FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Should children get vote at 12

Jump to newest
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds

As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds

So now, 12 years old old enough to make a decision

When do they get the vote

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * Plus ECouple
over a year ago

The South


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

"

I think measuring parental consent v ability to vote is a false equivalence.

E

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lank CanvasCouple
over a year ago

Belfast

To be fair they might have more sense than some of the "adults" who vote.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds

I don't.

Vaccination is more important therefore if 12 year old can make this decision it is only right and fair they can vote

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"To be fair they might have more sense than some of the "adults" who vote."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

"

Wherever the line is drawn, someone will disagree and pick fault. Has the issue with either a child of 13 voting or a child of 12 deciding on having the vaccine affected you personally? Or..... Are you just trying to start a fight in an empty room?

Genuinely interested.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm sure this will be a calm and rational thread. No reason to worry at all. Nope.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This has all kicked off from a telegraph article right. One that said consent won't be needed ... But was light in details as to if and when it won't be needed.

It may be that the existing rules continue which allow over 12 to make a decision if an expert believes them to be competent.

So not every 12 yo.

So looks like clickbait.

But I guess "nothing changes with the world" isn't quite as exciting sounding.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
over a year ago

nr faversham

Don't talk bollocks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtylittletramp100TV/TS
over a year ago

Notts

A vote a car licence a gun licence and keys to the drinks cabinet lol oh and a big box of matches

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

A mandatory vaccination policy for children was introduced by the Goverment in 1853!

I did see the OPs original and very ranting thread in the Virus section.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"This has all kicked off from a telegraph article right. One that said consent won't be needed ... But was light in details as to if and when it won't be needed.

It may be that the existing rules continue which allow over 12 to make a decision if an expert believes them to be competent.

So not every 12 yo.

So looks like clickbait.

But I guess "nothing changes with the world" isn't quite as exciting sounding. "

Who's the expert who decided.

.. My worry is a teacher which is very wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

"

Are you vaccinated

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This has all kicked off from a telegraph article right. One that said consent won't be needed ... But was light in details as to if and when it won't be needed.

It may be that the existing rules continue which allow over 12 to make a decision if an expert believes them to be competent.

So not every 12 yo.

So looks like clickbait.

But I guess "nothing changes with the world" isn't quite as exciting sounding.

Who's the expert who decided.

.. My worry is a teacher which is very wrong "

judges and health professionals.

Legal competence to make decisions is conditional on the child gradually acquiring both:

Maturity

That takes account of the child's experiences and the child's ability to manage influences on their decision making such as information, peer pressure, family pressure, fear and misgivings.

Intelligence

That takes account of the child's understanding, ability to weigh risk and benefit, consideration of longer term factors such as effect on family life and on such things as schooling.

The degree of maturity and intelligence needed depends on the gravity of the decision.

Question: would you be against a 15yo being given the morning after pill because their parents haven't given consent? Or anesthic to mend a broken leg and the partents cant be contacted?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asyukMan
over a year ago

West London


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

"

The distinction is if their decision only effects themselves or if it affects others.

As other players have started, this is along running right. It allows a child to overrule parental control in medical situations. For instance due to treatment being withheld due to religious beliefs.

It seems proportionate, but it could overwhelm the system of there are a lot of child/parent disagreements about this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *losguygl3Man
over a year ago

Gloucester

[Removed by poster at 28/08/21 10:14:00]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *losguygl3Man
over a year ago

Gloucester


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

Parental consent hasn’t been withdrawn.

And there is no connection between the vaccination program and the right to vote.

What are you on about?!?

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare

No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * Plus ECouple
over a year ago

The South


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this"

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

"

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"As vaccine doesn'tneed parental consent as 12 years old enough to decide.

Therefore competent enough to vote

By the way do you class an adult who voted for Boris competent as I voted for him therefore I believe I'm not competent

Are you vaccinated "

Yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick270Man
over a year ago

Here

No one under 30 should be allowed to vote.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agan_PairCouple
over a year ago

portchester


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

"

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour "

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agan_PairCouple
over a year ago

portchester


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights."

