well, they do love a billionaire, sex pest, underdog , it’s a shame Epstein isn’t alive, he would be their perfect president I doubt whether Biden knows what a woman is. Though he does like sniffing young girls' hair. " Biden is useless, I don’t think he has had to pay $2 million to a woman that he sexually assaulted though , | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader. Well, they do love a billionaire, sex pest, underdog , it’s a shame Epstein isn’t alive, he would be their perfect president I doubt whether Biden knows what a woman is. Though he does like sniffing young girls' hair. Biden is useless, I don’t think he has had to pay $2 million to a woman that he sexually assaulted though , "Who has Trump paid $2 million dollars to? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare I do agree somewhat. It's the same with all the professional trolls like Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins etc. Ignore them and they go away. It's sad state of affairs though, that the more his sexual assaults are brought to light, the more people support him. Maybe he should commit more sexual assaults to get even more support, the US loves a sexual predator (apparently) The guy above you agrees. Sad times for the women of America if their country votes in a sec pest as leader. Well, they do love a billionaire, sex pest, underdog , it’s a shame Epstein isn’t alive, he would be their perfect president I doubt whether Biden knows what a woman is. Though he does like sniffing young girls' hair. Biden is useless, I don’t think he has had to pay $2 million to a woman that he sexually assaulted though ,
Who has Trump paid $2 million dollars to?"I said Biden hadn’t, keep up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing!" If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The thing with Trump is Americans love a underdog story. They keep stacking everything against him and he still going. Expecialy now with the economy the way it is it is helping him. The blame Biden rehtoric is working because the economy is horrible. It is not just the US that loves the underdog. The more that gets piled onto him the more support he will pick up. Silence is Trumps worst nightmare " I agree the more they stack things against him and feed the media the more people see him as being vilified. Silence for a name that everyone knows would be a better option. They just keep putting him in the spotlight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there." Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. " America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president." It was a civil case | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. " He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him." The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan "So what? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan
So what?"That is why it will be tried in Manhattan , keep up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case " *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him." Why are you suggesting that only "rich liberals" take sexual assaults seriously? That's a really bizarre claim. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? " You could specify by removing the word 'criminal', as I said, it was a civil case not a criminal one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? You could specify by removing the word 'criminal', as I said, it was a civil case not a criminal one." Would "sexual assault enthusiast" be more appropriate? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? You could specify by removing the word 'criminal', as I said, it was a civil case not a criminal one. Would "sexual assault enthusiast" be more appropriate?" By all means. Criminal is a strong word and should only be used if someone is convicted of a crime. Trump was not. Words are important. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan
So what?
That is why it will be tried in Manhattan , keep up "Much as you would like to present yourself as an expert in Civil Procedure in the State of New York, I'm pretty sure you know stuff all about it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? " Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan
So what?
That is why it will be tried in Manhattan , keep up
Much as you would like to present yourself as an expert in Civil Procedure in the State of New York, I'm pretty sure you know stuff all about it. "Tbh, I know that is the offence is committed in Manhattan it is tried in Manhattan | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of." He is a sex offender End of | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan
So what?
That is why it will be tried in Manhattan , keep up
Much as you would like to present yourself as an expert in Civil Procedure in the State of New York, I'm pretty sure you know stuff all about it.
Tbh, I know that is the offence is committed in Manhattan it is tried in Manhattan "It wasn't an "offence". "Offence" suggests criminality, and Trump has not been charged with any "crime" over this alleged incident, for obvious reasons. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The more government throws at him the more it's going to be in his favor. People honestly don't give a shit about the civil suit. People win or lose them all the time. People remember 1 thing. The economy. Do you honestly think that civil suit matters when people are struggling ? They are desperate for anything to lower costs. Including reel ecting Trump." They don’t care that he is a sex pest? I thought the president was a meant to be a ‘respectable ‘ person? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. He is a sex offender End of "Cry all ye like. He is not a 'criminal'. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. The sexual assault was committed in Manhattan
So what?
That is why it will be tried in Manhattan , keep up
Much as you would like to present yourself as an expert in Civil Procedure in the State of New York, I'm pretty sure you know stuff all about it.
Tbh, I know that is the offence is committed in Manhattan it is tried in Manhattan
It wasn't an "offence". "Offence" suggests criminality, and Trump has not been charged with any "crime" over this alleged incident, for obvious reasons. "He is a sex pest, he has been ordered to pay $5 million, why are you defending a man who has sexually assaulted a woman ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. He is a sex offender End of
Cry all ye like.
He is not a 'criminal'. "He sexually assaulted a woman, why are you defending him? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. He is a sex offender End of
Cry all ye like.
He is not a 'criminal'.
He sexually assaulted a woman, why are you defending him? "No one is defending him. As blu said, it was a civil suit. Thousands happen in America everyday and Americans generally don't give a flying about them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Better quality of home life or be triggered about a civil suit. Hmm decisions decisions. Guess what people are going to take home life first." Do you have a terrible quality of ‘home life’ ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. He is a sex offender End of
Cry all ye like.
He is not a 'criminal'.
He sexually assaulted a woman, why are you defending him? "For the last time...., (christ, you really are hard work), No-one is defending anything but the CORRECT application of the word 'criminal' Got it...? Goodbye. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. He is a sex offender End of
Cry all ye like.
He is not a 'criminal'.
He sexually assaulted a woman, why are you defending him?
For the last time....,
(christ, you really are hard work),
No-one is defending anything but the CORRECT application of the word 'criminal'
Got it...?
Goodbye.
"He sexually assaulted a woman, Got it? Seeya | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of." Why are only lefties opposed to sexual assault? This thread is getting weirder and weirder | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Better quality of home life or be triggered about a civil suit. Hmm decisions decisions. Guess what people are going to take home life first." Fair play. I hope that more Americans oppose a sexual assault enthusiast being voted president than support him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Better quality of home life or be triggered about a civil suit. Hmm decisions decisions. Guess what people are going to take home life first. Fair play. I hope that more Americans oppose a sexual assault enthusiast being voted president than support him." It looks like the promise (from a known liar) of petrol being 10 cent cheaper is more important | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. Why are only lefties opposed to sexual assault? This thread is getting weirder and weirder " I'm not sure participants in a political forum pointing out that referring to someone as a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime may well be libellous means that they are in favour of sexual assault. Simply that they may prefer a little more specificity and a little less libel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind?" My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it?" Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of." What a weird take
So it is leftie to be concerned that the person who could hold the most powerful job in the world (and previously did) has sexually assaulted a woman? That he therefore exhibits traits, opinions, and behaviours that are patently wrong and offensive? Are you ok with that?
I think Trump is a cunt and hope he rots in hell. Am I a leftie? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not." NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it?" No, I thought you were going to suggest the magnificent 7, some need to come out of retirement but I think they’ll be up for the job: Farage, Abbott, Mogg, Raab, Truss, Hancock and Corbyn. What a line up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates!" There aren't many good ones left who haven't sold their country out for a red hat. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? No, I thought you were going to suggest the magnificent 7, some need to come out of retirement but I think they’ll be up for the job: Farage, Abbott, Mogg, Raab, Truss, Hancock and Corbyn. What a line up" Which one is going to shave their head and wear a black stetson? Feels like it would be more the Magnificent 300 ish | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates!" A this time the polls indicate people would vote for the devil himself in order the get Biden out of office. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates! A this time the polls indicate people would vote for the devil himself in order the get Biden out of office." You’ve gone and set that up for a barrage of quips | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates! A this time the polls indicate people would vote for the devil himself in order the get Biden out of office." Rather the Devil than Trump I say | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? No, I thought you were going to suggest the magnificent 7, some need to come out of retirement but I think they’ll be up for the job: Farage, Abbott, Mogg, Raab, Truss, Hancock and Corbyn. What a line up Which one is going to shave their head and wear a black stetson? Feels like it would be more the Magnificent 300 ish" I think Hancock would be up for that, but I reckon Truss might want a bit of the lime light too. Mogg would be in a zorro mask, Abbott and Corbyn will come as they are and Raab will be in full ceremonial karate gi and black belt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump says he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours and millions believe him. But he won’t say how he would do it and if he did, he could altruistically save tens of thousands of lives starting today. He would end the rest by simply not finding Ukraine. Where USA stands NATO normally follows. This would force Ukraine to make peace terms with Russia. However unfortunately this would not be done from a position of strength. No, he wants simple people to believe that there are simple solutions to complex problems. It’s Trump, it’s Brexit - it’s all about playing with the minds of the hard of thinking." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What a choice huh America, Trump or Biden. About time you got some decent politicians. BTW we have a few going spare in the UK you can have for nothing! If we have a few descent ones I think we should keep them, who did you have in mind? My sarcasm didn’t come across very well did it? Sarcasm? Waste of time on here ,you need biting hard hitting bitter twisted comments to make your point ,plus some self opinionated bias too ! No doubt Trump is a sod ,just that people vote for him no matter what he does, criminal or not. NotMe knows my point. Just banter. I think “sod” really undersells what an utter prick Trump is. I totally fail to comprehend how anyone can vote for him? Surely the Republicans will have better candidates! A this time the polls indicate people would vote for the devil himself in order the get Biden out of office. You’ve gone and set that up for a barrage of quips "lol I am use to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him." No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached " Why go to the trial when probably his defense attorneys probably advised him not to. Because the jury already was biased in the first place. The case was already decided even before they casted their vote. Hypothetically that's what I would do in a situation like that. Then just appeal the decision. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached Why go to the trial when probably his defense attorneys probably advised him not to. Because the jury already was biased in the first place. The case was already decided even before they casted their vote. Hypothetically that's what I would do in a situation like that. Then just appeal the decision." I feel sorry for trump, he is obviously unwell, suffering from paranoia and delusions, I don’t think you should encourage this behaviour, it’s cruel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached Why go to the trial when probably his defense attorneys probably advised him not to. Because the jury already was biased in the first place. The case was already decided even before they casted their vote. Hypothetically that's what I would do in a situation like that. Then just appeal the decision." 9 New Yorker agreed he was guilty FFS, normally you can't get 9 New Yorkers to agree on anything. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached Why go to the trial when probably his defense attorneys probably advised him not to. Because the jury already was biased in the first place. The case was already decided even before they casted their vote. Hypothetically that's what I would do in a situation like that. Then just appeal the decision. 9 New Yorker agreed he was guilty FFS, normally you can't get 9 New Yorkers to agree on anything. " lol true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. He hasn't committed any criminal "offence" therefore technically he cannot be an "offender". This was a purely civil claim which has a much lower burden of proof. Which is why of course no criminal prosecution will be brought against him, as he will never get convicted of anything. He will appeal no doubt. It's highly unlikely that Trump can get a fair trial in the US, and certainly not in a place like Manhattan where he only got 12% of the vote and the rich liberals all hate him. No… the reason it’s wasn’t a criminal case is that the statute of limitations on a sexual battery case in New York State is 10 years! What happened is because of the various cases of historical sexual assault that was made much more aware in the light of “me too” the New York State legislature put into law a “1 year window” where victims of historical sexual assault could go back and sue their attackers civilly… and to give E Jean Carroll her credit, literally within 30 minutes of the amended law going into effect, she filed papers in New York State Court! I hate the “he isn’t going to get a fair trial!” Argument because you are giving him a free pass.. he was convicted by 6 men and 3 women and for E Jean Carroll to win her case the decision has to be unanimous! If he wants to say it wasn’t a fair trial he would have a much better argument if he put up a defence (spoiler… he didn’t!) he could have appeared ( spoiler….. he said he would, judge called his bluff and gave him an extension to do so, he decided not to appear) he could have given a better disposition (in which he put his foot so far down his mouth I am not surprised if he is shitting shoe for the next month!) He could have laid something in the final words to the jury (spoiler… he didn’t!) She went on the stand and was cross examined for 3 days…. He was on a golf course! If he doesn’t want to have the case in Manhattan don’t commit the offence in Manhattan! And I hope that she sues him again for defamation.. because he is still saying what he did to get him into trouble… she can rightly go back to the judge and say he hasn’t stopped…. And this time there would be a multiplier attached " This was interesting. I didn't know most of this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. Why are only lefties opposed to sexual assault? This thread is getting weirder and weirder I'm not sure participants in a political forum pointing out that referring to someone as a criminal when they have not been convicted of a crime may well be libellous means that they are in favour of sexual assault. Simply that they may prefer a little more specificity and a little less libel. " Good point Magnus Gallus. It was a civil case and he was found "liable". Now can we also stop refering to Prince Andrew as a peodophile? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The more government throws at him the more it's going to be in his favor. People honestly don't give a shit about the civil suit. People win or lose them all the time. People remember 1 thing. The economy. Do you honestly think that civil suit matters when people are struggling ? They are desperate for anything to lower costs. Including reel ecting Trump. They don’t care that he is a sex pest? I thought the president was a meant to be a ‘respectable ‘ person? " hahahahahahaha oh your serious about leaders being respectable people, they wouldnt of made it to the top job if they were respectable, dear me i thought u was an expert on how politics work... Obviously not | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. What a weird take
So it is leftie to be concerned that the person who could hold the most powerful job in the world (and previously did) has sexually assaulted a woman? That he therefore exhibits traits, opinions, and behaviours that are patently wrong and offensive? Are you ok with that?
I think Trump is a cunt and hope he rots in hell. Am I a leftie?"I have no idea of your real political leanings but the profanity you exhibit in your last sentence would deter me from further debate with you on any subject. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Donald Trump is a sexual assault offender You can't legally say that. He was found to be liable for sexual assault in a civil court, but there has been no criminal trial, so he can't be described as an offender. You can continue to describe him as 'offensive' however, there's no problem there. Actually… yes you can… You can say that a jury of his peers found that there was a probability due to the preponderance of evidence shown that he committed a sexual offence against E Jean Carroll… therefore he is a sex offender… We laugh.. well some laugh… but those people are your mothers, and daughters, and aunts, and nieces…. America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted sex criminal as president. It was a civil case *America will be a scary place for women if they vote in a convicted (in a civil court) sex criminal as president. I think the more important part is that Trump is a convicted sex criminal, more so than the type of court case. But still. I can make sure to specify if that helps? Typical straw-clutching leftie comment. He has NOT been convicted of a criminal offence. End of. What a weird take
So it is leftie to be concerned that the person who could hold the most powerful job in the world (and previously did) has sexually assaulted a woman? That he therefore exhibits traits, opinions, and behaviours that are patently wrong and offensive? Are you ok with that?
I think Trump is a cunt and hope he rots in hell. Am I a leftie?
I have no idea of your real political leanings but the profanity you exhibit in your last sentence would deter me from further debate with you on any subject." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I've not read the entire thread. But if Trump knows how to stop the war he should do so immediately regardless of his position. If he can help save lives then they should come before his own political career. If he can and does then perhaps he deserves a second go at pres. But as I think it's just bollocks he won't and can't." Apparently he has to stop the war in-front Of Penn & Teller, if they can't work out how he's done it he becomes President for life. . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m sure he would end the war in a day. Closely followed by the world in a week. Humanity would be wiped off the face of the planet " You might have to.prepare for the possibility | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected" I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m sure he would end the war in a day. Closely followed by the world in a week. Humanity would be wiped off the face of the planet " I'm afraid that would be my fault as I told Trump that nuclear weapons would only kill Democrats, and Black & Brown people. Think I'm joking? I'm the one that told him about the Bleach. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays." Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays." RStag know how bad things are now compared to before. So you saying everyone should suffer more for your needs ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? " He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. RStag know how bad things are now compared to before. So you saying everyone should suffer more for your needs ? " I don't understand the question sorry. Can you rephrase? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
"I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate. Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader."Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost. What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position. He certainly never thinks before he talks. A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
"I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego. The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
"and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader."Well he kind of proved where he stood on race when we had the events at Charlottesville.. I think it’s interesting he is taking credit for putting his 3 nominations on SCOTUS and the dobbs decision to overturn roe vs wade, but won’t say if he supports a federal ban on abortion… Oh… still awaiting the trump healthcare plan.. that always “a couple of weeks away” from being announced | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about. "I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs."So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US"Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions? The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. "How far apart do think we are here in the UK to the politics and sound bites of the US? I find this to be really interesting, as in the saying if the US sneezes the world gets a cold | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. "I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter. "How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc.
How far apart do think we are here in the UK to the politics and sound bites of the US?
I find this to be really interesting, as in the saying if the US sneezes the world gets a cold"We're getting ever closer. In my opinion. We're more divided and more partisan all the time. It appears we have a rise in people being anti-science, anti-woke, etc. It all feels like we're getting closer and closer to the US situation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter. "What did Trump do for the economy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?"Sorry this is much better. Answer this and ignore me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?"It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
"It should matter though. If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge. "It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it. It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
"No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not."Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living. "Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care. I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. "Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid."So they don't care if he did anything to help them or not. Fair enough. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid.
So they don't care if he did anything to help them or not.
Fair enough."Most people in most countries don't care too much about politics. They only care about how good or bad they perceive their lives to be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid.
So they don't care if he did anything to help them or not.
Fair enough.
Most people in most countries don't care too much about politics. They only care about how good or bad they perceive their lives to be.
"I agree with you. I think the world would be a better place of people were more engaged. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid.
So they don't care if he did anything to help them or not.
Fair enough.
Most people in most countries don't care too much about politics. They only care about how good or bad they perceive their lives to be.
I agree with you.
I think the world would be a better place of people were more engaged. "some people choose not to engage | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best outcome for the world and the U.S? Elect Trump again The world and our country were in a much better position a few years ago. I absolutely hated Trump when he was first elected I don't think the US would be better off for women with a sexual assault enthusiast being in charge. And the rest of the world would be fucked, he doesn't understand climate change and thinks that science isn't real. He was a fucking disaster the first time around. And seems even more insecure and hateful nowadays. Removing the Capitol nonsense out of this for the sake of conversation, what was disastrous about his term? He egged on racists, and seemed to be aligned with the alt-right and their agenda of hate. He removed the US from the paris climate agreement He reduced the US's standing on the world stage. Wouldn't accept he lost the election, tried to undermine democracy and he encouraged people to riot. He said Mexicans were "r4pists". He sexually assaulted women. He stacked the judiciary with people who think women shouldn't have rights over their own bodies. Stoked culture wars to further divide the country He rolled back 100s of environmental protections. He moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Causing more destabilisation. He defended charity causes that help women. Spunked millions of $$ on a pointless wall. He tried to remove healthcare from millions of the poorest Americans during the worst pandemic in living memory. I'm sure you could think of a bunch more yourself.
Let's take this one thing at a time, Mexicans, here is his speech.
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people
Do you still think your point is correct?
I think saying of Mexican's "they're r4pists" will stoke division and race hate.
Which in my opinion, is a negative trait for anyone. Nevermind a world leader.
Sorry deleted the above post as I hadn't added a point and I was going to repost.
What I was going to say is, he wasn't saying the one thing you highlighted, he spouted out a number of things that indicated his confused position.
He certainly never thinks before he talks.
A lot of the things you describe in why he was disastrous are causes and interests to you that he cares little for, does that make his tenure a disaster, or was it always going to be a bumpy ride because he was pushing water uphill with the resistance he faced from the media
I think that understand the science behind climate change. Not encouraging racism. Not destabilising the middle east. And all the other things. Should be something a world leader cares about. All he cares about is his own ego.
The media loved him because he kept saying such weird shit. He was his own worst enemy on Twitter, we didn't need the media to portray him any way, we could see exactly what he was all about from his words.
and yet the polls are stating everything you are saying no one gives a shit about. All you stated guess what. Americans don't truly give a fuck about.
I agree. It's a sorry state of affairs.
So why the support? What’s he got the resonates with the people of the US
Honestly, no idea. Maybe people like soundbites, easy sounding solutions to difficult solutions?
The reality is. I don't know why people don't care about race hate, climate change, self serving narcissistic leaders etc. I said it repeatedly. People remember the better economy it's the number 1 issue above everything else. That alone is his strength. Everything else does not matter.
How materially did Trump’s policies improve the economy for ordinary Americans? Which policies of his, and his alone - made people’s lives better?
It doesn't really matter if any policies were his, and his alone. If the American people felt they had a better life in terms of finance when he was president then he'll get the plaudits for that. Just as if they were worse he'll be blamed for it.
It should matter though.
If they think his performance on the economy is worth ignoring all the other shit for. Surely they would want to know if he made any difference or if it would have been the same with a lettuce in charge.
It should matter but it doesn't. That's the reality of it.
It's the same in every country in the world. People care about their own lives, end of. You may not like it but that doesn't mean it isn't the reality.
No, I'm saying if they did care about their own lives they should be interested in this stuff and engaged enough to know if the person they are voting for actually did something positive, or not. Guess what ? People are not you They remember cheaper energy food and affordable housing. Does the climate matter ? No it doesn't . Does inequality matter ? again no it doesn't. They are issues that do not dominate everyday living.
Are they not interested in looking into whether Trump's policies helped or not? Or do you think people just aren't engaged enough to care.
I agree people don't care about inequity, climate change etc. It's a sad state of affairs. Did they have more income when Trump was in ? Yes they did. People work 8 to 12 our a day do they have the time to constantly check policies? No they worry about what's for dinner and if the bills are paid.
So they don't care if he did anything to help them or not.
Fair enough.
Most people in most countries don't care too much about politics. They only care about how good or bad they perceive their lives to be.
I agree with you.
I think the world would be a better place of people were more engaged. "I engage with what I myself consider worthwhile to others. And, I certainly do so. But, I'd refuse to be cajoled to engage anything some pseudo-utopian suggested. Some people are either extremely narrow-minded or, merely 'virtue-signalling'. That is my opinion, for what it's worth..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes " Stock up on iodine pills. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes " The length Trump will go to to avoid settling his debts! Nuclear war so he doesn't have to settle his kompromat bill! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes The length Trump will go to to avoid settling his debts! Nuclear war so he doesn't have to settle his kompromat bill! " Well the Durham report proves otherwise | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes The length Trump will go to to avoid settling his debts! Nuclear war so he doesn't have to settle his kompromat bill! Well the Durham report proves otherwise "Yes and no… trump said that the Durham report would show that Hillary Clinton and her minions were behind the scandal .. so let’s call it 1 for 2 at best
The report said that FBI should not have investigated that there was a link personally between him personally and Russia… it did not say that there were not links between his political team and Russia!
He was just far enough away to not know personally what his political team were doing or what the Russians themselves were doing on his behalf……
So if that’s the W you want to celebrate… cool! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes The length Trump will go to to avoid settling his debts! Nuclear war so he doesn't have to settle his kompromat bill! Well the Durham report proves otherwise
Yes and no… trump said that the Durham report would show that Hillary Clinton and her minions were behind the scandal .. so let’s call it 1 for 2 at best
The report said that FBI should not have investigated that there was a link personally between him personally and Russia… it did not say that there were not links between his political team and Russia!
He was just far enough away to not know personally what his political team were doing or what the Russians themselves were doing on his behalf……
So if that’s the W you want to celebrate… cool! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Roughly translated, Trump will end the Human race in a day, because his actions would likely cause Putin to launch his nukes The length Trump will go to to avoid settling his debts! Nuclear war so he doesn't have to settle his kompromat bill! Well the Durham report proves otherwise
Yes and no… trump said that the Durham report would show that Hillary Clinton and her minions were behind the scandal .. so let’s call it 1 for 2 at best
The report said that FBI should not have investigated that there was a link personally between him personally and Russia… it did not say that there were not links between his political team and Russia!
He was just far enough away to not know personally what his political team were doing or what the Russians themselves were doing on his behalf……
So if that’s the W you want to celebrate… cool! "You can have investigations and reports till the cows come home, the only things that matters are indictments and convictions. . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
