Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitol" really lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And the Mirror reported some of the protestors had a noose. " Just goes to show the kind of people who were there demonstrating. They only arrested 2 of them  should have banged them all up for 24 hours  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And the Mirror reported some of the protestors had a noose. Just goes to show the kind of people who were there demonstrating. They only arrested 2 of them should have banged them all up for 24 hours "Politically engaged nutters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour" Chris Bryant MP chair of the Parliamentary Standards Committee has just made the same comparison as me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour Chris Bryant MP chair of the Parliamentary Standards Committee has just made the same comparison as me." We now have our own version of Trump and Trump behaviour in politics here, sad and shameful. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitol"
It is the same process, that they both have form for. Weasel words thrown out to inflame the anger of dangerous people amongst us, without a care for the consequences, as long as each of the leaders get to hold on to power.
Obviously, both are unfit to hold any public office. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Given so many on fab turned out to be q anon followers, no doubt they believe this BS conspiracy theory." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment. "It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment. "Yup the press manipulating the situation because it’s sensational news | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. "yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?"These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Boris stands by his statement by saying that the head of an organisation is responsible for anything that happens within the organisation. By the same argument he is therefore responsible for all the government lockdown breaking parties, even the ones he wasn't present at. " Nailed it.. Once again the lying buffoon undermines his own indefensible position .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour Chris Bryant MP chair of the Parliamentary Standards Committee has just made the same comparison as me." Doesnt mean its right You are aware people died on the 6th right? Nearly as stupid as comparing it to 911 like Harris did | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"His position is surely indefensible now. " Agreed, but his own ego and over inflated self opinion of his own competence will not allow him to even contemplate resignation.. Like Berlusconi, Putin and Trump he deems himself above and beyond the norms that are expected of others below him.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour Chris Bryant MP chair of the Parliamentary Standards Committee has just made the same comparison as me. Doesnt mean its right You are aware people died on the 6th right? Nearly as stupid as comparing it to 911 like Harris did" It's a totally reasonable comparison to what trump spent most of his tenure doing.. That the outcome was different is irrelevant, it's the far right extremist dog whistle tactics that's the issue with Boris.. That it possibly came from Rees mogg would not be a surprise.. And that Boris ignored the advice of his then most trusted and loyal advisor of 14 years and still went ahead with it says more about the levels like trump that Boris will stoop to.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As has been widely reported in the media, and contrary to the bullshit in the opening post, the thugs who attacked Starmer were identified as some of Corbyn's extreme left anti-vax wankers. As the old saying goes, shit comes out of the same hole. Old mother Corbyn certainly shat out a couple of steaming turds with Piers and Jezza "Bull shit, one of the main culprits was a raging right wing nutter and ex Tory councillor | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?"Same context as his newspaper article about Muslim women looking like letterboxes and bank robbers "defending" their right to do so. Just an opportunity to inflame a certain section on the population. This time to deflect attention rather than attract it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As has been widely reported in the media, and contrary to the bullshit in the opening post, the thugs who attacked Starmer were identified as some of Corbyn's extreme left anti-vax wankers. As the old saying goes, shit comes out of the same hole. Old mother Corbyn certainly shat out a couple of steaming turds with Piers and Jezza
Bull shit, one of the main culprits was a raging right wing nutter and ex Tory councillor"Do you call Christian Wakeford an ex Tory MP or the Labour MP for Bury South? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda " You will be devastated when Boris goes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda " I watched the Guardians on line clip of this. All you could hear was traitor, magna Carter, Assange and journalist but they still advertised the clip as people shouting about Savile. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda I watched the Guardians on line clip of this. All you could hear was traitor, magna Carter, Assange and journalist but they still advertised the clip as people shouting about Savile." Did you watch it all? They kept shouting Saville and pedo protector, however they are anti vax loons so that probably explains why they believe Boris | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda You will be devastated when Boris goes " Not as devastated as people are that he still remains... I don't like his policies and have pushed the party towards the left a nudge. If there was an competent opposition with a decent media then he would of gone weeks ago but at present there is no opposition, sadly. They have a vast majority but haven't done anything with it. A good opposition forces the government of the day to actually act. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda I watched the Guardians on line clip of this. All you could hear was traitor, magna Carter, Assange and journalist but they still advertised the clip as people shouting about Savile. Did you watch it all? They kept shouting Saville and pedo protector, however they are anti vax loons so that probably explains why they believe Boris " They also shout peado protector at BBC news people and other journalists. Their mission is to bring down the government and its weak opposition, in their own words | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda You will be devastated when Boris goes Not as devastated as people are that he still remains... I don't like his policies and have pushed the party towards the left a nudge. If there was an competent opposition with a decent media then he would of gone weeks ago but at present there is no opposition, sadly. They have a vast majority but haven't done anything with it. A good opposition forces the government of the day to actually act. " I hope he stays, he is destroying your party, the longer he lingers the better | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement "No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda I watched the Guardians on line clip of this. All you could hear was traitor, magna Carter, Assange and journalist but they still advertised the clip as people shouting about Savile. Did you watch it all? They kept shouting Saville and pedo protector, however they are anti vax loons so that probably explains why they believe Boris They also shout peado protector at BBC news people and other journalists. Their mission is to bring down the government and its weak opposition, in their own words" No matter how you try and spin this Boris has shot himself in the foot, he really is as thick as shit | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys. "Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys.
Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo " so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys.
Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo "Kieth even said in his past comments about being the Head, the buck stops with him, he was head at the time, let's not talk about Knighting a peado when there's Lord Ahmed lifetime labour peer. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys.
Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job ."He has nothing to do with case Are you saying that if there were any parties at No 10? Then Boris is responsible? The Tory party have been pedo protectors | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys.
Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo
Kieth even said in his past comments about being the Head, the buck stops with him, he was head at the time, let's not talk about Knighting a peado when there's Lord Ahmed lifetime labour peer. "Ok, you are parroting the usual right wing nonsense, it really doesn’t matter, this has backfired, it is just another nail in Boris’s coffin, it is great to watch his slow and painful downfall | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is just another political scoring match group think ran from the media that want to topple Boris, the protesters own mission was to take down the government and its "weak opposition" in their own words.... There was 2 shouts about Saville, most was about the magna carta, being a traitor, peado protector and also Assange, that won't stop the tory haters online though. Its hilarious how left wing tabloids attribute this to Boris, almost as if they have an agenda You will be devastated when Boris goes Not as devastated as people are that he still remains... I don't like his policies and have pushed the party towards the left a nudge. If there was an competent opposition with a decent media then he would of gone weeks ago but at present there is no opposition, sadly. They have a vast majority but haven't done anything with it. A good opposition forces the government of the day to actually act. " It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job ." If he was no good at his job why did he get a Knighthood for it during David Cameron's parliament? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job . If he was no good at his job why did he get a Knighthood for it during David Cameron's parliament?" Ha, brilliant reply | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys. "Costa, one difference this far is that Boris has lied to Parliament over the parties he 'condemned', refused to say whether as the bloke at the top that he will take any responsibility for the ones he attended and happened on his watch.. Starmer like Cameron's apology over Hillsborough is how leaders are meant to act even when they had no previous direct involvement in the actual issue.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.." My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on" Boris is finished, if he manages to survive this there will be other scandals to come, time for you to accept reality and start to plan for a new leader | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on" Yep. I've said it a million times. People who vote Tory don't give a shit about any of his multiple and continuous scandals and fuck ups. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on" The Tories who are not part of the cult of Boris want to see the full report, any pictures which are part of that will be damning for them as a party if they don't act.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on Yep. I've said it a million times. People who vote Tory don't give a shit about any of his multiple and continuous scandals and fuck ups." Majority of the "scandals" are just a lynch mob attack by the media/ wonderful world of twitter and are infact not representing the real world views... Cake gate, wallpaper gate, party gate... Hence why the polls are now going back up and any decent opposition would be leagues ahead but the Labour of today caters to the metropolitan and the overly woke. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on The Tories who are not part of the cult of Boris want to see the full report, any pictures which are part of that will be damning for them as a party if they don't act.. " I have said in this thread I am far from the cult of Boris but not part of the self jerking circle of twitter faux outrage of left wing toilet papers like the guardian and the mirror. I also hate the views of the daily fail, scum and torygrapgh. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on Boris is finished, if he manages to survive this there will be other scandals to come, time for you to accept reality and start to plan for a new leader " Realistically there is none at present.... In the real world people are caring about the brink of a world war and not party gate but hey the media go to Ukraine and the first 2 questions to Boris are about party gate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job . If he was no good at his job why did he get a Knighthood for it during David Cameron's parliament?" Erm, could it be because all former DPPs are awarded a knighthood / damehood when they step down, regardless of how crap they are? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on Boris is finished, if he manages to survive this there will be other scandals to come, time for you to accept reality and start to plan for a new leader Realistically there is none at present.... In the real world people are caring about the brink of a world war and not party gate but hey the media go to Ukraine and the first 2 questions to Boris are about party gate. " Boris is finished, the sooner you learn to accept this the better, Dom Cummings (who is a cunt) has plenty more up his sleeve | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have I Got News For You tweet "Police have arrested two antivaxers for shouting Jimmy Savile abuse at Kier Starmer. They have yet to find a single brain cell" " How does shouting abuse a kier starmer about jimmy saville and julian assange make them "anti vaxxers" Can anyone remind me? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job . If he was no good at his job why did he get a Knighthood for it during David Cameron's parliament? Erm, could it be because all former DPPs are awarded a knighthood / damehood when they step down, regardless of how crap they are?" Do all children entertainers /DJ peados also get them? Or only those who are Tories and friends with Thatcher? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job . If he was no good at his job why did he get a Knighthood for it during David Cameron's parliament? Erm, could it be because all former DPPs are awarded a knighthood / damehood when they step down, regardless of how crap they are?" Same with former speakers but the last one hahaha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have I Got News For You tweet "Police have arrested two antivaxers for shouting Jimmy Savile abuse at Kier Starmer. They have yet to find a single brain cell" How does shouting abuse a kier starmer about jimmy saville and julian assange make them "anti vaxxers" Can anyone remind me?" Nothing, the reason they were there was to parrot the trucker protests, and failed, but to get rid of the government and opposition. Then just shouted everything they could but the media runs with the minute Saville comments and not the traitor, peado protector, magna carta and Assange shouts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do all children entertainers /DJ peados also get them? Or only those who are Tories and friends with Thatcher? " Not sure about knighthoods. It's certainly true that Greville Janner QC, former Labour MP for Leicester West, was made a life peer in 1997 in the early days of the New Labour government, despite there having been several allegations of child abuse made against him from 1991 onwards, and dating back all the way to 1955. Again, despite three investigations (1991, 2002, and 2006) the CPS and the police refused to take matters further, even though there was extensive credible evidence against Janner. Finally, in 2013-14, police submitted a file to CPS, who again decided not to prosecute on the grounds of Janner's "ill health". If he hadn't been ill he'd have faced 22 charges of indecent assaults and buggery against minors. Following this decision, the Labour Party finally moved to suspend him, FOURTEEN YEARS after the allegations first surfaced. Of course, being elevated to the House of Lords, and never having been a frontbencher, means that Greville Janner could not have been one the two Labour MPs, both former ministers, who were caught by Operation Ore (the same op that caught Pete Townshend and Chris Langham) paying with their credit cards to access child pornography. It was an enormous shock at the time, but swiftly covered up following the issue of a D-Notice (D for Defence of the Realm Act) by the New Labour government to kill the story on the grounds of national security. The only reference you'll find left online is a piece in the Guardian dated Mon 13 Jan 2003, reporting that Scotland Yard had been sent details of the MPs by US police. Needless to say, no further action was taken. Has anyone mentioned Lord Ahmed yet, or would that be overkill? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do all children entertainers /DJ peados also get them? Or only those who are Tories and friends with Thatcher? Not sure about knighthoods. It's certainly true that Greville Janner QC, former Labour MP for Leicester West, was made a life peer in 1997 in the early days of the New Labour government, despite there having been several allegations of child abuse made against him from 1991 onwards, and dating back all the way to 1955. Again, despite three investigations (1991, 2002, and 2006) the CPS and the police refused to take matters further, even though there was extensive credible evidence against Janner. Finally, in 2013-14, police submitted a file to CPS, who again decided not to prosecute on the grounds of Janner's "ill health". If he hadn't been ill he'd have faced 22 charges of indecent assaults and buggery against minors. Following this decision, the Labour Party finally moved to suspend him, FOURTEEN YEARS after the allegations first surfaced. Of course, being elevated to the House of Lords, and never having been a frontbencher, means that Greville Janner could not have been one the two Labour MPs, both former ministers, who were caught by Operation Ore (the same op that caught Pete Townshend and Chris Langham) paying with their credit cards to access child pornography. It was an enormous shock at the time, but swiftly covered up following the issue of a D-Notice (D for Defence of the Realm Act) by the New Labour government to kill the story on the grounds of national security. The only reference you'll find left online is a piece in the Guardian dated Mon 13 Jan 2003, reporting that Scotland Yard had been sent details of the MPs by US police. Needless to say, no further action was taken. Has anyone mentioned Lord Ahmed yet, or would that be overkill? " Just to clarify, do all childrens entertainers /DJ pedos get Knighted or is it just Saville ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do all children entertainers /DJ peados also get them? Or only those who are Tories and friends with Thatcher? Not sure about knighthoods. It's certainly true that Greville Janner QC, former Labour MP for Leicester West, was made a life peer in 1997 in the early days of the New Labour government, despite there having been several allegations of child abuse made against him from 1991 onwards, and dating back all the way to 1955. Again, despite three investigations (1991, 2002, and 2006) the CPS and the police refused to take matters further, even though there was extensive credible evidence against Janner. Finally, in 2013-14, police submitted a file to CPS, who again decided not to prosecute on the grounds of Janner's "ill health". If he hadn't been ill he'd have faced 22 charges of indecent assaults and buggery against minors. Following this decision, the Labour Party finally moved to suspend him, FOURTEEN YEARS after the allegations first surfaced. Of course, being elevated to the House of Lords, and never having been a frontbencher, means that Greville Janner could not have been one the two Labour MPs, both former ministers, who were caught by Operation Ore (the same op that caught Pete Townshend and Chris Langham) paying with their credit cards to access child pornography. It was an enormous shock at the time, but swiftly covered up following the issue of a D-Notice (D for Defence of the Realm Act) by the New Labour government to kill the story on the grounds of national security. The only reference you'll find left online is a piece in the Guardian dated Mon 13 Jan 2003, reporting that Scotland Yard had been sent details of the MPs by US police. Needless to say, no further action was taken. Has anyone mentioned Lord Ahmed yet, or would that be overkill? " Btw, why did Thatcher decide to knight Cyril Smith despite knowing about sex abuse allegations about him? Seems she liked to give knight hoods to pedos | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was also clear that the majority were anti vaxers and the mob were shouting all sorts of things but as usual on here all we hear about is the jimmy saville comment.
It was the Saville smear that Johnson threw out, to inflame emotions amongst the gullible. Hence it's covered here. yes i understand that but dont you think it should be covered in context?
These people are obviously ignorant fools , hence why they are anti vaxers and believe Boris, do you think Boris should apologise and retract his statement No he didnt say anything that was not true as the speaker has pointed out and starmer was the top man at the time, the buck stops there as you keep saying over these partys.
Standard, here is the difference, Boris attended the parties, Starmer had nothing to do with the Saville case, it was your beloved party that protected abs then knighted a pedo so what you are saying is starmer was no good at his job ."You understand the difference between the legal profession and just doing what you want, don't you? The DPP is not supposed to intervene in individual matters. Decisions are made based on the available evidence and not modified because the DPP " thinks" that it will look good. You cannot prosecute if there is not sufficient evidence to have a good chance of conviction. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour" Well the Americans always do things bigger, louder and better than us.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Soooo... Johnson threw out a Smear based on a far-right conspiracy theory about Starmer + Jimmy Savile. It was an utter lie. Many MPs were disgusted, even Tories. But Johnson didn't retract it. Fast forward a while, a mob of right wing loons accosted Starmer in public, ranting about it. Cops had to get Starmer out of there. This is the sort of thing that happens when a figure who's supposedly a leader throws around this sort of shit." BJ is a leader in the same way that if lightning strikes your local 400,000volt mains grid pylon and a wire snaps, then you're gonna dance to the tune of the broken cable. Hope that helps. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It reminded me of Trump inciting the storming of The Capitolreally lol a handfull of bellends shouting at starmer is like jan 6th do me a favour Chris Bryant MP chair of the Parliamentary Standards Committee has just made the same comparison as me." Well he is talking out the top of his head also then he also thinks half a dozen people shouting bollox is the same as thousands streaming towards the capitol building | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's a tad naive to think Boris would have gone weeks ago, it's his own party that has his fate in their hands and no one else.. Let's see how the police investigation and the full Gray report steers this.. My prediction, fixed penalty for high enough civil servents, none for Boris personally, then they say they have issued x amount of FPN but don't reveal who they have given it too, doesn't matter what's in the grey report after it as its been dealt by the met... Life goes on Yep. I've said it a million times. People who vote Tory don't give a shit about any of his multiple and continuous scandals and fuck ups. Majority of the "scandals" are just a lynch mob attack by the media/ wonderful world of twitter and are infact not representing the real world views... Cake gate, wallpaper gate, party gate... Hence why the polls are now going back up and any decent opposition would be leagues ahead but the Labour of today caters to the metropolitan and the overly woke. " Lolz. I think we are in full agreement. Yeah as I said Tory voters just don't care how badly they fuck us all over. I did enjoy the "what about Labour" jibe too. Lol. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Watching Chanel 4 news about the mob from yesterday. Jeez what a Bunch of fucking misfits
"That sounds a fair description of them. Apparently this lot are not new to this sort of action having treated other politicians in the same way and quite recently too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We don't believe the spin of any media as they all have their own agendas. The media is there to distract and divide us all, while advertising products for us to consume. That is all. That said, looking at the footage that is available of what actually happened, it looks like a group of people accusing Starmer of all sorts of things. Given that Labour have repeatedly stuck to the script of the Covid authoritarian policies it could just as easily be viewed that this relates to their past support of lockdowns. At the end of the day Boris is nothing more than a puppet for the people who bankroll his interests. The wiser folk should be asking who is digging the dirt and pushing for him to be gone, and why. Furthermore, which puppet will replace Boris and who will be their masters? " Nobody needs to dig dirt. He broadcasts what he does openly. We also know that it's Cummings who brought him to power with the same games. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, now that we've found out the truth of this "mob of right wing loons" in the OP, the usual subjects have gone quiet on that one. In the past, the looney labourists have always portrayed thugs as far right jack-booted skinheads. Today's thugs are much more likely to be left whingers who wear responsibly sourced vegan-friendly sandals and sport man-buns and beards. And that's just the women! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, now that we've found out the truth of this "mob of right wing loons" in the OP, the usual subjects have gone quiet on that one. In the past, the looney labourists have always portrayed thugs as far right jack-booted skinheads. Today's thugs are much more likely to be left whingers who wear responsibly sourced vegan-friendly sandals and sport man-buns and beards. And that's just the women! "Whoever they were, they were repeating a lie told by our Prime Minister in order to distract from being an incompetent leader and serial liar. You clearly believe otherwise, which after all this time seems remarkable considering how transparent his repeated tactics are, but if you want to believe, you believe. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, now that we've found out the truth of this "mob of right wing loons" in the OP, the usual subjects have gone quiet on that one. In the past, the looney labourists have always portrayed thugs as far right jack-booted skinheads. Today's thugs are much more likely to be left whingers who wear responsibly sourced vegan-friendly sandals and sport man-buns and beards. And that's just the women!
Whoever they were, they were repeating a lie told by our Prime Minister in order to distract from being an incompetent leader and serial liar.
You clearly believe otherwise, which after all this time seems remarkable considering how transparent his repeated tactics are, but if you want to believe, you believe."It's known exactly who they were. One of them was Will Coleshill, who is editor of 'Resistance GB'. The video quite clearly shows him screeching 'You are the leader of the opposition - why aren't you standing up for our constitution? For the working classes of this country. What about the working people of this country? Aren't you meant to be the opposition?' So, nothing to do with the PM and all about the incompetence of Starmer - your hapless idol. You should try finding out the facts rather than making up your own version to fit your agenda. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, now that we've found out the truth of this "mob of right wing loons" in the OP, the usual subjects have gone quiet on that one. In the past, the looney labourists have always portrayed thugs as far right jack-booted skinheads. Today's thugs are much more likely to be left whingers who wear responsibly sourced vegan-friendly sandals and sport man-buns and beards. And that's just the women!
Whoever they were, they were repeating a lie told by our Prime Minister in order to distract from being an incompetent leader and serial liar.
You clearly believe otherwise, which after all this time seems remarkable considering how transparent his repeated tactics are, but if you want to believe, you believe.
It's known exactly who they were. One of them was Will Coleshill, who is editor of 'Resistance GB'. The video quite clearly shows him screeching 'You are the leader of the opposition - why aren't you standing up for our constitution? For the working classes of this country. What about the working people of this country? Aren't you meant to be the opposition?' So, nothing to do with the PM and all about the incompetence of Starmer - your hapless idol. You should try finding out the facts rather than making up your own version to fit your agenda."Nobody said that BoJo was mentioned directly. He encouraged abusive behaviour with inflammatory language. He has done it before. What you hear most clearly is the person closest to the microphone. That is what you are writing about. If you do not want to hear anything else, then you won't. Are you saying that nothing else was said? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/keir-starmer-protesters-jimmy-savile-slurs-b2009596.html?r=91737 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, now that we've found out the truth of this "mob of right wing loons" in the OP, the usual subjects have gone quiet on that one. In the past, the looney labourists have always portrayed thugs as far right jack-booted skinheads. Today's thugs are much more likely to be left whingers who wear responsibly sourced vegan-friendly sandals and sport man-buns and beards. And that's just the women! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As has been widely reported in the media, and contrary to the bullshit in the opening post, the thugs who attacked Starmer were identified as some of Corbyn's extreme left anti-vax wankers. As the old saying goes, shit comes out of the same hole. Old mother Corbyn certainly shat out a couple of steaming turds with Piers and Jezza " this!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Just goes to show it not just Labour or Tory's they want to bring down but the who government no matter what.
as far as I can see they are just a bunch of wasters who don't work sponge off the state.
Mind you Pierce Corbyn is Loaded so he might be bank rolling them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As has been widely reported in the media, and contrary to the bullshit in the opening post, the thugs who attacked Starmer were identified as some of Corbyn's extreme left anti-vax wankers. As the old saying goes, shit comes out of the same hole. Old mother Corbyn certainly shat out a couple of steaming turds with Piers and Jezza "pmsl | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We don't believe the spin of any media as they all have their own agendas. The media is there to distract and divide us all, while advertising products for us to consume. That is all. That said, looking at the footage that is available of what actually happened, it looks like a group of people accusing Starmer of all sorts of things. Given that Labour have repeatedly stuck to the script of the Covid authoritarian policies it could just as easily be viewed that this relates to their past support of lockdowns. At the end of the day Boris is nothing more than a puppet for the people who bankroll his interests. The wiser folk should be asking who is digging the dirt and pushing for him to be gone, and why. Furthermore, which puppet will replace Boris and who will be their masters? " Simple answer. Jacob Rees Mogg. Because he's got a funny sounding double barrelled name. So that makes him worthy. He also seems to like enjoy wearing a blue and white shirt which I find quite disturbing. Yes, I HAVE visited the campsite just outside of Oranienburg. Hope that helps. Butcher of Downing Street. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer might have been head of the organisation. It is alleged he didn't know anything about the decision not to prosecute Saville. As the head, I honestly don't think he did not know anything about it. The case against a high profile public figure like Saville I would have expected or needed to cross his desk, if not clearly the position he held was not needed. I'd love a job in an organisation as the Head where cases with a potential for massive public interest wouldn't cross my desk. Makes you wonder about his level of leadership whilst there and how he run the organisation, it creates a lot of doubt about his leadership capability. " I would ask the same of the BBC. But what do I know? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