Oh yeah the virus is all the conservatives fault … luckily I can see past the mist and see it for what it is. I shall be voting then back in …

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

Oh yeah the virus is all the conservatives fault … luckily I can see past the mist and see it for what it is. I shall be voting then back in …"

If you believe the Tories aren't to blame for any of their many fuck ups, you're clearly blinded by that mist.

Have a great day.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town

Better still 12 year olds should be able to stand for office... Can you imagine? Children of the damned springs to mind.

Mind you might make a better job of education policy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

Oh yeah the virus is all the conservatives fault … luckily I can see past the mist and see it for what it is. I shall be voting then back in …"

Open your eyes if you think this is the worst goverment ever.

What does Dominic rabb nerd to do to get sacked.

Also when 2nd hand car salesman Boris getting sacked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'd like it guided by psychological evidence and perhaps it could be graded, according to age, ability to comprehend, responsibility and what's voted on. Certainly 16 should be the maximum, in all probability

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnj21 OP   Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"I'd like it guided by psychological evidence and perhaps it could be graded, according to age, ability to comprehend, responsibility and what's voted on. Certainly 16 should be the maximum, in all probability "

That's, a parent job. Under 16 child

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"No one under 30 should be allowed to vote."

And no one over 60 to make sure we have balance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lirty-CoupleCouple
over a year ago

Bexley


"

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights."

Yet, if it were all true, despite all of that Labour are still nowhere let alone an effective, credible opposition. Far too busy navel gazing and infighting about how red and antisemetic they are. Riddled with their own brand of corruption and ineptitude. Pathetic party who can't even take advantage of all Boris's problems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"I'd like it guided by psychological evidence and perhaps it could be graded, according to age, ability to comprehend, responsibility and what's voted on. Certainly 16 should be the maximum, in all probability

That's, a parent job. Under 16 child"

No. Being guided by psychological evidence is about having policy and law etc, being based on the best expertise and knowledge available. Voting rights would be based across the board, not set individually, hence the need for evidence to help to shape policy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

Yet, if it were all true, despite all of that Labour are still nowhere let alone an effective, credible opposition. Far too busy navel gazing and infighting about how red and antisemetic they are. Riddled with their own brand of corruption and ineptitude. Pathetic party who can't even take advantage of all Boris's problems."

Sounds like you wouldn't consider anyone but the conservatives, except perhaps a right wing alternative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights."

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. "

can we pin the NIP on them ? I accept we voted for brexit. Can they be blamed for the flavour

(Pre emotive answer on my part: probs not as was in their manifesto. So also the will of the people...)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. can we pin the NIP on them ? I accept we voted for brexit. Can they be blamed for the flavour

(Pre emotive answer on my part: probs not as was in their manifesto. So also the will of the people...)"

Well, the whole thing was a waste of 2 years as no way were the EU ever going to negotiate anything that could have been seen as losing political ground to the UK.

So we should have done no deal earlier and stopped wasting time with EU negotiators. So again, in thta regard we all knew we of we voted to leave the EU, that they would not give an inch to help us... Why would they? Why should they?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. can we pin the NIP on them ? I accept we voted for brexit. Can they be blamed for the flavour

(Pre emotive answer on my part: probs not as was in their manifesto. So also the will of the people...)

Well, the whole thing was a waste of 2 years as no way were the EU ever going to negotiate anything that could have been seen as losing political ground to the UK.

So we should have done no deal earlier and stopped wasting time with EU negotiators. So again, in thta regard we all knew we of we voted to leave the EU, that they would not give an inch to help us... Why would they? Why should they? "

that's your view tho. But do you agree the people voted for NIP by voting for BoJo?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. can we pin the NIP on them ? I accept we voted for brexit. Can they be blamed for the flavour

(Pre emotive answer on my part: probs not as was in their manifesto. So also the will of the people...)

Well, the whole thing was a waste of 2 years as no way were the EU ever going to negotiate anything that could have been seen as losing political ground to the UK.

So we should have done no deal earlier and stopped wasting time with EU negotiators. So again, in thta regard we all knew we of we voted to leave the EU, that they would not give an inch to help us... Why would they? Why should they? that's your view tho. But do you agree the people voted for NIP by voting for BoJo?"

Nip? Hmmm... Probably not...even though it is glaringly obvious I don't think many people thought beyond the top level of in or out. The mechanics I don't think we're thought about by most people. Of course when you stop and think how it might operate... Once again the EU are never going to concede anything to the UK and as the Ireland situation exists and hasn't been resolved in hundreds of years it was inevitable that a fudge would have to happen. But at the time I don't think anyone was thinking past the emotive in / out question. And by now we all have a bit of selective memory about something that some people are quite highly strung about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. "

Boris chose the leave side and ran his campaign to achieve power on the basis of defeating Cameron over Brexit. I think the commander in chief was top of the pile leading the lies into Brexit so I would pin a very large badge on him!,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No as they will instinctively just pick the clown.

Bet bojo the clown is behind all this

You do realise there's not an actual plan to give 12 year olds the vote, yes?

It's just pontificating nonsense to try and make a point.

E

My post was pontificating nonsense just to call johnson a name.

But i think you should give 12 year olds a vote.

They cant do any worse than you lot voting in johnson

Let’s face it … they could do worse, the could choose labour

How would any party be worse than the Tories at this point? They've presided over 1 of the biggest per capita Covid death tolls in the world. They've forced a ruinous Brexit on the country. And they've taken lying and corruption to dizzying new heights.

I think you need to get your facts about brexit right. The British people chose in a referendum. This govt democratically executed the will of the people.

You may not agree with it. But it was the will of the majority of the people who bothered to vote.

There are plenty of other criticisms that are legitimate but you can't pin brexit on them. can we pin the NIP on them ? I accept we voted for brexit. Can they be blamed for the flavour

(Pre emotive answer on my part: probs not as was in their manifesto. So also the will of the people...)

Well, the whole thing was a waste of 2 years as no way were the EU ever going to negotiate anything that could have been seen as losing political ground to the UK.

So we should have done no deal earlier and stopped wasting time with EU negotiators. So again, in thta regard we all knew we of we voted to leave the EU, that they would not give an inch to help us... Why would they? Why should they? that's your view tho. But do you agree the people voted for NIP by voting for BoJo?

Nip? Hmmm... Probably not...even though it is glaringly obvious I don't think many people thought beyond the top level of in or out. The mechanics I don't think we're thought about by most people. Of course when you stop and think how it might operate... Once again the EU are never going to concede anything to the UK and as the Ireland situation exists and hasn't been resolved in hundreds of years it was inevitable that a fudge would have to happen. But at the time I don't think anyone was thinking past the emotive in / out question. And by now we all have a bit of selective memory about something that some people are quite highly strung about. "

to clarify, the people didn't vote for NIP despite this being a manifesto promise and one he put quite high up his campaign.

In which case it was entirely a Tory decision to enter.

Do you think NIP is a success or problematic. Or something else ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ddmanMan
over a year ago

Norwich

Vaccine vs Vote is an example of an apples to oranges comparison:

- being able to have a say in what happens to themselves in terms of health.

Vs

- being able to have a say in what happens to other people too.

A person of 12 may be competent of the first, having only to consider thier own interests but not the second, which requires a more complex,nuanced appreciation of society, politics, ethics and ideology.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
over a year ago

dudley


"Vaccine vs Vote is an example of an apples to oranges comparison:

- being able to have a say in what happens to themselves in terms of health.

Vs

- being able to have a say in what happens to other people too.

A person of 12 may be competent of the first, having only to consider thier own interests but not the second, which requires a more complex,nuanced appreciation of society, politics, ethics and ideology."

Let them vote and when they realise innocent civilians are being killed in endless wars, with their vote attached regardless of parental political persuasion, seeing them being corralled and tear gassed by the met when they march on westminster with banners in hand.

Just a thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Vaccine vs Vote is an example of an apples to oranges comparison:

- being able to have a say in what happens to themselves in terms of health.

Vs

- being able to have a say in what happens to other people too.

A person of 12 may be competent of the first, having only to consider thier own interests but not the second, which requires a more complex,nuanced appreciation of society, politics, ethics and ideology."

Like pitt the younger. Only younger...pitt the teenager for prime minister.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top