Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy?" I would say it's both a U turn but also a sensible revision. If it were the UK what would it be described as? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy?" The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"?" BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently " This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know." Berating was the word used in the article I read as I recall. Science types may well assess data but when they all agree on something you can start chirping about it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know. Berating was the word used in the article I read as I recall. Science types may well assess data but when they all agree on something you can start chirping about it " Sounds like a biased article looking at what was actually done. No idea what the attempt at patronisation was at the end though. Could you explain more clearly what you meant? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know. Berating was the word used in the article I read as I recall. Science types may well assess data but when they all agree on something you can start chirping about it Sounds like a biased article looking at what was actually done. No idea what the attempt at patronisation was at the end though. Could you explain more clearly what you meant?" Nah, you really do bore the shit out of me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know. Berating was the word used in the article I read as I recall. Science types may well assess data but when they all agree on something you can start chirping about it Sounds like a biased article looking at what was actually done. No idea what the attempt at patronisation was at the end though. Could you explain more clearly what you meant? Nah, you really do bore the shit out of me" Excellent response. You must have "won"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Start of the week the EU was berating those countries that were requiring, or considering requiring, negative covid tests but now, they are recommending them to member states. Dramatic U-turn or sensible revision of policy? The EU were "berating" countries? Really. Do please provide the quote. If the advice has changed or the risk has increased then what is wrong with a "U-turn"? BBC 4 days ago. I don't have a photographic memory. As for what is wrong with a u turn, nothing...unless it's carried out by the govt apparently This seems to be what you are referring to: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20221229-eu-says-mandatory-covid-screening-unjustified-for-travellers-from-china They seem to have said that restrictions were unjustified for the EU due to high levels of vaccination. They didn't criticise anyone else. How do you define "berating"? Then they assessed the data (or lack thereof from China) and changed their mind. That's what those science types do you know. Berating was the word used in the article I read as I recall. Science types may well assess data but when they all agree on something you can start chirping about it Sounds like a biased article looking at what was actually done. No idea what the attempt at patronisation was at the end though. Could you explain more clearly what you meant? Nah, you really do bore the shit out of me Excellent response. You must have "won" "Glad to see you've conceded to the far better man  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
