FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Cineworld

Jump to newest
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol

So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What's been pulled

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion "

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed

And it’s a shame it’s worked. Because it’s teaching the extremists that threats of violence not only work, but go unpunished

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago

London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact


"What's been pulled "

The Lady of Heaven

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What's been pulled

The Lady of Heaven"
cheers just found on net bought right it's up to big companies to stand up as independent ones cannot afford to because these people would shut them down be nice for ch4 put it on that would stuff them up.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want "

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles "

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles "

Meaning of radicles

BOTANY

the part of a plant embryo that develops into the primary root.

ANATOMY

a rootlike subdivision of a nerve or vein.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eglover62TV/TS
over a year ago

Ayr


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about? "

What’s not to get annoyed about. It’s symptomatic about everything that’s wrong with society today. Hopefully other chains won’t be so spineless. I take it you know what the protesters were chanting. Muslims of one sect chanting in the crudest terms about Muslims of another sect. But hey ho, just give in to their sensibilities.

I await the pile on.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

If you really need to see it, 'Vue'.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

What’s not to get annoyed about. It’s symptomatic about everything that’s wrong with society today. Hopefully other chains won’t be so spineless. I take it you know what the protesters were chanting. Muslims of one sect chanting in the crudest terms about Muslims of another sect. But hey ho, just give in to their sensibilities.

I await the pile on."

‘It’s symptomatic about everything that is wrong with society’ , really? Cinema chains have stopped screening certain films for decades . We’re you hoping to watch the film at Cineworld?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres."

Have they? Or have they shown the film to the small minority that wanted to see it, and are now dropping it while getting some free publicity?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about? "

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media. "

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld? "

That is not the point why would I not have ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld? "

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint "

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people? "

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

That is not the point why would I not have ?

"

Do you get angry every time a film is banned by a cinema chain or is it just this one ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews "

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one? "

Every

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one? "

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh look, an old white guy getting upset because people of colour are asking you to respect their culture / religion. I bet your the type that goes on holiday abroad, only speak English and only eat food with chips.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What's been pulled "

His gammon gland

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree? "

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film? "

Overall yes, because it’s not the 1st time this small minority of extremists have acted this way. This is just another time it’s happened and the fact we are allowing it to happen just reinforces the idea in their head that if they gather enough people with enough threats of violence, they will get their way

If they want to protest peacefully, choose to boycott the cinema, stand outside handing out leaflets explaining why they don’t like the film and why you shouldn’t watch it, great. Good for them. That’s a peaceful way to put your point across.

I’m always going to be against pushing your agenda with threats of violence. That’s basically terrorism. and by pulling the film we’ve told them “terrorism works. Keep doing it”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film?

Overall yes, because it’s not the 1st time this small minority of extremists have acted this way. This is just another time it’s happened and the fact we are allowing it to happen just reinforces the idea in their head that if they gather enough people with enough threats of violence, they will get their way

If they want to protest peacefully, choose to boycott the cinema, stand outside handing out leaflets explaining why they don’t like the film and why you shouldn’t watch it, great. Good for them. That’s a peaceful way to put your point across.

I’m always going to be against pushing your agenda with threats of violence. That’s basically terrorism. and by pulling the film we’ve told them “terrorism works. Keep doing it” "

Do you apply this ‘moral stance’ to all protests where a tiny minority resort to violence ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What's been pulled

His gammon gland"

PMSL , that made me laugh

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film?

Overall yes, because it’s not the 1st time this small minority of extremists have acted this way. This is just another time it’s happened and the fact we are allowing it to happen just reinforces the idea in their head that if they gather enough people with enough threats of violence, they will get their way

If they want to protest peacefully, choose to boycott the cinema, stand outside handing out leaflets explaining why they don’t like the film and why you shouldn’t watch it, great. Good for them. That’s a peaceful way to put your point across.

I’m always going to be against pushing your agenda with threats of violence. That’s basically terrorism. and by pulling the film we’ve told them “terrorism works. Keep doing it”

Do you apply this ‘moral stance’ to all protests where a tiny minority resort to violence ? "

Yeah, always. Do you agree with violence to push an agenda? Why do you seem so intent on defending a violent mob outside a cinema? Do you support them?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film?

Overall yes, because it’s not the 1st time this small minority of extremists have acted this way. This is just another time it’s happened and the fact we are allowing it to happen just reinforces the idea in their head that if they gather enough people with enough threats of violence, they will get their way

If they want to protest peacefully, choose to boycott the cinema, stand outside handing out leaflets explaining why they don’t like the film and why you shouldn’t watch it, great. Good for them. That’s a peaceful way to put your point across.

I’m always going to be against pushing your agenda with threats of violence. That’s basically terrorism. and by pulling the film we’ve told them “terrorism works. Keep doing it”

Do you apply this ‘moral stance’ to all protests where a tiny minority resort to violence ?

Yeah, always. Do you agree with violence to push an agenda? Why do you seem so intent on defending a violent mob outside a cinema? Do you support them? "

Fair enough, I admire your ‘consistency ‘ . Where have I defended a violent mob? Do you have proof that the majority of the protesters were indeed ‘violent’ ? I have already stated that I don’t agree with violent protest . I merely asked the OP why he was so angry at the banning of this film and if he felt the same way when other films were banned. Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

The whole “if it doesn’t effect you why care” attitude is awful

The principle is that a minority used threats of violence to push their agenda. Which could be labelled as terrorism

This is the same minority that pushed a teacher into hiding after death threats. And the same minority that shot and killed 12 people in France.

If your willing to turn a blind eye to extremism because you didn’t fancy watching the film anyways, then good for you. Much like I’m sure many turned a blind eye to the horrors of WW2 because they weren’t Jewish. Not everyone carries that moral standpoint

Are you comparing Cineworld banning a film with the Nazis killing millions of Jewish people?

No, I’m comparing you attitude of “if it doesn’t effect me why care” to the attitudes of those in ww2 that carried the same attitude to the nazi treatment of Jews

If I don’t care about this then I don’t care about the Nazis killing Jewish people? Do you care about ever film banned by a cinema chain or just this one?

I care about any agenda that pushed through with the threat of violence. Whether that’s a movie, a song, art, anything

In a civilised society we shouldn’t be letting extremist minorities dictate peoples lives through threat of violence. Or do you disagree?

I agree, there shouldn’t be threats of violence towards anyone who is trying to do their job, so your more concerned with the behaviour of the protestors rather than the actually banning of the film?

Overall yes, because it’s not the 1st time this small minority of extremists have acted this way. This is just another time it’s happened and the fact we are allowing it to happen just reinforces the idea in their head that if they gather enough people with enough threats of violence, they will get their way

If they want to protest peacefully, choose to boycott the cinema, stand outside handing out leaflets explaining why they don’t like the film and why you shouldn’t watch it, great. Good for them. That’s a peaceful way to put your point across.

I’m always going to be against pushing your agenda with threats of violence. That’s basically terrorism. and by pulling the film we’ve told them “terrorism works. Keep doing it”

Do you apply this ‘moral stance’ to all protests where a tiny minority resort to violence ?

Yeah, always. Do you agree with violence to push an agenda? Why do you seem so intent on defending a violent mob outside a cinema? Do you support them?

Fair enough, I admire your ‘consistency ‘ . Where have I defended a violent mob? Do you have proof that the majority of the protesters were indeed ‘violent’ ? I have already stated that I don’t agree with violent protest . I merely asked the OP why he was so angry at the banning of this film and if he felt the same way when other films were banned. Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??"

You just seem to be very questioning of anyone that didn’t like this clear injustice of freedom. This is a known violent minority that gather outside and chant, intending to intimidate. These are the same people that forced that teacher into hiding, whose life has been ruined to this day. That’s why the cinema folded, because they are a known violent minority that show up to intimidate and cause issues.

Obviously you can understand, all you comments and questions so far seem to be in defence of them. With the attitude of “if you didn’t want to watch the film who cares?”. It’s an odd stance to take.

I don’t care for details. All I see is a violent minority forcing their view and agenda on supposedly free people and businesses.

Hopefully it will be properly investigated, but as we have seen. Not only is the police force quite inept at the moment, they also seem to turn a blind eye to these kind of things. Much like they did with the huge grooming and sex trafficking operations the last few past years

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

Also to add, your questioning is very odd. Your last question

“ Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??”

In every single one of my comments I’ve mentioned then as a small minority of extremists. This makes me think your just not reading what I put. Your playing devils advocate and actually don’t have a true point you stand on.

I dunno what that’s called. Strawman? Gaslighting? I’m not sure, but it’s pretty evident from every one of my replies I don’t believe everyone that wants the film banned is a violent intolerant extremist

Why did you ask?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Also to add, your questioning is very odd. Your last question

“ Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??”

In every single one of my comments I’ve mentioned then as a small minority of extremists. This makes me think your just not reading what I put. Your playing devils advocate and actually don’t have a true point you stand on.

I dunno what that’s called. Strawman? Gaslighting? I’m not sure, but it’s pretty evident from every one of my replies I don’t believe everyone that wants the film banned is a violent intolerant extremist

Why did you ask? "

‘Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed’

This is what you stated on your first post on here, I don’t need to say anything else ,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Also to add, your questioning is very odd. Your last question

“ Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??”

In every single one of my comments I’ve mentioned then as a small minority of extremists. This makes me think your just not reading what I put. Your playing devils advocate and actually don’t have a true point you stand on.

I dunno what that’s called. Strawman? Gaslighting? I’m not sure, but it’s pretty evident from every one of my replies I don’t believe everyone that wants the film banned is a violent intolerant extremist

Why did you ask?

‘Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed’

This is what you stated on your first post on here, I don’t need to say anything else , "

Islam extremism is the only religion in the UK that’s recently been doing this. We’ve seen several in recent years. Along with a mass shooting in France

In every other posts I made it clear it was a small minority of extremists. Why did you choose to ignore that?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Also to add, your questioning is very odd. Your last question

“ Do you think that everyone who wanted this film banning is a ‘violent, intolerant , extremist’ ??”

In every single one of my comments I’ve mentioned then as a small minority of extremists. This makes me think your just not reading what I put. Your playing devils advocate and actually don’t have a true point you stand on.

I dunno what that’s called. Strawman? Gaslighting? I’m not sure, but it’s pretty evident from every one of my replies I don’t believe everyone that wants the film banned is a violent intolerant extremist

Why did you ask?

‘Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed’

This is what you stated on your first post on here, I don’t need to say anything else ,

Islam extremism is the only religion in the UK that’s recently been doing this. We’ve seen several in recent years. Along with a mass shooting in France

In every other posts I made it clear it was a small minority of extremists. Why did you choose to ignore that?"

‘Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed’

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

Well I can see it’s going no where, so at least we can agree that this type of stuff shouldn’t be happening. Dunno what your other points are, or if you had any, or if your just playing devils advocate

But I think it’s fair to say everyone agrees that violence to push an agenda doesn’t belong in the UK

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well I can see it’s going no where, so at least we can agree that this type of stuff shouldn’t be happening. Dunno what your other points are, or if you had any, or if your just playing devils advocate

But I think it’s fair to say everyone agrees that violence to push an agenda doesn’t belong in the UK "

‘Why am I not surprised which religion it was that protested with threats of violence to get something they didn’t like removed’

Your words, it is fair to say everyone can see where your coming from here .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about?

I would go to watch it why would I not?

I will probably watch it when it comes out on digital media.

So you had no plans to watch it Cineworld?

That is not the point why would I not have ?

Do you get angry every time a film is banned by a cinema chain or is it just this one ? "

Who said I was angry ? That’s just your supposition.

I was just starting a conversation on the subject that was in the news

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago

milton keynes


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion "

Would it not have been easier and fairer for the cinema to have shown the movie as planned but put out a warning about how the content may be offensive to certain religions. That way anyone that wants to see it can and those that find it offensive don't have to watch it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

Would it not have been easier and fairer for the cinema to have shown the movie as planned but put out a warning about how the content may be offensive to certain religions. That way anyone that wants to see it can and those that find it offensive don't have to watch it"

BBC news reports that they've removed the film due to threats of violence against cinema staff. Not to be taken lightly these days.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

If I remember rightly there was a huge uproar when he passion of the Christ was released and banned in certain places?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

The

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

Would it not have been easier and fairer for the cinema to have shown the movie as planned but put out a warning about how the content may be offensive to certain religions. That way anyone that wants to see it can and those that find it offensive don't have to watch it"

They wanted the movie cancelled not to be shown at all because apparently they see it as offensive

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

It is a free country , they are a Private company , they can do what they want

No they have not done what they wanted they have been forced to by radicles

Did you want to watch the film at Cineworld? Or are you just looking for things to get angry/annoyed about? "

Sounda well pissed off and hot under the collat. Poor fella aaah bless.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If I remember rightly there was a huge uproar when he passion of the Christ was released and banned in certain places?"

And The life of Brian

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago

milton keynes


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

Would it not have been easier and fairer for the cinema to have shown the movie as planned but put out a warning about how the content may be offensive to certain religions. That way anyone that wants to see it can and those that find it offensive don't have to watch it

They wanted the movie cancelled not to be shown at all because apparently they see it as offensive "

I understand they may find it offensive so I would have thought just not going to see it would be an easy solution. Why deny the choice to others

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Have been a Cineworld unlimited card holder for a year. Cancelling it tomorrow.

I am curious to know what the cowards who call themselves liberals these days have to say about this matter. I bet they will come up with an excuse for this.

Also, where is the guy who questioned why Islamic immigrants were not treated the same way as Ukrainian immigrants? Here is the answer for you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter."

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?"

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A."

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?"

It's not my job to set any precedents for this country, whether good or bad, and it isn't me who banned it. The cinema chains are protecting their staff who are being threatened by mobs. In not one of the pictures I've seen online of these protests is there a police officer visible. Who will protect the staff? If your kid was a minimum wage cinema usher faced with this, what would you advise them to do? Sometimes you've just got to cut your losses. Remember Charlie Hebdo?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?"

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What's been pulled "

BJ’s catheter?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

It's not my job to set any precedents for this country, whether good or bad, and it isn't me who banned it. The cinema chains are protecting their staff who are being threatened by mobs. In not one of the pictures I've seen online of these protests is there a police officer visible. Who will protect the staff? If your kid was a minimum wage cinema usher faced with this, what would you advise them to do? Sometimes you've just got to cut your losses. Remember Charlie Hebdo? "

And Charlie Hebdo actually republished the cartoon just to prove a point that the mobsters will never be able to silence them.

Ideally Cineworld should request police protection and screen the film.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson."

Sorry?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

Sorry?"

Your talking about setting bad precedents right and bending once lunatics will ask for more, well UKIP and ERG and look where we are now a slob for a PM and a fucked up economy tell me how far does the British Public have to bend to the will of the minority who kicked and screamed eh and moaned and whinged, and blocked and obstructed

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

Sorry?

Your talking about setting bad precedents right and bending once lunatics will ask for more, well UKIP and ERG and look where we are now a slob for a PM and a fucked up economy tell me how far does the British Public have to bend to the will of the minority who kicked and screamed eh and moaned and whinged, and blocked and obstructed "

If you want to whine about Brexit, there are other threads. Not sure what this has got to do with the thread.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

Sorry?

Your talking about setting bad precedents right and bending once lunatics will ask for more, well UKIP and ERG and look where we are now a slob for a PM and a fucked up economy tell me how far does the British Public have to bend to the will of the minority who kicked and screamed eh and moaned and whinged, and blocked and obstructed

If you want to whine about Brexit, there are other threads. Not sure what this has got to do with the thread."

Oh it has very much to do with this thread, you’re talking about the vocal minority which seems to dictate terms, well it happens all the time, the vocal minority dictating terms on the majority of people. That how hard brexit happened, instead of getting consensus there was this massive railroading of hard polices which fucked us up, we gave euroskeptics and inch and they took a fucking mile.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

Sorry?

Your talking about setting bad precedents right and bending once lunatics will ask for more, well UKIP and ERG and look where we are now a slob for a PM and a fucked up economy tell me how far does the British Public have to bend to the will of the minority who kicked and screamed eh and moaned and whinged, and blocked and obstructed

If you want to whine about Brexit, there are other threads. Not sure what this has got to do with the thread.

Oh it has very much to do with this thread, you’re talking about the vocal minority which seems to dictate terms, well it happens all the time, the vocal minority dictating terms on the majority of people. That how hard brexit happened, instead of getting consensus there was this massive railroading of hard polices which fucked us up, we gave euroskeptics and inch and they took a fucking mile. "

Are you high?

We are talking about freedom of expression being destroyed by a group by use of violent threat. But if your goal is to distract people from the issue because it's your favourite religion, then you are on right track.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with some of the posters above. This film is reportedly offensive to many muslims and now the Showcase chain has also dropped it, and I applaud them for it. The last thing this country needs is another Manchester arena type slaughter.

So bend over to intolerant mobsters and do anything they want us to do because we are scared of them?

Yup. When the choice is not seeing a crappy film about an imagined flying spaghetti monster or the possibility of more innocent people getting ripped apart by Ali Snackbar and his homemade backpack bomb, I'll take option A.

You know that you are setting a bad precedent for the country right? If you bend over once, those lunatics will ask for more. Where will you draw the line?

Damn right!, that’s how we got a hard Brexit and Boris Johnson.

Sorry?

Your talking about setting bad precedents right and bending once lunatics will ask for more, well UKIP and ERG and look where we are now a slob for a PM and a fucked up economy tell me how far does the British Public have to bend to the will of the minority who kicked and screamed eh and moaned and whinged, and blocked and obstructed

If you want to whine about Brexit, there are other threads. Not sure what this has got to do with the thread.

Oh it has very much to do with this thread, you’re talking about the vocal minority which seems to dictate terms, well it happens all the time, the vocal minority dictating terms on the majority of people. That how hard brexit happened, instead of getting consensus there was this massive railroading of hard polices which fucked us up, we gave euroskeptics and inch and they took a fucking mile. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"What's been pulled

BJ’s catheter? "

really ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling. "

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists."

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it. "

The right to free expression without threat of violence.

Shouldn’t we all be free to express ourselves freely without the threat of violence? Or do you advocate violence if someone does something you don’t like?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

The right to free expression without threat of violence.

Shouldn’t we all be free to express ourselves freely without the threat of violence? Or do you advocate violence if someone does something you don’t like? "

It’s strange you think I’m advocating violence. I’m asking from an objective viewpoint. I have admiration for my Muslim friends because of the way they conduct themselves their religion is more than a lifestyle. It’s way more dedication than I can muster anymore.

I’m asking I suppose should freedom of expression override the right to be offended? Which ones more important? (I don’t agree with death threats and fatwahs before anyone insinuates)

If you are doing something that’s clearly going to cause offence to wide portion of people then why do it? Seems a bit disrespectful to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

The right to free expression without threat of violence.

Shouldn’t we all be free to express ourselves freely without the threat of violence? Or do you advocate violence if someone does something you don’t like?

It’s strange you think I’m advocating violence. I’m asking from an objective viewpoint. I have admiration for my Muslim friends because of the way they conduct themselves their religion is more than a lifestyle. It’s way more dedication than I can muster anymore.

I’m asking I suppose should freedom of expression override the right to be offended? Which ones more important? (I don’t agree with death threats and fatwahs before anyone insinuates)

If you are doing something that’s clearly going to cause offence to wide portion of people then why do it? Seems a bit disrespectful to me. "

I suppose that’s the big moral debate. To me the right to expression is the most important, otherwise, where do you stop it

They turn up at your kids school and say the teachings there are offensive to them. Do we change? Do we teach only Islam in school to avoid offence? What about if Christian’s start saying the sciences are offensive? Do we teach children evolution isn’t real and the world is only 6000 years old? These are extremes obviously, but that’s what a slippery slope leads to.

To me, freedom of expression comes with the ability to ignore it if you want

If we start blocking expression to avoid offence, it’s a slippery slope that might never end.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh look, an old white guy getting upset because people of colour are asking you to respect their culture / religion. I bet your the type that goes on holiday abroad, only speak English and only eat food with chips.

"

Hurry ave a curry! Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it. "

Not blaming anybody? What you are doing is exactly victim blaming. It's like asking why did that woman walk into that dangerous street at night. It's people's rights. They can use their rights in whatever the way they want. As a country, that's the last thing we need to focus on. The main focus should be on why this group that takes offense at everything gets away with getting what they want with threats of violence.

To be honest, I am not surprised that most liberals are resorting to victim blaming because the perpetrators here belong to a religion they love.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

The right to free expression without threat of violence.

Shouldn’t we all be free to express ourselves freely without the threat of violence? Or do you advocate violence if someone does something you don’t like?

It’s strange you think I’m advocating violence. I’m asking from an objective viewpoint. I have admiration for my Muslim friends because of the way they conduct themselves their religion is more than a lifestyle. It’s way more dedication than I can muster anymore.

I’m asking I suppose should freedom of expression override the right to be offended? Which ones more important? (I don’t agree with death threats and fatwahs before anyone insinuates)

If you are doing something that’s clearly going to cause offence to wide portion of people then why do it? Seems a bit disrespectful to me.

I suppose that’s the big moral debate. To me the right to expression is the most important, otherwise, where do you stop it

They turn up at your kids school and say the teachings there are offensive to them. Do we change? Do we teach only Islam in school to avoid offence? What about if Christian’s start saying the sciences are offensive? Do we teach children evolution isn’t real and the world is only 6000 years old? These are extremes obviously, but that’s what a slippery slope leads to.

To me, freedom of expression comes with the ability to ignore it if you want

If we start blocking expression to avoid offence, it’s a slippery slope that might never end. "

Exactly! If they ask that theort of evolution shouldn't be taught in schools, should we stop? Classic liberals fought for decades for these rights. Modern liberals are making a mockery of it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

Not blaming anybody? What you are doing is exactly victim blaming. It's like asking why did that woman walk into that dangerous street at night. It's people's rights. They can use their rights in whatever the way they want. As a country, that's the last thing we need to focus on. The main focus should be on why this group that takes offense at everything gets away with getting what they want with threats of violence.

To be honest, I am not surprised that most liberals are resorting to victim blaming because the perpetrators here belong to a religion they love."

Lol me liberal.

I’m debating. Who is the “group” you refer to?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Have been a Cineworld unlimited card holder for a year. Cancelling it tomorrow.

I am curious to know what the cowards who call themselves liberals these days have to say about this matter. I bet they will come up with an excuse for this.

Also, where is the guy who questioned why Islamic immigrants were not treated the same way as Ukrainian immigrants? Here is the answer for you."

You shite stirring again. You mate om that other thread. You both need to meet up and have a wee cuddle. Bless.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Have been a Cineworld unlimited card holder for a year. Cancelling it tomorrow.

I am curious to know what the cowards who call themselves liberals these days have to say about this matter. I bet they will come up with an excuse for this.

Also, where is the guy who questioned why Islamic immigrants were not treated the same way as Ukrainian immigrants? Here is the answer for you.

You shite stirring again. You mate om that other thread. You both need to meet up and have a wee cuddle. Bless. "

Sorry for actually respecting and supporting freedom of expression instead of using it when I want and throwing it away when I don't want.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

Not blaming anybody? What you are doing is exactly victim blaming. It's like asking why did that woman walk into that dangerous street at night. It's people's rights. They can use their rights in whatever the way they want. As a country, that's the last thing we need to focus on. The main focus should be on why this group that takes offense at everything gets away with getting what they want with threats of violence.

To be honest, I am not surprised that most liberals are resorting to victim blaming because the perpetrators here belong to a religion they love.

Lol me liberal.

I’m debating. Who is the “group” you refer to? "

The guy who led these protests is the same guy who was leading protests against LGBT education in Birmingham and calling the school teachers pedos. Liberals stayed silent on both these issues because they would rather fight with JK Rowling for making tweets, looking for weak targets on the internet and acting like they care about the cause instead of opposing groups like these who cause real world damage to these causes.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

Not blaming anybody? What you are doing is exactly victim blaming. It's like asking why did that woman walk into that dangerous street at night. It's people's rights. They can use their rights in whatever the way they want. As a country, that's the last thing we need to focus on. The main focus should be on why this group that takes offense at everything gets away with getting what they want with threats of violence.

To be honest, I am not surprised that most liberals are resorting to victim blaming because the perpetrators here belong to a religion they love.

Lol me liberal.

I’m debating. Who is the “group” you refer to?

The guy who led these protests is the same guy who was leading protests against LGBT education in Birmingham and calling the school teachers pedos. Liberals stayed silent on both these issues because they would rather fight with JK Rowling for making tweets, looking for weak targets on the internet and acting like they care about the cause instead of opposing groups like these who cause real world damage to these causes."

Liberals staying silent is nothing new the hypocrisy is staggering sometimes (see creepy Joe)

But that’s for another thread.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"What's been pulled

His gammon gland"

Really ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"Oh look, an old white guy getting upset because people of colour are asking you to respect their culture / religion. I bet your the type that goes on holiday abroad, only speak English and only eat food with chips.

"

Listen to yourself , people of colour

Apologist

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"In not one of the pictures I've seen online of these protests is there a police officer visible."

Could that be because no death threats were made, and no violence occurred, and that Cineworld are just trying to get some free publicity after dropping a film that no one was watching?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OXBOXEDMan
over a year ago

Uxbridge

In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

I’m not blaming anybody. I just want to know the thought process behind making this depiction in film?

It’s like Charlie Hebdo publishing a picture of the Prophet? It’s know to cause offence so why go out your way to do it. Sadly they paid an extreme price for it.

Not blaming anybody? What you are doing is exactly victim blaming. It's like asking why did that woman walk into that dangerous street at night. It's people's rights. They can use their rights in whatever the way they want. As a country, that's the last thing we need to focus on. The main focus should be on why this group that takes offense at everything gets away with getting what they want with threats of violence.

To be honest, I am not surprised that most liberals are resorting to victim blaming because the perpetrators here belong to a religion they love.

Lol me liberal.

I’m debating. Who is the “group” you refer to?

The guy who led these protests is the same guy who was leading protests against LGBT education in Birmingham and calling the school teachers pedos. Liberals stayed silent on both these issues because they would rather fight with JK Rowling for making tweets, looking for weak targets on the internet and acting like they care about the cause instead of opposing groups like these who cause real world damage to these causes.

Liberals staying silent is nothing new the hypocrisy is staggering sometimes (see creepy Joe)

But that’s for another thread. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda"

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is there any specific reporting on the violence etc? I can find verbal attacks .... But that can be a lot of things.

To be clear I condem threats of violence. I am uncomfortable with censorship being dictated by a few.

I ask because the language in the thread isn't quite the same as the details being released.

(I did Google BBC violence Cineworld.... Anyone heard of blue story ?)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OXBOXEDMan
over a year ago

Uxbridge


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people."

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OXBOXEDMan
over a year ago

Uxbridge


"Is there any specific reporting on the violence etc? I can find verbal attacks .... But that can be a lot of things.

To be clear I condem threats of violence. I am uncomfortable with censorship being dictated by a few.

I ask because the language in the thread isn't quite the same as the details being released.

(I did Google BBC violence Cineworld.... Anyone heard of blue story ?)"

Blue story I remember that one attack in one cinema unrelated to the film. Cineworld drop it quickly. Is this a breach of free speech?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is there any specific reporting on the violence etc? I can find verbal attacks .... But that can be a lot of things.

To be clear I condem threats of violence. I am uncomfortable with censorship being dictated by a few.

I ask because the language in the thread isn't quite the same as the details being released.

(I did Google BBC violence Cineworld.... Anyone heard of blue story ?)

Blue story I remember that one attack in one cinema unrelated to the film. Cineworld drop it quickly. Is this a breach of free speech?"
feels similar. no violence, but the hunt was also dropped (by the studio) after public backlash.

Both these passed me by. Is that my bias, or the media's? I suspect a bit of both ...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh look, an old white guy getting upset because people of colour are asking you to respect their culture / religion. I bet your the type that goes on holiday abroad, only speak English and only eat food with chips.

Listen to yourself , people of colour

Apologist "

You seem to not like colour much do you!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists."

The film hasn’t been banned

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What's been pulled

His gammon gland

Really ?

"

Really lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m"

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

The film hasn’t been banned "

It has been taken down from a theatre because of intimidation by a mob.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Depicting the prophet or his family is asking for these type of problems. So whilst I’m against violent protest and threats you have to kind of ask what were they thinking bringing this project to life?

Strange old state of affairs when you look at who backed this film. Very puzzling.

There are so many film projects which I don't care about and have no clue what they were trying to do. I don't think it's right to blame them. They made a film with their own money with perfectly legal means. They believed that this country would support their freedom of expression. But alas, the country respects a bunch of mobsters over artists.

The film hasn’t been banned

It has been taken down from a theatre because of intimidation by a mob."

You can still watch it else where,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection? "

Why would you do that ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Well I can see it’s going no where, so at least we can agree that this type of stuff shouldn’t be happening. Dunno what your other points are, or if you had any, or if your just playing devils advocate

But I think it’s fair to say everyone agrees that violence to push an agenda doesn’t belong in the UK "
It wont go anywhere mate just round and round in circles, ive give up engaging as you never get a sensible debate.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ? "

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Funny story. I emailed Cineworld to cancel my unlimited subscription. Got a response that there is high volume of requests today and they need some time to respond. Going by reactions on social media, I guess they are going to lose lots of customers.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reading up a bit more about this film, I have gleaned the following. It hasn't been banned everywhere, just a few cinemas where protesting has taken place and staff have been intimidated and threatened. It was made by a group of four producers, all Shia muslims. The main complaint about it is that it was made following the minority Shia's view of events in the Koran, and the majority Sunni muslims are the ones who say it's blasphemous and want it banned. So, it's basically religious in-fighting between the two sects of the same religion, but the protestors are targeting the cinemas where it was being shown. Citing "protection of staff", these cinemas have stopped showing it, but it can still be seen elsewhere.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ustintime69Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"Well I can see it’s going no where, so at least we can agree that this type of stuff shouldn’t be happening. Dunno what your other points are, or if you had any, or if your just playing devils advocate

But I think it’s fair to say everyone agrees that violence to push an agenda doesn’t belong in the UK It wont go anywhere mate just round and round in circles, ive give up engaging as you never get a sensible debate. "

OMG Costa, I actually find myself agreeing with you on this!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny story. I emailed Cineworld to cancel my unlimited subscription. Got a response that there is high volume of requests today and they need some time to respond. Going by reactions on social media, I guess they are going to lose lots of customers."

Of course they did

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools."

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? "

My motivation is to show people that religion is a silly concept and we need to move forward from it as a society. If you disagree, it's totally fine and you can show your disagreement without using violence or threat of violence. But I have the right to not give heed to your disagreement and continue making the jokes.

Yes. We can make fun of anything as long as people can opt out of it. You don't like the content of a film? You can just not watch it. If you don't like the jokes a comedian makes? Don't go to his shows. You don't like a tweet I make about your religion? Block me or even report me to twitter. They will take it down if it's against their rules. It's not like I am on hyde park shouting stuff at people who don't want to hear it and can't opt out of it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion "
there’s a shock lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ovebjs OP   Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"Oh look, an old white guy getting upset because people of colour are asking you to respect their culture / religion. I bet your the type that goes on holiday abroad, only speak English and only eat food with chips.

Listen to yourself , people of colour

Apologist

You seem to not like colour much do you!!"

I best tell my other half then, she’s not white

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OXBOXEDMan
over a year ago

Uxbridge


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ?

My motivation is to show people that religion is a silly concept and we need to move forward from it as a society. If you disagree, it's totally fine and you can show your disagreement without using violence or threat of violence. But I have the right to not give heed to your disagreement and continue making the jokes.

Yes. We can make fun of anything as long as people can opt out of it. You don't like the content of a film? You can just not watch it. If you don't like the jokes a comedian makes? Don't go to his shows. You don't like a tweet I make about your religion? Block me or even report me to twitter. They will take it down if it's against their rules. It's not like I am on hyde park shouting stuff at people who don't want to hear it and can't opt out of it."

everyone has the right to express themselves, but you can never be safe, if you don’t know the audience. I can insult somebody’s child based on their disability. Some may laugh, some may punch me in the face. The latter is criminal act of assault but that person did it anyways. Both reactions are valid.

Freedom of speech does not safeguard from individual’s actions. Freedom of speech gives the ability to not be criminalise for it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Id say in principal, we shouldn't back down in the face of threats of violence but understand why.

That said, noone should threats of violence to get there way. And should be condemned if they did.

There is a grey area where sufficient angry people feel threatening. Even if they are not. It's like walking through a group of football fans or past a "gang" of kids on their bikes. And knowing this, you can create implicit threats without saying anything. Or just from shouting.

I still am not sure where this all sits.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? "
yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?"

People who voted for brexit don't seem to like being made fun of.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol. "

Look at this distraction over here.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here."

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?"

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

People who voted for brexit don't seem to like being made fun of.

"
you mean members of your family and work mates and friends lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? "
if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

People who voted for brexit don't seem to like being made fun of.

you mean members of your family and work mates and friends lol"

No one at my work voted for brexit. My friends all understand the EU. And I have some dodgy family that I don't really speak to much anyway.

But no, I specifically meant people here who think Brexit is a good idea. They're extremely sensitive about it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? "

Did you know it was commonly known as Union Jack when it was flown at sea and union flag when on shore.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? "

Judging from the number of upside-down flags that I've seen over the past few days, very few people have any respect for the flag.

The only people that care about that sort of thing are pedants, who would know that it isn't called the Union Jack, unless it's on a jack staff.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol "

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

People who voted for brexit don't seem to like being made fun of.

"

Does anyone like being made fun of?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ?

Judging from the number of upside-down flags that I've seen over the past few days, very few people have any respect for the flag.

The only people that care about that sort of thing are pedants, who would know that it isn't called the Union Jack, unless it's on a jack staff."

They’d also fail the Britishness test . Lol And went to Rwanda haha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?"

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ?

Judging from the number of upside-down flags that I've seen over the past few days, very few people have any respect for the flag.

The only people that care about that sort of thing are pedants, who would know that it isn't called the Union Jack, unless it's on a jack staff."

A will have to replace the Union Jack with the St George’s flag then

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ? "

I ment Boo ‘god save the queen’

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ? "
we where talking about groups who protest whereby we and who the hell thinks people who are disabled are silly which groups are these ? Coz me on answer my question where do you draw the line do you think it’s ok to protest and threaten people over a movie ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government."

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance."

I’m amused people are bothered and butt hurt haha.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I’m amused people are bothered and butt hurt haha. "

Butt hurt about what?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ? we where talking about groups who protest whereby we and who the hell thinks people who are disabled are silly which groups are these ? Coz me on answer my question where do you draw the line do you think it’s ok to protest and threaten people over a movie ?"

I bet you have no idea what the movie is about and you have absolutely no idea why they won’t it banned?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance."
exactly they can’t help it tho if it was there kids who worked there then they would be more than upset

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance."

Lol. Steady!

I was poking fun at the other person for saying it's okay to poke fun at people. Because they're notoriously sensitive about being a Brexit supporter.

I'm well aware this issue has nothing to do with partygate or brexit.

I have no idea what you think my agenda is, or why you're so annoyed about what it is that you imagine my agenda to be.

Top work.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance."

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ? we where talking about groups who protest whereby we and who the hell thinks people who are disabled are silly which groups are these ? Coz me on answer my question where do you draw the line do you think it’s ok to protest and threaten people over a movie ?

I bet you have no idea what the movie is about and you have absolutely no idea why they won’t it banned? "

Want

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"In the UK, protests and petitions are normal right? Companies and organisations reacting to it is normal as well. I read through this about violence and threats but none of this has been reported in the UK.

Seems like people want to pedal the violent Muslim agenda

All reports claim that the staff were intimidated. I don't think there is an agenda. You just have to look at number of stand up comedians and teachers who need police protection because they made a joke or a drawing that offended some people.

The agenda of a protest is to intimidate with a large mass of people to get the message across. That’s not violent.

The talk of police protection towards teachers and comedians usually come from online trolls who make threat on their lives.

The issue isn’t the same here.

But I will say cineworld is a family environment to be enjoy without the need of angry upset people. If angry people are standing at the door, children won’t come in to see that new marvel movie.

It makes sense to drop a mid revenue film,m

The agenda or a protest is to peacefully send a message across. Intimidation is wrong.

Are you seriously saying that there is no threat for someone who paints that picture or makes a joke about Prophet? If I make a joke about Prophet or sell a painting in public, do you think I can stay safe for the rest of my life without needing police protection?

Why would you do that ?

Because we live in a country where we have rights to criticise ideas and I personally find religion to be one of the worst ideas that has been conceived by humans. So I have the right to make fun of it without having to worry about my safety. If people were afraid of offending others, we would not be teaching evolution in schools.

So what would be your motivation here? Where do you draw the line, are you free to ‘make fun’ out of anything ? yes why not like you say it’s fun why should religion not be made fun of ? Where do you draw the line then ?

Do you think it’s ok the burn the Union Jack because people think a flag is silly ? if that floats there boat mate do you burn any flags ?

Are you bothered about people who boo the British national anthem, because they think it’s silly? Or maybe laugh at and make fun of people who are disabled , because they think they are silly ? we where talking about groups who protest whereby we and who the hell thinks people who are disabled are silly which groups are these ? Coz me on answer my question where do you draw the line do you think it’s ok to protest and threaten people over a movie ?

I bet you have no idea what the movie is about and you have absolutely no idea why they won’t it banned? "
only what I read on here I’m not arsed about any movie I’m talking about protests and threats I always answer your questions your not so keen to answer others mate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests, "

THREATS of violence. FFS.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS."

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest "
do you support the right to show the movie aswell ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest do you support the right to show the movie aswell ?"

Yes and I support Cineworld in their decision to stop showing it, the film hasn’t been banned , just like you support the right of people to burn the flag of st George and boo the national anthem

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest "

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures "

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest do you support the right to show the movie aswell ?

Yes and I support Cineworld in their decision to stop showing it, the film hasn’t been banned , just like you support the right of people to burn the flag of st George and boo the national anthem "
anyone who boos and burns flags and protests are just arseholes who don’t have a life to be honest

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest do you support the right to show the movie aswell ?

Yes and I support Cineworld in their decision to stop showing it, the film hasn’t been banned , just like you support the right of people to burn the flag of st George and boo the national anthem anyone who boos and burns flags and protests are just arseholes who don’t have a life to be honest "

Really, but they might think waving flags is ‘silly’ and something to be mocked ? Surely that’s ok?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest do you support the right to show the movie aswell ?

Yes and I support Cineworld in their decision to stop showing it, the film hasn’t been banned , just like you support the right of people to burn the flag of st George and boo the national anthem anyone who boos and burns flags and protests are just arseholes who don’t have a life to be honest

Really, but they might think waving flags is ‘silly’ and something to be mocked ? Surely that’s ok? "
what ever floats there boat aslong as it’s peaceful like I said ares holes

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted? "

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”"

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted "

So, you're a punish rather than prevent kind of guy. Ok.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted

So, you're a punish rather than prevent kind of guy. Ok."

No, I am the innocent until proven guilty kind of guy

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted

So, you're a punish rather than prevent kind of guy. Ok."
he sounds that way to me

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted

So, you're a punish rather than prevent kind of guy. Ok. he sounds that way to me "

I am the innocent until proven guilty type of guy, that is how the law works in England

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo"

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, "
if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our human rights are being taken from us by the government and people upset by a straight dvd movie that you had no interest seeing lol.

Look at this distraction over here.

You’re clearly distracted . Bigger pitch mate. Think about it . Lol

I'm with you, I'm making fun of people who suddenly feel passionate about a movie not being shown in one cinema chain. Same people who don't care about billions of £ of public money being handed to friends and neighbors of the government.

Read the thread properly. People aren't feeling passionate about the movie, they're expressing concern over the protests and threats of violence against the innocent people who work in the cinemas. Not everything is a brexit or partygate issue, no matter how much you want it to be. Perhaps you should stop trying to push your agenda into threads where it has no relevance.

I haven’t seen any evidence of violence at these protests,

THREATS of violence. FFS.

I haven’t seen any ‘threats of violence’ FFS, unless shouting is now a threat of violence? Anyone using or threatening violence should be prosecuted but I will support their right to protest

How can you possibly "see" threats of violence on a news story? Try reading the articles instead of just looking at the pictures

I have read the ‘stories’ I have watched the video clips, has anyone been arrested? Prosecuted?

Not as far as I'm aware - yet. Would you prefer violence against innocent people happens first to prove to you that a threat exists? The cinema owners who are actually in the position to gauge this have said

“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of The Lady of Heaven, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.”

No, I want the people who have committed a ‘crime’ to be arrested and prosecuted

So, you're a punish rather than prevent kind of guy. Ok. he sounds that way to me

I am the innocent until proven guilty type of guy, that is how the law works in England "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match "

Show me evidence of any threats,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, "

My quote was from the Independent. That's where most of these "certain" people hang out these days.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 09/06/22 16:14:16]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats, "
if you read I said IF

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Here's a quote from one of those "certain" news sources:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cineworld-prophet-muhammad-fatima-lady-of-heaven-b2096633.html

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats, if you read I said IF "

He seems to have a "selective reading" problem

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats, "

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion "

Protest is fine. Nobody should expect to have the film banned though. Cineworld's decision to screen or no, but it is cleared by the BBFC, who apply the actual criteria for certification.

Threat's of violence not acceptable. If in person then police should have been involved immediately. Also if communicated.

Were they credible threat's or a convenient pretext? Would they have done the same thing if this happened with a blockbuster rather than a film likely to have a small audience?

The irony is that this film will now have a vastly broader viewership, so the militancy will be self-defeating

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *othin 2 proveCouple
over a year ago

Blackpool


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it . "
...... Yes the Jewish community do seem to be getting a raw deal and very hard time!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

Protest is fine. Nobody should expect to have the film banned though. Cineworld's decision to screen or no, but it is cleared by the BBFC, who apply the actual criteria for certification.

Threat's of violence not acceptable. If in person then police should have been involved immediately. Also if communicated.

Were they credible threat's or a convenient pretext? Would they have done the same thing if this happened with a blockbuster rather than a film likely to have a small audience?

The irony is that this film will now have a vastly broader viewership, so the militancy will be self-defeating "
yes your probably right I agree with you for once

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"So they have now bowed to protests and pulled the movie from all uk theatres.

So much for what they call a tolerant religion

Protest is fine. Nobody should expect to have the film banned though. Cineworld's decision to screen or no, but it is cleared by the BBFC, who apply the actual criteria for certification.

Threat's of violence not acceptable. If in person then police should have been involved immediately. Also if communicated.

Were they credible threat's or a convenient pretext? Would they have done the same thing if this happened with a blockbuster rather than a film likely to have a small audience?

The irony is that this film will now have a vastly broader viewership, so the militancy will be self-defeating yes your probably right I agree with you for once "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Here's a quote from one of those "certain" news sources:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cineworld-prophet-muhammad-fatima-lady-of-heaven-b2096633.html"

Death threats are different imo to the protests. They should be taken seriously and prosecuted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it . ...... Yes the Jewish community do seem to be getting a raw deal and very hard time!"

Western ‘Christian’s’ sadly have murdered and incinerated more Jews then any Muslims in history. And majority of antisemitism continues from this group of people.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Here's a quote from one of those "certain" news sources:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cineworld-prophet-muhammad-fatima-lady-of-heaven-b2096633.html"

That article says that the producer of the film has received death threats. It also quotes him as saying "I don’t worry about it – it’s just empty threats".

There are no claims of any threats made to Cineworld, just a statement that "Cineworld said it feared for the safety of its workers".

If that article is accurate, there were no threats and no violence at the Cineworld protests.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *othin 2 proveCouple
over a year ago

Blackpool


" Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it . ...... Yes the Jewish community do seem to be getting a raw deal and very hard time!

Western ‘Christian’s’ sadly have murdered and incinerated more Jews then any Muslims in history. And majority of antisemitism continues from this group of people.

"
Yes you are right about past history but I'm talking here and now, there have been several attacks on jews in London and very vicious but they don't make the headlines, but if it's a white guy called john smith then obviously it will be headline news and will be forever talked about.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Here's a quote from one of those "certain" news sources:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cineworld-prophet-muhammad-fatima-lady-of-heaven-b2096633.html

That article says that the producer of the film has received death threats. It also quotes him as saying "I don’t worry about it – it’s just empty threats".

There are no claims of any threats made to Cineworld, just a statement that "Cineworld said it feared for the safety of its workers".

If that article is accurate, there were no threats and no violence at the Cineworld protests."

Ah, because the producer doesn't take the death threats seriously, they don't matter? Alright mate, good one. The article also says "“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of ‘The Lady of Heaven’, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.” So, do you think they're just making up these "incidents"? It's probably just because they're all racist brexiters innit eh?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Here's a quote from one of those "certain" news sources:-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cineworld-prophet-muhammad-fatima-lady-of-heaven-b2096633.html"


"That article says that the producer of the film has received death threats. It also quotes him as saying "I don’t worry about it – it’s just empty threats".

There are no claims of any threats made to Cineworld, just a statement that "Cineworld said it feared for the safety of its workers".

If that article is accurate, there were no threats and no violence at the Cineworld protests."


"Ah, because the producer doesn't take the death threats seriously, they don't matter? ."

No, they don't matter to this discussion because we're talking about protests outside Cineworld cinemas. Death threats received by the producer have nothing to do with Cineworld's decision.


"The article also says "“Due to recent incidents related to screenings of ‘The Lady of Heaven’, we have made the decision to cancel upcoming screenings of the film nationwide to ensure the safety of our staff and customers.” So, do you think they're just making up these "incidents"?"

If there were any 'incidents', the writer of the article has been remarkably lax in failing to mention them. It's almost as if he just read the press release and didn't actually do any investigation.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it . "

Dare they admit openly. Rather tip toe in the darker shadows.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it . "

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians."
and were the people protesting this level of fanatic?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians.and were the people protesting this level of fanatic?"

You'd have to ask them that, not me. Best of luck

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians.and were the people protesting this level of fanatic?

You'd have to ask them that, not me. Best of luck "
Id have hoped the journalist did before printing stories ... No luck there !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians.and were the people protesting this level of fanatic?

You'd have to ask them that, not me. Best of luck Id have hoped the journalist did before printing stories ... No luck there !

"

It was in the Independent. They're not famous for accuracy, truth or for properly researching their articles. This is why the rag is popular with certain types who aren't really interested in the truth. A bit like the Daily Heil - two sides of the same coin.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Protests can turn violent. One could imagine an imposing faction turning up for their own protest

Therefore Cineworld could have put out that statement even if there were no threats of violence at the time.

There are some leaps being made without much evidence. It doesn't mean it didn't happen (to cover myself if vids do appear) but as yet .. its unfounded imo

Exactly, we know why ‘certain’ people and ‘certain’ news papers have jumped all over this, if there have been threats isn’t it right that they jump all over this tho ? Or should we talk about burning flags and booing at a match

Show me evidence of any threats,

Some people have a predisposition to look for an excuse to hate on certain minority groups. I wish they’d just admit to it .

I'll openly admit that I hate all religious fanatics whose response to questioning their doctrine is the use of threats, intimidation and the mass murder of innocent civilians.and were the people protesting this level of fanatic?

You'd have to ask them that, not me. Best of luck Id have hoped the journalist did before printing stories ... No luck there !

It was in the Independent. They're not famous for accuracy, truth or for properly researching their articles. This is why the rag is popular with certain types who aren't really interested in the truth. A bit like the Daily Heil - two sides of the same coin. "
no-one has done the legwork TBF. Some have made bigger meals of it than others tho... Much like this thread!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"It was in the Independent. They're not famous for accuracy, truth or for properly researching their articles."

So why did you post it if you thought it was of poor quality?

And why have you been defending it?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was in the Independent. They're not famous for accuracy, truth or for properly researching their articles."

So why did you post it if you thought it was of poor quality?

And why have you been defending it?"

To be honest, it was the first of many articles of many I found. Also, had I quoted the daily mail, the usual morons would just waste space arguing the toss about the source, not the story. It happens on here a lot

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top