FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Jeremy Corbyn…

Jump to newest
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West

What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9alMan
over a year ago

Bridgend

All four have got a lot worse under the conservatives, if we had got Jeremy in power things would be much better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West


"All four have got a lot worse under the conservatives, if we had got Jeremy in power things would be much better "

Why do you think that? On what basis have you formed your opinion?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
over a year ago

dudley


"All four have got a lot worse under the conservatives, if we had got Jeremy in power things would be much better "

I doubt he would be facing public and police scrutiny there would be no partygate or hypocrisy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"All four have got a lot worse under the conservatives, if we had got Jeremy in power things would be much better

I doubt he would be facing public and police scrutiny there would be no partygate or hypocrisy. "

He wouldn't have given billions in public money to his mates PPE start up businesses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West

Here is what I think.

The final Brexit deal would not have been anything like as economically damaging as the one presented by Johnson. It would not have left N Ireland in limbo and ultimately would have probably been a compromise that would have been better for U.K. because it would not have resulted in the perpetual warring that we have had since “Brexit got done.”

Corbyn would also not have wasted and/or spent countless £billions on outsourced private procurement and service companies. The vast majority of the money would have been funnelled through the NHS so that at the end of the pandemic the NHS would have been in a better position than it was before and with excess capacity to repurpose for regular NHS services.

Jeremy Corbyn would probably not have got involved in the types of aggressive culture wars that are seemingly being created and promoted by the Johnson Government. Therefore I think that society as a whole would be less dramatic, calmer and pleasant.

Jeremy Corbyn would have ( at worst) taxed the energy companies on their windfall profits and would probably because of the current situation be pushing a Nationalisation agenda for energy. As his Brexit deal would have been less damaging, the supply chain/delay/border barrier issues would probably not have been anything like they are now. All told, the cost of living crisis would not likely have been as bad under Jeremy Corbyn as we have now.

So on those points I would think that a Corbyn Government would have been better for Britain and better for British people than what we have actually experienced.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Champagne socialist wanker! No thanks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Here is what I think.

The final Brexit deal would not have been anything like as economically damaging as the one presented by Johnson. It would not have left N Ireland in limbo and ultimately would have probably been a compromise that would have been better for U.K. because it would not have resulted in the perpetual warring that we have had since “Brexit got done.”

Corbyn would also not have wasted and/or spent countless £billions on outsourced private procurement and service companies. The vast majority of the money would have been funnelled through the NHS so that at the end of the pandemic the NHS would have been in a better position than it was before and with excess capacity to repurpose for regular NHS services.

Jeremy Corbyn would probably not have got involved in the types of aggressive culture wars that are seemingly being created and promoted by the Johnson Government. Therefore I think that society as a whole would be less dramatic, calmer and pleasant.

Jeremy Corbyn would have ( at worst) taxed the energy companies on their windfall profits and would probably because of the current situation be pushing a Nationalisation agenda for energy. As his Brexit deal would have been less damaging, the supply chain/delay/border barrier issues would probably not have been anything like they are now. All told, the cost of living crisis would not likely have been as bad under Jeremy Corbyn as we have now.

So on those points I would think that a Corbyn Government would have been better for Britain and better for British people than what we have actually experienced. "

I'd agree with all that.

He might have made progress on renewable energy too, moving us further towards energy independence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Champagne socialist wanker! No thanks "

Ah the likes of the Mail found fertile ground in you...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living"

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter "

The impressive thing is the certainty with which you say something that is utter bullshit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter "

More so than Boris?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Corbyn has actually been critical of Putin for years.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/fact-check-no-politician-has-been-more-consistent-about-putin-than-corbyn-315752/

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living"

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave."

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ixi n DogCouple
over a year ago

Pembrokeshire


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave."

you do realise it's virtually impossible to go bankrupt as a country when said country owns a bank that prints as much currency as the government sees fit? Government budgeting is nothing more than an attempt in accounting to balance the sheets with figures that based on nothing tangible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here

1st of all you would have to wait for him to get of the fence, then umpteen committee meetings, on deciding how to tackle a given issue, all over coffee and biscuits( From his wife's coffee business).

They would then have meetings on what was discussed at the meeting to decide when to have the next meeting all while Rome burns or in our case the UK.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions? "

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"you do realise it's virtually impossible to go bankrupt as a country when said country owns a bank that prints as much currency as the government sees fit? Government budgeting is nothing more than an attempt in accounting to balance the sheets with figures that based on nothing tangible. "

This would be the worst part of a Corbyn Britain. He's a follower of Richard Murphy's version of Modern Monetary Theory, which says that we should just print money if we need it, and then tax it back if inflation gets too high.

Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years. He would right now be printing more billions to cover energy bills and keep the cost of living down. By the end of his term Britain would have rampant inflation, and we'd all have a huge tax burden to 'correct' the issue.

It's easily possible to go bankrupt as a country if other countries start to wonder if the pound is really as stable as it used to be. Printing money whenever you feel like it will knock confidence in the international markets, and soon we'll find ourselves with a currency that can't be used for international trade.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9alMan
over a year ago

Bridgend


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there. "

we seem to be heading towards a police state with the present lot curbs on peaceful protests & police investigations hanging over leading politicians

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there.

we seem to be heading towards a police state with the present lot curbs on peaceful protests & police investigations hanging over leading politicians "

Just a levelling up of the past 50 years where the minority have to much say, and how we ended up a woke country, long over due.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there."

Maybe you could point out which of Corbyns policies were "far left" and how they would lead to a policed state.

And maybe explain why you think he's further to the left of Sweden or Norway (non-policed left run countries).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"you do realise it's virtually impossible to go bankrupt as a country when said country owns a bank that prints as much currency as the government sees fit? Government budgeting is nothing more than an attempt in accounting to balance the sheets with figures that based on nothing tangible.

This would be the worst part of a Corbyn Britain. He's a follower of Richard Murphy's version of Modern Monetary Theory, which says that we should just print money if we need it, and then tax it back if inflation gets too high.

Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years. He would right now be printing more billions to cover energy bills and keep the cost of living down. By the end of his term Britain would have rampant inflation, and we'd all have a huge tax burden to 'correct' the issue.

It's easily possible to go bankrupt as a country if other countries start to wonder if the pound is really as stable as it used to be. Printing money whenever you feel like it will knock confidence in the international markets, and soon we'll find ourselves with a currency that can't be used for international trade."

Bizarre.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?"

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?"

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties."

No they are not at all, hypothetical on your be half, he also sat on the fence during Brexit so much so they are still pulling splinters out of his arse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties."

Are they? corbyn has been anti eu since day one so dont know why you are saying that? no idea why you say he would have put more money in you are just surmising.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

"

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties.Are they? corbyn has been anti eu since day one so dont know why you are saying that? no idea why you say he would have put more money in you are just surmising."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here. "

Now that i can believe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ixi n DogCouple
over a year ago

Pembrokeshire


"you do realise it's virtually impossible to go bankrupt as a country when said country owns a bank that prints as much currency as the government sees fit? Government budgeting is nothing more than an attempt in accounting to balance the sheets with figures that based on nothing tangible.

This would be the worst part of a Corbyn Britain. He's a follower of Richard Murphy's version of Modern Monetary Theory, which says that we should just print money if we need it, and then tax it back if inflation gets too high.

Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years. He would right now be printing more billions to cover energy bills and keep the cost of living down. By the end of his term Britain would have rampant inflation, and we'd all have a huge tax burden to 'correct' the issue.

It's easily possible to go bankrupt as a country if other countries start to wonder if the pound is really as stable as it used to be. Printing money whenever you feel like it will knock confidence in the international markets, and soon we'll find ourselves with a currency that can't be used for international trade."

we've been printing money hand over foot since the financial crisis of 2006!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"you do realise it's virtually impossible to go bankrupt as a country when said country owns a bank that prints as much currency as the government sees fit? Government budgeting is nothing more than an attempt in accounting to balance the sheets with figures that based on nothing tangible.

This would be the worst part of a Corbyn Britain. He's a follower of Richard Murphy's version of Modern Monetary Theory, which says that we should just print money if we need it, and then tax it back if inflation gets too high.

Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years. He would right now be printing more billions to cover energy bills and keep the cost of living down. By the end of his term Britain would have rampant inflation, and we'd all have a huge tax burden to 'correct' the issue.

It's easily possible to go bankrupt as a country if other countries start to wonder if the pound is really as stable as it used to be. Printing money whenever you feel like it will knock confidence in the international markets, and soon we'll find ourselves with a currency that can't be used for international trade. we've been printing money hand over foot since the financial crisis of 2006! "

And remind us all who was in government at the time ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Corbyn loved: Russia, Venezuela, Iran.

Corbyn hated: Britain, USA, EU.

I wonder what he would have done in Government?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here. "

Yes you explained that you were confused about his stance on brexit. Not sure how that's related.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Corbyn loved: Russia, Venezuela, Iran.

Corbyn hated: Britain, USA, EU.

I wonder what he would have done in Government? "

You know, just saying random stuff, doesn't make it true.

Mongolians are allergic to raspberries.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here.

Yes you explained that you were confused about his stance on brexit. Not sure how that's related."

No not at all he didn't want to be part of the EU but sat on the fence, the man is a complete wanker.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here.

Yes you explained that you were confused about his stance on brexit. Not sure how that's related.

No not at all he didn't want to be part of the EU but sat on the fence, the man is a complete wanker. "

He's a wanker for not wanting to be a part of the EU?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there.

we seem to be heading towards a police state with the present lot curbs on peaceful protests & police investigations hanging over leading politicians

Just a levelling up of the past 50 years where the minority have to much say, and how we ended up a woke country, long over due. "

‘The minority have to much to say’, when did this happen? I want real examples, not stuff you have imagined or read in the daily mail

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hybloke67Man
over a year ago

ROMFORD


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living"

He sat on the fence about Brexit so IMO he would have said the UK would have a second referendum in the new year to decide the outcome. But Covid hit the world therefore stopping the public from going to the voting stations so effectively the UK would still be in limbo and still in the EU.

So with that in mind we would have been in the EU vaccination programme. The UK wouldn't have helped develop the AstraZeneca vaccine or fund any other vaccines.

Labour would have installed stronger and longer lockdowns as well. The economy would basically be fucked and businesses wouldn't have received any furlow meaning many went under.

As Labour is now saying PPE procurement processes were not followed correctly we wouldn't of received any PPE till the full six month process was followed meaning PPE starts to arrive in September 2020. Result of which would be many many more UK deaths.

No private companies like Dyson developing ventiators as Labour don't like private companies. Even more lives lost.

Doesn't matter how much money you through at the NHS it's always going to waste it. It needs reform from the top downwards. That doesn't mean privatisation, just needs to clean up its act.

The Public will be completely pissed of because of ever lasting lockdowns and remoaners harping on about staying in the EU.!

The UK wouldn't have done anything to help Ukraine because one still being in the EU they haven't done much at all, two Corbyn is communist and a terrorist sympathiser and three the Ukraine president is Jewish and we all know what Corbyn thinks of Jewish people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here.

Yes you explained that you were confused about his stance on brexit. Not sure how that's related.

No not at all he didn't want to be part of the EU but sat on the fence, the man is a complete wanker.

He's a wanker for not wanting to be a part of the EU?"

No just a wanker full stop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there.

we seem to be heading towards a police state with the present lot curbs on peaceful protests & police investigations hanging over leading politicians

Just a levelling up of the past 50 years where the minority have to much say, and how we ended up a woke country, long over due.

‘The minority have to much to say’, when did this happen? I want real examples, not stuff you have imagined or read in the daily mail "

Go back to the 60s

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Indeed. It's just speculation.

I speculate that he wouldn't have given billions of tax payers money to his friends and neighbors for their PPE start up companies during the pandemic.

No by the time he had made a decision, it would have been to late, read my previous post on here.

Yes you explained that you were confused about his stance on brexit. Not sure how that's related.

No not at all he didn't want to be part of the EU but sat on the fence, the man is a complete wanker.

He's a wanker for not wanting to be a part of the EU?

No just a wanker full stop."

Oh. So nothing to do with anything.

Sterling work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter

The impressive thing is the certainty with which you say something that is utter bullshit."

Yea ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

He sat on the fence about Brexit so IMO he would have said the UK would have a second referendum in the new year to decide the outcome. But Covid hit the world therefore stopping the public from going to the voting stations so effectively the UK would still be in limbo and still in the EU.

So with that in mind we would have been in the EU vaccination programme. The UK wouldn't have helped develop the AstraZeneca vaccine or fund any other vaccines.

Labour would have installed stronger and longer lockdowns as well. The economy would basically be fucked and businesses wouldn't have received any furlow meaning many went under.

As Labour is now saying PPE procurement processes were not followed correctly we wouldn't of received any PPE till the full six month process was followed meaning PPE starts to arrive in September 2020. Result of which would be many many more UK deaths.

No private companies like Dyson developing ventiators as Labour don't like private companies. Even more lives lost.

Doesn't matter how much money you through at the NHS it's always going to waste it. It needs reform from the top downwards. That doesn't mean privatisation, just needs to clean up its act.

The Public will be completely pissed of because of ever lasting lockdowns and remoaners harping on about staying in the EU.!

The UK wouldn't have done anything to help Ukraine because one still being in the EU they haven't done much at all, two Corbyn is communist and a terrorist sympathiser and three the Ukraine president is Jewish and we all know what Corbyn thinks of Jewish people.

"

This is like an episode of Dr Who, but if Richard Littlejohn had written it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter

More so than Boris?"

Is boris a Putin supporter?

I think your confused

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here

As always the topic goes stupid im out of here .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

I don’t think things would have been any better considering what’s gone on worldwide in the last few years.

But I do think he would have been fighting the rest of the government on helping out Ukraine as we all know he’s a Putin supporter

More so than Boris?

Is boris a Putin supporter?

I think your confused "

Boris is keen on Putin, has financial ties with russian oligarchs.

Aside from in your Corbyn fantasies, what, in the real world, has he got to do with Putin?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave.

Fancy expanding on how you came to those conclusions?

Simples. Every far left country in history has ended up as a basket case police state. Go to Carracas and ask the starving people there.

we seem to be heading towards a police state with the present lot curbs on peaceful protests & police investigations hanging over leading politicians

Just a levelling up of the past 50 years where the minority have to much say, and how we ended up a woke country, long over due.

‘The minority have to much to say’, when did this happen? I want real examples, not stuff you have imagined or read in the daily mail

Go back to the 60s "

Eh? What happened in the 60s? Are you always this confused?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties.

No they are not at all, hypothetical on your be half, he also sat on the fence during Brexit so much so they are still pulling splinters out of his arse. "

So you think we wouldn’t be in a post-Brexit economic catastrophe had Corbyn won because we would still be in transition and therefore protected from what has actually unfolded?

Are you one of the 17% who according to yougov think that Brexit is going well?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"we've been printing money hand over foot since the financial crisis of 2006! "

That's true, but we've been doing it the old fashioned "Standard Economic Theory" way, of issuing bonds. That method has the advantage of being reversible simply by allowing the bonds to mature.

The MMT way of doing it is to just print more money when you need it, and then remove the money by taxation when necessary. This has the mild flaw of assuming that people will happily pay the higher taxes, and won't just vote out the tax-raisers for someone else.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"

Go back to the 60s "

I loved every minute of them. You must have been a bit too young to have enjoyed them fully!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
over a year ago

nr faversham


"Who knows what he would have done and what the outcome would have been?

Well you could say that. But….

He wouldn’t have negotiated an ideologically damaging Brexit and he would have put money into the NHS in the pandemic.

Those are absolute certainties.

No they are not at all, hypothetical on your be half, he also sat on the fence during Brexit so much so they are still pulling splinters out of his arse.

So you think we wouldn’t be in a post-Brexit economic catastrophe had Corbyn won because we would still be in transition and therefore protected from what has actually unfolded?

Are you one of the 17% who according to yougov think that Brexit is going well?"

Always comes back to Brexit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right. "

The lunatics have the resources, money, and media behind them.

I can't see any hope for a brighter future. We're still racing towards a more divided society with an ever increasing gap between the haves and the have nots.

The Tories are winning, British people are losing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Corbin, the racist piece of trash and thieving bastard as PM? No way!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Corbin, the racist piece of trash and thieving bastard as PM? No way!!!"

What's your method for determining the good racists from the racists you disapprove of?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

"

Thriving bastard? I thought thriving would be a positive

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

I meant thieving (my auto text)!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

"

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

No, I really do hate Labour and lefties!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right.

The lunatics have the resources, money, and media behind them.

I can't see any hope for a brighter future. We're still racing towards a more divided society with an ever increasing gap between the haves and the have nots.

The Tories are winning, British people are losing. "

This is what they want you to believe, its a house of cards one concerted push and the whole thing falls over, as long as there is fire in the belly to take a stand at the ballot box that's all you need, Governments answer to us, not the other way around.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties! "

Who are these ‘lefties’ ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties! "

I can believe that. Imagine wanting a political system and policies that benefit people instead of corporations. Total nightmare. Lol.

But the rest of the stuff you posted is beyond wildly inaccurate. You have to be taking the piss, surely not even daily mail readers are that far removed from reality!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties! "

You must really hate living in Slough then? Considering its a Red town.

Slough even the name sounds like some sound you make when your wrenching lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"1st of all you would have to wait for him to get of the fence, then umpteen committee meetings, on deciding how to tackle a given issue, all over coffee and biscuits( From his wife's coffee business).

They would then have meetings on what was discussed at the meeting to decide when to have the next meeting all while Rome burns or in our case the UK. "

But like Boris and the start of Covid then!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right.

The lunatics have the resources, money, and media behind them.

I can't see any hope for a brighter future. We're still racing towards a more divided society with an ever increasing gap between the haves and the have nots.

The Tories are winning, British people are losing.

This is what they want you to believe, its a house of cards one concerted push and the whole thing falls over, as long as there is fire in the belly to take a stand at the ballot box that's all you need, Governments answer to us, not the other way around. "

I'm with you, I always vote. I just don't believe that the current system serves the people, and it's too strong to allow any meaningful change.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties!

You must really hate living in Slough then? Considering its a Red town.

Slough even the name sounds like some sound you make when your wrenching lol"

It is!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties!

You must really hate living in Slough then? Considering its a Red town.

Slough even the name sounds like some sound you make when your wrenching lol

It is!!! "

Why don’t you move then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you! "

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No, I really do hate Labour and lefties!

You must really hate living in Slough then? Considering its a Red town.

Slough even the name sounds like some sound you make when your wrenching lol

It is!!! "

I could here people say it, "I've just Slough'd over the carpet after having one too many'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right.

The lunatics have the resources, money, and media behind them.

I can't see any hope for a brighter future. We're still racing towards a more divided society with an ever increasing gap between the haves and the have nots.

The Tories are winning, British people are losing.

This is what they want you to believe, its a house of cards one concerted push and the whole thing falls over, as long as there is fire in the belly to take a stand at the ballot box that's all you need, Governments answer to us, not the other way around.

I'm with you, I always vote. I just don't believe that the current system serves the people, and it's too strong to allow any meaningful change. "

It’s why PR is such a good thing. Everyone’s vote does actually count and get representation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough. "

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?"

Wishful thinking!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We can speculate on the what ifs, what we should be focusing is on the what nows.

We can tread the same stories, but frankly its not worth replaying the past.

If we are ever going to get the brighter future, we need to be taking back our country from the lunatics vote by vote, in the cities, towns, and villages.

It's doesn't have to be labour, just a coalition of the willing to stop the agenda of the rabid right.

The lunatics have the resources, money, and media behind them.

I can't see any hope for a brighter future. We're still racing towards a more divided society with an ever increasing gap between the haves and the have nots.

The Tories are winning, British people are losing.

This is what they want you to believe, its a house of cards one concerted push and the whole thing falls over, as long as there is fire in the belly to take a stand at the ballot box that's all you need, Governments answer to us, not the other way around.

I'm with you, I always vote. I just don't believe that the current system serves the people, and it's too strong to allow any meaningful change.

It’s why PR is such a good thing. Everyone’s vote does actually count and get representation. "

Well to Get PR you need to vote in the existing system to get the change you want.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking! "

Or is it thinking wishfully? that's daily mail reader for you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!! "

Who are these ‘lefties’

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

"

He failed to deal with anti Semitic behaviour properly.

Why does that make him worse than much more overtly racist types that you seem to support, such as Trump and Boris?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

"

Of course Corbyn was a prick, but labour turned that corner and they won Barnet, so trust has been restored.

We should not also forget the rabid anti-islamic of the Tories either?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

He failed to deal with anti Semitic behaviour properly.

Why does that make him worse than much more overtly racist types that you seem to support, such as Trump and Boris?"

She also loves Putin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking! "

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!"

PMSL,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking!

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant. "

No, I’m an evil cow !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

He failed to deal with anti Semitic behaviour properly.

Why does that make him worse than much more overtly racist types that you seem to support, such as Trump and Boris?

She also loves Putin "

Some would say that Putin isn't a great guy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!! "

What truth? that looking at the pictures in the daily mail (I doubt daily mail readers can read properly, the odd grunt perhaps) makes them informed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking!

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant.

No, I’m an evil cow !!!"

Lol, I don't know if I believe you.

But you did make me laugh properly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!!

What truth? that looking at the pictures in the daily mail (I doubt daily mail readers can read properly, the odd grunt perhaps) makes them informed?"

The same Daily mail that is historically anti semitic

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking!

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant.

No, I’m an evil cow !!!"

What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking!

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant.

No, I’m an evil cow !!!

What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously? "

Tbh, under this government they are given the job of Home Secretary

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!!

What truth? that looking at the pictures in the daily mail (I doubt daily mail readers can read properly, the odd grunt perhaps) makes them informed?

The same Daily mail that is historically anti semitic "

Yes that is true, they are like the Front Nationale of newspapers, they used to be more outwardly racist, now they are less outwardly racist and imply it more though their stories.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously? "

Ah when you have no defence, you go to personal attacks you are losing. Rather pathetic and sad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Corbyn is a c**t.

Is your memory that bad? He was thrown out for his Antisemitic behaviour.

As for a thriving bastards, he wants to take away people’s hard earned money (so no inheritance for kids/grandkids) and take it away from them. Labour? Never!!

Labour can f**k off.

Lol,

I thought you were for real until now.

But you're another who just posts the most ridiculous thing you can think of as a wind up!

Got you!

She reads the Daily Mail twice a day to make sure the brainwashing is thorough.

How can you wash a brain of a daily mail reader, when their brain doesn't exist?

Wishful thinking!

It could be allturistic wishful thinking?

That you're brainwashed into bizarre hateful points of view, rather than being inherently a bad person.

Maybe that's what was meant.

No, I’m an evil cow !!!

What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously?

Tbh, under this government they are given the job of Home Secretary "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously?

Ah when you have no defence, you go to personal attacks you are losing. Rather pathetic and sad. "

Hold on, you called yourself an evil cow,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

When people lose arguments they resort to personal attacks. What a fail!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously?

Ah when you have no defence, you go to personal attacks you are losing. Rather pathetic and sad.

Hold on, you called yourself an evil cow, "

True I didn't write about that you described yourself, I was curious on the aspects of being an evil cow, do they have a lair in a volcano? do they stroke cats whilst planning how to disrupt the worlds milk supply?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"When people lose arguments they resort to personal attacks. What a fail!!"

What argument!, I just want to know about Evil cows now, do they have a society of evil cows, is there a Doctor Evil Cow? does he have cows with fricking laser beams?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!! "

Strange that they have said + written racist things then...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What does and evil cow do? give sour milk and moo insidiously?

Ah when you have no defence, you go to personal attacks you are losing. Rather pathetic and sad.

Hold on, you called yourself an evil cow, "

hahahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!

Strange that they have said + written racist things then..."

Boris and postboxes I think was a bit tongue in cheek but Trump id need convincing ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any way, it's all hypothetical. In reality almost everyone is relieved the old crank has gone back to his allotment and appearing on Russia Today.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!! "

If people aren't even keeping the discussion even vaguely in the bounds of reality, what's the point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if he had become Prime Minister in 2019. What state would the country be in now three years later… and why do you think that?

Let’s stick to four core issues:

1) Public Health Services

2) The economy

3) Societal satisfaction / tensions

4) Cost of living

1) Broke

2) Bankrupt

3) Like Venezuela

4) 1% happy, 99% applying to leave."

the four replies youve give are Great Britain today. Under WEF prime minister Johnson

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!

Strange that they have said + written racist things then...

Boris and postboxes I think was a bit tongue in cheek but Trump id need convincing ?"

You missed Trump? He was all over the news for about five years. Fair play to you for not noticing him, he was everywhere!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Here’s an article from your beloved BBC, for those forgetting Corbyn’s Antisemitic behaviour…

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54730425

“Sir Keir Starmer, who became Labour leader in April, said the publication of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) report had brought "a day of shame" for the party.

It found Labour responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act:

Political interference in anti-Semitism complaints

Failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints

Harassment, including the use of anti-Semitic tropes and suggesting that complaints of anti-Semitism were fake or smears

The EHRC found evidence of 23 instances of "inappropriate involvement" by Mr Corbyn's office.

"

What has this got to do with the OP?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!"

Johnson just loves picaninnies with watermelon smiles

Trump just thinks all Mexicans are rapists

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Lefties - can’t handle the truth!!!

What truth? that looking at the pictures in the daily mail (I doubt daily mail readers can read properly, the odd grunt perhaps) makes them informed?

The same Daily mail that is historically anti semitic "

Hilarious isn’t it. Viscount Rothermere used to write articles in the Daily Heil in support of Mosley and the Black Shirts!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Trump and Boris are NOT racists!!!

Strange that they have said + written racist things then...

Boris and postboxes I think was a bit tongue in cheek but Trump id need convincing ?"

Oh that’s ok then you have any idea how insulting that is? No of course you don’t! Jeez!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealthy_and_HungMan
over a year ago

Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney


"

Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years."

the bank of ingerland has printed 895 bil in the last 12 years of tory government .... what was your point again?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

I find all lefties insulting……

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"I find all lefties insulting…… "

Yeah left handed people are just weird! That’s what you mean yes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

Left wing people…. They are called lefties … or morons

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Left wing people…. They are called lefties … or morons "

So you find lefties insulting and you confirm this by being insulting yourself. You are excelling yourself tonight.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"Left wing people…. They are called lefties … or morons

So you find lefties insulting and you confirm this by being insulting yourself. You are excelling yourself tonight. "

I’m right wing dear.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
over a year ago

nr faversham


"Left wing people…. They are called lefties … or morons

So you find lefties insulting and you confirm this by being insulting yourself. You are excelling yourself tonight.

I’m right wing dear. "

God help you on here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Has Mitzi been banned for insulting herself yet when she called herself an evil cow above? That'd be a fab 1st.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
over a year ago

Gilfach


"Corbyn would have printed billions to cover the COVID years."


"the bank of ingerland has printed 895 bil in the last 12 years of tory government .... what was your point again?"

My point, as I explained above, is that Corbyn would have done the same thing under MMT, misguidedly taking advice from Richard Murphy. That would have involved just printing the money, and then taxing it back when inflation moved above the target. That would have resulted in companies and rich people restructuring their finances to avoid the new taxes, and the poor being hit the hardest.

The Tories, despite their failings, at least printed money the old-fashioned way by using bonds. This allows them to destroy the recently printed money by allowing the bonds to expire and just cancelling the money. Since it's central government cancelling the funds, there's no means for anyone to avoid the issue.

Does that make it clearer for you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Left wing people…. They are called lefties … or morons

So you find lefties insulting and you confirm this by being insulting yourself. You are excelling yourself tonight.

I’m right wing dear. "

Yes and my comment missed both wings and flew right over your head dear.

If you’re an example of a right wing thinker no wonder the country is in such a mess.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough


"Has Mitzi been banned for insulting herself yet when she called herself an evil cow above? That'd be a fab 1st."

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Has Mitzi been banned for insulting herself yet when she called herself an evil cow above? That'd be a fab 1st.

No"

You should report yourself for insulting yourself then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Has Mitzi been banned for insulting herself yet when she called herself an evil cow above? That'd be a fab 1st.

No

You should report yourself for insulting yourself then "

It’s a Cowspiracy, I tell you! the cows are planning to increase global warming by farting heavily, in their sheds, mooing away evilly to themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzi999Woman
over a year ago

Slough

I wonder how many of the Labour/left wing ever get laid on Fabswingers?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder how many of the Labour/left wing ever get laid on Fabswingers? "

They get fucked by Tories all the time...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"I wonder how many of the Labour/left wing ever get laid on Fabswingers?

They get fucked by Tories all the time..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top