Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Ironic for a guy who has used them lots of times to lose his balls when it comes to some decisions.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though." It was pressure from Tory backbenchers I would wager | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though." Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.." Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said" Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. " Maybe the action should have been taken quicker but we don't and won't know what happened in those talks. If they happened at all of course. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. Maybe the action should have been taken quicker but we don't and won't know what happened in those talks. If they happened at all of course." We know Boris was quoted on Friday as saying the matter is closed, then there's a resignation on the Saturday.. Pretty much confirms a u turn following a poor decision on the Friday.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. Maybe the action should have been taken quicker but we don't and won't know what happened in those talks. If they happened at all of course. We know Boris was quoted on Friday as saying the matter is closed, then there's a resignation on the Saturday.. Pretty much confirms a u turn following a poor decision on the Friday.." How many times have you heard someone say (anyone) that 'the matter is closed' 'we are behind him' 'we have confidence in him' only for it to lead to a sacking within days? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. Maybe the action should have been taken quicker but we don't and won't know what happened in those talks. If they happened at all of course. We know Boris was quoted on Friday as saying the matter is closed, then there's a resignation on the Saturday.. Pretty much confirms a u turn following a poor decision on the Friday.. How many times have you heard someone say (anyone) that 'the matter is closed' 'we are behind him' 'we have confidence in him' only for it to lead to a sacking within days? " Tbh it's not uncommon yes but it only serves to make whomever look like they're dithering or trying to brazen it out.. Under the circumstances this was as clear cut a case of gross negligence as there could be, should have gone Friday.. Especially as Boris was on the record as saying he was hopeless, then with the briefing in the telegraph? Prior to the picture in that rag it all looked orchestrated.. To be fair maybe that's why Hancock didn't go straight to away.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though. Shouldn't have come to that, Boris should have said on Friday 'times up, son' then let him resign or sack him.. Yet he failed in one of his duties which is to lead.. Shouldn't have come to what? Private talks to make a decision and then tell him he has to resign or he'll be sacked? That is what I said Apologies, misread what you wrote.. It should have told him to resign on the Friday etc.. Maybe the action should have been taken quicker but we don't and won't know what happened in those talks. If they happened at all of course. We know Boris was quoted on Friday as saying the matter is closed, then there's a resignation on the Saturday.. Pretty much confirms a u turn following a poor decision on the Friday.. How many times have you heard someone say (anyone) that 'the matter is closed' 'we are behind him' 'we have confidence in him' only for it to lead to a sacking within days? Tbh it's not uncommon yes but it only serves to make whomever look like they're dithering or trying to brazen it out.. Under the circumstances this was as clear cut a case of gross negligence as there could be, should have gone Friday.. Especially as Boris was on the record as saying he was hopeless, then with the briefing in the telegraph? Prior to the picture in that rag it all looked orchestrated.. To be fair maybe that's why Hancock didn't go straight to away.." Youre right that it appears like a clear cut case. Gross misconduct I'm not sure. You can't just sack someone on the spot. There are laws to stop it. And let's face it, Hancock will know an awful lot about that Cabinet so just maybe they had a bit of a stand off for a short period. Anyway, he's gone now. That's really all that matters | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have no idea what has been said or by whom. But it is possible that action was taken in private to force Hancock to resign. We will never know the truth though." But then you can’t say on Friday that you accept his apology and the matter is closed…. Only for his to fall on his sword on the Saturday!!! He is trying to play the role of captain hindsight…. But they are trying to claim we have amnesia | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"and people keeping defending the tory lies" They do seem to have gone quiet recently | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon." I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon. I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch " That speaker is a waste of oxygen He just lets him prattle shite. I don't know why starmer bothers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One has to question Boris Johnson's intelligence surely ? He has proven time and time again he is a liar but, come on this last statement shows he is incapable of knowing truth from lie! It is nothing short of criminal that this man is being left to decide this countries fate." Well, quite. However, if anyone hasn't been questioning his intelligence since long before his lack of it led to the deaths of over 100,000 UK citizens, they really ought to have been. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One has to question Boris Johnson's intelligence surely ? He has proven time and time again he is a liar but, come on this last statement shows he is incapable of knowing truth from lie! It is nothing short of criminal that this man is being left to decide this countries fate. Well, quite. However, if anyone hasn't been questioning his intelligence since long before his lack of it led to the deaths of over 100,000 UK citizens, they really ought to have been." Sutely a sizeable majority are still not questioning his intelligence? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon. I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch " Do the speaker actually have the power to instruct the PM to actually answer the question? I’ve not heard him answer any direct questions. So exactly what is the point apart from raising a public profile of an issue. I think Boris is insulting the status of the office of PM. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon. I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch Do the speaker actually have the power to instruct the PM to actually answer the question? I’ve not heard him answer any direct questions. So exactly what is the point apart from raising a public profile of an issue. I think Boris is insulting the status of the office of PM. " I don't know but that current one is waste of space. Sutely he should have the authority to say..answer the fucking question you blundering idiot. It was utterly farcical the other day..an absolute sham | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon. I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch Do the speaker actually have the power to instruct the PM to actually answer the question? I’ve not heard him answer any direct questions. So exactly what is the point apart from raising a public profile of an issue. I think Boris is insulting the status of the office of PM. I don't know but that current one is waste of space. Sutely he should have the authority to say..answer the fucking question you blundering idiot. It was utterly farcical the other day..an absolute sham " aw that would be great imagine how many would tune in if the speaker could say that if he won’t answer a question he should be asked to leave | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another pmq car crash ..asked about Hancock he pointed out we see ahead of israel in vaccines. We may mock Americans but at least they,finally, jettisoned their inept buffoon. I can’t see the point of PMQs anymore if he is allowed to get away with not answering the questions , it’s pitiful to watch Do the speaker actually have the power to instruct the PM to actually answer the question? I’ve not heard him answer any direct questions. So exactly what is the point apart from raising a public profile of an issue. I think Boris is insulting the status of the office of PM. I don't know but that current one is waste of space. Sutely he should have the authority to say..answer the fucking question you blundering idiot. It was utterly farcical the other day..an absolute sham aw that would be great imagine how many would tune in if the speaker could say that if he won’t answer a question he should be asked to leave " Nah make him stay until he does answer and if that means he misses out on tea and scones with nanny then so be it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
