Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up." I disagree. Local stuff is down to local councillors. My fossil of an MP is useless when asked to help with local issues in my experience | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. " By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. " Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up." Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. " Well said. Really..! I shall treasure this first full agreement we have, keep it safe and seek more to come...! (Trumpet fanfare in celebration....!)  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. " I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark?" My local councillors are great at their job  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. Well said. Really..! I shall treasure this first full agreement we have, keep it safe and seek more to come...! (Trumpet fanfare in celebration....!) " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark?" Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. " I understand your point but I have only 3 candidates to choose from. There's no independent and even the Greens haven't bothered in my ward. I'm not voting for either of the 3 standing for various reasons so I'm likely to end up not voting at all... something I'm very much against. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. I understand your point but I have only 3 candidates to choose from. There's no independent and even the Greens haven't bothered in my ward. I'm not voting for either of the 3 standing for various reasons so I'm likely to end up not voting at all... something I'm very much against." Spoil your ballot paper, it gets counted as not happy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. " My view would be that I don't want a higher turnout. There is widespread disaffection with politicians. If other want to vote that's up to them, but I see no benefit in voting for parties that don't represent my views and values. The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Otherwise their policies are identical, a few tweaks here and there They simply aren't serious people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. My view would be that I don't want a higher turnout. There is widespread disaffection with politicians. If other want to vote that's up to them, but I see no benefit in voting for parties that don't represent my views and values. The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Otherwise their policies are identical, a few tweaks here and there They simply aren't serious people." By this argument it would appear you are looking for a party that thinks a greater % of women have a penis, or have I read it wrong  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Spoil your ballot paper, it gets counted as not happy " I always do as nobody can ever get in round here other than tories. What I want to see is an 'Analysis of spoilt papers' Bill brought in. Even if it only differentiates between accidental/erroneous spoiling and downright dissatisfaction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. ... " If my local 'safe seaters' are hanging around outside the polling station I will ask them what they are doing about the Sadiq Khameras which will be installed at the end of our road soon. Not 'What do you think about them?'. 'What are you doing about them?'. Not even 'What are you going to do about them?', because I know it will be nothing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. ... If my local 'safe seaters' are hanging around outside the polling station I will ask them what they are doing about the Sadiq Khameras which will be installed at the end of our road soon. Not 'What do you think about them?'. 'What are you doing about them?'. Not even 'What are you going to do about them?', because I know it will be nothing." Wouldn't it be more prudent to find out these questions before you even register your interest to vote and participate in electing mediocre people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not saying we live in an Orwellian, dystopian and authoritarian alternate reality, but if we did, I think the Government would think it bloody marvellous that some folks could not be bothered to vote due to voter apathy. If you want more of the same, then just walk on by. But understand this... Your apathy does not help the oppressed. It only helps the oppressor." ? Who is doing the oppressing.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up." ULEZ and LTN's were on the cards over 20 years ago for London, there was a paper published that evetywhere inside of the M25 will be in a ULEZ/LTN/congestion charge area. I dare say there was similar papers published for other cities as well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not saying we live in an Orwellian, dystopian and authoritarian alternate reality, but if we did, I think the Government would think it bloody marvellous that some folks could not be bothered to vote due to voter apathy. If you want more of the same, then just walk on by. But understand this... Your apathy does not help the oppressed. It only helps the oppressor." I'm not sure not voting is a sign of apathy, it may well be a sign of anger and disgust at the options available. And how does turning up to vote for one of the legacy oppressor parties send a message, aside from legitimising them? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I gave up voting years ago, I see no point in it at all, to me it is a joke that we should stop buying in to. It would take a shift from the wealthy to the providers of this country to get me voting again." Are there any parties beyond the big two that you feel you could support? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I gave up voting years ago, I see no point in it at all, to me it is a joke that we should stop buying in to. It would take a shift from the wealthy to the providers of this country to get me voting again." I hear a lot of people saying they're not voting again, including my father who has voted at every election since he became eligible and is now 96. Do you have any ideas of how the shift you'd like to see could be brought abkut? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. My view would be that I don't want a higher turnout. There is widespread disaffection with politicians. If other want to vote that's up to them, but I see no benefit in voting for parties that don't represent my views and values. The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Otherwise their policies are identical, a few tweaks here and there They simply aren't serious people." If you care to look, you will find that there is something of a very big difference between National and Local politics. I get it that for some people thinking critically and pragmatically is too much like hard work, but really local politics is about local issues not about the things that you are talking about. One of my local councillors is also a neighbour and she tells me that all of our local councillors, irrespective of Party politics are passionate “locals” themselves and all have town and neighbourhood issues at heart. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. ULEZ and LTN's were on the cards over 20 years ago for London, there was a paper published that evetywhere inside of the M25 will be in a ULEZ/LTN/congestion charge area. I dare say there was similar papers published for other cities as well." Why must publishing papers make something a 'fait accompli'? I know it usually does! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis." Rishi Sunak seems to think that this difference is a vote winner. He keeps being reported saying "I know what a woman is", and letting the listener draw the conclusion that Kier Starmer doesn't. It'll be interesting to see how much this issue is debated when it gets closer to general election time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Rishi Sunak seems to think that this difference is a vote winner. He keeps being reported saying "I know what a woman is", and letting the listener draw the conclusion that Kier Starmer doesn't. It'll be interesting to see how much this issue is debated when it gets closer to general election time." Calling it now, Akshata Murthy wears the trousers and Sunak is a cuck! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Rishi Sunak seems to think that this difference is a vote winner. He keeps being reported saying "I know what a woman is", and letting the listener draw the conclusion that Kier Starmer doesn't. It'll be interesting to see how much this issue is debated when it gets closer to general election time." If true, it simply demonstrates that the dumbing down of the electorate has achieved even more success since the Brexit referendum. Of course, no-one should be bothering with the Governments economic record over the last 13 years. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. My view would be that I don't want a higher turnout. There is widespread disaffection with politicians. If other want to vote that's up to them, but I see no benefit in voting for parties that don't represent my views and values. The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Otherwise their policies are identical, a few tweaks here and there They simply aren't serious people. If you care to look, you will find that there is something of a very big difference between National and Local politics. I get it that for some people thinking critically and pragmatically is too much like hard work, but really local politics is about local issues not about the things that you are talking about. One of my local councillors is also a neighbour and she tells me that all of our local councillors, irrespective of Party politics are passionate “locals” themselves and all have town and neighbourhood issues at heart. " Thanks for your condescending comments, but I won't bother thanks. I wouldn't let my local Councillors clean my toilet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Rishi Sunak seems to think that this difference is a vote winner. He keeps being reported saying "I know what a woman is", and letting the listener draw the conclusion that Kier Starmer doesn't. It'll be interesting to see how much this issue is debated when it gets closer to general election time." It wouldn't surprise me at all if Labour spends the whole General Election campaign talking about whether women can have a penis and which toilets everyone should be using. They really are that dumb. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" One of my local councillors is also a neighbour and she tells me that all of our local councillors, irrespective of Party politics are passionate “locals” themselves and all have town and neighbourhood issues at heart. " A shame, then, that more independents don't get on the council but they can't if the sitting party has the voters in their thrall. Voters ought not automatically go to local council polls with their General Election hats on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. I understand your point but I have only 3 candidates to choose from. There's no independent and even the Greens haven't bothered in my ward. I'm not voting for either of the 3 standing for various reasons so I'm likely to end up not voting at all... something I'm very much against." Have you thought of standing yourself? At least that way you would have someone you could both vote for and trust to do what you voted for them to do. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Have you thought of standing yourself? At least that way you would have someone you could both vote for and trust to do what you voted for them to do." Only if oneself is the successful candidate! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. I understand your point but I have only 3 candidates to choose from. There's no independent and even the Greens haven't bothered in my ward. I'm not voting for either of the 3 standing for various reasons so I'm likely to end up not voting at all... something I'm very much against. Have you thought of standing yourself? At least that way you would have someone you could both vote for and trust to do what you voted for them to do." No, whilst I'm a decent and competent individual,I'm straight talking, not remotely PC and would find myself in more trouble than I can be bothered with simply for stating my opinion | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I gave up voting years ago, I see no point in it at all, to me it is a joke that we should stop buying in to. It would take a shift from the wealthy to the providers of this country to get me voting again. Are there any parties beyond the big two that you feel you could support?" No not really they are all frauds and cheats, when I start to see normal people not millionaires running for parliament then I may consider voting again. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I gave up voting years ago, I see no point in it at all, to me it is a joke that we should stop buying in to. It would take a shift from the wealthy to the providers of this country to get me voting again. I hear a lot of people saying they're not voting again, including my father who has voted at every election since he became eligible and is now 96. Do you have any ideas of how the shift you'd like to see could be brought abkut?" IMO not voting is a protest vote, a poster earlier suggested defacing the ballots paper as a protest which I would agree with as then there would be proof of how many people are really tired of this system. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" IMO not voting is a protest vote, a poster earlier suggested defacing the ballots paper as a protest which I would agree with as then there would be proof of how many people are really tired of this system." But, still we need that statistical analysis of the spoiled papers in order to prove whether the paper was spoiled as an act of defiance or merely through a technical error. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hardly even worth the walk to the village polling station. " My polling station is in the local pub so we can have a drink or a meal afterwards ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hardly even worth the walk to the village polling station. My polling station is in the local pub so we can have a drink or a meal afterwards !" That’s not a bad incentive tbh | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" IMO not voting is a protest vote, a poster earlier suggested defacing the ballots paper as a protest which I would agree with as then there would be proof of how many people are really tired of this system. But, still we need that statistical analysis of the spoiled papers in order to prove whether the paper was spoiled as an act of defiance or merely through a technical error." As I always say, write "none of the above". because none of them are worth it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Only voting for someone who will get rid of these LTN schemes making life harder for people who have no other way of travelling other then car" Is there anyone campaigning to promote other forms of transport, bus, bicycle lanes, trains etc? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Got a tory leaflet today saying "Stop Labour's ULEZ Car Tax". Meaning exactly what? I should stop it? They are going to stop it? They have taken any steps towards trying to stop it? Are they even concerned or just hoping to cash in on the slogan with zero actual effort? Very low chance that they themselves will have non compliant cars." Did the leaflet make any sort of pledge or promise to reverse this ULEZ scheme if they are elected | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Got a tory leaflet today saying "Stop Labour's ULEZ Car Tax". Meaning exactly what? I should stop it? They are going to stop it? They have taken any steps towards trying to stop it? Are they even concerned or just hoping to cash in on the slogan with zero actual effort? Very low chance that they themselves will have non compliant cars. Did the leaflet make any sort of pledge or promise to reverse this ULEZ scheme if they are elected" Of course not. They were merely painting Labour as the ULEZ bogeyman. ULEZ charging probably effects very few of their voters anyway because they all drive newish cars. If I see the candidates hanging around the polling station, I will tell them that I will vote for them in six months time after I see what they have done about it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder what will happen on Thursday? " For a start, I wonder how many people won't bother at all because of the need to provide photo ID? I mean, what is wrong with the polling card? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder what will happen on Thursday? For a start, I wonder how many people won't bother at all because of the need to provide photo ID? I mean, what is wrong with the polling card?" The problem with just using a polling card is it doesn't make it harder for marginalised people to vote. Of which the general opinion is that they don't vote Tory. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Got a tory leaflet today saying "Stop Labour's ULEZ Car Tax". Meaning exactly what? I should stop it? They are going to stop it? They have taken any steps towards trying to stop it? Are they even concerned or just hoping to cash in on the slogan with zero actual effort? Very low chance that they themselves will have non compliant cars. Did the leaflet make any sort of pledge or promise to reverse this ULEZ scheme if they are elected Of course not. They were merely painting Labour as the ULEZ bogeyman. ULEZ charging probably effects very few of their voters anyway because they all drive newish cars. If I see the candidates hanging around the polling station, I will tell them that I will vote for them in six months time after I see what they have done about it!" Thought not. I see this lots from both parties. They complain about a policy or law but when asked would they reverse it if they were in a position to do so, they hardly ever commit to doing so. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder what will happen on Thursday? " The conservatives will get a thrashing I suspect and the bits I read seem to support this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the Tories getting hammered (as expected) with Labour being the main beneficiary. Will this herald a golden age of free everything for everybody?" No it just means central govt can continue to prioritise “levelling up funding” to a now smaller number of Conservative run councils. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the Tories getting hammered (as expected) with Labour being the main beneficiary. Will this herald a golden age of free everything for everybody?" Looking forward to a Labour government so we can have a complete change of direction to: Highest taxes on record Endless money printing Inflation out of control Ineffectual public services Pointless foreign wars Highest immigration on record Self destructive net zero posturing Actually sounds like we've already got a Labour government so not much will change. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out..." Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the Tories getting hammered (as expected) with Labour being the main beneficiary. Will this herald a golden age of free everything for everybody?" No. Just another false hope for change. We've seen it before. Tories lose big on local elections. People get excited that something will finally change at national level. But it never seems to follow suit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the Tories getting hammered (as expected) with Labour being the main beneficiary. Will this herald a golden age of free everything for everybody? No. Just another false hope for change. We've seen it before. Tories lose big on local elections. People get excited that something will finally change at national level. But it never seems to follow suit. " I'm struggling to see how anyone thinks a Labour government would actually change anything from where we are now. It seems to be Labour will just be an absolute continuation of the government we currently have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Voting should be compulsory. However, there should also be another option on the ballot paper: "None of the above". That will probably win in most places, and all the candidates should be barred from standing again. This would allow the public to quickly change their useless councillors." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No point bothering. Turnout will likely be around 25% if that. By bothering to turn up, we will all reduce voter apathy. Whichever party you vote for at local level the future is ULEZ, LTN's and 15 minute cities. Prepare yourself to be locked up. Then vote for a local councillor that is against this stuff. I am voting, with my feet, and with the 70% to 75% who also won't be bothering to legitimise the sham. Why should I waste my time voting for some semi-literate no-mark? Also valid. I was more pointing out that: A. if you want a higher turn out, showing up to vote might be a good idea. B. If there are specific policies you don't like, vote for someone who has counter-policies. My view would be that I don't want a higher turnout. There is widespread disaffection with politicians. If other want to vote that's up to them, but I see no benefit in voting for parties that don't represent my views and values. The main difference between Labour and the Conservatives at the moment seems to be that Conservatives think women can't have a penis, and Labour think 1% of women can have a penis. Otherwise their policies are identical, a few tweaks here and there They simply aren't serious people." Unfortunately true! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings." Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor." That's what I just said the politicians will say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies" What ‘woke agenda’ policies are you referring to ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor." I had a feeling this would be an 'issue' for any losing parties. I had both blue & green leaflets through the door, both of which had massive boxes saying 'don't forget your ID' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor. I had a feeling this would be an 'issue' for any losing parties. I had both blue & green leaflets through the door, both of which had massive boxes saying 'don't forget your ID'" Not for only the 'losing' parties but for every party. Between voter apathy and ID's, this country's politicians are increasingly voted in by less and less people. Interestingly enough, many people (some on here) who complain about the politics and laws, don't even bother to vote. Not having someone on the ballot paper who agrees with your views is unfortunate but, on that same ballot paper, there will be people who tend to agree more with your viewpoint than others and it is those people who should be voted in. All the candidates, at some time leading up to the elections, make themselves available to the public and people should take advantage of these opportunities to ask questions and voice their concerns. There is no excuse for apathy and voter id's plays nicely into the hands of the political parties who expect the working class to not have them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor. I had a feeling this would be an 'issue' for any losing parties. I had both blue & green leaflets through the door, both of which had massive boxes saying 'don't forget your ID' Not for only the 'losing' parties but for every party. Between voter apathy and ID's, this country's politicians are increasingly voted in by less and less people. Interestingly enough, many people (some on here) who complain about the politics and laws, don't even bother to vote. Not having someone on the ballot paper who agrees with your views is unfortunate but, on that same ballot paper, there will be people who tend to agree more with your viewpoint than others and it is those people who should be voted in. All the candidates, at some time leading up to the elections, make themselves available to the public and people should take advantage of these opportunities to ask questions and voice their concerns. There is no excuse for apathy and voter id's plays nicely into the hands of the political parties who expect the working class to not have them. " It is a change that everyone will become accustomed too! Change is hard for some people to grasp but that shouldn't stop the majority moving on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the Tories getting hammered (as expected) with Labour being the main beneficiary. Will this herald a golden age of free everything for everybody? No. Just another false hope for change. We've seen it before. Tories lose big on local elections. People get excited that something will finally change at national level. But it never seems to follow suit. I'm struggling to see how anyone thinks a Labour government would actually change anything from where we are now. It seems to be Labour will just be an absolute continuation of the government we currently have." I don't personally think they'd be much better aside from less corrupt possibly. But lots of other people are hopeful. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies" Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be interesting to get the numbers of the people turned away due to not having appropriate identification. The Electoral Commission report that there were a number of people turned away and that these figures need to be evaluated. Given that voter fraud was cited as the reason to bring in the requirement for voter id's, I hope that the number turned away were less than the number of fraudulent cases however; we will never know and this will never be reported. It would also be interesting to know what party the people turned away would have voted for but, we will never find out... Hopefully they just went home and got their ID and returned to the polling station. Though no doubt it will provide politicians with an opportunity to blame the dismal turnout on "voter suppression" rather than their own failings. Or perhaps it is simply that people were turned away having had no id therefore the turnout was poor. I had a feeling this would be an 'issue' for any losing parties. I had both blue & green leaflets through the door, both of which had massive boxes saying 'don't forget your ID' Not for only the 'losing' parties but for every party. Between voter apathy and ID's, this country's politicians are increasingly voted in by less and less people. Interestingly enough, many people (some on here) who complain about the politics and laws, don't even bother to vote. Not having someone on the ballot paper who agrees with your views is unfortunate but, on that same ballot paper, there will be people who tend to agree more with your viewpoint than others and it is those people who should be voted in. All the candidates, at some time leading up to the elections, make themselves available to the public and people should take advantage of these opportunities to ask questions and voice their concerns. There is no excuse for apathy and voter id's plays nicely into the hands of the political parties who expect the working class to not have them. " It is only 'losing' councillors complaining though. Voter apathy has been a thing in this country forever, its not likely to change without some real drastic change, which we aren't gonna get. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news." Sorry I dont watch GB news | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news" What are Labours ‘woke agenda’ policy’s ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news" Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low "I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it "It's true, otherwise how would they know what the content is? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it "I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM "Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel. I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion. Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy "Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs) "Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs)
Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable)."You stick to GB news then, the BBC want to thank you for paying for their license though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news What are Labours ‘woke agenda’ policy’s ? " we be here all day to go through them all so just to give you one they want zero carbon electricity by 2030, nothing wrong in going carbon zero but its not feasible in 7 years from now | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news What are Labours ‘woke agenda’ policy’s ? we be here all day to go through them all so just to give you one they want zero carbon electricity by 2030, nothing wrong in going carbon zero but its not feasible in 7 years from now" So do the tories
What has that got to do with being ‘woke’ ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs)
Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable).
You stick to GB news then, the BBC want to thank you for paying for their license though "I don't pay it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs)
Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable).
You stick to GB news then, the BBC want to thank you for paying for their license though
I don't pay it. "Of course you don’t , you stick to GB news, Kermit will be on later | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low "Why is it an insult? He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No local elections in our area. Pretty much resigned to the country going down the toilet at this point so focussing on looking after our own interests." It's still got further to go down the toilet? Blimey, that is a grim thought | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news What are Labours ‘woke agenda’ policy’s ? we be here all day to go through them all so just to give you one they want zero carbon electricity by 2030, nothing wrong in going carbon zero but its not feasible in 7 years from now" I find this very bizarre. What's this got to do with being "aware, especially of social problems such as racism and inequality"? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment. "As you said, 'bizarre' views. You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views? Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs)
Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable).
You stick to GB news then, the BBC want to thank you for paying for their license though
I don't pay it.
Of course you don’t , you stick to GB news, Kermit will be on later "Enjoy subsidising my non payment. When the 1930's licence fee is finally scrapped and 98% of the population has given up paying, you can carry on handing over a few thousand a year to keep your hero Lineker in the lifestyle he has become accustomed to. They are laughing at you, and you are too dumb to see it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
I find it strange how those that must watch it or they couldn't comment on it, get triggered by people who they assume watch it
I have watched it a few times, good comedy value, especially Farage & JRM
Ah problem solved! I have read the synopsis and it is a news channel.
I'm not sure what your sense of humour is tuned into, but of those you've mentioned and adding Neil Oliver, they are not at all funny in my opinion.
Try Morcombe and Wise, that is a nice entry level into comedy
Neil Oliver is funny aswell, I guess I have a warped sense of humour, tbh it isn’t a news channel, it’s a right wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (unless you watch it for laughs)
Makes a change from the BBC though, which is just a left wing propagandist echo chamber catering for the feeble minded (and you can't even watch it for the laughs as they are all so miserable).
You stick to GB news then, the BBC want to thank you for paying for their license though
I don't pay it.
Of course you don’t , you stick to GB news, Kermit will be on later
Enjoy subsidising my non payment. When the 1930's licence fee is finally scrapped and 98% of the population has given up paying, you can carry on handing over a few thousand a year to keep your hero Lineker in the lifestyle he has become accustomed to.
They are laughing at you, and you are too dumb to see it "When is it going to be ‘scrapped’ , a few thousand a year , it cost £159, amazing value, and Gary Linekar is a national hero and worth every penny, you stick to Neil Oliver and his crackpot show | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it."His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant."I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on"They're confused about climate change and what "woke" means too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on
They're confused about climate change and what "woke" means too.
"You seem to know an awful lot about GB News for someone who thinks it's terrible, and appear to be pretty fixated about it given how often you mention it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on
They're confused about climate change and what "woke" means too.
You seem to know an awful lot about GB News for someone who thinks it's terrible, and appear to be pretty fixated about it given how often you mention it."Just once actually. Then I replied to other people on the subject. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on
They're confused about climate change and what "woke" means too.
You seem to know an awful lot about GB News for someone who thinks it's terrible, and appear to be pretty fixated about it given how often you mention it.
Just once actually. Then I replied to other people on the subject.
"You should get back on gb news, Mr Robinson's common sense crusade is excellent viewing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As much as I hate the Tories I fear a Labour Government much more with their leader who has difficulties telling the difference between a man and a woman but also their woke agenda policies Oh dear. This is what happens when you get your information from GB news. Sorry I dont watch GB news Don't worry about it. It's the standard of insult round here that's low
Why is it an insult?
He expressed the same bizarre views pushed by GB news. Seems like he would take it as a compliment.
As you said, 'bizarre' views.
You were trying to compliment someone on their 'bizarre' views?
Some of you guys do have a strange way of trying to insult and then backtracking. Just f*cking own it.
His views are bizarre. They do line up with GB news. Presumably he will not find it an instant. I dont watch news off any kind on tv so not sure why you feel my views are the same as GB news? I dont even know what channel thats on
They're confused about climate change and what "woke" means too.
You seem to know an awful lot about GB News for someone who thinks it's terrible, and appear to be pretty fixated about it given how often you mention it.
Just once actually. Then I replied to other people on the subject.
You should get back on gb news, Mr Robinson's common sense crusade is excellent viewing."Lol There's funnier far right conspiracy theorists on YouTube. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
