Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The legal decisions by trump supporters. It's not great for extensive time wasting and preventing or delaying justice" Intelligent community should be the ones reviewing the documents to see if there was international breech don't you think ? Along with a independent judicial investigation. FBI and DOJ are not qualified to assess the information. They not CIA now are they. Who better to pass judgement. The intelligence community. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too..." Looks ....Isn't it up to the intelligence community to decide? Not the DOJ and FBI. CIA confirmation would be much more damning. You know national security. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too... Looks ....Isn't it up to the intelligence community to decide? Not the DOJ and FBI. CIA confirmation would be much more damning. You know national security." And how about Trump's other greatest hits that I brought up? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"PS if Trump didn't steal a bunch of classified documents, why were there a bunch of classified documents at his place?" Again assessment to the alligations.CIA and the intelligence community are the ones best qualified to pass judgement. They are the ones directly effected by National security. I'll say you were right if the assessment preformed by the by the master and the intelligence community is founded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"PS if Trump didn't steal a bunch of classified documents, why were there a bunch of classified documents at his place? Again assessment to the alligations.CIA and the intelligence community are the ones best qualified to pass judgement. They are the ones directly effected by National security. I'll say you were right if the assessment preformed by the by the master and the intelligence community is founded. " Total mystery why he had all those classified docs, eh? So what about the other issues I mentioned above? Happy to ignore them? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shouldn't the NSA and CIA decide what is a national security risk not the FBI and DOJ? For all we know the can be old documents and irrelevant. The judge was smart to grant the master. " Yup I'm sure that explains it haha And the other issues I raised above? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too... Looks ....Isn't it up to the intelligence community to decide? Not the DOJ and FBI. CIA confirmation would be much more damning. You know national security." The facts of the matter are; The government documents were found in his house in the USA. The CIA deals with foreign intelligence outside the USA and has no jurisdiction inside. Trumps lawyers certified in writing that there were no documents remaining. That was incorrect. The FBI found certified secret and top secret docs but more concerningly, empty secret and top secret file covers. Given those facts, accepted even by Trump, even a 5 year old would know he was illegally in possession of sensitive national documents. No further checking is necessary. The Special master is simply a legal ploy to delay matters until the midterm elections. It has been allowed to try and show the MAGA bunch that Trump is being treated fairly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"PS if Trump didn't steal a bunch of classified documents, why were there a bunch of classified documents at his place?" He ran out of bog roll? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shouldn't the NSA and CIA decide what is a national security risk not the FBI and DOJ? For all we know the can be old documents and irrelevant. The judge was smart to grant the master. " If he is found guilty, will you change your opinion, or still be a fan? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " Who appointed the Judge that made this decision? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is excellent. The Republicans are ruining things for Trump and Trump is ruining things for the GOP. The Special Master thing appears to be a time wasting exercise, because that's what he always does. I think what is in his mind is that if he runs, they can't touch him. The great thing is that this situation spoils things for DeSantis too. It's a win win." I look forward to all potential criminal defendants being able to rely on potential unspecified irreparable harm in stopping investigation into them 
Rule of law - if it's good enough for Trump, it's good enough for everybody else | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " Actually… she has far overreached on her jurisdiction and given him preferential treatment because he is an ex president, she specifically said that in her statement…. So she has opened herself up for appeal at federal court level Because the documents were taken from DC they may have jurisdiction, not Florida! Also she gave him part treatment on the basis of executive privilege when it’s not his to claim! Only a current president has that authority! But anyway because they waited so long the sift teams have already separated what is attorney client privilege … so it won’t delay the investigation a lot | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Actually… she has far overreached on her jurisdiction and given him preferential treatment because he is an ex president, she specifically said that in her statement…. So she has opened herself up for appeal at federal court level Because the documents were taken from DC they may have jurisdiction, not Florida! Also she gave him part treatment on the basis of executive privilege when it’s not his to claim! Only a current president has that authority! But anyway because they waited so long the sift teams have already separated what is attorney client privilege … so it won’t delay the investigation a lot " Ordering a halt to investigation is a bit troubling. Can't wait to hear who Trump thinks is suitable to go through highly classified documents (which he declassified and the FBI planted and he wants back and should be attached to him as the executive and not the DOJ as executive and - it's not even internally consistent ) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Actually… she has far overreached on her jurisdiction and given him preferential treatment because he is an ex president, she specifically said that in her statement…. So she has opened herself up for appeal at federal court level Because the documents were taken from DC they may have jurisdiction, not Florida! Also she gave him part treatment on the basis of executive privilege when it’s not his to claim! Only a current president has that authority! But anyway because they waited so long the sift teams have already separated what is attorney client privilege … so it won’t delay the investigation a lot Ordering a halt to investigation is a bit troubling. Can't wait to hear who Trump thinks is suitable to go through highly classified documents (which he declassified and the FBI planted and he wants back and should be attached to him as the executive and not the DOJ as executive and - it's not even internally consistent )"Because of the security levels needed they will both suggest names but it’s going to be a short list! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Actually… she has far overreached on her jurisdiction and given him preferential treatment because he is an ex president, she specifically said that in her statement…. So she has opened herself up for appeal at federal court level Because the documents were taken from DC they may have jurisdiction, not Florida! Also she gave him part treatment on the basis of executive privilege when it’s not his to claim! Only a current president has that authority! But anyway because they waited so long the sift teams have already separated what is attorney client privilege … so it won’t delay the investigation a lot Ordering a halt to investigation is a bit troubling. Can't wait to hear who Trump thinks is suitable to go through highly classified documents (which he declassified and the FBI planted and he wants back and should be attached to him as the executive and not the DOJ as executive and - it's not even internally consistent )
Because of the security levels needed they will both suggest names but it’s going to be a short list! "I heard that Trump's lawyer suggested himself. Umm... Yeah... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " You don't trust your legal and judicial system. You never will be able to in that case. Your country is a failure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. You don't trust your legal and judicial system. You never will be able to in that case. Your country is a failure." It's not a failure yet. It will be if this stands. A modern society cannot exist without the rule of law. The law being applied equally, without fear or favour. Given the time that's elapsed since these documents were stolen, and how Joe Bloggs would be treated doing the same, there has already been considerable favour. And ok, there are extra legal considerations to take into account, so, I get it. But to grant this, when this case should only have been held in DC under the Presidential Records Act, to separate it from the ongoing process in another Florida court, to limit an investigation which has implications for US and even international security - the mind fucking boggles. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It's not a failure yet. It will be if this stands. A modern society cannot exist without the rule of law. The law being applied equally, without fear or favour. " i disagree .... that baby went out with the bath water some years previously. the US has ceased to function for sometime and as a result has proved to be a failed state. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It's not a failure yet. It will be if this stands. A modern society cannot exist without the rule of law. The law being applied equally, without fear or favour. i disagree .... that baby went out with the bath water some years previously. the US has ceased to function for sometime and as a result has proved to be a failed state." There are degrees of failure. Most countries, in practice, have imperfect rule of law. This one - complete with threats of violence from lawmakers and acts of stochastic terrorism if Trump doesn't get his way - seems to be a big red line. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Who appointed the Judge that made this decision?" and appointed Merrick Garland. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? " Yes. He refers to Biden as the US chief executive | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Who appointed the Judge that made this decision? and appointed Merrick Garland." Head of the DOJ is a senate appointed position.. a president just nominates the person they would like.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? " Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail." (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.)" He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset)" But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word." Lol. You see what I mean though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word." He has to say he truly believes, because if he doesn’t then it opens up a whole bunch of legal liability with regards to incitement, obstruction ect | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word." Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't." It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV." Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. " I will ask again. Does Trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. " You know he's a fraud, a bully and a liar, don't you? I believe he is becoming increasingly desperate. It's pretty obvious his fall is going to be precipitous. He's bad for business. And that's one thing the US will not tolerate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. " Because Mueller didn't feel he had the authority. And Barr - per the recent revelation via freedom of information - decided not to even entertain the idea of indicting Trump. Funny how facts work. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. Because Mueller didn't feel he had the authority. And Barr - per the recent revelation via freedom of information - decided not to even entertain the idea of indicting Trump. Funny how facts work." Trump is not the messiah returned to Earth. Consequently believing in his innocent perfection is not a matter of faith. He is a corrupt business man who has managed to deceive gullible people and dishonest hangers on into believing every single negative thing said about him was lies or fake news. Even when the "corrupt media" show two clips, one after the other, where he lies and then contradicts himself the loyal followers continue in their suspended reality to never doubt him. If he stands and loses the next presidential election he will try and turn the USA into a national version of Waco Siege. That will be massively destructive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"We “might “ have some idea of what trump was holding in the top secret documents… Washington post are saying that one of the documents found in trumps office may have described the nuclear capabilities of other countries…. If that’s true… then he is going to jail no questions!!! " Oh good god. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Does Trump still think the last election was stolen?? Ooh I can answer that 1. No Trump doesn't think the election was stolen. But he lies that it was to whip up his base of misled loons. Because he knows if he can keep a big enough mob frothing at the mouth, he might not get charged with his crimes and end up in jail. (Unless Trump is just mad. Then he may believe his own rants. I find it hard to tell at times if Trump is truly just mad or not.) He claims to believe it, and in the absence of other evidence it's probably safest to go with what he claims. (Not for most things. Just what he claims about his own mindset) But Trump's a pathological liar. His word should never be taken on anything. He shouldn't even trust his own word. Yet millions do. Remember the Russian collusion debacle? Alot of people presumed he was guilty. He wasn't. It's odd, because if you read the contents of the Mueller report, it doesn't say that. It says the opposite. Barr just lied on TV. Did the investigation indite trump ? No it did not. Because Mueller didn't feel he had the authority. And Barr - per the recent revelation via freedom of information - decided not to even entertain the idea of indicting Trump. Funny how facts work. Trump is not the messiah returned to Earth. Consequently believing in his innocent perfection is not a matter of faith. He is a corrupt business man who has managed to deceive gullible people and dishonest hangers on into believing every single negative thing said about him was lies or fake news. Even when the "corrupt media" show two clips, one after the other, where he lies and then contradicts himself the loyal followers continue in their suspended reality to never doubt him. If he stands and loses the next presidential election he will try and turn the USA into a national version of Waco Siege. That will be massively destructive. " Trump tried to build a casino in Sydney, Australia in 1987. The New South Wales authorities rejected him, 35 fucking years ago, because of his mafia like behaviour. And now people (not the person I'm replying to) think he's the fucking Messiah *massages temple* | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"We “might “ have some idea of what trump was holding in the top secret documents… Washington post are saying that one of the documents found in trumps office may have described the nuclear capabilities of other countries…. If that’s true… then he is going to jail no questions!!! Oh good god." Oh I really hope he ends up in jail. If he ever does, I'm sure Blu will agree Trump deserves to rot in jail. (Who am I kidding?) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm sure any nuclear secrets found at Trump's place were just having a bit of a rest there because they were tired. Nothing to see, eh?" I'm sure the international community will think this is bigly fine. Yuge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " Why is it "great", that this is happening? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening?" A independent party review.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. "Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? "do you ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ?"No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? " he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? " I haven’t got a clue what that is? Let’s hope he has now realised that he was wrong and the election wasn’t stolen because it has made him look like an idiot , really embarrassing  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? " What an idiot, what is he basing that on? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? " isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch." you can't answer  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch. you can't answer "Thought so with your one liners. Typical troll behavior. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch." They're both similar in that they're both meaningless bullshit designed to transfer power and wealth from the people to the few billionaires at the top. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch. They're both similar in that they're both meaningless bullshit designed to transfer power and wealth from the people to the few billionaires at the top." The rest of the world laughing at us for brexit and trump is another parallel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. "Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review?"you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review?"If the USA claimed you queen had some secret information that was detrimental to public scrutiny. Would you feel the same if public security raided her castle? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money." Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? " If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? " Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. " Completely unrelated to what I said. Trump is NOTHING like the monarchy, although his cultists seem hell bent on making him a king. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. " if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. Completely unrelated to what I said. Trump is NOTHING like the monarchy, although his cultists seem hell bent on making him a king." your still a monarchy/ democracy. Prove me wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice?" The English Monarchy and how it works is completely unrelated to anything to do with Trump | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice? The English Monarchy and how it works is completely unrelated to anything to do with Trump" Than don't claim you are a democracy . You literally a monarch/ democracy. Yet we are a constitutional republic that decides otherwise. No monarchy. Yet the democrats here wants to copy you assumptions. You are still controlled by a monarchy. You are technically a monarch/ democracy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice? The English Monarchy and how it works is completely unrelated to anything to do with Trump Than don't claim you are a democracy . You literally a monarch/ democracy. Yet we are a constitutional republic that decides otherwise. No monarchy. Yet the democrats here wants to copy you assumptions. You are still controlled by a monarchy. You are technically a monarch/ democracy. " /facepalm | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice? The English Monarchy and how it works is completely unrelated to anything to do with Trump Than don't claim you are a democracy . You literally a monarch/ democracy. Yet we are a constitutional republic that decides otherwise. No monarchy. Yet the democrats here wants to copy you assumptions. You are still controlled by a monarchy. You are technically a monarch/ democracy. /facepalm" yet you all are controlled by a democratic / monarch system are you not? You still bow to a queen. So if Trump was our king with similarities to your government you should be acceptive twords that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? If trump was our monarch and the people choose otherwise on issues is that acceptable in all of your eyes? Let's play this game.. Trump bad ..Yet your monarchy demades respect. From multiple countries. Yet we scream less government. More to the people and we the outcasts. Yet you all have a monarchy / Democratic system. if trump was king / with the benefit of your system of democracy would that suffice? The English Monarchy and how it works is completely unrelated to anything to do with Trump Than don't claim you are a democracy . You literally a monarch/ democracy. Yet we are a constitutional republic that decides otherwise. No monarchy. Yet the democrats here wants to copy you assumptions. You are still controlled by a monarchy. You are technically a monarch/ democracy. /facepalm yet you all are controlled by a democratic / monarch system are you not? You still bow to a queen. So if Trump was our king with similarities to your government you should be acceptive twords that. " Revolt than and prove me otherwise. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You want us to dump trump but you can't realize your own fallacies of a monarch. Dump the monarchy then.why have it? " You dumped Trump in 2020. Congratulations. You did it. Done | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review. He does I don't. MAGA loves the policy not the man. We need to move away from forgien affairs. Trade is fine our military support no. Does trump still think the last election was ‘stolen’ ? do you ? No, I will try again, does trump still think the last election was stolen ? he does. So what is wrong with the make America great again policy? What an idiot, what is he basing that on? isn't Brexit similar to the MAGA movement here? You all voted for it to separate your nationalism from the rest. So I say again what is wrong with the MAGA policy. You all voted on a similar concept.You know UK first. We do it and everyone gets their knickers in a bunch." Why does he still think the election was stolen? He is embarrassing himself and making people who support him look like idiots | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You want us to dump trump but you can't realize your own fallacies of a monarch. Dump the monarchy then.why have it? " What's the queen got to do with Trump and all his crimes against the American people? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You want us to dump trump but you can't realize your own fallacies of a monarch. Dump the monarchy then.why have it? What's the queen got to do with Trump and all his crimes against the American people?" Trump thinks he's king? I'm no royalist, but this is weak sauce | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy. "Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review? Is Trump more important than you or any other American is? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Vote against the monarchy. Kick that system to the curb. Do you see queens here? You do not. Yet you all vote to sustain the influence of a monarchy. Trusting trump is exactly the same outcome you all choose. Be brave shut down the monarchy.Its the same but with a different face." Unfortunately, you don't seem to understand how a constitutional monarchy functions. The monarch does not introduce laws or policy. It does not have any executive power whatsoever. The monarch does not question the legitimacy of elections. The monarch does not remove secret documents. So very different to Trump. Interesting though that you seem to be comparing hom to an absolute monarch which is not what the UK has. We seem to enjoy the history and the pomp and ceremony enough to retain the monarchy. It doesn't appear to represent a threat to democracy. Ironically our current elected government appears to be more of a threat, but that's another discussion. As an aside, the link to your article is also factually wrong and a bit weird. The Queen does not own all of the land in the UK and Commonwealth. A slightly better researched link here: https://www.dw.com/en/the-crown-estate-the-mysterious-property-empire-behind-queen-elizabeth-ii/a-57821897#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16626216173054&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dw.com%2Fen%2Fthe-crown-estate-the-mysterious-property-empire-behind-queen-elizabeth-ii%2Fa-57821897 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?"Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law. Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?
Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law.
Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now. "I don't care how much the Americans scream and shout, there's no way we should allow them back in the commonwealth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?
Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law.
Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now.
I don't care how much the Americans scream and shout, there's no way we should allow them back in the commonwealth. "I live in a Commonwealth  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?
Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law.
Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now.
I don't care how much the Americans scream and shout, there's no way we should allow them back in the commonwealth. I live in a Commonwealth "Different Commonwealth. (There's also the Commonwealth of Australia. Which is part of "the" Commonwealth) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?
Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law.
Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now.
I don't care how much the Americans scream and shout, there's no way we should allow them back in the commonwealth. "Why would we want to join your commonwealth? We broke away a long time ago | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555" and ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. Why is it "great", that this is happening? A independent party review.
Does everybody charged for a criminal offence get an independent party review? you fail to realize the ramifications of this " Person". That's like me calling your queen with heresy against the UK public on energy supplies. You know a semi monarch government. Dump the queen and let's talk about democracy.
Why should everyone charged with a crime not have an independent party review?
Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?
Yes. We're looking at Trump through our understanding of US law.
Given the Queen has no special status in US law (and has not been alleged to commit crimes under US law ) she's entirely irrelevant.
Besides, we did have a civil war to sort this shit out. It's why she's only a figurehead now.
I don't care how much the Americans scream and shout, there's no way we should allow them back in the commonwealth.
Why would we want to join your commonwealth? We broke away a long time ago"...and Washington was offered a monarchy. Fortunately your executive presidency has an option to remove the temporary monarch. Traditionally they have left peacefully when they lost and not tried to pretend that some kind of fraud was perpetrated... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555" if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. " https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader." Figured there would be an Epstein and Royal family connection | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader." ... And this exonerates Trump how? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? "It exonerates your new crown how ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ? "Can you clarify why you're bringing Charles into your defence of Trump? I can't figure out how it's related. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ? "In a thread about Trump, Charles isn't relevant. Charles could be the worst criminal in the history of humanity and it wouldn't make what Trump seems to have done any better. Btw I'm not even a monarchist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
Can you clarify why you're bringing Charles into your defence of Trump?
I can't figure out how it's related."leaders if you can't comprehend. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
In a thread about Trump, Charles isn't relevant. Charles could be the worst criminal in the history of humanity and it wouldn't make what Trump seems to have done any better.
Btw I'm not even a monarchist. "so why the crown then ? Like you said it's just a figurehead.Enact change in your "swamp" like we want to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
In a thread about Trump, Charles isn't relevant. Charles could be the worst criminal in the history of humanity and it wouldn't make what Trump seems to have done any better.
Btw I'm not even a monarchist. so why the crown then ? Like you said it's just a figurehead.Enact change in your "swamp" like we want to."Do you ever answer questions or just skip by them and ask a new question? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
In a thread about Trump, Charles isn't relevant. Charles could be the worst criminal in the history of humanity and it wouldn't make what Trump seems to have done any better.
Btw I'm not even a monarchist. so why the crown then ? Like you said it's just a figurehead.Enact change in your "swamp" like we want to."That has nothing to do with the considerable evidence of Trump's crimes. The DOJ has considerable evidence of Trump's crimes, whether we have Queen Elizabeth, King Charles, a lot of executed royals, or President Truss (god help us). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. " He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
Can you clarify why you're bringing Charles into your defence of Trump?
I can't figure out how it's related. leaders if you can't comprehend.
"Our political leader is Liz Truss. Our Constitutional setup is different to yours. Charles is not the equivalent of our president. Hope this helps. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do." Yet Charles is in charge why not just end it after the queens fantastic reign. Nope you all going back to the status quo and we the stupid ones. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do. Yet Charles is in charge why not just end it after the queens fantastic reign. Nope you all going back to the status quo and we the stupid ones." There has been a convention that the royals don't interfere in politics. It's the underpinning of the British constitution and has been for 300 years. Our political leader is Liz Truss, not King Charles. And even if King Charles decided to fuck up the settlement of the English civil war, Trump would still be in deep legal trouble in the US. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why should everyone charged with a crime in the US not have an independent party review? Is Trump more important than you or any other American is?" Yes but you don't understand. The monarchy exists  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So why do you need Charles in charge again? " Dunno. What does that have to do with Trump stealing international nuclear secrets, which is the topic of this thread? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do. Yet Charles is in charge why not just end it after the queens fantastic reign. Nope you all going back to the status quo and we the stupid ones." The reigning monarch has no influence on our political system but they're nice for tourists and visiting dignitaries and do some good work for charity. People, on the whole, aren't that bothered. Your President has a very big influence on how your country is run. This is of some concern to people. Can you see the difference? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do. Yet Charles is in charge why not just end it after the queens fantastic reign. Nope you all going back to the status quo and we the stupid ones. The reigning monarch has no influence on our political system but they're nice for tourists and visiting dignitaries and do some good work for charity. People, on the whole, aren't that bothered. Your President has a very big influence on how your country is run. This is of some concern to people. Can you see the difference?" And while Charles is immune from prosecution in the UK, if he nicked a bunch of classified documents from the US, there would probably be enormous upset beyond ranting on Truth Social  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. He is a constitutional monarch, as the Queen was. He has no influence on our laws or stealing national secrets nor in creating national division and anger or illegitimately claiming election fraud. You understand that, right? The monarchs, good or bad, no longer influences how our country is run. Your Presidents do. Yet Charles is in charge why not just end it after the queens fantastic reign. Nope you all going back to the status quo and we the stupid ones. The reigning monarch has no influence on our political system but they're nice for tourists and visiting dignitaries and do some good work for charity. People, on the whole, aren't that bothered. Your President has a very big influence on how your country is run. This is of some concern to people. Can you see the difference?" nope when they spend exorbitant amount of tax payer money for upkeep on the "traditional" UK image. I'll call foul. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now is chance for you all to dissolve the monarchy image." What does this have to do with a thread you started about an American citizen who has been accused in America of stealing American classified documents, which is a crime under American law? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now is chance for you all to dissolve the monarchy image. What does this have to do with a thread you started about an American citizen who has been accused in America of stealing American classified documents, which is a crime under American law?" should prince Andrew be held accountable for his actions under American laws? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now is chance for you all to dissolve the monarchy image. What does this have to do with a thread you started about an American citizen who has been accused in America of stealing American classified documents, which is a crime under American law? should prince Andrew be held accountable for his actions under American laws? " Dunno. What does that have to do with Trump's criminal activity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now is chance for you all to dissolve the monarchy image. What does this have to do with a thread you started about an American citizen who has been accused in America of stealing American classified documents, which is a crime under American law? should prince Andrew be held accountable for his actions under American laws? " As much as Ann Sacoolas should face trial in the UK over the death of Harry Dunn. Neither Ann Sacoolas not Prince Andrew have run their respective countries, falsely claimed voter fraud, spread division and illegally removed secret documents or is threatening to try to run the country having done so. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy " I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now is chance for you all to dissolve the monarchy image." Why do we want to dissolve the monarchy? We have our own political system which was in place long before yours and appears to be marginally more stable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this" Blu brought it up! I don't even support the monarchy pity's sake. I tried to get into the details I've gleaned about your system. I'm following all of this. But apparently we're now arguing that the monarchy shouldn't exist. (I happen to agree, although not passionately enough to try to overthrow anything) The monarchy is entirely irrelevant to a US citizen doing things in America under US law. If King Charles steals US classified documents, maybe the monarchy becomes relevant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this Blu brought it up! I don't even support the monarchy pity's sake. I tried to get into the details I've gleaned about your system. I'm following all of this. But apparently we're now arguing that the monarchy shouldn't exist. (I happen to agree, although not passionately enough to try to overthrow anything) The monarchy is entirely irrelevant to a US citizen doing things in America under US law. If King Charles steals US classified documents, maybe the monarchy becomes relevant "I agree with you on all this. None of this makes sense and what point is Blu still making about the opening post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this Blu brought it up! I don't even support the monarchy pity's sake. I tried to get into the details I've gleaned about your system. I'm following all of this. But apparently we're now arguing that the monarchy shouldn't exist. (I happen to agree, although not passionately enough to try to overthrow anything) The monarchy is entirely irrelevant to a US citizen doing things in America under US law. If King Charles steals US classified documents, maybe the monarchy becomes relevant
I agree with you on all this. None of this makes sense and what point is Blu still making about the opening post"I don't know. Seems to not trust the US judicial and law enforcement system. Curious because, apparently, the judge appointing the Special Master is trustworthy but the one who allowed the search (which seems to have found classified documents) is not... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this Blu brought it up! I don't even support the monarchy pity's sake. I tried to get into the details I've gleaned about your system. I'm following all of this. But apparently we're now arguing that the monarchy shouldn't exist. (I happen to agree, although not passionately enough to try to overthrow anything) The monarchy is entirely irrelevant to a US citizen doing things in America under US law. If King Charles steals US classified documents, maybe the monarchy becomes relevant
I agree with you on all this. None of this makes sense and what point is Blu still making about the opening post"I think it's "the UK has problems so you can't criticise the US or Trump". I mean I can. Also I'm Australian, so *shrug* (Australia also has problems. Happy to criticise Australia, but not in a thread about Donald Trump) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Blu. If the monarchy were abolished tomorrow. If we gave all the money to Epstein's victims. If we shot everyone in the royal succession down to me (which is probably tens of millions of people)... Even if all that were true, Trump is still being investigated for breaching US intelligence law. May have compromised international security. Which is what you started the thread about. You did not start it about the UK monarchy I dont understand this thread. The two topics are not related to one another. Dont think Blu can comprehend this" Unfortunately this kind of disconnect in posting within a thread isn't uncommon... Hell if you can get consistency within a single post you are witnessing a good day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sucker? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-fox-news-lawsuit-lincoln-project-ad_n_631a2036e4b046aa02325555 if if I were you " Charles in charge". Would be a troublesome worry. https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-bailing-out-prince-andrew-9m-jeffrey-epstein-pay-out-republic-1685803 your new leader. ... And this exonerates Trump how? It exonerates your new crown how ?
Can you clarify why you're bringing Charles into your defence of Trump?
I can't figure out how it's related. leaders if you can't comprehend.
"The monarch isn't a leader. But anyway, there's 100s of wold leaders. What have any of them got to do with Trump's legal issues? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=3YCtzRVMUDY&feature=share" Yup, most Trump Cultists are... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=3YCtzRVMUDY&feature=share" I think you have to subscribe to that service for the link to work. So I don't know what this is linking to | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trumps lawyer, the one who signed the document saying they had given everything back before the FBI raided and found more stuff.. well they apparently have just obtained the services of a lawyer…… Someone is about to take a fall…. " I've worked out what MAGA stand for. Many Attorneys Get Attorneys | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too..." Well if I had a vote in the USA id vote Trump before Bin Biden. Biden said to the leader of SF dont worry theres no orange here a direct insult to every family who lost friends at the hands of the IRA funded by the USA fund raisers which Biden supported and attended. He would not dare say to a white man dont worry theres no blacks here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too... Well if I had a vote in the USA id vote Trump before Bin Biden. Biden said to the leader of SF dont worry theres no orange here a direct insult to every family who lost friends at the hands of the IRA funded by the USA fund raisers which Biden supported and attended. He would not dare say to a white man dont worry theres no blacks here." Lol. How bizarre. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " So trump team got the special masters they wanted (at the moment.. it’s being appealed in federal court today) so whilst that is going on.. the special master has asked the trump team which documents they are alleged to have been declassified? Trump team are saying “we are not going to tell you/ we don’t want to tell you!” Reason being they don’t want to give up that information just in case the DOJ decide to charge!! Madness…. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. So trump team got the special masters they wanted (at the moment.. it’s being appealed in federal court today) so whilst that is going on.. the special master has asked the trump team which documents they are alleged to have been declassified? Trump team are saying “we are not going to tell you/ we don’t want to tell you!” Reason being they don’t want to give up that information just in case the DOJ decide to charge!! Madness…. " That and if they lie in court or admit to crimes, that just leads to more trouble  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trumps lawyer, the one who signed the document saying they had given everything back before the FBI raided and found more stuff.. well they apparently have just obtained the services of a lawyer…… Someone is about to take a fall…. I've worked out what MAGA stand for. Many Attorneys Get Attorneys" I've heard Make Attorneys Get Attorneys. Either fits at the moment | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. So trump team got the special masters they wanted (at the moment.. it’s being appealed in federal court today) so whilst that is going on.. the special master has asked the trump team which documents they are alleged to have been declassified? Trump team are saying “we are not going to tell you/ we don’t want to tell you!” Reason being they don’t want to give up that information just in case the DOJ decide to charge!! Madness…. That and if they lie in court or admit to crimes, that just leads to more trouble "Notice that trump is trying to claim the documents were unclassified in all his rallies but the lawyers won’t say it in court…. 
It looks like the trump team are going to try and make the DOJ prove the documents are classified without making the assertion trump didn’t declassify them!!! That’s a hell of a play! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. So trump team got the special masters they wanted (at the moment.. it’s being appealed in federal court today) so whilst that is going on.. the special master has asked the trump team which documents they are alleged to have been declassified? Trump team are saying “we are not going to tell you/ we don’t want to tell you!” Reason being they don’t want to give up that information just in case the DOJ decide to charge!! Madness…. That and if they lie in court or admit to crimes, that just leads to more trouble
Notice that trump is trying to claim the documents were unclassified in all his rallies but the lawyers won’t say it in court….
It looks like the trump team are going to try and make the DOJ prove the documents are classified without making the assertion trump didn’t declassify them!!! That’s a hell of a play! "Indeed. I'm half amused, half appalled | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"New York AG dropping the hammer…. Bank and wire fraud! The fact they are referring some of it for criminal referral to SDNY is huge, because if they are probably the federal financial criminal people to go to… " I think you can also expect that the various banks, lenders and other institutions involved in the transactions to be following ‘suit.’ Lol As if Trump isn’t already mired with legal problems, this suit and the others that will surely follow it will be a Tsunami. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"New York AG dropping the hammer…. Bank and wire fraud! The fact they are referring some of it for criminal referral to SDNY is huge, because if they are probably the federal financial criminal people to go to… I think you can also expect that the various banks, lenders and other institutions involved in the transactions to be following ‘suit.’ Lol As if Trump isn’t already mired with legal problems, this suit and the others that will surely follow it will be a Tsunami." Well we know why trump was desperately trying to prevent deutsche bank from cooperating with any investigation.. if he has been inflating the value of his assets to get loans and loans at preferential rates the IRS are going to have his tax records to see if he was using the same value or lower to reduce his tax burden | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"New York AG dropping the hammer…. Bank and wire fraud! The fact they are referring some of it for criminal referral to SDNY is huge, because if they are probably the federal financial criminal people to go to… I think you can also expect that the various banks, lenders and other institutions involved in the transactions to be following ‘suit.’ Lol As if Trump isn’t already mired with legal problems, this suit and the others that will surely follow it will be a Tsunami. Well we know why trump was desperately trying to prevent deutsche bank from cooperating with any investigation.. if he has been inflating the value of his assets to get loans and loans at preferential rates the IRS are going to have his tax records to see if he was using the same value or lower to reduce his tax burden " He's dealing with yet another sexual assault lawsuit now too. Wonder if any of these will stick, or if his lawyers will tie things up for years and years until he croaks it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"https://www.cnn.com/ It's great the judge is allowing a independent party to decide with the intelligence community. Prosecutors might be biased. " And back to the original post… Trump got another kick in the nuts last night…. DOJ wins its appeal over the classified documents and can continue its investigation The judges ruled 3-0 in favour of the DOJ, the appeals was held in the 11th circuit, which is the one that covers the south and south eastern United States, it’s the most conservative of the court of appeals, 2 of the 3 federal judges on the court of appeal panel who oversaw the case were appointed by trump and McConnell The 29 page ruling is scathing of trump and of the original judge saying the ruling was all sorts of wrong, and the evidence and arguments put forward by the trump team was flimsy at best Seriously though… if trump isn’t winning there, he is not winning this case anyway!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When asked why he valued Maralgo at $750 million and not the $75 mill it was arguably worth, Trump said "It worth that before the FBI took everything of valve." "  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Anyone who still supports Trump is one or more of the following: 1) One of the 1% and is morally bankrupt enough to put their own wealth over the well being of their fellow citizens 2) A cultist who has swallowed lies and propaganda unseen before the current age of politics. 3) Mentally incapable of making rational or logical decisions in their life 4) Lying to you to make money. Yet you all have a monarch as a figurehead. Why is that? " Definition of a "figurehead"... "a nominal leader or head without real power." Our monarchy was separated from any real power over the country many many years ago, and now has no power to make decisions that in any way form, alter, or guide our government or laws. Maybe now you can move on from this one incorrect assumption you keep making. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point  "Interesting. What do you think of the criminal implications of sending asylum seekers across state lines? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point "Does this mean we have given up trying to defend the indefensible? Curious?? Also… if Ron is your best 2nd option the DNC are going to have a field day showing the country what he does in Florida…. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point
Does this mean we have given up trying to defend the indefensible? Curious??
Also… if Ron is your best 2nd option the DNC are going to have a field day showing the country what he does in Florida…. "Interesting how Trump's grand victorious winning is now yay Ron | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Also loving this special master because he is obviously listening to comments being made by trump and his inner circle on tv… One of the things trump has alluded to on TV is that the FBI planted some of the documents… so he has now given his lawyers 1 week under oath to tell them exactly which documents they think were slipped in!!! Basically he is making them put up or shut up… " You can lie on TV. There are limits and consequences if you lie in court | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When asked why he valued Maralgo at $750 million and not the $75 mill it was arguably worth, Trump said "It worth that before the FBI took everything of valve." " Steven Colbert on the Late Show said that joke but it is really funny. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too..." Oooh what a shame people in UK suffering TDS. Overthrowing the government, yep told nancy to surround the capital with 20,000 national guard troops for security. Saw with my one eyes capital police opening gates and ushering protestors into the capital. Only shot fired was the US Govt shooting an unarmed non violent female US Air Force veteran. ( curious of where your outrageous for that is?). Pathological liar, reported by one of the most biased tabloids in the US (where is your outrage about hillary and billy) Sex offender? Based on a tape that was done as if he was one if the guys. (My goodness Mr. Fab key board hero, your gonna pass judgment on that ??) Classified documents, where is your outrage that they used a judge that originally was Harvey weinsteins prosecutor, but he stepped down from that.Then became his defense, then was used to Grant the search warrant to raid a Presidents house and not allow any of president Trumps attorneys or representatives to be present. Then leak pictures and information to the gullible. Yep where US the outrage that this administration is weaponizing law enforcement and other parts if the justice system. Please be objective and look at both sides | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too... Oooh what a shame people in UK suffering TDS. Overthrowing the government, yep told nancy to surround the capital with 20,000 national guard troops for security. Saw with my one eyes capital police opening gates and ushering protestors into the capital. Only shot fired was the US Govt shooting an unarmed non violent female US Air Force veteran. ( curious of where your outrageous for that is?). Pathological liar, reported by one of the most biased tabloids in the US (where is your outrage about hillary and billy) Sex offender? Based on a tape that was done as if he was one if the guys. (My goodness Mr. Fab key board hero, your gonna pass judgment on that ??) Classified documents, where is your outrage that they used a judge that originally was Harvey weinsteins prosecutor, but he stepped down from that.Then became his defense, then was used to Grant the search warrant to raid a Presidents house and not allow any of president Trumps attorneys or representatives to be present. Then leak pictures and information to the gullible. Yep where US the outrage that this administration is weaponizing law enforcement and other parts if the justice system. Please be objective and look at both sides" "Both sides". Who exactly are you suggesting is the other side to Trump? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Another day, another Blu Trump thread. Happy times. Blu, why are you so intent on supporting this guy? A few of his greatest hits: He really did try to overthrow democracy in your country. You saw and heard the evidence with your own eyes and ears. That's a huge deal. He's a pathological liar, so you can't trust a word he says. The Washington Post catalogued over 30,000 of his lies in office. He's a sex offender. He's on tape admitting as much. Looks a hell of a lot like he stole a bunch of classified documents too... Oooh what a shame people in UK suffering TDS. Overthrowing the government, yep told nancy to surround the capital with 20,000 national guard troops for security. Saw with my one eyes capital police opening gates and ushering protestors into the capital. Only shot fired was the US Govt shooting an unarmed non violent female US Air Force veteran. ( curious of where your outrageous for that is?). Pathological liar, reported by one of the most biased tabloids in the US (where is your outrage about hillary and billy) Sex offender? Based on a tape that was done as if he was one if the guys. (My goodness Mr. Fab key board hero, your gonna pass judgment on that ??) Classified documents, where is your outrage that they used a judge that originally was Harvey weinsteins prosecutor, but he stepped down from that.Then became his defense, then was used to Grant the search warrant to raid a Presidents house and not allow any of president Trumps attorneys or representatives to be present. Then leak pictures and information to the gullible. Yep where US the outrage that this administration is weaponizing law enforcement and other parts if the justice system. Please be objective and look at both sides" What is the other side of stealing classified documents? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Please be objective and look at both sides What is the other side of stealing classified documents?" Returning stolen classified documents? Don't put it past these loons to claim this as a win for Trump soon. "They were safer at Mar a Lago than in the White House. When the security in Washington improved he returned them." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Please be objective and look at both sides What is the other side of stealing classified documents? Returning stolen classified documents? Don't put it past these loons to claim this as a win for Trump soon. "They were safer at Mar a Lago than in the White House. When the security in Washington improved he returned them." " Probably
That and the legal arguments don't seem to acknowledge that Biden is president. Fucking lunacy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point
Interesting. What do you think of the criminal implications of sending asylum seekers across state lines?"So delusional, look at the first issue. When President Trump left office, the illegal immigration flood had been drastically slowed and controlled. joey shows up now we have an uncontrolled invasion of millions in under 2 years. joey appointed the cackling vp, with nothing being done. Basically another failure. joey, has been trafficking these illegals all over the US with documented flights into Jacksonville Fl at late and early hours of the day (10pm-3am) joeys press lady called them early morning flights. Governor DeSantis is mandated to protect Florida from being over run with illegal immigrants, immigrants that do not get screened for background checks, have no means to support themselves. Governor DeSantis offered to take these illegal immigrants to marthas vineyard which is a self proclaimed sanctuary city on a voluntary basis. One that will take illegal aliens and shelter them, feed them and protect them from Federal immigration officials. My goodness these hypocrits had them removed and transported to another undisclosed city. By the way here could be your case for trafficking as I am sure they were not moved voluntarily. Get the facts, or otherwise your spreading propaganda like the majority of tabloid journalists Thanks for enlightening me did not know they still had late night people that thought they were funny. Thought they had been all washed up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point
Interesting. What do you think of the criminal implications of sending asylum seekers across state lines?
So delusional, look at the first issue.
When President Trump left office, the illegal immigration flood had been drastically slowed and controlled. joey shows up now we have an uncontrolled invasion of millions in under 2 years. joey appointed the cackling vp, with nothing being done. Basically another failure.
joey, has been trafficking these illegals all over the US with documented flights into Jacksonville Fl at late and early hours of the day (10pm-3am) joeys press lady called them early morning flights.
Governor DeSantis is mandated to protect Florida from being over run with illegal immigrants, immigrants that do not get screened for background checks, have no means to support themselves.
Governor DeSantis offered to take these illegal immigrants to marthas vineyard which is a self proclaimed sanctuary city on a voluntary basis. One that will take illegal aliens and shelter them, feed them and protect them from Federal immigration officials.
My goodness these hypocrits had them removed and transported to another undisclosed city. By the way here could be your case for trafficking as I am sure they were not moved voluntarily.
Get the facts, or otherwise your spreading propaganda like the majority of tabloid journalists
Thanks for enlightening me did not know they still had late night people that thought they were funny. Thought they had been all washed up."Fascinating. Not sure it's attached to reality, but fascinating. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Desantis at this point
Interesting. What do you think of the criminal implications of sending asylum seekers across state lines?
So delusional, look at the first issue.
When President Trump left office, the illegal immigration flood had been drastically slowed and controlled. joey shows up now we have an uncontrolled invasion of millions in under 2 years. joey appointed the cackling vp, with nothing being done. Basically another failure.
joey, has been trafficking these illegals all over the US with documented flights into Jacksonville Fl at late and early hours of the day (10pm-3am) joeys press lady called them early morning flights.
Governor DeSantis is mandated to protect Florida from being over run with illegal immigrants, immigrants that do not get screened for background checks, have no means to support themselves.
Governor DeSantis offered to take these illegal immigrants to marthas vineyard which is a self proclaimed sanctuary city on a voluntary basis. One that will take illegal aliens and shelter them, feed them and protect them from Federal immigration officials.
My goodness these hypocrits had them removed and transported to another undisclosed city. By the way here could be your case for trafficking as I am sure they were not moved voluntarily.
Get the facts, or otherwise your spreading propaganda like the majority of tabloid journalists
Thanks for enlightening me did not know they still had late night people that thought they were funny. Thought they had been all washed up."President Trump, Governer DeSantis, joey (not even worthy of a capital letter). Not someone who's ever going to have a rational discussion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
