Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They have been ground testing this for six months now but great to see a flight take place. Was only one engine on a four engined 747, but everything went to plan. Current aviation rules only allow for 50% of a plane's engines to use SAF but progress is being made. " The way i read it was that they only used the one engine for the 3 odd hour flight but had to put it on a 4 engine plane as the other 3 were backup for safety reasons. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They have been ground testing this for six months now but great to see a flight take place. Was only one engine on a four engined 747, but everything went to plan. Current aviation rules only allow for 50% of a plane's engines to use SAF but progress is being made. The way i read it was that they only used the one engine for the 3 odd hour flight but had to put it on a 4 engine plane as the other 3 were backup for safety reasons." Exactly that. Expect them to move to two engine SAF very soon. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They have been ground testing this for six months now but great to see a flight take place. Was only one engine on a four engined 747, but everything went to plan. Current aviation rules only allow for 50% of a plane's engines to use SAF but progress is being made. " It is, indeed, good news. However, it's not going to have any major impact for years - for a few reasons. 1. SAF is still a good bit more expensive than kerosene - because it's not as easily available. 2. A new industry supplying SAF in the volume the oil industry supplies kerosene is going to have to be built up. 3. Rolls Royce only manufacture 30% of the jet engines used in wide bodied passenger aircraft. 4. If RR don't share the technology - even via licence deals - with the world's other major jet engine manufacturers; not enough SAF engines will be sold, worldwide, to make them worth the bother. Thankfully, none of these things is a bar to further progress being made - but they do have to be thought about. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |