FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Abolish the Monarchy ?

Jump to newest
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/abolish-monarchy-billboard-pops-up-21203195

Who knew lol.

I passed one of these today. Are you a member?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never heard of them but you can be sure they have a fair few supporters on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adetMan
over a year ago

South of Ipswich

In my younger more idealistic days I was staunchly anti monarchy and there is still a part of me that isnt entirely comfortable with hereditary rulers

However as you grow and get a more rounded view of the world you come to realise that it's important for a nation to have a historical grounding and that tradition, culture and ceremony in some form is very important to people

So while I'm still not exactly pro monarchy I do understand that they serve a purpose, and quite an important one, even if a lot people don't necessarily realise that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adetMan
over a year ago

South of Ipswich

Ooops, got carried away

In answer, no I'm not a member

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

I’m ambivalent on the monarchy. I don’t think I could be that invested to join one of these campaigns.

There is other things much more worthy of my time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

Someone told me that they were pressuring Leeds Council to have them taken down. I don't see how the council could take them down. But as most council chambers have a picture of the Queen, I bet they are not that comfortable with the signs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleAcornMan
over a year ago

visiting the beach


"I’m ambivalent on the monarchy. I don’t think I could be that invested to join one of these campaigns.

There is other things much more worthy of my time.

"

I'm much the same, given a vote, I'd probably vote for getting rid of them.

At least in their present format. A head of state is a useful role to have filled by a (mostly)non-political figurehead though.

But I'd like a bit of a rewrite regarding some of their perks of the job!

I also realise that if it came to a vote, I'd certainly be in a minority. So as you say, I tend not to give it too much thought unless someone brings up the subject.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtylittletramp100TV/TS
over a year ago

Notts

head of council head of police head of most things really, head of BBC... there are not many heads of anything I like! get a guillotine and chop their heads off but I know the new improved head.... will also need cutting off! aahhhhhh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichiebigMan
over a year ago

nenagh

Fxxck the queen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
over a year ago

nr faversham


"In my younger more idealistic days I was staunchly anti monarchy and there is still a part of me that isnt entirely comfortable with hereditary rulers

However as you grow and get a more rounded view of the world you come to realise that it's important for a nation to have a historical grounding and that tradition, culture and ceremony in some form is very important to people

So while I'm still not exactly pro monarchy I do understand that they serve a purpose, and quite an important one, even if a lot people don't necessarily realise that "

Nicely put

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

Not a Royalist.

But maybe another way of asking could be:

'What would we gain from abolishing the Monarchy?'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Fxxck the queen "
yes get rid sooner the better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleAcornMan
over a year ago

visiting the beach


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

"

You could probably keep a few of the family on as tour guides.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

You could probably keep a few of the family on as tour guides. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

"

France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!

Just saying!!

I like the Queen and the dignity she has. Once she’s gone I’m all for getting rid of the whole stinking system. The class system holds so many back in this country. Who you know not how good you are is still a gilded right of passage to the select few.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtylittletramp100TV/TS
over a year ago

Notts


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!

Just saying!!

I like the Queen and the dignity she has. Once she’s gone I’m all for getting rid of the whole stinking system. The class system holds so many back in this country. Who you know not how good you are is still a gilded right of passage to the select few. "

Paris Prague Rome and no boat or plane required helps France a lot!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isandhers691127Couple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

"

Turn buck House into an old people's home and have them care for them. See if the go on about how much work they do now after that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!

Just saying!!

I like the Queen and the dignity she has. Once she’s gone I’m all for getting rid of the whole stinking system. The class system holds so many back in this country. Who you know not how good you are is still a gilded right of passage to the select few.

Paris Prague Rome and no boat or plane required helps France a lot! "

They also have nicer weather !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *coptoCouple
over a year ago

Côte d'Azur & Great Yarmouth

“France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!”

Yup, the “The Queen brings in more tourist money than she costs” bullshit REALLY winds me up. Firstly it’s based on no facts, figures or research whatsoever; secondly, tourists visiting Stratford-Upon-Avon and Hampton Court hardly expect to see Shakespeare or Henry VIII (and if they stand outside gawping at Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle hoping to glimpse the Queen they’ll be sorely disappointed); and thirdly, how then do we judge the Monarch’s “performance”? Charles was a better/worse King than William because he brought in more/less tourist money?

The Queen could be replaced by a cardboard cut-out: she “instructs” Parliament in a Speech which the Government has prepared based on the Electorate’s votes (quite rightly) and rubber-stamps the Royal Assent turning a Bill into law (and mostly even that isn’t needed).

BUT, she represents our country, is the basis of our legal (Regina vs. etc) and diplomatic systems (Ambassadors represent the Monarch), and is in herself a remarkable woman. For example, at the time of Diana’s death she was faced with the choice of maintaining the Establishment way of doing things (she refused to lower the flags at Windsor and the Tower because Diana had been stripped of her HRH title) or bowing to populist pressure and acknowledging the “people’s princess”. In the end she managed a quite reasonable compromise. She didn’t handle the 1992 fire at Windsor Castle quite so well though, demanding at first that the public should pay for the repairs. Good Old Tony (Blair) had to get her out of that hole.

My heart tells me that UK taxpayers should continue to maintain the Monarch (and the “heir and a spare”, all the other civil listers a different matter) in the style and splendour befitting the Head of State of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. But my head tells me that when William and Kate arrive on the scene we might just as well have had Posh and Becks represent us to the World…

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9alMan
over a year ago

Bridgend

after the queen dies do we need another expensive irrelevant parasitic monarch ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"“France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!”

Yup, the “The Queen brings in more tourist money than she costs” bullshit REALLY winds me up. Firstly it’s based on no facts, figures or research whatsoever; secondly, tourists visiting Stratford-Upon-Avon and Hampton Court hardly expect to see Shakespeare or Henry VIII (and if they stand outside gawping at Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle hoping to glimpse the Queen they’ll be sorely disappointed); and thirdly, how then do we judge the Monarch’s “performance”? Charles was a better/worse King than William because he brought in more/less tourist money?

The Queen could be replaced by a cardboard cut-out: she “instructs” Parliament in a Speech which the Government has prepared based on the Electorate’s votes (quite rightly) and rubber-stamps the Royal Assent turning a Bill into law (and mostly even that isn’t needed).

BUT, she represents our country, is the basis of our legal (Regina vs. etc) and diplomatic systems (Ambassadors represent the Monarch), and is in herself a remarkable woman. For example, at the time of Diana’s death she was faced with the choice of maintaining the Establishment way of doing things (she refused to lower the flags at Windsor and the Tower because Diana had been stripped of her HRH title) or bowing to populist pressure and acknowledging the “people’s princess”. In the end she managed a quite reasonable compromise. She didn’t handle the 1992 fire at Windsor Castle quite so well though, demanding at first that the public should pay for the repairs. Good Old Tony (Blair) had to get her out of that hole.

My heart tells me that UK taxpayers should continue to maintain the Monarch (and the “heir and a spare”, all the other civil listers a different matter) in the style and splendour befitting the Head of State of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. But my head tells me that when William and Kate arrive on the scene we might just as well have had Posh and Becks represent us to the World…"

I believe research was done many years ago saying the attraction of the queen with her palaces , guards etc does bring in more revenue that she costs .

Not sure the hangers on are quite so well documented.

I like an independent head of state but not sure how we would replace the Queen without it becoming a political pile of shite similar to Parliament.

Who could we vote for? Who is independent in reality?

Keep the heir and as you say a spare but fuck all the leeches off and castles pass over to the national trust. Then let’s have a monarchy similar in statute to the Scandinavians .

Nice people but less of a costly burden and certainly less of a class barrier.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood


"“France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!”

Yup, the “The Queen brings in more tourist money than she costs” bullshit REALLY winds me up. Firstly it’s based on no facts, figures or research whatsoever; secondly, tourists visiting Stratford-Upon-Avon and Hampton Court hardly expect to see Shakespeare or Henry VIII (and if they stand outside gawping at Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle hoping to glimpse the Queen they’ll be sorely disappointed); and thirdly, how then do we judge the Monarch’s “performance”? Charles was a better/worse King than William because he brought in more/less tourist money?

The Queen could be replaced by a cardboard cut-out: she “instructs” Parliament in a Speech which the Government has prepared based on the Electorate’s votes (quite rightly) and rubber-stamps the Royal Assent turning a Bill into law (and mostly even that isn’t needed).

BUT, she represents our country, is the basis of our legal (Regina vs. etc) and diplomatic systems (Ambassadors represent the Monarch), and is in herself a remarkable woman. For example, at the time of Diana’s death she was faced with the choice of maintaining the Establishment way of doing things (she refused to lower the flags at Windsor and the Tower because Diana had been stripped of her HRH title) or bowing to populist pressure and acknowledging the “people’s princess”. In the end she managed a quite reasonable compromise. She didn’t handle the 1992 fire at Windsor Castle quite so well though, demanding at first that the public should pay for the repairs. Good Old Tony (Blair) had to get her out of that hole.

My heart tells me that UK taxpayers should continue to maintain the Monarch (and the “heir and a spare”, all the other civil listers a different matter) in the style and splendour befitting the Head of State of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. But my head tells me that when William and Kate arrive on the scene we might just as well have had Posh and Becks represent us to the World…"

peoples princess hahahahahaha was nothing of the people about her,grew up with the same privlages as the rest of them,nice big family pile titles privatley educated,used the press when it suited her but didnt like being used by them,like most in her position she didnt do anything unless it helped her be that financialy or raising her public profile,saying that i guess the same ones who want them abolished also luv harry and think he one of us normal people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *host63Man
over a year ago

Bedfont Feltham

Not heard of them but I am an anti royalist so I will be looking at them with interest

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago

Bristol

While we are about it let’s get rid of the honours list you know medals for doing good works in the community etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Maybe we could keep all the fancy stuff like the Palaces and such like and make a very large 'Monarchy Towers' Like the Alton one. With rides. Maybe open Buck Palace as a Hotel. Balmoral as a Haunted Castle.

It would still bring in the tourists, but without the civil list.

France gets more tourists than us and they cut if the kings head!!

Just saying!!

I like the Queen and the dignity she has. Once she’s gone I’m all for getting rid of the whole stinking system. The class system holds so many back in this country. Who you know not how good you are is still a gilded right of passage to the select few. "

well said it’s total bullshit about the tourists they bring in all the major capitals get tourists without a monarchy they look at the palaces not the bloody queen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtylittletramp100TV/TS
over a year ago

Notts

Should we get flaming torches and go burn them. ...... here comes the baying mob lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"Should we get flaming torches and go burn them. ...... here comes the baying mob lol"

Oooh can I bring marshmallows??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebbie69Couple
over a year ago

milton keynes

If they are abolished what differences we will see in our day to day lives

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Abolish the house of Lords

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"If they are abolished what differences we will see in our day to day lives"
zero diffrence I can’t understand how there’s some on here against the empire but adore the monarchy lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At last something of interest in the Politics section.

Thank you for brining it to my attention and I'm pleased to chip in a bob or two.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leasure domMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh

If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy. "
ain’t that tne truth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy. "

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leasure domMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

"

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleAcornMan
over a year ago

visiting the beach


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day. "

There has to be a desire from the electorate for it.

Just like leaving the EU, there hadn't been much interest in it until Farage etc. got enough of the public interested in the idea.

That put pressure on MPs, who put pressure on their parties leaderships.

The same levers can be pulled for just about any subject. All you need is a good firm grip of the media.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day. "

If ever there was a need to, then perhaps they would and the important thing is that it could, I'm NOT a Royalist. But the reality is that the majority of the public still want it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

How nice to see actual debate and a modicum of respect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"How nice to see actual debate and a modicum of respect.

"

Yes. It's quite nice in here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day.

If ever there was a need to, then perhaps they would and the important thing is that it could, I'm NOT a Royalist. But the reality is that the majority of the public still want it.

"

i don’t think they do tho maybe there should be a vote lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day.

If ever there was a need to, then perhaps they would and the important thing is that it could, I'm NOT a Royalist. But the reality is that the majority of the public still want it.

i don’t think they do tho maybe there should be a vote lol"

Just saw this . . .

"Despite the conversation had by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex with Oprah Winfrey last week about their time as active Royal members, two surveys by Ipsos MORI, completed before and after the interview, show it has done little to alter British opinions towards the monarchy.

Before the interview was aired in the UK on Monday 8th March, 43% said Britain’s future would be worse should the monarchy be abolished, and after the interview 41% said the same. Only 1 in 5 (19%) now believe abolishing the monarchy would be good for the country’s future, a similar proportion to before the interview (17%). "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

A "Monexit" ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"A "Monexit" ?"

Major groan!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Fxxck the queen "

If she was on here there would be plenty queueing up to do just that!

A female hippo would have a following on here let alone an elderly female monarch.

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

Probably done more to strengthen opinions on those that gave the interview.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day.

If ever there was a need to, then perhaps they would and the important thing is that it could, I'm NOT a Royalist. But the reality is that the majority of the public still want it.

i don’t think they do tho maybe there should be a vote lol

Just saw this . . .

"Despite the conversation had by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex with Oprah Winfrey last week about their time as active Royal members, two surveys by Ipsos MORI, completed before and after the interview, show it has done little to alter British opinions towards the monarchy.

Before the interview was aired in the UK on Monday 8th March, 43% said Britain’s future would be worse should the monarchy be abolished, and after the interview 41% said the same. Only 1 in 5 (19%) now believe abolishing the monarchy would be good for the country’s future, a similar proportion to before the interview (17%). ""

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"If a citizen (NOT subject) is denied the right to elect the head of state and Parliament is never given the chance to debate if monarchy is desirable, you're not living in a proper democracy.

That would be a Republic - ours is a Monarchy but with Parliamentary sovereignty.

But the UK Government does have the power to Depose or Appoint a Monarch.

Remind me of the last time the relevance/desirability of monarchy was debated in Parliament or by the state broadcaster.

Maybe I was abroad on that day.

If ever there was a need to, then perhaps they would and the important thing is that it could, I'm NOT a Royalist. But the reality is that the majority of the public still want it.

i don’t think they do tho maybe there should be a vote lol

Just saw this . . .

"Despite the conversation had by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex with Oprah Winfrey last week about their time as active Royal members, two surveys by Ipsos MORI, completed before and after the interview, show it has done little to alter British opinions towards the monarchy.

Before the interview was aired in the UK on Monday 8th March, 43% said Britain’s future would be worse should the monarchy be abolished, and after the interview 41% said the same. Only 1 in 5 (19%) now believe abolishing the monarchy would be good for the country’s future, a similar proportion to before the interview (17%). ""

aw well survey is never wrong then lol did they ask anyone in the north lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

"

What makes you think that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

"

You don’t?? Really??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? "

what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol"

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

"

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??"

You’re not reading what I put Foxy

I’m against the monarchy as it stands and would like to see a more Scandinavian example to keep an independent head of state but strip the wealth and privilege .

The woman Elizabeth is someone I’d love to chat to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??

You’re not reading what I put Foxy

I’m against the monarchy as it stands and would like to see a more Scandinavian example to keep an independent head of state but strip the wealth and privilege .

The woman Elizabeth is someone I’d love to chat to. "

well I’d like to see the lot of them gone keep there money fund themselves no more taxpayers money opens there palaces to the public make something back and get rid of the lords aswell fair enough if you think she’s someone special but I think your nana or my nana could easily of done what she as given her opportunity’don’t think she could of done what ours could tho now there the special ones

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleAcornMan
over a year ago

visiting the beach


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??

You’re not reading what I put Foxy

I’m against the monarchy as it stands and would like to see a more Scandinavian example to keep an independent head of state but strip the wealth and privilege .

The woman Elizabeth is someone I’d love to chat to.

"

I've met Princess Anne three times (she was our Colonel in Chief).

She was a really interesting and funny woman to chat to. She also seems the most like her mum.

(Of course the above is not to say I wouldn't line her up against the wall and shoot her with the rest of them!)

;-)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??

You’re not reading what I put Foxy

I’m against the monarchy as it stands and would like to see a more Scandinavian example to keep an independent head of state but strip the wealth and privilege .

The woman Elizabeth is someone I’d love to chat to.

I've met Princess Anne three times (she was our Colonel in Chief).

She was a really interesting and funny woman to chat to. She also seems the most like her mum.

(Of course the above is not to say I wouldn't line her up against the wall and shoot her with the rest of them!)

;-)"

duno about shoot them just send them on there merry way will do me lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"

And at least she would be able to hold and intelligent and interesting conversation.

What makes you think that?

You don’t?? Really?? what would she talk about that you would want to here jackal lol

I’d love to know her views on world leaders from the past . Gorbachev , Reagan , Churchill scientists , industrial magnates, inspirational people like Richard Attenborough. People who’s she’s met from me around the commonwealth. She will have a thousand stories to tell.

I don’t care if you like or dislike her she would be a fantastic dinner guest.

I’m all for cutting back the monarchy as it’s a waste and class re-enforcing but as a person fuck me she is pretty awesome.

really do you think you would hear anything she’s not said before lol funny how you constantly go on about the rich and priveliged but the queens ok she gets a pass I’d hazard against you don’t like the days of the empire aswell ??

You’re not reading what I put Foxy

I’m against the monarchy as it stands and would like to see a more Scandinavian example to keep an independent head of state but strip the wealth and privilege .

The woman Elizabeth is someone I’d love to chat to.

I've met Princess Anne three times (she was our Colonel in Chief).

She was a really interesting and funny woman to chat to. She also seems the most like her mum.

(Of course the above is not to say I wouldn't line her up against the wall and shoot her with the rest of them!)

;-)"

she wasn’t really your colonel in chief tho she didn’t really earn it just a title that’s all lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"A "Monexit" ?

Major groan!!! "

A 'Queexit' ? lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare

Does she give interviews often to be able to judge on what kind of person she is?

I saw her once do an interview with david Attenborough i think where they walked around a garden and talked.if you could call it that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare


"A "Monexit" ?

Major groan!!!

A 'Queexit' ? lol"

Isnt that a fanny fart

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"Does she give interviews often to be able to judge on what kind of person she is?

I saw her once do an interview with david Attenborough i think where they walked around a garden and talked.if you could call it that

"

she’s been schooled on what to say and when all her life the poor bugger probsbly asnt got a decent conversation in her shed probably slip you a note under the table asking to be rescued from the palace

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *al2001Man
over a year ago

kildare


"Does she give interviews often to be able to judge on what kind of person she is?

I saw her once do an interview with david Attenborough i think where they walked around a garden and talked.if you could call it that

she’s been schooled on what to say and when all her life the poor bugger probsbly asnt got a decent conversation in her shed probably slip you a note under the table asking to be rescued from the palace "

Poor dear

Dr@gged too id say

Like charles

Think someone tried to rescue her before didnt they before they shipped him off to the tower

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Abolish. Sick of being infantilised.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ynecplCouple
over a year ago

Newcastle upon Tyne

Ambivalent with regards to the monarchy. They serve a purpose and the trouble with abolishing them is that there will be a desire to replace them with a career politician. It will then all turn nasty, plus I would rather there were fewer elections these days not more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyone30Man
over a year ago

ABERDEEN

Get shot of the rancid lot of them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester


"A "Monexit" ?

Major groan!!!

A 'Queexit' ? lol"

Home head in hands and groans!! Please make her stop!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top