Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? " Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot" "Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub "Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp"The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets. Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
"yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain. "Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-covid-scientists-warning-b1885305.html%3famp" 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in "The man who doesnt know the name of his children is not an idiot. The man who is urging people to wear masks on public transport is. Another day in Tory world | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in "It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask. Why are people always trying to complicate things? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in
It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask.
Why are people always trying to complicate things?"Maybe something to do with the senior memember of the gmnt urging everyone to ditch their mask at the earliest opportunity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in
It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask.
Why are people always trying to complicate things?
Maybe something to do with the senior memember of the gmnt urging everyone to ditch their mask at the earliest opportunity."How about - In England, the legal requirement to wear a face covering in enclosed public spaces ends. But government guidance says it "expects and recommends" the continued wearing of masks in crowded areas such as public transport. Businesses and travel operators can set their own rules for customers and passengers. As I said, why are people always trying to complicate things. Rather than grabbing at one part of what has been said, try using your noggin for just once. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in
It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask.
Why are people always trying to complicate things?"It’s easier for certain political slants to have a go at and blame the government if you can pretend things are difficult and confusing ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in
It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask.
Why are people always trying to complicate things?
It’s easier for certain political slants to have a go at and blame the government if you can pretend things are difficult and confusing ! "You're probably right. I personally have never been confused by the guidance or laws. And even if I was, it takes 2 mins on Google to clear anything up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do "Wtf are you on about? If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice. Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter. It's simple. Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government. The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it."Funny yes or no But thank you for proving my point | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
Funny yes or no
But thank you for proving my point
"Funny how you try to shut me down by asking a closed question on something that has zero to do with what I'm saying | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it."it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules! Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing? Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Great Wall of Chaos where inadequacies are accepted, immoral/amoral people hide and pathological lying becomes the norm. Rings any bells !!!" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing"They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear. I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? Probably because some would be shouting its all too confusing "why do i have to wear a mask on a train or bus to go to a packed nightclub where i dont have to? the man is an idiot"
Because not everyone on that train or bus is going to a packed nightclub
Well the daily express readership think he is an idiot so I'm convinced
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1462366/BBC-Breakfast-Sadiq-Khan-Dan-Walker-face-mask-TFL-London-Underground-fury-BBC-video/amp
The Express readership said no such thing. They have just printed tweets.
Besides, if Sadiq Khan and TFL want masks, they should have masks. Of someone doesn't wanna wear one then don't use TFL services, it's that simple.
yep pretty simple for anyone with 1/2 a brain.
Not it isn't that simple! . Some people are dependent on public transport. , and would have been at the mercy of unhygienic idiots if Sadiq Khan hadn't stepped in
It really is that simple. If TFL insist you wear a mask and you're reliant on TFL services then you wear a mask.
Why are people always trying to complicate things?
It’s easier for certain political slants to have a go at and blame the government if you can pretend things are difficult and confusing ! "Fucking scientists!, what do they know over boris ?! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?"And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"? "Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me the guidance is clear. Don’t rely on the government and don’t rely on the strangers around you. Time and time again both have fucked up during this pandemic. (Responsible people aside) Look after your own. " You can't ask people to do that. They need their hands held | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"?
Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?
"Not to me, but to protect the likes of people like me at risk of catching a virus because of the irresponsible. Some have no choice but to use public transport. You may be sitting on a bus wearing a mask which protects others from any virus you may have, it doesnt reakky protect you from the virus from others. Someone potentially carrying the virus gets on tbe bus without a mask puts you and all the other mask wearers at risk. With a law in place the driver can refuse them, without it, that person can sit right next to you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"?
Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?
Not to me, but to protect the likes of people like me at risk of catching a virus because of the irresponsible.
Some have no choice but to use public transport. You may be sitting on a bus wearing a mask which protects others from any virus you may have, it doesnt reakky protect you from the virus from others.
Someone potentially carrying the virus gets on tbe bus without a mask puts you and all the other mask wearers at risk. With a law in place the driver can refuse them, without it, that person can sit right next to you.
"So you started a thread with 'more unclear messages' yet you're now telling us it isn't unclear to you? That makes sense. BTW, there are still laws in place for any private company to refuse entry to anyone they so choose providing it doesn't break discrimination laws. It's called contract law. It's the exact law that Sadiq Khan has said they will use to enforce mask wearing on TFL services. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"?
Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?
Not to me, but to protect the likes of people like me at risk of catching a virus because of the irresponsible.
Some have no choice but to use public transport. You may be sitting on a bus wearing a mask which protects others from any virus you may have, it doesnt reakky protect you from the virus from others.
Someone potentially carrying the virus gets on tbe bus without a mask puts you and all the other mask wearers at risk. With a law in place the driver can refuse them, without it, that person can sit right next to you.
So you started a thread with 'more unclear messages' yet you're now telling us it isn't unclear to you?
That makes sense.
BTW, there are still laws in place for any private company to refuse entry to anyone they so choose providing it doesn't break discrimination laws.
It's called contract law. It's the exact law that Sadiq Khan has said they will use to enforce mask wearing on TFL services."Thats because it is unclear messaging. Its now opened the door to pillocks to abuse any guidance and bigger fools to uphold the chaos like yourself | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"?
Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?
Not to me, but to protect the likes of people like me at risk of catching a virus because of the irresponsible.
Some have no choice but to use public transport. You may be sitting on a bus wearing a mask which protects others from any virus you may have, it doesnt reakky protect you from the virus from others.
Someone potentially carrying the virus gets on tbe bus without a mask puts you and all the other mask wearers at risk. With a law in place the driver can refuse them, without it, that person can sit right next to you.
So you started a thread with 'more unclear messages' yet you're now telling us it isn't unclear to you?
That makes sense.
BTW, there are still laws in place for any private company to refuse entry to anyone they so choose providing it doesn't break discrimination laws.
It's called contract law. It's the exact law that Sadiq Khan has said they will use to enforce mask wearing on TFL services.
Thats because it is unclear messaging. Its now opened the door to pillocks to abuse any guidance and bigger fools to uphold the chaos like yourself "I've asked you what's unclear, you said it wasn't. Nice to know when you have nowhere else to go you start name calling. Thanks for providing a clear insight into what you're trying to achieve with this subject 
It's unclear, actually no it isn't, it's unclear again but I understand it
Bravo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the biggest criticism of the handling of the crises has been the mixed messengers Completely unsurprisingly the cheer leaders are saying the message is clear. Completely contradicting scientists and a big chunk of the population. " I'll ask you the same as I did Calico. Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just to clarify. Whitty saying cases are going to through the roof and to be as careful as possible in mo way contradicts sunak saying he is going to ditch the mask as soon as possible. You can safely say those 2 sentences are totally comparable. A simple yes or no will do
Wtf are you on about?
If the legal requirement mean Sunak can ditch the mask then thats his choice.
Should he wish to enter a private premises who require a mask (we know he isn't exempt) then he either puts one on or doesn't enter.
It's simple.
Quit with all this 'just to clarify' bullshit, we aren't talking about medics vs government.
The new guidance is clear, regardless of how murky you try to make it.
it is about medic v politics. Chris whitty and just about everyone involved in medicine disagree with the government's decision to drop the rules!
Tell me, why is it such a big deal to keep the mandatory mask wearing?
Is it because bafoon boris wanted to play politics and undermine the medical advice given to the public by the "freedom day" shite on the 19th.? Adding (needlessly) to making it less standardised and therefore more confusing
They do disagree and thats for them to sort out. The point is though, the guidance I clear.
I thought your post was about the guidance not being clear?
And it isn't, leaving a dangerous virus in the hands of people using "common sense" has now opened the door for the virus. Im positive i can drive my car safely after Downing 5 pints of beer, should that be based on law or "common sense"?
Which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?
Not to me, but to protect the likes of people like me at risk of catching a virus because of the irresponsible.
Some have no choice but to use public transport. You may be sitting on a bus wearing a mask which protects others from any virus you may have, it doesnt reakky protect you from the virus from others.
Someone potentially carrying the virus gets on tbe bus without a mask puts you and all the other mask wearers at risk. With a law in place the driver can refuse them, without it, that person can sit right next to you.
So you started a thread with 'more unclear messages' yet you're now telling us it isn't unclear to you?
That makes sense.
BTW, there are still laws in place for any private company to refuse entry to anyone they so choose providing it doesn't break discrimination laws.
It's called contract law. It's the exact law that Sadiq Khan has said they will use to enforce mask wearing on TFL services.
Thats because it is unclear messaging. Its now opened the door to pillocks to abuse any guidance and bigger fools to uphold the chaos like yourself
I've asked you what's unclear, you said it wasn't.
Nice to know when you have nowhere else to go you start name calling.
Thanks for providing a clear insight into what you're trying to achieve with this subject
It's unclear, actually no it isn't, it's unclear again but I understand it
Bravo "You should be Boris's advisor.. Step aside chris whittey!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you?" I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the biggest criticism of the handling of the crises has been the mixed messengers Completely unsurprisingly the cheer leaders are saying the message is clear. Completely contradicting scientists and a big chunk of the population. " Let us know which part of the guidance you don't understand i know you dont like looking for the answers on google im sure we will be able to help. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed "Standard response really. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed "Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Standard response really."Outstanding | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse? "Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris? I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you. As for confusing guidance look at the news | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news "I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless. This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that. Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though 
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case."Yeah, its nit like we have knowledge advice from people beibg ignored / over ridden by an inept populist driven cabinet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case. "Yesh great, if their actions harm you then all is well? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case.
Yesh great, if their actions harm you then all is well? "Why would their actions harm me? I will continue as I have always done and make sure I look after myself and my family. If I put myself in a situation where I could be harmed then that is on me, no one else. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case.
Yesh great, if their actions harm you then all is well? "Obviously the fact that johnson was accused of his incompetence costing the deaths of 1000s of lives has been swept under the carpet ditto the care homes and schools fiasco | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" which part of the law or guidance surrounding the wearing of masks is unclear to you? I sometimes think, with attitudes like this we're doomed
Have you been taking tips from Lionel on how to converse?
Nope, but after reading his posts, hes's right about the likes of you standing by boris regardless of anything the scientists say you been taking tips from Boris?
I for one, think chris whittey is the one we should be taking advice from, not you.
As for confusing guidance look at the news
I think you have me wrong, I don't stand by Boris regardless.
This is the thing you see, if you wish to listen to Chris Whitty and continue to wear a mask, you are free to do so. There's absolutely no confusion in that.
Him and Boris may not agree and thats cool but Chris Whitty isn't the one who makes laws, neither is Boris though
Isn't it amazing that we are free in this country to listen to the advice of whoever we wish, and then follow that advice too. I'd hate to to live somewhere that wasn't the case.
Yesh great, if their actions harm you then all is well?
Obviously the fact that johnson was accused of his incompetence costing the deaths of 1000s of lives has been swept under the carpet ditto the care homes and schools fiasco
"What has any of that got to do with mask wearing guidance?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reading these posts is interesting . Defending the idiot in chief is quite sad. The point about it not being law. Now if it’s law as it is today and you try to enter shop the police can be called and they will more than likely attend. You can be arrested and charged. Now the “law” has changed to contract law this will change the outcome. So if four young guys wander into Tesco’s and the 55year old security guard tries to stop them what’s the outcome? The guard won’t be using force and when he calls the police just as before, they will respond by saying “ sorry it’s a civil matter and not for our attention” So here we are with the incompetent leader putting their faith in people such as those forcing their way through security at Wembley recently. There was no need to change the law as it was good for us all. Who benefits from it being dropped? " I am also for keeping the mask wearing and hear what you say about the shops situation. As you say it could lead to problems. It would not be a criminal offence but would have thought the shops have a right to ban people who cause problems. In other words I would have thought shops can set there own conditions for entry a bit like night clubs (when they were open). They set certain dress codes and stop those not adhering to them entering. It would be a sad sight to see bouncers at the entrance to shops, let's hope people use common sense | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reading these posts is interesting . Defending the idiot in chief is quite sad. The point about it not being law. Now if it’s law as it is today and you try to enter shop the police can be called and they will more than likely attend. You can be arrested and charged. Now the “law” has changed to contract law this will change the outcome. So if four young guys wander into Tesco’s and the 55year old security guard tries to stop them what’s the outcome? The guard won’t be using force and when he calls the police just as before, they will respond by saying “ sorry it’s a civil matter and not for our attention” So here we are with the incompetent leader putting their faith in people such as those forcing their way through security at Wembley recently. There was no need to change the law as it was good for us all. Who benefits from it being dropped? I am also for keeping the mask wearing and hear what you say about the shops situation. As you say it could lead to problems. It would not be a criminal offence but would have thought the shops have a right to ban people who cause problems. In other words I would have thought shops can set there own conditions for entry a bit like night clubs (when they were open). They set certain dress codes and stop those not adhering to them entering. It would be a sad sight to see bouncers at the entrance to shops, let's hope people use common sense" I would like to think they will, but seeing a young lad take a deodorant from the shelf, use it under his armpits before putting it back and walking out of the shop leads me to believe it’s not going to happen! Bad government yet again. Education education education ., until we get that right we will have a growing population of Fuckwhits who don’t give a toss. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reading these posts is interesting . Defending the idiot in chief is quite sad. The point about it not being law. Now if it’s law as it is today and you try to enter shop the police can be called and they will more than likely attend. You can be arrested and charged. Now the “law” has changed to contract law this will change the outcome. So if four young guys wander into Tesco’s and the 55year old security guard tries to stop them what’s the outcome? The guard won’t be using force and when he calls the police just as before, they will respond by saying “ sorry it’s a civil matter and not for our attention” So here we are with the incompetent leader putting their faith in people such as those forcing their way through security at Wembley recently. There was no need to change the law as it was good for us all. Who benefits from it being dropped? I am also for keeping the mask wearing and hear what you say about the shops situation. As you say it could lead to problems. It would not be a criminal offence but would have thought the shops have a right to ban people who cause problems. In other words I would have thought shops can set there own conditions for entry a bit like night clubs (when they were open). They set certain dress codes and stop those not adhering to them entering. It would be a sad sight to see bouncers at the entrance to shops, let's hope people use common sense I would like to think they will, but seeing a young lad take a deodorant from the shelf, use it under his armpits before putting it back and walking out of the shop leads me to believe it’s not going to happen! Bad government yet again. Education education education ., until we get that right we will have a growing population of Fuckwhits who don’t give a toss. " That's disgusting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reading these posts is interesting . Defending the idiot in chief is quite sad. The point about it not being law. Now if it’s law as it is today and you try to enter shop the police can be called and they will more than likely attend. You can be arrested and charged. Now the “law” has changed to contract law this will change the outcome. So if four young guys wander into Tesco’s and the 55year old security guard tries to stop them what’s the outcome? The guard won’t be using force and when he calls the police just as before, they will respond by saying “ sorry it’s a civil matter and not for our attention” So here we are with the incompetent leader putting their faith in people such as those forcing their way through security at Wembley recently. There was no need to change the law as it was good for us all. Who benefits from it being dropped? I am also for keeping the mask wearing and hear what you say about the shops situation. As you say it could lead to problems. It would not be a criminal offence but would have thought the shops have a right to ban people who cause problems. In other words I would have thought shops can set there own conditions for entry a bit like night clubs (when they were open). They set certain dress codes and stop those not adhering to them entering. It would be a sad sight to see bouncers at the entrance to shops, let's hope people use common sense I would like to think they will, but seeing a young lad take a deodorant from the shelf, use it under his armpits before putting it back and walking out of the shop leads me to believe it’s not going to happen! Bad government yet again. Education education education ., until we get that right we will have a growing population of Fuckwhits who don’t give a toss. That's disgusting" Yes but that’s the level that’s growing in this country while tax avoidance is allowed and youth services are cut by 70% . If you don’t invest in and catch them young they are lost to that sort of disgusting behaviour. Sad times indeed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reading these posts is interesting . Defending the idiot in chief is quite sad. The point about it not being law. Now if it’s law as it is today and you try to enter shop the police can be called and they will more than likely attend. You can be arrested and charged. Now the “law” has changed to contract law this will change the outcome. So if four young guys wander into Tesco’s and the 55year old security guard tries to stop them what’s the outcome? The guard won’t be using force and when he calls the police just as before, they will respond by saying “ sorry it’s a civil matter and not for our attention” So here we are with the incompetent leader putting their faith in people such as those forcing their way through security at Wembley recently. There was no need to change the law as it was good for us all. Who benefits from it being dropped? I am also for keeping the mask wearing and hear what you say about the shops situation. As you say it could lead to problems. It would not be a criminal offence but would have thought the shops have a right to ban people who cause problems. In other words I would have thought shops can set there own conditions for entry a bit like night clubs (when they were open). They set certain dress codes and stop those not adhering to them entering. It would be a sad sight to see bouncers at the entrance to shops, let's hope people use common sense I would like to think they will, but seeing a young lad take a deodorant from the shelf, use it under his armpits before putting it back and walking out of the shop leads me to believe it’s not going to happen! Bad government yet again. Education education education ., until we get that right we will have a growing population of Fuckwhits who don’t give a toss. " aw we’ve all done that I still spray the latest aftershave in duty free before boarding the plane smelling great | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More waffly unclear messages from the government. Confusion over wearing masks on public transport and Yet again local leaders like Sadiq Khan having to step in. Why is it such a big deal for keep wearing a mask on public transport? " Its just the way, government want us to return to a sense of normalcy, it needs to appease its core vote to ensure it can continue its long reign. So the messaging needs to be just the right type of vague so it can be open to interpretation, thus when it comes to polling day every voter feels they were given what they wanted and thus more years have been added to this current government, Wicked strategy or what? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
