Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Politics |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do we need another thread on this? " Yes, definitely | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's already busier ![]() Read what I said just above. I said it was busier. Ironically, by arguing you are now making this thread busier than it needs to be... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%" He should have resigned for lying to Parliament. Anyone who still thinks he's fit to run the country, is no better than he is. They have no integrity and no credibility. They are worthy of nothing but scorn, derision and justifiably utter contempt. If you, as a Tory, object to being thought of in such a way; stop giving us all cause to. Reject Johnson's faux apology and tell him that he has to go because the rules apply equally, to us all. If you don't believe they do - you make my point on scorn, derision and contempt for me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. " I there anything that would make you think he should resign? Breaking the law + lying clearly aint enough for you, so what is? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. I there anything that would make you think he should resign? Breaking the law + lying clearly aint enough for you, so what is?" Loads of people potentially broke the law during the crisis. Are you going to trawl through all the CCTV cameras in order to identify them and issue fixed penalty notice. Receiving a fixed penalty notice is hardly breaking the law. Lots of people get parking tickets or speeding fines. Only a fool would resign over a fixed penalty notice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Only a fool would resign over a fixed penalty notice. " But Boris is a fool. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. I there anything that would make you think he should resign? Breaking the law + lying clearly aint enough for you, so what is? Loads of people potentially broke the law during the crisis. Are you going to trawl through all the CCTV cameras in order to identify them and issue fixed penalty notice. Receiving a fixed penalty notice is hardly breaking the law. Lots of people get parking tickets or speeding fines. Only a fool would resign over a fixed penalty notice. " The problem is he lied to parliament repeatedly and despite your willingness to turn a blind eye and downplay the gravity of his choice it is dishonest and he should go. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" The problem is he lied to parliament repeatedly and despite your willingness to turn a blind eye and downplay the gravity of his choice it is dishonest and he should go." On eight different occasions Johnson lied and said no rules had been broken. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. " Obviously the lying sack of shit should have resigned for one of the other lies or some of the other sleaze. But this post tells you a lot about the people who vote Tory. They don't give a fuck what he does and says. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Where is Lee Harvey Oswald when you need him." Psst!! He didn’t do it ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, especially when it was something he came on TV to warn the general public not to do, then he goes n does it himself n acts stupid saying " I don't know, have I broken the law". Plus when covid first started n the leaders of other countries started meeting each other on the weekends, Boris didn't attend any n had the cheek to say " l value my weekends away n I won't give them up for covid". The guy is a fucking idiot. Needs to go." LBC radio journalist is investigating the rumour that Boris and Carrie repeatedly moved between houses each weekend after lockdown. A whistleblower reported that the reasons were purely social . The staff were not allowed to mix but had to attend each time the couple wanted to move in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, especially when it was something he came on TV to warn the general public not to do, then he goes n does it himself n acts stupid saying " I don't know, have I broken the law". Plus when covid first started n the leaders of other countries started meeting each other on the weekends, Boris didn't attend any n had the cheek to say " l value my weekends away n I won't give them up for covid". The guy is a fucking idiot. Needs to go. LBC radio journalist is investigating the rumour that Boris and Carrie repeatedly moved between houses each weekend after lockdown. A whistleblower reported that the reasons were purely social . The staff were not allowed to mix but had to attend each time the couple wanted to move in. " He will have broke the covid ‘laws’ dozens of times, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, especially when it was something he came on TV to warn the general public not to do, then he goes n does it himself n acts stupid saying " I don't know, have I broken the law". Plus when covid first started n the leaders of other countries started meeting each other on the weekends, Boris didn't attend any n had the cheek to say " l value my weekends away n I won't give them up for covid". The guy is a fucking idiot. Needs to go. LBC radio journalist is investigating the rumour that Boris and Carrie repeatedly moved between houses each weekend after lockdown. A whistleblower reported that the reasons were purely social . The staff were not allowed to mix but had to attend each time the couple wanted to move in. He will have broke the covid ‘laws’ dozens of times, " Ah but it doesn't matter if the PM broke the law. Hadn't you heard? Laws, eh? Who needs em? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, especially when it was something he came on TV to warn the general public not to do, then he goes n does it himself n acts stupid saying " I don't know, have I broken the law". Plus when covid first started n the leaders of other countries started meeting each other on the weekends, Boris didn't attend any n had the cheek to say " l value my weekends away n I won't give them up for covid". The guy is a fucking idiot. Needs to go. LBC radio journalist is investigating the rumour that Boris and Carrie repeatedly moved between houses each weekend after lockdown. A whistleblower reported that the reasons were purely social . The staff were not allowed to mix but had to attend each time the couple wanted to move in. He will have broke the covid ‘laws’ dozens of times, Ah but it doesn't matter if the PM broke the law. Hadn't you heard? Laws, eh? Who needs em?" True, I guess it doesn’t matter, he may as well break a few more | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes, especially when it was something he came on TV to warn the general public not to do, then he goes n does it himself n acts stupid saying " I don't know, have I broken the law". Plus when covid first started n the leaders of other countries started meeting each other on the weekends, Boris didn't attend any n had the cheek to say " l value my weekends away n I won't give them up for covid". The guy is a fucking idiot. Needs to go. LBC radio journalist is investigating the rumour that Boris and Carrie repeatedly moved between houses each weekend after lockdown. A whistleblower reported that the reasons were purely social . The staff were not allowed to mix but had to attend each time the couple wanted to move in. He will have broke the covid ‘laws’ dozens of times, Ah but it doesn't matter if the PM broke the law. Hadn't you heard? Laws, eh? Who needs em? True, I guess it doesn’t matter, he may as well break a few more " Might as well go for the full bingo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%" no he should be sacked | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boring " Yet you went to the trouble to read the thread abs comment ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked " But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So my usual comment is that one more scandal will do him. But that was at least five or six scandals ago (and I’m being generous) I think with what else is going on in the world will work in his favour and he will stick around for a few more scandals yet. " Yup. He'll be a choice at the next General Election on Thursday, May 2, 2024. So, only 2 years, 20 days to go to get campaigning. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"100% he should. He won't and has a shit for brains Cabinet, who have no moral backboneml. His party is little better. " He makes me ashamed to be British, imagine having that thing as our leader, no wonder the world is laughing at us ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. I there anything that would make you think he should resign? Breaking the law + lying clearly aint enough for you, so what is? Loads of people potentially broke the law during the crisis. Are you going to trawl through all the CCTV cameras in order to identify them and issue fixed penalty notice. Receiving a fixed penalty notice is hardly breaking the law. Lots of people get parking tickets or speeding fines. Only a fool would resign over a fixed penalty notice. " During lockdowns, nobody thought of breaking the Covid laws as equivalent to getting a parking ticket. ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"100% he should. He won't and has a shit for brains Cabinet, who have no moral backboneml. His party is little better. He makes me ashamed to be British, imagine having that thing as our leader, no wonder the world is laughing at us ![]() I fully agree! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, he should not resign. I there anything that would make you think he should resign? Breaking the law + lying clearly aint enough for you, so what is? Loads of people potentially broke the law during the crisis. Are you going to trawl through all the CCTV cameras in order to identify them and issue fixed penalty notice. Receiving a fixed penalty notice is hardly breaking the law. Lots of people get parking tickets or speeding fines. Only a fool would resign over a fixed penalty notice. During lockdowns, nobody thought of breaking the Covid laws as equivalent to getting a parking ticket. ![]() ![]() ![]() Only fools and the government | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() exactly he got brexit done lol jobs a gudun now piss off bj and why are you ashamed of being British ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() Because we elected a lying , law breaking narcissist to the highest position in the land , and millions are still defending him, makes me ashamed, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() but you didn’t vote for him mate so grow up ffs ashamed so are you walking round with your head bowed can’t look people in the eye fucking hell half the world leaders are as bad or worse than our Far East Middle East USA Russia South America to name a few | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() Why are you getting narky? He makes me ashamed to be British, do you think we deserve better? Or are you happy he is holding the most important position in the country | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"100% he should. He won't and has a shit for brains Cabinet, who have no moral backboneml. His party is little better. He makes me ashamed to be British, imagine having that thing as our leader, no wonder the world is laughing at us ![]() at a recent summit meeting no other world leaders wanted anything to do with BJ the rest of the world has no respect for a country with a lying buffoon as its leader | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. " . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. " ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"^^^ soooo much bait!!" Indeed, but when you realise he is a parody, so much comedy ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"^^^ soooo much bait!! Indeed, but when you realise he is a parody, so much comedy ![]() my favourite part is not that it sounds like a Tory supporter, but could be straight out of the mouth of their MPs. Art becomes life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"^^^ soooo much bait!! Indeed, but when you realise he is a parody, so much comedy ![]() It is sublime satire, up to now he has only managed to fool one fool, bless her ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%no he should be sacked But he ‘got Brexit done’ and has apologised, ![]() im not nearly but to say you are ashamed to be British because of Boris is childish grow up mate I’m not ashamed to be British lots worse leaders than him should Russians be ashamed to be Russian because of putin ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. " Definitely a troll but a very amateur one . More people didn’t vote for Boris so his detractors are in the majority but don’t let facts get in your way. A successful Brexit. Ha ha. Our economy has shrunk and is predicted to have become at least 4% smaller which means in real term a 40-50 Billion pound loss per year to the exchequer . ONS figures so from Boris himself. 600k less people working. Chronic shortages of staff in the NHS , hospitality and the tourism industries. You are right regarding his success with Covid though. We are a leading, in fact top ten in the amount of deaths for a country so I’m sure you’re very proud of that as of course death is inevitable. Boris has just speeded up the “inevitable” for tens of thousands. Excellent performance and you as his leading champion of his successes will be delighted in all those excess deaths. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. Definitely a troll but a very amateur one . More people didn’t vote for Boris so his detractors are in the majority but don’t let facts get in your way. A successful Brexit. Ha ha. Our economy has shrunk and is predicted to have become at least 4% smaller which means in real term a 40-50 Billion pound loss per year to the exchequer . ONS figures so from Boris himself. 600k less people working. Chronic shortages of staff in the NHS , hospitality and the tourism industries. You are right regarding his success with Covid though. We are a leading, in fact top ten in the amount of deaths for a country so I’m sure you’re very proud of that as of course death is inevitable. Boris has just speeded up the “inevitable” for tens of thousands. Excellent performance and you as his leading champion of his successes will be delighted in all those excess deaths. " It simply has to be satire! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. Definitely a troll but a very amateur one . More people didn’t vote for Boris so his detractors are in the majority but don’t let facts get in your way. A successful Brexit. Ha ha. Our economy has shrunk and is predicted to have become at least 4% smaller which means in real term a 40-50 Billion pound loss per year to the exchequer . ONS figures so from Boris himself. 600k less people working. Chronic shortages of staff in the NHS , hospitality and the tourism industries. You are right regarding his success with Covid though. We are a leading, in fact top ten in the amount of deaths for a country so I’m sure you’re very proud of that as of course death is inevitable. Boris has just speeded up the “inevitable” for tens of thousands. Excellent performance and you as his leading champion of his successes will be delighted in all those excess deaths. It simply has to be satire!" Surreal more like | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. Definitely a troll but a very amateur one . More people didn’t vote for Boris so his detractors are in the majority but don’t let facts get in your way. A successful Brexit. Ha ha. Our economy has shrunk and is predicted to have become at least 4% smaller which means in real term a 40-50 Billion pound loss per year to the exchequer . ONS figures so from Boris himself. 600k less people working. Chronic shortages of staff in the NHS , hospitality and the tourism industries. You are right regarding his success with Covid though. We are a leading, in fact top ten in the amount of deaths for a country so I’m sure you’re very proud of that as of course death is inevitable. Boris has just speeded up the “inevitable” for tens of thousands. Excellent performance and you as his leading champion of his successes will be delighted in all those excess deaths. It simply has to be satire!" Maybe you need to analyse the excess deaths in a little more detail . During the autumn and early winter months central and eastern European countries had the highest levels of excess mortality in Europe; western European countries still experienced some excess mortality but at lower levels than those experienced in the spring. Of all countries analysed, Poland had the greatest cumulative excess mortality (relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates, (rcASMRs)) by 18 December 2020, at 11.6% above the five-year average. The highest peak in weekly excess mortality (relative age-standardised mortality rates (rASMRs)) in the autumn was in Bulgaria, at 112.3% (week ending 27 November), but this was the second-highest peak in the year overall, behind Spain at 142.9% in week ending 3 April; the UK's highest peak was 101.5% (week ending 17 April). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The justice Minister has resigned with a stinging rebuke to Boris. Boris will be thinking oh if there’s no justice Minister it’s a free for all now. How can he not see and feel the utter contempt the majority of people in this country have for him. Entitled doesn’t cover it anymore. He’s a narcissist lacking in any empathy for anyone his only concern is himself. . You might need to reword what you wrote. It should read some people hold him in contempt. An 80 seat majority at the last election hardly put his supporters in a minority . It was a stunning achievement and by no means a forgone conclusion The opinions of a vocal minority determined to run a persistent hate campaign against Boris are hardly relevant . His has continued his success in office. A very successfull EU withdrawal programme followed by managing Covid with a very low excess death rate . Ukraine regard the UK as one of the world leaders in the fight against Russia . If we were to have an election to morrow , Boris would probably be re elected. Most people recognise success and do not base their opinions on a very vocal minority who seem to think that their thoughts represent everyone. Definitely a troll but a very amateur one . More people didn’t vote for Boris so his detractors are in the majority but don’t let facts get in your way. A successful Brexit. Ha ha. Our economy has shrunk and is predicted to have become at least 4% smaller which means in real term a 40-50 Billion pound loss per year to the exchequer . ONS figures so from Boris himself. 600k less people working. Chronic shortages of staff in the NHS , hospitality and the tourism industries. You are right regarding his success with Covid though. We are a leading, in fact top ten in the amount of deaths for a country so I’m sure you’re very proud of that as of course death is inevitable. Boris has just speeded up the “inevitable” for tens of thousands. Excellent performance and you as his leading champion of his successes will be delighted in all those excess deaths. It simply has to be satire! Maybe you need to analyse the excess deaths in a little more detail . During the autumn and early winter months central and eastern European countries had the highest levels of excess mortality in Europe; western European countries still experienced some excess mortality but at lower levels than those experienced in the spring. Of all countries analysed, Poland had the greatest cumulative excess mortality (relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates, (rcASMRs)) by 18 December 2020, at 11.6% above the five-year average. The highest peak in weekly excess mortality (relative age-standardised mortality rates (rASMRs)) in the autumn was in Bulgaria, at 112.3% (week ending 27 November), but this was the second-highest peak in the year overall, behind Spain at 142.9% in week ending 3 April; the UK's highest peak was 101.5% (week ending 17 April)." I've found your 101.5pc. I believe it's England only btw. What is your number for 26 feb 2021? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"NO" Johnson is a proven liar, lawbreaker and hypocrite. He also has zero moral authority now when it comes to telling any of us what to do. All of those things make his position utterly untenable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. " At last, World beating ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. At last, World beating ![]() There will be certain people furiously flicking through the Tax Payers Alliance handbook looking for a suitably glib response. Failing that a call to their Tufton St overlords to see how to swerve this one! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. At last, World beating ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I forgot to add we are an island so had the perfect situation to stop the import en masse before vaccination but chose to keep the borders open. We were determined to win this weren’t we!, " lets not forget that for 2 whole months after the first reported case of covid on these islands, johnski and his chums were quaffing and gorging with the financial elite, celebrity far righties, extremist media barons and russian oligrach bankrollers of the conservative and unionist party at locations across europe, while it was left to junior ministers to convene ad hoc cobra meetings. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who here hasn't broken a law? ![]() While being prime minister,,, no one! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who here hasn't broken a law? ![]() Not while in government, and not while laughing at British people dying alone in hospital while I broke the rules I made. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who here hasn't broken a law? ![]() I have never broken a law I have voted for. Nor have I ever denied breaking a law that I voted. Nor have I ever voted for a law that I didn't understand. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Who here hasn't broken a law? ![]() Who here is a prime minister? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. " . Maybe you need to adjust your figures for population density and use deaths per thousand. The figures above are a bit meaningless as different countries used different methods to record deaths . The UK erred on the side of caution and people were recorded as dying with Covid which is entirely different to dying of Covid . If you wanted to measure the true impact you would really need to complete the analysis by age groups and in many cases it was on average a reduction in life of a few months. Excess deaths is a much more realistic measurement of the impact of Covid and the UKs performance was very favourable. No doubt the merchants of doom and gloom are very disappointed than an objective assessment of the government's handling of the crisis paints a very favourable picture We were one of the first counties to implement an award winning vacinaton programme and provide extensive help to businness . Only the merchants of doom and gloom would criticise the government's handling of the crisis . Boris has sailed the ship very successfully through some very stormy waters . The good law project appear to have failed in most of their cases. They even missed one deadline for filing and the case was struck out . Most people would conclude that the government's handling of Covid was good . You will not always get all decisions correct in a time of crisis | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. . Maybe you need to adjust your figures for population density and use deaths per thousand. The figures above are a bit meaningless as different countries used different methods to record deaths . The UK erred on the side of caution and people were recorded as dying with Covid which is entirely different to dying of Covid . If you wanted to measure the true impact you would really need to complete the analysis by age groups and in many cases it was on average a reduction in life of a few months. Excess deaths is a much more realistic measurement of the impact of Covid and the UKs performance was very favourable. No doubt the merchants of doom and gloom are very disappointed than an objective assessment of the government's handling of the crisis paints a very favourable picture We were one of the first counties to implement an award winning vacinaton programme and provide extensive help to businness . Only the merchants of doom and gloom would criticise the government's handling of the crisis . Boris has sailed the ship very successfully through some very stormy waters . The good law project appear to have failed in most of their cases. They even missed one deadline for filing and the case was struck out . Most people would conclude that the government's handling of Covid was good . You will not always get all decisions correct in a time of crisis " wasn't it ten years ? Not a couple of months. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. At last, World beating ![]() . Hi , There is no need to contact anyone as the above data is meaningless when different countries use different recording techniques , It may be a big disappointment to some but the Uk was no where near the top of the list . You can only really do a meaningful analysis by using deaths per 1000 or excess deaths . The comments below would tend to indicate that we have over recorded Covid deaths ( by up to 33 % ) . If another country has under recorded the comparisons become meaningless . One person convinced that non-Covid deaths were being blamed on the virus is Gary Wylde, a 59-year-old sales executive from Wolverhampton whose mother Jessie suffered from dementia as well as a severe lung disease that limited her ability to breathe. When Jessie died in April 2020, doctors noted her cause of death as Covid-19 – despite her never testing positive for the virus. ‘The doctor explained to me that, in the absence of a test, doctors are encouraged to put down Covid on death certificates,’ said Gary. Likewise Julie Perkins, a 57-year-old civil servant from Leicestershire, who believes her 83-year-old father Ted died after suffering a stroke in May 2020. The retired road worker, who lived in a care home, also had a high temperature for six days and his death certificate stated he died of Covid-19 – despite a recent negative test. ‘We were extremely shocked when the GP wrote he’d died of the virus on his death certificate,’ said Julie. ‘It’s just not right.’ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. At last, World beating ![]() Copy and paste from the daily mail website. Lolz | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. At last, World beating ![]() This is true, and Julie is correct, it’s just not right, there is no way Boris would allow anyone in this country to die from COVID | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What did he do" He repeatedly broke the law which he had created | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What did he do He repeatedly broke the law which he had created" And repeatedly lied about it to parliament and the British people…a disgrace | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. " and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed " How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bait and switch. Should Boris resign for breaking rules he voted for and then denied he broke? .... Lets post some incorrect numbers and argue about excess death definitions " Yep. Back to the subject; the lying lawmaker should resign or get the boot, along with Fishy. QE2 has a little time remaining to actually do something good for the country. Calling him in and giving him his dismissal letter would tick that box. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? " you tell me your the expert on every subject on here I think the uk system is flawed as hardly anyone died of anything other than covid for two years | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? you tell me your the expert on every subject on here I think the uk system is flawed as hardly anyone died of anything other than covid for two years " How do you know they count them differently then? You made the claim, I didn’t | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? you tell me your the expert on every subject on here I think the uk system is flawed as hardly anyone died of anything other than covid for two years " even at the peak, COVID was "only" about a third of all deaths. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? you tell me your the expert on every subject on here I think the uk system is flawed as hardly anyone died of anything other than covid for two years even at the peak, COVID was "only" about a third of all deaths. " no it wasn’t cancer deaths where down all deaths where down how does that happen then ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed " Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed How do they count them in Italy, France and Germany? you tell me your the expert on every subject on here I think the uk system is flawed as hardly anyone died of anything other than covid for two years even at the peak, COVID was "only" about a third of all deaths. no it wasn’t cancer deaths where down all deaths where down how does that happen then ?" the two statements can coexist. To keep it simple In 2019 100 people died. All from cancer. In 2020 150 people died. 51 from COVID. Cancer deaths are down. COVID is 30pc of deaths. There are still a fuck load of non COVID deaths. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . " yes the numbers are the numbers but in a few years when there s more data we will see the true effect of covid luke all the experts say yes I agree it was Boris who caused the deaths nowt to do with covid lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . yes the numbers are the numbers but in a few years when there s more data we will see the true effect of covid luke all the experts say yes I agree it was Boris who caused the deaths nowt to do with covid lol" Lack of action and slow reactions lead to further cases which leads to more deaths. Cause and effect foxy. I agree he didn’t put a needle in the the result of his behaviour brought the same result . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . yes the numbers are the numbers but in a few years when there s more data we will see the true effect of covid luke all the experts say yes I agree it was Boris who caused the deaths nowt to do with covid lol Lack of action and slow reactions lead to further cases which leads to more deaths. Cause and effect foxy. I agree he didn’t put a needle in the the result of his behaviour brought the same result . " you know I’m no fan of his mate but a lot of leaders fucked up no one had a clue about this virus the fucking experts where breaking rules aswell there all useless twats tbf but this was a once in lifetime virus so fuckups where inevitable but I still think he should go | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . yes the numbers are the numbers but in a few years when there s more data we will see the true effect of covid luke all the experts say yes I agree it was Boris who caused the deaths nowt to do with covid lol Lack of action and slow reactions lead to further cases which leads to more deaths. Cause and effect foxy. I agree he didn’t put a needle in the the result of his behaviour brought the same result . you know I’m no fan of his mate but a lot of leaders fucked up no one had a clue about this virus the fucking experts where breaking rules aswell there all useless twats tbf but this was a once in lifetime virus so fuckups where inevitable but I still think he should go " There’s cocking up (a bit) and royally fucking up (a lot). Johnson fits the latter group with Trump and Bolsonara (sp?) guess what they all had in common? Populist govt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . " . The figures below would tend to indicate that we have a pretty good result Eleven countries in eastern Europe are reporting more than ten daily Covid-19 fatalities per million people while the UK is down to two. The UK registered some of the continent’s lowest case and death rates with just 629 new cases per million people on Wednesday. This is largely due to Britain’s successful vaccine and booster programme. The UK has already given out booster jabs to over a quarter of its eligible population. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . " . The figures which you quote do not really mean anything . Most people would expect a densely populated county to have a high death rate . If you re-order the table by deaths per 100,000 people instead of total deaths Italy looks about 5% worse than the UK. And smaller countries such as Hungary and the Czech Republic have much worse death rates per 100,000 people. Statisticians warn against using reported deaths alone to compare countries. Not all countries report deaths in the same way and so more reported deaths could mean better reporting systems or more testing as well as more deaths. And so experts also advise looking at the total number of deaths, and may attribute any sharp rises to the pandemic. Poland saw a very sharp rise in deaths in their winter wave but only some of the rise was captured in their official reported Covid deaths (the red area in the chart below). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. " There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’." And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. " . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. " Aside from you, can you name any of these maniacs you're talking of? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. " And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"He isn't obligated to resign. So why would he? Would anyone here resign from their job if they didn't have to? Don't give me all the "in the public eye" and "setting an example" bollocks, he's a fucking politician. Don't expect him to have scruples! I never voted for the shower in charge, I've voted every hue apart from blue, but I will readily admit that they are ALL barefaced liars that will cling on to power whatever it takes." The rule about lying or misleading Parliament is usually the trigger to resign. Boris has Prorogued Parliament illegally which included lying to the queen. He has lied repeatedly regarding unemployment Brexit, the economy and government spending so given his constant lying it is no surprise he won’t resign due to lying. The man is the worst PM this country has ever had and he has brought shame on the office of PM. Those in the Tory party who do not act are complicit in his disgraceful behaviour and should also be ashamed of their lack of action over standards. Their own self interest is overriding their vows to be act for the good of the country.. Money over morals. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. " . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. " But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never voted for the shower in charge, I've voted every hue apart from blue, but I will readily admit that they are ALL barefaced liars that will cling on to power whatever it takes." apart from those who have distanced themselves from the corruption somewhat by taken the principled decision to resign during johnski's tenure. so no, not ALL by any stretch. ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() But that's the interesting question. Why do upto 18% of people still think brexit is a good idea. Despite the reality of brexit. Why do so many people still support the most self serving PM we've ever seen? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() you believe what polls you choose to but its not what i see in everyday life. Most people dont even give brexit a second thought its yesterdays news and are getting on with their lives, companies are adapting as they always have and brexit is a thing of the past for most. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() I don't believe polls. I find it hard to believe that 18% of people do think it's a good idea. But whatever the number there are still potentially millions they do. So if you're right, and people are not thinking about the damage done by brexit. That in itself is a problem. Why are people so apathetic to this kind of stuff. Not just the brexit thing. But Boris and his chronies in government, all his lies, and his friends who donate to the party and are richly rewarded. As the Hay Turner account mentioned people just don't seem to care about the PM being a lying self serving narcissist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() It is because they hate their country | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Fair enough, so that’s it, Brexit is done? If that is the case, what is JRM doing? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Minister for stepping in human shit at the giant brexit lorry parks in Kent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() As i said before most people have a life and they are living it, politics doesn't even come into their heads on a regular basis. When im out and about i dont hear people talking politics they are too busy enjoying themselves its only the few keyboard warriors that fill their lives with it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Why do we need a minister for Brexit opportunities? Seems strange when Brexit is done, finished, now part of life, ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Yet here you are on a politics forum taking about politics, you should be out their enjoying life ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() ![]() There | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() ![]() Just killing a bit of time between cooking ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() . Maybe the electorate are slightly more objective in their analysis of the performance of Boris and our exit from the EU. It night just be that they accept that we continue to trade with the EU and that any marginal short term expenses can be offset by long term gains with the removal of bureaucracy which in turn will encourage businness development . Again a few mistakes made by Boris will be dismissed by most rational balanced people when they are offset against his success stories. . The vendetta against him is hardly the hallmark of successfull individuals . He is probably the only person in the country that the police have trawled through pictures in order to see if he was present at a ten minute works event in his office. If we looked hard enough we could probably find evidence that a very significant section of the population broke covid rules. Are the police going to trawl through all the pictures of those pictured on the beach in Brigton during lockdown , launch a national campaign to identify them and then issue fines ? Unlike Boris who was at a works event those on the beach knew they should not be there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Ignorance is bliss eh! Ignorance and apathy are two fantastic weapons used by the government. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() We fundamentally agree here. The difference being, you seem to celebrate apathy amongst British people as Boris and co run the country into the ground. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. " were the circumstances "given we had Boris and his government in charge". In which case I agree. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() ![]() ![]() Of course, did you type that on a keyboard ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() Maybe people are not ignorant. As things stand only about 15 % of the population have any interest in politics. That does not quite equate to being ignorant. Maybe the care worker who sees a variety of different clients on a day to day basis and potentially has a more informed view of life is quite capable of forming their own view of the government and exercises their choice during the general election. No one needs reminding of the result of the last election. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. But that’s all it is half a dozen regular anti brexit anti boris posters nothing more ,they don’t reflect the mood of the country and this forum just let’s them let off steam which is a good thing ![]() post of the day spot on mate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. " Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? " . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. " How many people read the Fail online , via Twitter etc? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%" Well that’s an obvious yes. Next question? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say yes. 100%" Yes he must go he has lied twice once when he said no border in the Irish sea and now over the parties at No 10. In Northern Ireland many have lost thier jobs working for the Police after getting small fines so same should happen to Boris and all others at these parties. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . . The figures below would tend to indicate that we have a pretty good result Eleven countries in eastern Europe are reporting more than ten daily Covid-19 fatalities per million people while the UK is down to two. The UK registered some of the continent’s lowest case and death rates with just 629 new cases per million people on Wednesday. This is largely due to Britain’s successful vaccine and booster programme. The UK has already given out booster jabs to over a quarter of its eligible population." One point in the UK if you die with in 28 days of having covid it is counted as a cause of death many other countries only list it as cause of death if you die while you have it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I do wonder what Boris should need to do for his supporters to turn. Or does the fact people voted for him a few years ago mean he has the freedom to do anything without repraoch. " No it does not or at least should not. You do not give your vote, you lend your vote. At the next GE people get to evaluate and decide who they will next lend that vote to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. " Out of 190 million unique readers ( I didn’t think you would struggle with the number being more than the U.K. population) would you guess more than a million are U.K. readers ? You said the number is 1 million based on their circulation. Interesting how all those homes are single occupancy too given their readership is reported to be elderly. You know those older people who hanker for empire. The sun is a million a day too. Guess they must all live alone too and never read the sun online. It’s not beyond most people to calculate readerships could be two to five times as many as circulation. Then add the online readers . Then add the express ..Then the Times, the telegraph. are you getting there with so much bias reporting it can be suggested undue influence. Now back to how your claim that you know Boris did well with Covid when his MPs said he didn’t. I’m curious to know how you argue the contrary to their informed report. Please share with the forum your knowledge which is better informed than the select committee. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I do wonder what Boris should need to do for his supporters to turn. Or does the fact people voted for him a few years ago mean he has the freedom to do anything without repraoch. " People do not like to admit they are wrong . They find it embarrassing especially if they have shouted others down. They will make stuff up and grasp at every blade of supporting grass to defend themselves just like the Black Knight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. Out of 190 million unique readers ( I didn’t think you would struggle with the number being more than the U.K. population) would you guess more than a million are U.K. readers ? You said the number is 1 million based on their circulation. Interesting how all those homes are single occupancy too given their readership is reported to be elderly. You know those older people who hanker for empire. The sun is a million a day too. Guess they must all live alone too and never read the sun online. It’s not beyond most people to calculate readerships could be two to five times as many as circulation. Then add the online readers . Then add the express ..Then the Times, the telegraph. are you getting there with so much bias reporting it can be suggested undue influence. Now back to how your claim that you know Boris did well with Covid when his MPs said he didn’t. I’m curious to know how you argue the contrary to their informed report. Please share with the forum your knowledge which is better informed than the select committee. " . You have yet to explain how you correlate 190 million unique readers via the Internet with the UKs population of circa 60 million. . There is a massive difference and you have now bought other newspapers into the equation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. Out of 190 million unique readers ( I didn’t think you would struggle with the number being more than the U.K. population) would you guess more than a million are U.K. readers ? You said the number is 1 million based on their circulation. Interesting how all those homes are single occupancy too given their readership is reported to be elderly. You know those older people who hanker for empire. The sun is a million a day too. Guess they must all live alone too and never read the sun online. It’s not beyond most people to calculate readerships could be two to five times as many as circulation. Then add the online readers . Then add the express ..Then the Times, the telegraph. are you getting there with so much bias reporting it can be suggested undue influence. Now back to how your claim that you know Boris did well with Covid when his MPs said he didn’t. I’m curious to know how you argue the contrary to their informed report. Please share with the forum your knowledge which is better informed than the select committee. . You have yet to explain how you correlate 190 million unique readers via the Internet with the UKs population of circa 60 million. . There is a massive difference and you have now bought other newspapers into the equation. " You started with a claim that Boris has done well with Covid . I clearly pointed out to you that you were wrong. You have yet to answer why you made this up. Please do so then I will be happy to answer you 190m question . You’re attempt to move onto another topic without answering is very disappointing. Please explain your claim that Boris has done well and is award winning? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"covid absolute number of deaths league table top ten Europe. ( March 22) U.K. 162,147 Italy 156,357 France 138,275 Germany. 124764 Poland. 115,736 Ukraine. 108,194 Spain. 102,218 Turkey. 98,280 Romania. 65,249 Hungary. 45, 838 Yippee we are in the lead. Now there will be some responses saying but, but, but percentage wise we’re not top we’re possibly second or third. To that I say if a car with just the driver in crashes and he dies that’s 100% of the passengers of the car. If a minibus crashes and three out of the six passengers die that’s 50% so is that less of a tragedy? In absolute numbers despite being given the advantage of a much greater lead time with warnings to be able to prepare, we have still let more people die than any other country. and did they all use the same system to count the deaths tho I think not so your table is flawed Feel free to read the committee’s report again further up. Or is it too much to take in. I’ll abbreviate . Boris caused more deaths and the government performed very badly. That’s from their own MP’s They all counted differently so maybe the others are less too. The numbers are the numbers published by the governments own reports not the Labour Party . . The figures below would tend to indicate that we have a pretty good result Eleven countries in eastern Europe are reporting more than ten daily Covid-19 fatalities per million people while the UK is down to two. The UK registered some of the continent’s lowest case and death rates with just 629 new cases per million people on Wednesday. This is largely due to Britain’s successful vaccine and booster programme. The UK has already given out booster jabs to over a quarter of its eligible population. One point in the UK if you die with in 28 days of having covid it is counted as a cause of death many other countries only list it as cause of death if you die while you have it. " it's one of three measures, all of which give similar results. It's excess deaths for me ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. Out of 190 million unique readers ( I didn’t think you would struggle with the number being more than the U.K. population) would you guess more than a million are U.K. readers ? You said the number is 1 million based on their circulation. Interesting how all those homes are single occupancy too given their readership is reported to be elderly. You know those older people who hanker for empire. The sun is a million a day too. Guess they must all live alone too and never read the sun online. It’s not beyond most people to calculate readerships could be two to five times as many as circulation. Then add the online readers . Then add the express ..Then the Times, the telegraph. are you getting there with so much bias reporting it can be suggested undue influence. Now back to how your claim that you know Boris did well with Covid when his MPs said he didn’t. I’m curious to know how you argue the contrary to their informed report. Please share with the forum your knowledge which is better informed than the select committee. . You have yet to explain how you correlate 190 million unique readers via the Internet with the UKs population of circa 60 million. . There is a massive difference and you have now bought other newspapers into the equation. " I see Mr Hay is still desperately flicking through the handbooks that come out of Tufton St. Oh dear! I am not going to quote exact numbers because it would take too much effort to go through all the material (for a discussion on a swinger forum) but the price per impression for online adverts is set by the level of traffic, demographics of audience and geo-location data. Of course there are not 190 million UK based readers on the Mail Online but there is significantly more than 1 million physical circulation figures. I could make a phone call right now and find out the exact number of unique UK based online readers based on IP address. But I cannot be bothered. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Maybe the other European country’s death rate is half that published as they all counted different,y apparently? To point out individual cases is interesting. What about those elderly people who died due to covid but were out down as flu or old age before we started testing? Statistics again eh. The fact is this government failed its people repeatedly. Many died as a result. The parliamentary committee made up of all parties directly criticised the governments handling of the covid crisis and they found that there were possibly thousands of unnecessary deaths. So the Tory members of parliament agreed Boris mishandled the Covid epidemic. Award winning vaccine rollout? You do know the civil service issued those awards to themselves don’t you? The government repeat “award winning” as if an independent body like the BAFTA issued them . It was a thank you to the hard work of those on the front line. It’s like an engineering firm saying Dave you are our welder of the year! Meaningless but nice. I refer you to the parliamentary initial report in relation to the handling of the covid crisis and the repeated criticism of Boris Johnson in particular. “The delay to impose a first lockdown last spring was “one of the most important public health failures the United Kingdom has ever experienced”; planning for a possible virus outbreak smacked of “British exceptionalism”; the lack of early testing capacity was “an almost unimaginable setback”. “This isn’t enough,” one MP involved in the process said. “We owe it to the families of those who died to get to the bottom of who got it wrong. And that needs a public inquiry.” From the independent “ Likewise, the hesitation over the initial lockdown in March 2020 also needlessly cost lives and “reflected a fatalism about the spread of Covid that should have been robustly challenged at the time”. According to Mr Cummings – a key witness in the proceedings of the committee – it was challenged by him, but plainly it was insufficient to overcome the prime minister’s natural tendency to dither and delay, to borrow a phrase. “At every point in the developing pandemic, the decision to lockdown was invariably reluctantly taken and delayed for too long, while the relaxation of restrictions was usually rushed and premature. What’s more, the persistent failures to develop a viable locally-effective test and trace regime, one that could target the hotspots, meant that the effort in buying time and slowing the spread of Covid during lockdowns was partially wasted, delaying cases rather than preventing them. Without the vaccine, that dismal cycle would have persisted.” All the above catastrophic failures were known at the height of the pandemic and whenever Starmer points this out Boris deflects by calling him captain hindsight. He as usual never answers the point being made. There is no accepted international standard of how you measure Covid deaths; trying to rank different countries to decide which is the worst in Europe is, to quote one leading statistician, a ‘completely fatuous exercise’. And yet you claim we are the best and award winning lol . Take your foot out of your mouth before you go to bed we don’t want you choking. Your comedy is too good to miss. . A lot of people recognise that our overall management of the Covid programme was very successfull given the circumstances. And yet the governments own statistics and the select committee review undertaken by MPs including Tory members say otherwise., You are living in a rose coloured world of fantasy proportions. You must really stop reading just the Mail. It’s not good for you. . Maybe you need to check the results of the last general election. The current government were returned with a majority of 80 so my views are simply a reflection of the majority of the population ( or to be pedantic the party that elected more MPs than any other party. The Boris haters are simply a small but a very vocal minority. Your claim about the Daily Mail is a bit bizarre as you do not even know what newspapers I choose to read ( if any ) . Maybe you need to recognise that the circulation of the Daily Mail is only one million so it will have no influence on the other 29 million voters . Maybe getting out and about , travelling and mixing with a wide cross section of society enables people to make a more informed view of the county. It is intersting to note that quite a few regular posters are posting on this site during working hours for most people. For now as I believe in democracy I will use the views of the electorate as a validity check on my opinion, not the views of a very small minority who love to criticize the government at every available opportunity. Maybe you need to stick to the point as it was about covid and the statistics related to covid. The election was driven by Brexit and before covid. You inability to argue with facts is blatantly driving you to whataboutery again. The topic was covid but you failed to answer the facts again. Mail on line 190m unique readers so more than the million hard copy readers. More people voted for someone other that Boris so I think that means a “majority” statistically yet again. So you need to review your validity check. You waffle and think you can be persuasive but it’s just waffle against facts. Please explain how you think with your obvious experience how the government did well when their own MPS who had access to the facts said they didn’t? Do you have better facts from the daily mail? You copy and paste the daily mail so it’s a good assumption you have read it to be able to copy it! Or maybe it was telepathy? . How do you equate 190 million unique readers of the Daily Mail to the usual circulation of circa million. The potential readership is probably only 35 million if everyone read it , currently they have one million readers of the paper copy so in excess of 29 million either do not read it or have no interest in iy. It does not seem that you are doing a like for like comparison . How many of those readers to which you refer are actually registered to vote in the UK or are you quoting worldwide figures which may be irrelevant for comparison purposes. Out of 190 million unique readers ( I didn’t think you would struggle with the number being more than the U.K. population) would you guess more than a million are U.K. readers ? You said the number is 1 million based on their circulation. Interesting how all those homes are single occupancy too given their readership is reported to be elderly. You know those older people who hanker for empire. The sun is a million a day too. Guess they must all live alone too and never read the sun online. It’s not beyond most people to calculate readerships could be two to five times as many as circulation. Then add the online readers . Then add the express ..Then the Times, the telegraph. are you getting there with so much bias reporting it can be suggested undue influence. Now back to how your claim that you know Boris did well with Covid when his MPs said he didn’t. I’m curious to know how you argue the contrary to their informed report. Please share with the forum your knowledge which is better informed than the select committee. . You have yet to explain how you correlate 190 million unique readers via the Internet with the UKs population of circa 60 million. . There is a massive difference and you have now bought other newspapers into the equation. I see Mr Hay is still desperately flicking through the handbooks that come out of Tufton St. Oh dear! I am not going to quote exact numbers because it would take too much effort to go through all the material (for a discussion on a swinger forum) but the price per impression for online adverts is set by the level of traffic, demographics of audience and geo-location data. Of course there are not 190 million UK based readers on the Mail Online but there is significantly more than 1 million physical circulation figures. I could make a phone call right now and find out the exact number of unique UK based online readers based on IP address. But I cannot be bothered. " I don’t know the number but I’m guessing the media reach of the pro Brexit owners is well in excess of the 17m voters for Brexit . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ?" The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. " . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. " Lolz! You should post more of your own thoughts. Much funnier then the copy and paste jobs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. " So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() So are you saying that we can ignore left wing bias and you blame the media for influencing people. Maybe the losing parties have very unattractive policies and have no appeal to voters. Most newspapers present opinions from both sides . Blaming the media for parties lack of election success appears to me to be an act of desperation . Maybe those who read various newspapers read both sides of the argument and form their own conclusions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() given people make twheo own conclusions based on policies in manifestos, how should a party who then tries to reverse out of what it promised be held to account? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() The data below looks like a good result to me Eleven countries in eastern Europe are reporting more than ten daily Covid-19 fatalities per million people while the UK is down to two. The UK registered some of the continent’s lowest case and death rates with just 629 new cases per million people on Wednesday. This is largely due to Britain’s successful vaccine and booster programme. The UK has already given out booster jabs to over a quarter of its eligible population. Latvia, which registered 685 new cases per million people as of yesterday, had the highest number of deaths in Europe with almost 30 per million people. Like much of eastern Europe, the country’s vaccine rollout has only been partially successful, with 62 per cent of the population fully vaccinated. The country has given out no booster vaccines. Hungary, Bulgaria and Croatia all noted more than 15 deaths per million people, with 18, 17 and 16 new deaths respectively. Of those countries, only Hungary has managed to fully vaccinate more than half of its population. The most recent data suggest that Hungary has double vaccinated 60 per cent of its population and has given out booster jabs to almost a quarter of people. Even with the boosters Hungary’s high caseload – which at more than 1,300 new cases per million people is the 9th highest in Europe – has meant that the country has seen higher levels of death than many of its eastern European neighbours even though many have given out far fewer vaccines. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() No you definitely cannot ignore left wing bias as that would be equally awful if it was the only bias, but as 90% of media is right wing bias then you have to hunt out any conflicting information. This point isn’t about what they are saying it’s about who’s controlling the narrative and if there isn’t an equal information steam then the country is losing democracy. If you only have one source of information how do you know it’s right? Your confusing your blind party bias with the point I’m making of manipulation of the population by covering up the truth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() Look over there yet again . It’s like arguing with a bowl of porridge . We did ok last Wednesday PMSL The Select committee stated Boris has caused excess deaths and you keep claiming he’s sonde a good job. We have the highest number of deaths in “Western Europe” who are our economic equals . We also have the highest death rate across Europe . We lead the way in numbers of deaths. The vaccination rollout was quick and probably quicker than lesser developed Eastern European countries. We probably had a quicker rollout than Ethiopia too but all this speed did not stop the higher death rate. That’s actual people dying !! Not getting a needle in their arm . The economic damage to the U.K. was also the worst in Western Europe which again we are in the lead. Boris was in charge of that too. You claim Boris has done an excellent job . I repeat and the committee confirmed despite much more favourable warning time and the fact that we are an island Boris behaviour was inept disorganised m, he dithered and failed to protect the U.K. population adequately. Where are those awards ?? Anyway I’ve had enough of this futile debate you obviously have blind loyalty to Boris but repeatedly fail to come up with evidence to counter the select committee so let’s stop boring everyone to death with this utter drivel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jeez Mr Hay still banging on about the physical circulation of The Mail being only c.1m and therefore not having sufficient reach to influence LOL LOL LOL. Mr Hay how old are you really? You do realise what the internet is right? Of course you do because you are on it to post on Fab! Do you know how MOST people consume news and media now? Clue, it isn’t through physical papers! You are about 25 years out of date and should advise your Tufton St chums to update the relevant pages of their handbook!" . An amusing reply. Maybe you have answered the question which the other poster asked who had had difficulty recognising that the power of certain aspects of the media is not quite as great as it seemed. Last time I checked the circulation of the Daily Mail was around one million so we can only assume that there are at least twenty nine million voters who do not rely on the Daily Mail for information. The poster asking the question failed to mention media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok or any other form of social media or even the powers of trade unions . Their implication was that the media had undue influence on circulation of information. It might just be that other parties fail to get elected because their policies are not as good as either the Conservative Party of Boris Johnson. Sometimes in life you have to recognise reality and accept a winner when you see one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jeez Mr Hay still banging on about the physical circulation of The Mail being only c.1m and therefore not having sufficient reach to influence LOL LOL LOL. Mr Hay how old are you really? You do realise what the internet is right? Of course you do because you are on it to post on Fab! Do you know how MOST people consume news and media now? Clue, it isn’t through physical papers! You are about 25 years out of date and should advise your Tufton St chums to update the relevant pages of their handbook!. An amusing reply. Maybe you have answered the question which the other poster asked who had had difficulty recognising that the power of certain aspects of the media is not quite as great as it seemed. Last time I checked the circulation of the Daily Mail was around one million so we can only assume that there are at least twenty nine million voters who do not rely on the Daily Mail for information. The poster asking the question failed to mention media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok or any other form of social media or even the powers of trade unions . Their implication was that the media had undue influence on circulation of information. It might just be that other parties fail to get elected because their policies are not as good as either the Conservative Party of Boris Johnson. Sometimes in life you have to recognise reality and accept a winner when you see one. " If the media doesn't play a big part, why do people consistently vote against their own interests by voting Tory, and by voting for Brexit? Do you have an alternative suggestion? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jeez Mr Hay still banging on about the physical circulation of The Mail being only c.1m and therefore not having sufficient reach to influence LOL LOL LOL. Mr Hay how old are you really? You do realise what the internet is right? Of course you do because you are on it to post on Fab! Do you know how MOST people consume news and media now? Clue, it isn’t through physical papers! You are about 25 years out of date and should advise your Tufton St chums to update the relevant pages of their handbook!. An amusing reply. Maybe you have answered the question which the other poster asked who had had difficulty recognising that the power of certain aspects of the media is not quite as great as it seemed. Last time I checked the circulation of the Daily Mail was around one million so we can only assume that there are at least twenty nine million voters who do not rely on the Daily Mail for information. The poster asking the question failed to mention media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok or any other form of social media or even the powers of trade unions . Their implication was that the media had undue influence on circulation of information. It might just be that other parties fail to get elected because their policies are not as good as either the Conservative Party of Boris Johnson. Sometimes in life you have to recognise reality and accept a winner when you see one. " Hi, thanks for the reply. paerhaps you have confused being a proven criminal with being being a winner but 87.23% 0f the country disagree. maybe the forthcomming election in 18 days time will show a more accurate account of how people feel politicaly. luckily we have a justice system that appears to show johnski as a party organiser on friday the 13th novemeber and as such may face a £10,000 fine. a very vocal minority of choose to defend entrenched conservative criminality by posting fake news from fringe publications such as the daily mail on their social media echo chambers but cyber space isn't real life. hope this helps. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm lost at what knowing the actual number will show... What was the original point ? The original point was a claim that Boris handled the Covid outbreak well. It was diverted to media influence saying he was good but the select committee of MPs said he wasn’t based on facts. It diverted to how people actually believe Boris saying we were leaders over Covid because of the right wing bias of 90% of media in the U.K. re-enforcing the message. . I thought that the point was to establish what influence if any the media have on how people vote and form their opinion of various politicians. Some people appear to blame the media for the lack of any election success in the party that they support . With a circulation of only one million and an electorate of at least 30 million it seems difficult to conclude how a newspaper could have any real influence on election results.. At election times the media do not instruct you how to vote. Each party delivers their manifesto to your doorstep and advises of their policies. This will usually be followed up by party members canvassing on behalf of the party concerned . I would have thought that if any party feel that the electorate are not giving them the credit that they deserve, it is up to them to run an effective election campaign. A much more likely explanation is that the parties policies are simply unattractive and those that win have run a good campaign and their policies present what the electorate want . It is a bit pointless blaming others for lack of election success. Like most people during any election campaign I read the literature from each part and cast my vote accordingly. On Friday I read the literature for the local Liberal Democrat candidate. So still you can’t provide any support that Boris handled the Covid pandemic well? I thought not so let’s just put that down to you making false claims . Yes you were making it up!! The inference regarding media was to try to get through to you that if people only read a bias view of politics then they will be lead by that bias. The three major newspaper assuming every household isn’t single occupancy l, claim over three people read each copy . So 3 million right wing copies minimum equals 9 million people influenced . Add to that the online numbers were most of the younger generation read their news . The mail has 190 unique online readers 50 m of which are in the USA . If you then add the rest of the world you can comfortably assume over 50m readers if not considerably more . The mail online was originally targeted at the U.K. with online unique readers exceeding 6m when it first started. It is more now. ( I’m guessing there). Now add the same volume principals to the Sun the Express and the telegraph and your number of unique readers consuming the bias reporting it is well in excess of 17m in the U.K. Are you keeping up? So whilst not everyone is stupid some do not obtain their news or opinion form anything other than a bias media leading them to take poor uniformed decisions. As for the manifesto claim you made, the parties publish the manifestos they do not deliver them to each house as the printing and postage would be too costly . What you receive through your door is usually a pamphlet telling you a few basic promises. Oh and of course you can read an abridged version in your newspaper and your online media. The interpretation and opinion given online or in that newspaper will reflect the bias of the media organisation involved . Glad we cleared up the Boris is useless point though. ![]() ![]() not my question. AFAIK no covid promises were made! If you hold the position that voters were informed and made decisions based on manifestos, what should happen if parties u turn on promises? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some epic deflection on this thread. The question was v simple. Johnson broke the law. Should he resign?" Yes Johnson has lied constantly to Parliament. He lied over the parties and much more. When an MP refuses to resign despite being found guilty of lying under oath; you have to ask why. It's because the current Cabinet refuse to adhere to Parliamentary Standards. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jeez Mr Hay still banging on about the physical circulation of The Mail being only c.1m and therefore not having sufficient reach to influence LOL LOL LOL. Mr Hay how old are you really? You do realise what the internet is right? Of course you do because you are on it to post on Fab! Do you know how MOST people consume news and media now? Clue, it isn’t through physical papers! You are about 25 years out of date and should advise your Tufton St chums to update the relevant pages of their handbook!. An amusing reply. Maybe you have answered the question which the other poster asked who had had difficulty recognising that the power of certain aspects of the media is not quite as great as it seemed. Last time I checked the circulation of the Daily Mail was around one million so we can only assume that there are at least twenty nine million voters who do not rely on the Daily Mail for information. The poster asking the question failed to mention media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok or any other form of social media or even the powers of trade unions . Their implication was that the media had undue influence on circulation of information. It might just be that other parties fail to get elected because their policies are not as good as either the Conservative Party of Boris Johnson. Sometimes in life you have to recognise reality and accept a winner when you see one. " OMG you are trying so hard but let me explain about media influence in V E R Y S I M P L E T E R M S... 1) The physical circulation figures of The Daily Mail is almost irrelevant in 2022. 2) The Daily Mail is primarily funded by advertising revenue not newspaper sales. 3) The vast majority of their advertising revenue comes from their various online websites. 4) The reason for this is that their websites have huge numbers of unique viewers (The Mail Online has THE highest viewing figures of any UK based website). 5) Huge numbers of British voters are exposed to The Mail Online, not only through direct views but via affiliate websites carrying advertising (with attention grabbing headlines from The Mail) driving huge numbers of cluck through rates (CTRs). I can categorically say that everything you have been saying in relation to The Mail IS WRONG. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some epic deflection on this thread. The question was v simple. Johnson broke the law. Should he resign?" The deflection answers the question. He shouldn't resign because he doesn't need to. Conservative voters don't give a shit about being lied to by the PM who breaks the law. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |