Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And remember, this is not 70 odd percent of the original price. This is 70 odd percent of the price resulting from the previous 50 odd percent rise. In total that gives a more than 150% rise above the original price. For every £100 that your bill stood at last year, come October you will be paying over £250. The January rise will then be another percentage increase of the October price. Even at the currently suggested 6% (and lets face it, by the time January comes I'd be gobsmacked if that suggested 6% hasn't gone up to be something more like 60%), that would bring the price up to above £270 for every £100 you were paying last year. Still it'll be okay because the government have got it in hand (*). They're stopping any short term investment in stuff like on-shore turbines that could provide power in six months to a year, so that within a mere 30 to 40 years they can build some new nuclear plants. Our great grandchildren will have plenty of energy! *sarcasm alert " You might need to re-revise your figures, there is talk on the grapevine of £4,400 in Jan then £4,700 next April and fall back to £4,000 next July. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And remember, this is not 70 odd percent of the original price. This is 70 odd percent of the price resulting from the previous 50 odd percent rise. In total that gives a more than 150% rise above the original price. For every £100 that your bill stood at last year, come October you will be paying over £250. The January rise will then be another percentage increase of the October price. Even at the currently suggested 6% (and lets face it, by the time January comes I'd be gobsmacked if that suggested 6% hasn't gone up to be something more like 60%), that would bring the price up to above £270 for every £100 you were paying last year. Still it'll be okay because the government have got it in hand (*). They're stopping any short term investment in stuff like on-shore turbines that could provide power in six months to a year, so that within a mere 30 to 40 years they can build some new nuclear plants. Our great grandchildren will have plenty of energy! *sarcasm alert You might need to re-revise your figures, there is talk on the grapevine of £4,400 in Jan then £4,700 next April and fall back to £4,000 next July." Yeah my figures weren't the actual total for bills, just the results of the compounded rises for each £100 of last years bill. Trying to illustrate that (for instance) a rise of 20% then a further 20% six months later is more than a 40% rise, it's a rise of 44% against the original. And that making the rises more often actually allows them to be higher in total than on the face of it they sound. Eg. two rises of 50% at six month intervals sounds like it makes a total of 100%, but is actually 125%. And four rises of 25% at three month intervals also sounds like a total of 100%, but is actually 144%! So when they say they are going to review the price cap every three months, it allows the government to somewhat disguise the total real rise. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why are standing charges part of a price hike? If anything they should be coming down? " There is an issue with Standing Charges that is grossly unfair and OFGEM claim they going to address it. Last year many companies went bust, most of their customers paying Direct Debit are usually in 'Credit', some by £100's. These losses were covered by OFGEM who transferred customers to new providers and then compensated for what was lost. This money is not given by the government, it is collectively paid for by the rest of us - via increased Standing Charges. This means those struggling and scratting on pre-pay meters end up paying a higher value to the 'fund', to compensate those sitting comfortably with accounts in Credit lost nothing. It was put onto electricity as "not everyone uses gas", some was added to cover storm damage repair but the bulk of the 90% Standing Charge rise was to offset compensation given to cover credits on accounts. There should be a limit as to how much accounts can be in credit as the rest of us pay more when this is lost. It is also surprising why London and South East Standing Charges are a lot less than those in the North and West. It should be a flat fee for everyone, with no regional variations. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |