Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition" Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition" Only today Dorsey has admitted its algorithms are biased towards right wing politicians and news outlets. Straight from the horse’s mouth. At least try and keep up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition" You sign up for Facebook or Twitter you sign up for their terms of service. If you don't like it, tough. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well "Truth? Haha, your kidding me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well
Truth? Haha, your kidding me "It gets funnier, the terms of service for "truth" contain a clause stating that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well
Truth? Haha, your kidding me
It gets funnier, the terms of service for "truth" contain a
clause stating that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site."
"Haha, Priceless | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well
Truth? Haha, your kidding me
It gets funnier, the terms of service for "truth" contain a
clause stating that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site."
Haha, Priceless "If you don't want anything to do with it, don't. Simple as that isn't it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did "You've been watching the BBC and reading far-left rubbish
I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
You've been watching the BBC and reading far-left rubbish
I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'?"I sat and watched the insurrection live on TV. This includes the speech given by trump. He tried to encourage his followers, some of whom were armed, to storm the capitol. He did nothing to stop it, no tweets or TV until after the worst of it. He knew what he was doing. Sooner he is behind bars after a fair trial, the better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'?" Wow….. I’ll tell you what…. Let me go and eat my breakfast… and then I will come back and answer it… blow by blow…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'? Wow….. I’ll tell you what…. Let me go and eat my breakfast… and then I will come back and answer it… blow by blow…." Gets large box of popcorn A few tinnies Sits in comfy chair  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'? Wow….. I’ll tell you what…. Let me go and eat my breakfast… and then I will come back and answer it… blow by blow…." Right…. Okay…. Do I believe he was inciting an insurrection… hmmm Okay.. bearing in mind we all saw what happened… and some of the speeches in which more than one speaker is facing civil charges for what they said at the rally (guiliani, mo brooks,) …. And the fact that trump put pressure on pence to not ratify the results ( which pence could not do anyway) … and the fact that trump delayed the sending out of the DC national guard (dc doesn’t have a governor, so any request for the national guard from the mayor, it has to go thru the DOD, who then have to run it up to the president….. in fact he delayed the process so much that the DC mayor ended up doing a run around and called the governors of Virginia and Maryland asking them to send theirs to Washington) …. And the hostage message on social media telling people to “stop, no really, I love you, you are right to fight, I love you “ .. paraphrasing a bit but basically that is what he said Isn’t it ironic that he mocks the police who protect the capitol, but lauded over the protesters charged and the woman who died! And why is he trying to obstruct the commission by instructing people not to comply with the subpoena’s… I mean if bannon had nothing to hide, wouldn’t he be the first person to tell the world… in fact wouldn’t he demand the session be held in public to give he the platform to tell the world…. Or he could always plead the fifth!!!
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well
Truth? Haha, your kidding me
It gets funnier, the terms of service for "truth" contain a
clause stating that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site."
Haha, Priceless
If you don't want anything to do with it, don't. Simple as that isn't it?"Yes, it is, thanks for that information, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition" Does this Taliban account you mention follow the T&C's of Facebook and Twitter? Trump was booted because he consistently didn't, and he was given way more wiggle room than anyone else would have been. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well "Just having a laugh TRUTH trumps reality unchecked truth horseshit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did "what far right press exists in uk? 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
"Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right. Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there"oh a headline from 80 years ago, along with, does king kong live in the amazon? damn those japs? and three cheers for english cricket lol ...... i have a book from 1930 called its good to be gay lol people thought different then! Bet your grandma read it lol Its hardly FAR right, but i guess everything is awesome and legendary now, even when youve never heard of it! many people, what ten on fab | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trumps launched his own social media platform "Truth", if it enjoys the same success as his university he's going to end out of pocket, well this is Trump, so it may not be his money. At its launch it was trolled with people registering the user names DonaldTrump DonaldJTrump And mikepence It's not going well
Truth? Haha, your kidding me
It gets funnier, the terms of service for "truth" contain a
clause stating that users may not "disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site."
Haha, Priceless
If you don't want anything to do with it, don't. Simple as that isn't it?
Yes, it is, thanks for that information, "Any time | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'? Wow….. I’ll tell you what…. Let me go and eat my breakfast… and then I will come back and answer it… blow by blow…. Right…. Okay…. Do I believe he was inciting an insurrection… hmmm Okay.. bearing in mind we all saw what happened… and some of the speeches in which more than one speaker is facing civil charges for what they said at the rally (guiliani, mo brooks,) …. And the fact that trump put pressure on pence to not ratify the results ( which pence could not do anyway) … and the fact that trump delayed the sending out of the DC national guard (dc doesn’t have a governor, so any request for the national guard from the mayor, it has to go thru the DOD, who then have to run it up to the president….. in fact he delayed the process so much that the DC mayor ended up doing a run around and called the governors of Virginia and Maryland asking them to send theirs to Washington) …. And the hostage message on social media telling people to “stop, no really, I love you, you are right to fight, I love you “ .. paraphrasing a bit but basically that is what he said Isn’t it ironic that he mocks the police who protect the capitol, but lauded over the protesters charged and the woman who died! And why is he trying to obstruct the commission by instructing people not to comply with the subpoena’s… I mean if bannon had nothing to hide, wouldn’t he be the first person to tell the world… in fact wouldn’t he demand the session be held in public to give he the platform to tell the world…. Or he could always plead the fifth!!!
"In the words of Senator Mitch McConnell January 6th was a disgrace. American citizens attacked their own government. They used terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of democratic business they did not like. Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the vice president. They did this because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth – because he was angry he'd lost an election. Former President Trump's actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful dereliction of duty. The House accused the former president of, quote, "incitement." That is a specific term from the criminal law. Let me put that to the side for one moment and reiterate something I said weeks ago: There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day. The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. And their having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth. The issue is not only the president's intemperate language on January 6th. It is not just his endorsement of remarks in which an associate urged "trial by combat." It was also the entire manufactured atmosphere of looming catastrophe; the increasingly wild myths about a reverse landslide election that was being stolen in some secret coup by our now-president. I defended the president's right to bring any complaints to our legal system. The legal system spoke. The Electoral College spoke. As I stood up and said clearly at the time, the election was settled. But that reality just opened a new chapter of even wilder and more unfounded claims. The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things. Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally. This was different. This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters' decision or else torch our institutions on the way out. The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence began. Whatever our ex-president claims he thought might happen that day, whatever reaction he says he meant to produce, by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world. A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him. It was obvious that only President Trump could end this. Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the administration. But the president did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored. Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election! The words of Donald Trump to the insurrectionists, "We love you. You’re very special. Go home.” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there"Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there
Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand' "I read a couple of the lefts and rights. I'm not stuck with Tory or labour. I base my opinion on what I read/research. Sadly, if it's not what either side say, you get grief and slagged of, called all sorts etc. I would say that I have a lot of time for Frank field. Sadly, the left of his party are far too aggressive.. cue the usual shite | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I googled, yougov pole, daily mail considered most right wing, by 40% of people, so well under half, not exactly a kkk news letter then! Express by a margin less.... but 5% even considered guardian right wing "I read the mirror and the people, fuck knows why, and it's full of negative bile from start to finish. Even if your footy team wins 5-0 there's a negative slant. I read the sun and mail and it's at least got a positive outlook. They all play the pipe for their political allegiance but some are worse than others | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I expect you believe all sorts of nonsense about Trump. Did you believe he was 'inciting an insurrection'? Wow….. I’ll tell you what…. Let me go and eat my breakfast… and then I will come back and answer it… blow by blow…. Right…. Okay…. Do I believe he was inciting an insurrection… hmmm Okay.. bearing in mind we all saw what happened… and some of the speeches in which more than one speaker is facing civil charges for what they said at the rally (guiliani, mo brooks,) …. And the fact that trump put pressure on pence to not ratify the results ( which pence could not do anyway) … and the fact that trump delayed the sending out of the DC national guard (dc doesn’t have a governor, so any request for the national guard from the mayor, it has to go thru the DOD, who then have to run it up to the president….. in fact he delayed the process so much that the DC mayor ended up doing a run around and called the governors of Virginia and Maryland asking them to send theirs to Washington) …. And the hostage message on social media telling people to “stop, no really, I love you, you are right to fight, I love you “ .. paraphrasing a bit but basically that is what he said Isn’t it ironic that he mocks the police who protect the capitol, but lauded over the protesters charged and the woman who died! And why is he trying to obstruct the commission by instructing people not to comply with the subpoena’s… I mean if bannon had nothing to hide, wouldn’t he be the first person to tell the world… in fact wouldn’t he demand the session be held in public to give he the platform to tell the world…. Or he could always plead the fifth!!!
In the words of Senator Mitch McConnell
January 6th was a disgrace.
American citizens attacked their own government. They used terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of democratic business they did not like.
Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the vice president.
They did this because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth – because he was angry he'd lost an election.
Former President Trump's actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful dereliction of duty.
The House accused the former president of, quote, "incitement." That is a specific term from the criminal law.
Let me put that to the side for one moment and reiterate something I said weeks ago: There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day.
The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president.
And their having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.
The issue is not only the president's intemperate language on January 6th.
It is not just his endorsement of remarks in which an associate urged "trial by combat."
It was also the entire manufactured atmosphere of looming catastrophe; the increasingly wild myths about a reverse landslide election that was being stolen in some secret coup by our now-president.
I defended the president's right to bring any complaints to our legal system. The legal system spoke. The Electoral College spoke. As I stood up and said clearly at the time, the election was settled.
But that reality just opened a new chapter of even wilder and more unfounded claims.
The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.
Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally.
This was different.
This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters' decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.
The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence began.
Whatever our ex-president claims he thought might happen that day, whatever reaction he says he meant to produce, by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world.
A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.
It was obvious that only President Trump could end this.
Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the administration.
But the president did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored.
Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election!
The words of Donald Trump to the insurrectionists, "We love you. You’re very special. Go home.” "Pretty accurate and damning to boot.. Ty for posting it .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there
Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand' "The mirror got it badly wrong, and hasn't dabbled in that pond again. The daily fail however, still sticks to the right, to far right, of UK politics. Both the Fail and the Express are not recognised as legitimate sources of information by the likes of Wikipedia. That takes some doing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there
Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand'
The mirror got it badly wrong, and hasn't dabbled in that pond again. The daily fail however, still sticks to the right, to far right, of UK politics.
Both the Fail and the Express are not recognised as legitimate sources of information by the likes of Wikipedia. That takes some doing "They certainly did get it wrong and was to show that very old actions done by others should not taint today's people. I have always classed the DM as right wing but not far right personally. Same as I class the mirror as left wing but not far left | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there
Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand'
The mirror got it badly wrong, and hasn't dabbled in that pond again. The daily fail however, still sticks to the right, to far right, of UK politics.
Both the Fail and the Express are not recognised as legitimate sources of information by the likes of Wikipedia. That takes some doing
They certainly did get it wrong and was to show that very old actions done by others should not taint today's people.
I have always classed the DM as right wing but not far right personally. Same as I class the mirror as left wing but not far left"Ask yourself this, is the current editorial policy likely to support right wing politics or not? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's about time there was an alternative to Facebook, Twitter etc who allow Taliban accounts but don't allow a USA president. Zuckerberg, Dorsey etc don't allow free speech for views they don't like. Good luck to any new competition Oooh…. Someone has been reading the far right press to use that exact analogy… which rag???
To be honest trump got away with a lot more on social media than you or I because he was the president…. The fact that he kept pushing the envelope until he was banned for pushing a coup attempt (let’s not beat around the bush here) is no one’s fault but his own…….
I’m guessing his little venture will have the same success as trump university did
what far right press exists in uk?
Many people consider the express, you know the paper that ran a headline "hurrah for the Blackshirts" to be far right.
Daily Fail and it's constant abuse of refugees has to in there
Would you class the daily mirror as far right? In the same period of the daily mail headline you mention the daily mirror had a similar article headlined ' give the blackshirts a helping hand'
The mirror got it badly wrong, and hasn't dabbled in that pond again. The daily fail however, still sticks to the right, to far right, of UK politics.
Both the Fail and the Express are not recognised as legitimate sources of information by the likes of Wikipedia. That takes some doing
They certainly did get it wrong and was to show that very old actions done by others should not taint today's people.
I have always classed the DM as right wing but not far right personally. Same as I class the mirror as left wing but not far left
Ask yourself this, is the current editorial policy likely to support right wing politics or not?"I think the last 2 sentences in my previous post answers that exact question and also the same about the mirror. Or have I misunderstood your question | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seems that his social media platform is in technical trouble before it is even open for general use. The software has been ripped off from a General Public Licence package. This is not the same as freeware, the details are complex but basically it can only be used when (a) full credit is given to the original writers of the software, and (b) if the software is modified in any way, the full code is made visible to anybody that wants to see it. Apparently the trump organisation has removed all the creator credits and tried to claim it is all their own, and are refusing to release the source code. From the visible features of the software though it is apparently obvious to those familiar with the original package that this is what trump's people have done. Bottom line is that because of just stealing others hard work and not even giving credit where it is due, the real owners of the software may well be able to completely legally permanently turn off trumps new service before it is even going..." This is where parler went to pieces, they didn't have licences for their authentication process, they were using a trial version. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
