Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Politics |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All Govt business should be fully secure and fully auditable. " I would imagine that the level of encryption and security on some stuff social media is far better. Also it's pretty much free to use so more money for the government to waste on HS2 ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All Govt business should be fully secure and fully auditable. I would imagine that the level of encryption and security on some stuff social media is far better. Also it's pretty much free to use so more money for the government to waste on HS2 ![]() Think you work in IT right? May have mixed you up with another forumite. Surely the point is that the information being shared via Whatsapp is ultimately sitting on servers (and passing through servers) that are not controlled by the UK Govt. Where are the Whatsapp server farms? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All Govt business should be fully secure and fully auditable. I would imagine that the level of encryption and security on some stuff social media is far better. Also it's pretty much free to use so more money for the government to waste on HS2 ![]() Not me I'm just a shit for brains carpenter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All Govt business should be fully secure and fully auditable. I would imagine that the level of encryption and security on some stuff social media is far better. Also it's pretty much free to use so more money for the government to waste on HS2 ![]() Always gonna need carpenters! Not so sure about many other jobs! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Isn’t the point there’s no records kept and I agree maybe WhatsApp is better encrypted. Surely though recording what’s happening is critical . This is government by whisper and handshake . " Exactly my point on being auditable! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All Govt business should be fully secure and fully auditable. This. The slow creep of WhatsApp onto government and even corporate is just sheer laziness. " It's not laziness. It's done with deliberate intent to bypass scrutiny and to not have records of communications. I agree with the OP, but how can it be enforced? Government should not preclude an individual from having a private life. Perhaps private contacts have to be audited even if actually messaging is not. Then there is at least a record of who there are private communications with. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Isn’t the point there’s no records kept and I agree maybe WhatsApp is better encrypted. Surely though recording what’s happening is critical . This is government by whisper and handshake . " The issue will be the storage and transit of the data, the governance and controls applied to audit and proper record keeping, and the general slack attitude to working that using such tools introduce. As a tool itself it is probably no less secure than Teams or email. It is more to do about the controls and record keeping and fact there's no restriction on the device the data can be accessed from. The obsession of the government and news with social media needs to stop. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To put a fair balance on things. I would say MP's of all parties use WhatsApp and doing so discuss local issues as well as cross party issues. You can't just say its wrong for the government to use it if they are all at it." Agreed up to a point. But the issue is not really about MP communication. It is about Government communication. That has an order of implication much higher than the shadow government discussing a few ideas that they can’t actually do anything about as they’re, well nothing power. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To put a fair balance on things. I would say MP's of all parties use WhatsApp and doing so discuss local issues as well as cross party issues. You can't just say its wrong for the government to use it if they are all at it." I don’t think this requires a “fair balance” as only one party are in Government undertaking official Govt business. Not remotely the same or as sensitive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All government communication of voice and data follows strict protocols based on the sensitivity of the information, Failure to follow those protocols is the end of the road, except if you are Matt Hancock having a fling on a stairwell, or Boris Johnson having a lockdown tipple. " The headlines of mr Hancocks infidelity were a blessing in disguise for him, being forced to resign his position and for him not to be held accountable for the crocked dealings. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |