Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After years of ripping down gas storage sites, leaving little rainy day storage when wholesale prices are high. Every town in this country had gas storage facilities from legacy town gas which where later converted to store natural methane gas. There are no facilities here to compress gas to liquid to be stored in bulk. The times we hear wholesale gas prices are so cheap, suppliers are literally paid to take it. EU Storage capacity terawatt/hours Italy: 166 Germany: 147 Netherlands: 77 Poland: 34 Spain: 25 UK: 9 So when gas is abundant and cheap on the wholesale market mainly in summer, there is no where to buy cheap and store for winter. No wonder we are so exposed to Winter wholesale prices, the number of years we've heard the comments "Energy Security"? Just like PPE, there is little. So what are the plans if the Gas ships stop coming as they've gone to the highest bidder. Blackouts and no heating? " I agree .. This is partly due to the ease you can build onshore storage on the continent due to different geology | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After years of ripping down gas storage sites, leaving little rainy day storage when wholesale prices are high. Every town in this country had gas storage facilities from legacy town gas which where later converted to store natural methane gas. There are no facilities here to compress gas to liquid to be stored in bulk. The times we hear wholesale gas prices are so cheap, suppliers are literally paid to take it. EU Storage capacity terawatt/hours Italy: 166 Germany: 147 Netherlands: 77 Poland: 34 Spain: 25 UK: 9 So when gas is abundant and cheap on the wholesale market mainly in summer, there is no where to buy cheap and store for winter. No wonder we are so exposed to Winter wholesale prices, the number of years we've heard the comments "Energy Security"? Just like PPE, there is little. So what are the plans if the Gas ships stop coming as they've gone to the highest bidder. Blackouts and no heating? I agree .. This is partly due to the ease you can build onshore storage on the continent due to different geology " I gather you're meaning underground storage by geology? There are North Sea fields redundant they could use, as well as the now dismantled gas storage towers in every Town and city. The ultimate storage is liquefied, during summer compress cheaper gas as it arrives using surplus renewable energy, recover the heat released for industry into Heat Batteries which can then be stoted and driven around in shipping containers as yet another renewable source. One 40ft container can hold up to 25MW equivalent heat and dropped of at schools or office buildings to use. When needed, decompress back into the Grid and the cold again recovered into Heat Batteries for industrial cooling. I am surprised there has yet, NOT been a single mention of fracking and blame for high prices thrown at those that rejected it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As I have said elsewhere and have never stopped saying… ‘Can’t help but notice that virtually all of the privatised services have enriched the private providers whilst prices to the public have gone through the roof. I have never understood why transport, energy and communications were handed over to private entities when they represent the very fabric of a society.’" you forgot to mention that the framework in which the privatisations were delivered has lead to the consumer being entirely starved of any choice whatsoever unless it is part of the conservative and unionist parties chumocratic cartel. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As I have said elsewhere and have never stopped saying… ‘Can’t help but notice that virtually all of the privatised services have enriched the private providers whilst prices to the public have gone through the roof. I have never understood why transport, energy and communications were handed over to private entities when they represent the very fabric of a society.’" For any society to not have control of its own essentials is madness, of course the rampant free marketeers will disagree but turning on a tap in any part of this country should not excessively profit foreign states.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did anyone see that report of the undersea interconnect cable from Scotland to Wales where energy companies have just been hit with £150m for being late. There is a vast amount of wind energy 'trapped' in Scotland as there is no cable to bring it to England via Wales, which would have significantly reduced reliance on gas generation this winter. £15m has been handed to the Energy Saving Trust to give out as vouchers as the knock, was higher energy prices. There is also an ongoing project to bring Solar and Wind here in 4x 2500 mile cables, bypassing Europe at cost of £21b, enough for 8 million homes." There are much more than undersea cables. There are undersea oil lines, undersea gas lines also. Not to mention undersea telecom lines....... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There sure is.. Power cable is a different beast. I wonder how much is lost over 2500 miles. DC Voltage will be incredible." I'm no expert on this matter, but as I understand it, there have been many arguments throughout the years between famous inventors about the merits of DC and AC. Apparently, DC power is less efficient because much of it is "lost" in transit. A bit like my Hermes parcels I guess. However, DC requires only 1 cable and therefore is more efficient on the hardware side of things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There sure is.. Power cable is a different beast. I wonder how much is lost over 2500 miles. DC Voltage will be incredible. I'm no expert on this matter, but as I understand it, there have been many arguments throughout the years between famous inventors about the merits of DC and AC. Apparently, DC power is less efficient because much of it is "lost" in transit. A bit like my Hermes parcels I guess. However, DC requires only 1 cable and therefore is more efficient on the hardware side of things." Surprisingly, the long distance underwater cables are very high voltage DC. AC suffers massive impedance and resonance losses so DC, high voltage, low current is used. Submarine power cables are cables for electrical power running through the sea, below the surface. For transmission of large amounts of electric power through submarine cables, direct current(DC) is preferred, because DC cables require less reactive power than submarine AC cables. As well, for three phase AC-cables three conductors are necessary, while for DC only 1 or 2 conductors are required. A DC system may use the ground and seawater as a return path for current. However this cannot be always practiced because of disturbances to magnetic compass systems on vessels crossing the cable and because of ecological effects of electrochemical reactions at the electrodes. The length of AC cables is restricted by capacitance between the active conductors and the surrounding earth (or water). If the cable were to be made long enough, the reactive power consumed by the cable would take up the entire current carrying capacity of the conductor, so no usable power would be transmitted. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There sure is.. Power cable is a different beast. I wonder how much is lost over 2500 miles. DC Voltage will be incredible. I'm no expert on this matter, but as I understand it, there have been many arguments throughout the years between famous inventors about the merits of DC and AC. Apparently, DC power is less efficient because much of it is "lost" in transit. A bit like my Hermes parcels I guess. However, DC requires only 1 cable and therefore is more efficient on the hardware side of things. Surprisingly, the long distance underwater cables are very high voltage DC. AC suffers massive impedance and resonance losses so DC, high voltage, low current is used. Submarine power cables are cables for electrical power running through the sea, below the surface. For transmission of large amounts of electric power through submarine cables, direct current(DC) is preferred, because DC cables require less reactive power than submarine AC cables. As well, for three phase AC-cables three conductors are necessary, while for DC only 1 or 2 conductors are required. A DC system may use the ground and seawater as a return path for current. However this cannot be always practiced because of disturbances to magnetic compass systems on vessels crossing the cable and because of ecological effects of electrochemical reactions at the electrodes. The length of AC cables is restricted by capacitance between the active conductors and the surrounding earth (or water). If the cable were to be made long enough, the reactive power consumed by the cable would take up the entire current carrying capacity of the conductor, so no usable power would be transmitted. " I'm no professional in these AC/DC matters, but thankyou for the reply. Food for thought. If Nikolai Tesla was around today, he would be suing the pants of old Elon. I'm off to watch BigClive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |