FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Are the scandals over?...

Jump to newest
 

By *oo hot OP   Couple
over a year ago

North West

It's getting on for 4pm on Monday and little in the way of scandal and/or outrage has emanated from No 10 Drowning Street, or from the Drinks Cabinet.

Are we done? Is it all over?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester

My favourite at the moment isn’t a scandal it’s his new communications guy attempting to bolster Boris.

He firstly mentioned Boris singing I will survive. Right we all sing at business meetings. Then said “Boris is not a complete clown” . So we are to take from that he is a clown but not a “complete clown” . Absolutely hilarious . He can’t even do being a clown well!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"It's getting on for 4pm on Monday and little in the way of scandal and/or outrage has emanated from No 10 Drowning Street, or from the Drinks Cabinet.

Are we done? Is it all over?

"
Nope , puppet master cummings will drip some more in the coming weeks and sit back while he lets people with the same agenda try to bring boris down.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's getting on for 4pm on Monday and little in the way of scandal and/or outrage has emanated from No 10 Drowning Street, or from the Drinks Cabinet.

Are we done? Is it all over?

"

I doubt it, Boris won’t change, so there will be old scandals to leak and he will create new ones,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"It's getting on for 4pm on Monday and little in the way of scandal and/or outrage has emanated from No 10 Drowning Street, or from the Drinks Cabinet.

Are we done? Is it all over?

I doubt it, Boris won’t change, so there will be old scandals to leak and he will create new ones, "

Yeah, there will be some new bullshit.

Billions more handed to his mates, human shit used to pave carparks for thousands of trucks in the Kent Brexit car parks.

Doesn't matter. He'll get the votes anyway.

I can see why he stopped bothering to even pretend to care about the country a long time ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

It's in a pause phase maybe but the toxicity within the Tory party is still there and the police actions and publication of the full Gray report will push some MPs off the fence..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should. "

I saw that on the news, hardly surprising, Boris’s Saville comment is playing up to his supporters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should. "

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news "

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news "

This is now a daily occurrence, now we have starmer having to be protected by the police, as the crowd shout amongst other things jeers regarding Savile.

Boris has a nit on his back and he will need to resign before he can get rid of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then? "

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

"

And who created this narrative?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative? "

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative?

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about "

Irrelevant, they have latched on to a right wing lie that was repeated and endorsed by the PM in parliament, can you explain why you think this ok?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative?

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about

Irrelevant, they have latched on to a right wing lie that was repeated and endorsed by the PM in parliament, can you explain why you think this ok? "

Where did I say it’s ok ?

They are just another bunch of nutters who will latch on to anything against the establishment and sks is just another target.

But as Krishna guru Murphy said they have been there for ages accosting and badgering mps for ages.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative?

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about

Irrelevant, they have latched on to a right wing lie that was repeated and endorsed by the PM in parliament, can you explain why you think this ok?

Where did I say it’s ok ?

They are just another bunch of nutters who will latch on to anything against the establishment and sks is just another target.

But as Krishna guru Murphy said they have been there for ages accosting and badgering mps for ages.

"

Because your trying to downplay what they were saying as not being relevant as it will be ‘something else tomorrow’ . These idiots usually get there crack pot deluded ideas and conspiracy theories from face book and other unreliable sources, tonight they get their stupid theory from the what the PM said in the HOC , that is the difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative?

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about

Irrelevant, they have latched on to a right wing lie that was repeated and endorsed by the PM in parliament, can you explain why you think this ok?

Where did I say it’s ok ?

They are just another bunch of nutters who will latch on to anything against the establishment and sks is just another target.

But as Krishna guru Murphy said they have been there for ages accosting and badgering mps for ages.

Because your trying to downplay what they were saying as not being relevant as it will be ‘something else tomorrow’ . These idiots usually get there crack pot deluded ideas and conspiracy theories from face book and other unreliable sources, tonight they get their stupid theory from the what the PM said in the HOC , that is the difference. "

In shadow of a recently murdered MP to send out incorrect Information regarding another MP is against HOC rules which was why Boris was ask to retract the claim.

Now the public are repeating his words, this isn't good and why he should resign to put an end to the saga.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will Boris’ slurs against SKS (under the cover of parliamentary privilege) which seem to have encouraged (incitement?) and attack (or serious risk of one) on SKS result in a Scandal? It should.

Those antivax nutters have been outside Westminster since way before those comments in the house and they have been bothering anyone and everyone they can for ages now.

It’s just the press have seized on the moment to sell news

Why were they shouting out Saville, and you protects Peadophilles then?

Because that’s the narrative of the moment.

And who created this narrative?

The point is that they will latch onto anything tomorrow it will be something else to shout about

Irrelevant, they have latched on to a right wing lie that was repeated and endorsed by the PM in parliament, can you explain why you think this ok?

Where did I say it’s ok ?

They are just another bunch of nutters who will latch on to anything against the establishment and sks is just another target.

But as Krishna guru Murphy said they have been there for ages accosting and badgering mps for ages.

Because your trying to downplay what they were saying as not being relevant as it will be ‘something else tomorrow’ . These idiots usually get there crack pot deluded ideas and conspiracy theories from face book and other unreliable sources, tonight they get their stupid theory from the what the PM said in the HOC , that is the difference.

In shadow of a recently murdered MP to send out incorrect Information regarding another MP is against HOC rules which was why Boris was ask to retract the claim.

Now the public are repeating his words, this isn't good and why he should resign to put an end to the saga."

He won’t resign, but he could apologise and retract what he said, he won’t do that either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When a PM uses this type of language it invites danger to MP’s hasn’t he learned anything from last years tragedy?

Either he knowingly knew what would happen, or he talks without thinking of the ramifications of his actions. Either way, dangerous and divisive, with real world consequences, not just to opposition members but his own party too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uninlondon69Man
over a year ago

Tower Bridge South

This is a PM who told an MP that the death threats she was getting that quoted his words were "humbug".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *rFunBoyMan
over a year ago

Longridge

Trumpism seems to be the way..

Seed the hatred, step back and watch others do the dirty stuff for you..

Jan 6th being one example of many.

Boris should have been told to retract his comments or leave the Commons last week, not Ian Blackford who was doing nothing but tell the truth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top