Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Politics |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see he has done the right thing and resigned...I trust there'll be a by-election?" Yep, disgraceful behaviour , he should be jailed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What did he do?" Sex pest. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What did he do? Sex pest." If guilty throw the book at him! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sh! Labour are trying to play it down ![]() They acted as soon as the allegations were made and launched an investigation.. Remind me again how Boris acted in relation to Chris pincher? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What did he do? Sex pest. If guilty throw the book at him!" Ditto.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What did he do? Sex pest. If guilty throw the book at him!" If I read the story correctly, a parliamentary watchdog recommended he should be suspended for 4 weeks for serious sexual misconduct. Something doesn't add up, forcing unwanted sexual attention onto someone, gets a 4 weeks suspension and he would have been allowed to continue? Why wasn't he sacked? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |