FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Priti Patel

Jump to newest
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby

Has quietly made protest illegal

If you look in the opinion of a PC

It can be initiated “whether or not the constable has any grounds for suspecting that the person… is carrying a prohibited object”.

Anyone found guilty of obstructing a stop and search during a protest faces a jail term “not exceeding 51 weeks”. In other words, they risk imprisonment for nearly a year.

Amendment 319D criminalises the obstruction of “major transport works”, including roads, rail lines or airport runways. Amendment 319A creates an offence of “locking on”, or carrying equipment which might facilitate it. Got a tube of super glue, or a bike lock, even though you are on a bike? You break the law.

Just think about that, and think about the Suffareget movement.

An SDPO ( serious disruption prevention order ) is basically a protest Asbo. It can be imposed on anyone convicted of a “protest-related offence”. This category alone is extremely broad. It potentially applies, under the provisions of the bill itself, to the examples above – possessing superglue near a demonstration, or holding hands during a protest.

Shout "BoZo out" get nicked and you can then get arrested for holding hands with your partner.

Amendment 342M.2.iii allows it to be imposed on people whose activities “were likely to result in serious disruption”. In other words, you do not even have to have been convicted of a crime. You do not even need to have caused disruption. It’s enough that you might have.

They can be blocked from using the internet to “encourage” people to “carry out activities related to a protest”. Someone who used their social media account to promote a demonstration could be found in breach of the order.

Before the "it's only the lefties who need to worry" just think of what this would have done to brexit protests, fuel protests those marching to support the NHS?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby

Apologies for poor English.

I have man Flu at moment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton

If these amendments pass (and with the Tory majority and whip they will) welcome to the Fascist State of Britain

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

A year in prison lol your either being a drama queen or u dont know how the system works get banged up for a year you be lucky if your inside for more than four months,its like the insulate britain lot got given three months last week they will back out before xmas

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A year in prison lol your either being a drama queen or u dont know how the system works get banged up for a year you be lucky if your inside for more than four months,its like the insulate britain lot got given three months last week they will back out before xmas"

Your completely missing the point

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood


"A year in prison lol your either being a drama queen or u dont know how the system works get banged up for a year you be lucky if your inside for more than four months,its like the insulate britain lot got given three months last week they will back out before xmas

Your completely missing the point "
yawwwwwn you again eh lol im sure your stalking me,i never comment on what you post but you feel the need to comment on my posts even though ive asked you not to converse with me,now run along young man xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does. "

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebjonnsonMan
over a year ago

Maldon

It seems to be happening right across the ‘free’ world. Just look at the way the police look more like a paramilitary force wherever there is a protest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A year in prison lol your either being a drama queen or u dont know how the system works get banged up for a year you be lucky if your inside for more than four months,its like the insulate britain lot got given three months last week they will back out before xmas

Your completely missing the point yawwwwwn you again eh lol im sure your stalking me,i never comment on what you post but you feel the need to comment on my posts even though ive asked you not to converse with me,now run along young man xx"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"It seems to be happening right across the ‘free’ world. Just look at the way the police look more like a paramilitary force wherever there is a protest."

Because the criminals are getting a lot more violent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does. "

Ministers and government controls the parliamentary agenda.

1/10

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebjonnsonMan
over a year ago

Maldon


"It seems to be happening right across the ‘free’ world. Just look at the way the police look more like a paramilitary force wherever there is a protest.

Because the criminals are getting a lot more violent "

Criminals? The people I saw on the streets of Amsterdam & Brussels didn’t look hard core to me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!"

Thats for the future. The bill is with the Lords, ready for its line by line examination stage.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!

Thats for the future. The bill is with the Lords, ready for its line by line examination stage. "

You know well enough this will go through. Are you happy with the proposals?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!

Thats for the future. The bill is with the Lords, ready for its line by line examination stage.

You know well enough this will go through. Are you happy with the proposals?"

I've not had time to delve deep into it, just seeing the headlin news on it.

The left are against it, the right, all for it. As usual with these things, the best solution is probably in the middle.

The Lords will push for amendments, and a watered down bill may well come back to the HoC.

If BJ's and PP's standings keep falling, some back bench Conservative MPs may well go against it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields

I suspect "the right" are for it because everything is going their way at the moment.

In the future, there maybe a swing to the left, and they would have a different perspective if they're not able to protest against what they see as wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!

Thats for the future. The bill is with the Lords, ready for its line by line examination stage.

You know well enough this will go through. Are you happy with the proposals?

I've not had time to delve deep into it, just seeing the headlin news on it.

The left are against it, the right, all for it. As usual with these things, the best solution is probably in the middle.

The Lords will push for amendments, and a watered down bill may well come back to the HoC.

If BJ's and PP's standings keep falling, some back bench Conservative MPs may well go against it. "

80

Seat

Majority

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"I suspect "the right" are for it because everything is going their way at the moment.

In the future, there maybe a swing to the left, and they would have a different perspective if they're not able to protest against what they see as wrong. "

Bottom line is to ask whether living in a democracy we citizens should have a right to protest without fear of reproach or an over zealous interpretation of the law by the police.

Of course there are bad apples. Of course there are anarchists or agent provocateurs who will hijack peaceful protest. But laws that can easily be misapplied and therefore remove our hard won rights should be viewed with the utmost suspicion!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol


"It seems to be happening right across the ‘free’ world. Just look at the way the police look more like a paramilitary force wherever there is a protest.

Because the criminals are getting a lot more violent

Criminals? The people I saw on the streets of Amsterdam & Brussels didn’t look hard core to me."

And when people start throwing things at the police as so often happens now are they supposed to use harsh words at them ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"It seems to be happening right across the ‘free’ world. Just look at the way the police look more like a paramilitary force wherever there is a protest.

Because the criminals are getting a lot more violent

Criminals? The people I saw on the streets of Amsterdam & Brussels didn’t look hard core to me.

And when people start throwing things at the police as so often happens now are they supposed to use harsh words at them ?

"

If you assault a PC then you are in trouble.

The proposed law means if a PC doesn't like the look of you he or she can arrest you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberatedduoCouple
over a year ago

Ashbourne

[Removed by poster at 26/11/21 10:11:08]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberatedduoCouple
over a year ago

Ashbourne


"Ministers and Goverments do not pass laws, Parliament does.

And when you have an 80 seat majority full of spineless career MPs who dare not go against the whip it means it will pass into law!"

Who voted for this majority and does anyone now wished they hadn’t?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Has quietly made protest illegal

If you look in the opinion of a PC

It can be initiated “whether or not the constable has any grounds for suspecting that the person… is carrying a prohibited object”.

Anyone found guilty of obstructing a stop and search during a protest faces a jail term “not exceeding 51 weeks”. In other words, they risk imprisonment for nearly a year.

Amendment 319D criminalises the obstruction of “major transport works”, including roads, rail lines or airport runways. Amendment 319A creates an offence of “locking on”, or carrying equipment which might facilitate it. Got a tube of super glue, or a bike lock, even though you are on a bike? You break the law.

Just think about that, and think about the Suffareget movement.

An SDPO ( serious disruption prevention order ) is basically a protest Asbo. It can be imposed on anyone convicted of a “protest-related offence”. This category alone is extremely broad. It potentially applies, under the provisions of the bill itself, to the examples above – possessing superglue near a demonstration, or holding hands during a protest.

Shout "BoZo out" get nicked and you can then get arrested for holding hands with your partner.

Amendment 342M.2.iii allows it to be imposed on people whose activities “were likely to result in serious disruption”. In other words, you do not even have to have been convicted of a crime. You do not even need to have caused disruption. It’s enough that you might have.

They can be blocked from using the internet to “encourage” people to “carry out activities related to a protest”. Someone who used their social media account to promote a demonstration could be found in breach of the order.

Before the "it's only the lefties who need to worry" just think of what this would have done to brexit protests, fuel protests those marching to support the NHS?

"
and what's your objection what's wrong with it yes some extremes but that not what will happen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox Sake OP   Couple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"Has quietly made protest illegal

If you look in the opinion of a PC

It can be initiated “whether or not the constable has any grounds for suspecting that the person… is carrying a prohibited object”.

Anyone found guilty of obstructing a stop and search during a protest faces a jail term “not exceeding 51 weeks”. In other words, they risk imprisonment for nearly a year.

Amendment 319D criminalises the obstruction of “major transport works”, including roads, rail lines or airport runways. Amendment 319A creates an offence of “locking on”, or carrying equipment which might facilitate it. Got a tube of super glue, or a bike lock, even though you are on a bike? You break the law.

Just think about that, and think about the Suffareget movement.

An SDPO ( serious disruption prevention order ) is basically a protest Asbo. It can be imposed on anyone convicted of a “protest-related offence”. This category alone is extremely broad. It potentially applies, under the provisions of the bill itself, to the examples above – possessing superglue near a demonstration, or holding hands during a protest.

Shout "BoZo out" get nicked and you can then get arrested for holding hands with your partner.

Amendment 342M.2.iii allows it to be imposed on people whose activities “were likely to result in serious disruption”. In other words, you do not even have to have been convicted of a crime. You do not even need to have caused disruption. It’s enough that you might have.

They can be blocked from using the internet to “encourage” people to “carry out activities related to a protest”. Someone who used their social media account to promote a demonstration could be found in breach of the order.

Before the "it's only the lefties who need to worry" just think of what this would have done to brexit protests, fuel protests those marching to support the NHS?

and what's your objection what's wrong with it yes some extremes but that not what will happen."

A lots wrong with it.

Do you think you should have no right to protest?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ealthy_and_HungMan
over a year ago

Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney

hopefully a future home secretay will use her new laws to remove her citizenship from her while she is abroad on account of her being a danger to the country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top