Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m in two minds whether the approval ratings would plummet or soar if he got slapped in cuffs! Stranger things have happened. "It's a strange historical precedence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. " It's their Right to protest if they want. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want." That could be a call for insurrection... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. That could be a call for insurrection... " Doubtful | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want." Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? " They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. That could be a call for insurrection... Doubtful " When he called to protest on January 6th 2021, it ended looking like a coup d'etat. Luckily for you, a failed one | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want." Of course. I am always for people protesting. Just highlighted what he's said. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Of course. I am always for people protesting. Just highlighted what he's said. " plenty of other politicians that called for protests. In my eyes this is no different. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? " As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road." Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers." The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty." I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. "Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ? "If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial."Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment. "Is that a crime? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime?"was trump's? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's likely his way of stoking up the emotional ire of his fan base. It's probably not going to be on Tuesday that he's arrested but he can spin this out, until he potentially does, just as he's still spinning the fraudulent election lie. The perpetual victim. " exactly. It's so easy to spin. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bring back Lori Lightfoot for president! She knows what she's doing! "lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. " It's bullshit | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime? was trump's? "If Trump got his little dick sucked under the desk like that too, that wouldn't be a crime. (But it would be a low point for any porn star who did the deed for him.) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime? was trump's?
If Trump got his little dick sucked under the desk like that too, that wouldn't be a crime. (But it would be a low point for any porn star who did the deed for him.)"lol I agree but come on.. a pornstar really. Out of all of the accusations. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime? was trump's?
If Trump got his little dick sucked under the desk like that too, that wouldn't be a crime. (But it would be a low point for any porn star who did the deed for him.) lol I agree but come on.. a pornstar really. Out of all of the accusations. "It was a Stormy joke. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime? was trump's?
If Trump got his little dick sucked under the desk like that too, that wouldn't be a crime. (But it would be a low point for any porn star who did the deed for him.) lol I agree but come on.. a pornstar really. Out of all of the accusations.
It was a Stormy joke."I might as well be prosecuted for sucking a dick when I was 20.. I am guilty as charged. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. It's their Right to protest if they want. Why would they protest? Don’t they respect the police? They want there opinions heard. That is what protesting is for is it not ? As long has they don't glue themselves to thr road. Right wing Americans usually protest with guns and flags rather than glue and flowers. The radical left just destroys cities and people's livelihood. Then people wonder why half of Oregon wants state lines redrawn to join Idaho. Maybe you should be more centered. Both parties are just as guilty. I've never been to Oregon and Trump is trying to encourage the further to the right to protect. Thats why I commented as I did, instead of on something unrelated that I don't know anything about. Kind of silly the NY DA indictment is based on a payout to a woman he had sex with. When he is accused of much worse. That will emboldened the base. The optics is horrible. It does look like a witch hunt. Years later right before elections. It's dumb to charge him with that. Looks like it's going to be another volatile summer. Isn't politics great ?
If he's committed crimes, he should be put on trial. Yet a president gets his dick sucked under the resolute desk. No indictment.
Is that a crime? was trump's?
If Trump got his little dick sucked under the desk like that too, that wouldn't be a crime. (But it would be a low point for any porn star who did the deed for him.) lol I agree but come on.. a pornstar really. Out of all of the accusations.
It was a Stormy joke. I might as well be prosecuted for sucking a dick when I was 20.. I am guilty as charged. "What are you even talking about? Trump fucked pornstar Stormy Daniels. This is well known. Hence my pornstar joke above. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" " It’s not illegal as such, but he should have declared it as electoral expenses, which he didn’t… Besides if you charged cohen for the same thing, and we know that trump was an unnamed co conspirator in that case, and you couldn’t charge trump at the time because legal advice was that you can’t charge a sitting president..then you have to charge him noe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" " If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted " Which wasn't the question | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question "The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted "Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" It’s not illegal as such, but he should have declared it as electoral expenses, which he didn’t… Besides if you charged cohen for the same thing, and we know that trump was an unnamed co conspirator in that case, and you couldn’t charge trump at the time because legal advice was that you can’t charge a sitting president..then you have to charge him noe" You know a lot more about US laws than me, but how is electoral expenses different to legal expenses, in such a way it covers this transfer of money? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me "Let me simplify. Do you think a person should be prosecuted if they have Committed a crime and there is enough evidence for a prosecution | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
Let me simplify. Do you think a person should be prosecuted if they have
Committed a crime and there is enough evidence for a prosecution "That wasn't the question, it really wasn't. Fabio answered my question if you care to scroll up | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
Let me simplify. Do you think a person should be prosecuted if they have
Committed a crime and there is enough evidence for a prosecution
That wasn't the question, it really wasn't. Fabio answered my question if you care to scroll up " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me "So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for? "I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees". If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway the hush money case isn’t going to be the one that brings him down… it will be the Georgia case regarding election interference which will turn into a RICO case " If he was to make a backroom offer of not running again, would all this disappear or do you think the powers that be need to put him in his place for the damage they see he has done to democracy? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter? "Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)"Got it! He has some pretty poor advisors.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway the hush money case isn’t going to be the one that brings him down… it will be the Georgia case regarding election interference which will turn into a RICO case If he was to make a backroom offer of not running again, would all this disappear or do you think the powers that be need to put him in his place for the damage they see he has done to democracy? " Would they all disappear? The New York case… probably The 2 federal cases regarding handling top secret documents… maybe but that is so serious people have been sent to prison for handling less The Georgia case…. No! That is so serious I think they will bring the case so he legally could not stand again! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)
Got it!
He has some pretty poor advisors...."Not really…. The scandal of someone talking about him having an affair coming out 10 days before the general election probably would have sunk his chances This way he thought he could make it all “go away” … remember that not even his wife knew! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)
Got it!
He has some pretty poor advisors....
Not really…. The scandal of someone talking about him having an affair coming out 10 days before the general election probably would have sunk his chances
This way he thought he could make it all “go away” … remember that not even his wife knew! "Thanks for taking the time here Fabio, this has made a lot of sense | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)
Got it!
He has some pretty poor advisors...."He employed those advisors | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)
Got it!
He has some pretty poor advisors....
Not really…. The scandal of someone talking about him having an affair coming out 10 days before the general election probably would have sunk his chances
This way he thought he could make it all “go away” … remember that not even his wife knew! "Great explainer Fabi | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Had a look on cpl of news sites this morning and nothing about him being arrested yet, whens it supposed to happen wana make sure im watching ive not had a good chuckle for a bit" The reason why trump put it out is that his particular grand jury apparently meets on a Monday and Wednesday afternoon… so he speculated that all the witnesses had been called after Cohen testified… But then trumps lawyers threw a Hail Mary by calling a rebuttal witness against Cohen.. and they didn’t meet yesterday | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Had a look on cpl of news sites this morning and nothing about him being arrested yet, whens it supposed to happen wana make sure im watching ive not had a good chuckle for a bit The reason why trump put it out is that his particular grand jury apparently meets on a Monday and Wednesday afternoon… so he speculated that all the witnesses had been called after Cohen testified… But then trumps lawyers threw a Hail Mary by calling a rebuttal witness against Cohen.. and they didn’t meet yesterday " You are all over this, well done pal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The charge on Trump is strange... Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet on an affair she had with Trump. paying her that money for her silence is not illegal. Him paying Cohen back and declaring it has legal costs is classed as falsifying business recored. How should he have recorded it? I'm no Trump fan, but this does seem like "we will get him" If it’s a crime he should be prosecuted Which wasn't the question
The question is irrelevant if you agree that a crime should be prosecuted
Well, thank you very much for telling me my question is irrelevant, care to explain exactly how it is and who it is irrelevant too? Clue it is not irrelevant to me
So you are arguing is that cohen did all of this without any knowledge of trump! That is stretching belief
But again.. we know that trump is “individual 1” in the cohen case! And that person was a co conspirator
And would you sign 4 cheques for 35000 without knowing what it was for?
I have not argued anything, I'm trying to understand the nuances between "legal fees" and Electoral fees".
If he had declared electoral fees would this be a none starter?
Anything paid within 60 days of an election you are standing for has to be declared as an electoral expense… these payments to stormy Daniels were paid 14 days before the election
If he had declared it as an electoral expense, because they are a matter of public record anyone could have asked what the payments were for and he would have had to tell the truth (which is why the NDA agreement signed was declared to be invalid)
Got it!
He has some pretty poor advisors....
He employed those advisors "Not sure why Trump would even want Daniels to stay quiet...she was basically the only person he ever hired that was qualified for the job. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump claims he will be arrested. So it's probably bullshit. And has called for people to protest. " People have come out to protest in NYC, but not in the way Trump wanted. Chanting for him to be arrested and ‘Nobody is above the law’…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well the New York grand jury have decided to indict trump on hush money charges…. Let the games begin…" Let's see if it helps his campaign. It will be interesting. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well the New York grand jury have decided to indict trump on hush money charges…. Let the games begin… Let's see if it helps his campaign. It will be interesting. " I think it depends on whether the charge is a felony or a misdemeanour… If it’s just a misdemeanour.. people are going to argue was it all worth it If it’s a felony… then shit may hit the fan… interesting to see trump come to New York and do his perp walk! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well the New York grand jury have decided to indict trump on hush money charges…. Let the games begin… Let's see if it helps his campaign. It will be interesting. I think it depends on whether the charge is a felony or a misdemeanour… If it’s just a misdemeanour.. people are going to argue was it all worth it If it’s a felony… then shit may hit the fan… interesting to see trump come to New York and do his perp walk! " The logistics alone is going to be interesting. How is his secret service team going to react ect.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's definitely historical. His secret service swore oaths for his protection. That detail is loyal. It's a situation I wouldn't want to be in." They will protect him but they won’t stop him being arrested. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of funny ... Out of all the assumed charges he get taken down by a pornstar and people commenting on his demise on a swingers site. Ironic." Feels like this is just the starter case for Trump. There may be way more serious ones to come. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A ludicrous snippet from the BBC on why Trump supports might ignore calls to protest: We've just heard Mike Pence say the indictment is no reason for people to protest. And indeed many of Donald Trump's most fervent supporters not only ignored his prior calls to protest - they too discouraged mass demonstrations. This apparent contradiction is explained by the high level of paranoia in pro-Trump spaces online. Many believe - despite evidence to the contrary - that the Capitol riot was instigated not by Trump supporters, but by federal agents and anti-fascist “antifa” activists. Any protest will be infiltrated, their logic goes, and "false flag" violence will be used to paint them in a negative light. It sounds unhinged, but this kind of reality-free rhetoric is being broadcast by influential people" Well you have to wait until Tuesday to see if the new shitstorm kicks off. Plenty of time for his supporters to organize. America is experiencing technical difficulties please stand by. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hopefully it's not a shit show. "It's Trump, his entire life has been a shit show. I assume this will be more of the same. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A ludicrous snippet from the BBC on why Trump supports might ignore calls to protest: We've just heard Mike Pence say the indictment is no reason for people to protest. And indeed many of Donald Trump's most fervent supporters not only ignored his prior calls to protest - they too discouraged mass demonstrations. This apparent contradiction is explained by the high level of paranoia in pro-Trump spaces online. Many believe - despite evidence to the contrary - that the Capitol riot was instigated not by Trump supporters, but by federal agents and anti-fascist “antifa” activists. Any protest will be infiltrated, their logic goes, and "false flag" violence will be used to paint them in a negative light. It sounds unhinged, but this kind of reality-free rhetoric is being broadcast by influential people Well you have to wait until Tuesday to see if the new shitstorm kicks off. Plenty of time for his supporters to organize. America is experiencing technical difficulties please stand by." All NYPD have been told to report in this morning apparently. They’re not taking any chances on another Jan 6th, as unlikely as I think it is to happen. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well the New York grand jury have decided to indict trump on hush money charges…. Let the games begin…" This is the first of potentially a few indictments right? Jan 06th, document theft and Georgia still to come. Maybe he will do a deal to serve time as long as he can build (and staff) his own prison. What was allowed for Pablo Escobar should be allowed for Trump lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO." That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! " I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on." Maybe the system didn't completely fuck up for once in their collective lives? Or maybe he crossed a line that not even straight white old rich dudes can cross? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on." I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration….. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration….. "Right I see. But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton. My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange. The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration…..
Right I see.
But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton.
My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange.
The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing."It does feel a bit Al Capone, I'm getting your vibe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration…..
Right I see.
But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton.
My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange.
The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing.
It does feel a bit Al Capone, I'm getting your vibe "That and it probably the most expensive sexual encounter ever. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration…..
Right I see.
But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton.
My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange.
The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing.
It does feel a bit Al Capone, I'm getting your vibe That and it probably the most expensive sexual encounter ever. "To date for sure Supersedes Clinton | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration…..
Right I see.
But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton.
My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange.
The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing.
It does feel a bit Al Capone, I'm getting your vibe That and it probably the most expensive sexual encounter ever.
To date for sure Supersedes Clinton "lol well atleast Trump didn't do it on the resolute desk. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would never have thought that an American president would ever be arrested and treated like a criminal. I remember Watergate Nixon caught bang to rights and pardoned by Carter. World politics has taken a turn, things have changed, they would look out for each other in the past no matter what. Now we have Trump who has a different narrative, lots of support from the American people, and he is some how their enermy. Something about this stinks IMHO. That is very very close to saying that if someone becomes president they somehow are above the rule of law….. I was going to not say anything until we know what he has actually been charged with … but comments like this are almost running interference over something that they know nothing about…. It’s blind loyalty… which is more dangerous! This is the least of his worries… the Georgia case and the federal documents case are far more serious! But if he does get charged with business fraud, that is a felony!!! I understand what you say and agree, but history states that people in power rarely face consequences, and I would be happy to see powerful people face justice rightly so. So when I hear and read that trump is now facing criminal charges knowing this is rare, I think what is different here whats going on. I heard a brilliant analogy for what is happening Remember that trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen was charged and convicted for the same thing, the DOJ said you couldn’t charge a sitting president, and trump was “individual 1” the unindited co conspirator in that case…. So if you charged “bonnie” …. Don’t you in effect have to charge “Clyde” The irony just happens to be bonnie was charged convicted and sent to prison under clydes administration…..
Right I see.
But I would still be amazed if he was convicted, because Bush, blaire lied to their governments got caught out but are still free, and trump gets convicted of paying off a porn star if the indictment reads that way, he had an affair just like Clinton.
My thinking is those Leaders did bad things, now Trump in the same boat and they who ever they are are trying to convict him, I just find it strange.
The only thing I can think of is Clinton, Blair and Bush kept to a narrative, whilst Trump did his own thing.
It does feel a bit Al Capone, I'm getting your vibe "I just think that they do not want him to have a chance of being back in office, for reasons only they know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Started a riot Lied to people Bribed a call girl Tax fraud You name it he's done it" apart from starting a riot and even that is a bit debatable tax fraud, bribing people and lying to people isnt that part of being a politician? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can someone sum up what he’s done in really simple terms for me lol, it’s all I’m seeing but I’m really not assed to read news articles lol " Which one would you like… Breaking election law whilst committing business fraud Trying to obstruct and tampering with a federal election Holding onto national security documents he should not have… | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up. "that would be a good movie quote. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up.
that would be a good movie quote."Lol it's the truth any hint of social unrest firearm purchases spike. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up.
that would be a good movie quote. Lol it's the truth any hint of social unrest firearm purchases spike. "So 2024 elections people better fasten thier seatbelts. It's predictable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up. "Time to buy some stock in guns and ammo companies. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up. "Most American thing I've read in a long time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up.
Most American thing I've read in a long time." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I better stock up on more ammo election season is coming up.
Most American thing I've read in a long time.
"that's is us | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never really understood American’s fanatical obsession with their political leaders. It’s almost cult like. Can some enlighten me? If an ex-PM in the UK was charged with with fiddling their expenses return I very much doubt there would be a call for protests… More likely people would shrug their shoulders knowing like buses there would be another ex-PM along in 5 minutes. I guess it’s must be just the result of 2 party money dominated personality politics. That gives a limited choice between the right (Democrats) and far right (Republicans). I know there are other parties but they are so marginal that they don’t get a look in." The USA does not have a non-political Constitutional King like the UK and other countries so they invest their faith and lives in the politicians who become President. Having your guy win the presidency is like having your team win the Super Bowl so they become wedded to a political flag not the policies or performance of the party and, like any football supporter, will follow unquestioning to the death. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never really understood American’s fanatical obsession with their political leaders. It’s almost cult like. Can some enlighten me? If an ex-PM in the UK was charged with with fiddling their expenses return I very much doubt there would be a call for protests… More likely people would shrug their shoulders knowing like buses there would be another ex-PM along in 5 minutes. I guess it’s must be just the result of 2 party money dominated personality politics. That gives a limited choice between the right (Democrats) and far right (Republicans). I know there are other parties but they are so marginal that they don’t get a look in. The USA does not have a non-political Constitutional King like the UK and other countries so they invest their faith and lives in the politicians who become President. Having your guy win the presidency is like having your team win the Super Bowl so they become wedded to a political flag not the policies or performance of the party and, like any football supporter, will follow unquestioning to the death." It's getting more like that here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never really understood American’s fanatical obsession with their political leaders. It’s almost cult like. Can some enlighten me? If an ex-PM in the UK was charged with with fiddling their expenses return I very much doubt there would be a call for protests… More likely people would shrug their shoulders knowing like buses there would be another ex-PM along in 5 minutes. I guess it’s must be just the result of 2 party money dominated personality politics. That gives a limited choice between the right (Democrats) and far right (Republicans). I know there are other parties but they are so marginal that they don’t get a look in. The USA does not have a non-political Constitutional King like the UK and other countries so they invest their faith and lives in the politicians who become President. Having your guy win the presidency is like having your team win the Super Bowl so they become wedded to a political flag not the policies or performance of the party and, like any football supporter, will follow unquestioning to the death. It's getting more like that here." Sad to say you are right. My daughter lives in the US. Her father-in-Law was a staunch Republican. She is an Accountant and showed him a while back a calculation that clearly showed that only those that owned companies or earned over $400,000 per annum (neither of which was him) would benefit from the Republican policies. She showed him he would be better off under the Democrats. He still refused to change his vote because of a religion like commitment to the Republican party. In the UK it has become a cult of personality after Johnson. Truss was a fine example of a woman who sold the ghost of Thatcher to the faithful. Her proposals were undeliverable yet they voted for her whilst the MPs, who knew well, voted for Sunak. Give me boring but competent any day and I will still vote for whomever benefits me most. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"41% of the population are independent voters. Including myself. There is no 2 team. neither side can win without convincing us." How come US elections hinge on a handful of swing states then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"41% of the population are independent voters. Including myself. There is no 2 team. neither side can win without convincing us. How come US elections hinge on a handful of swing states then?" because we don't vote for strictly one party all the time. Pennsylvania is considered a purple state. Not red or blue. We are not staunch party followers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
