Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is a cunt but he is playing them perfectly. Shredding Hancock's already shredded reputation and raising big issues about Alex's judgement in the midst of a global crises." He will bring them all down, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
All they can do is deflect to
Not liking the platform the correspondence is on
To f*cking funny
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As ever, probably won't have any long term consequences as die hard Tory voters don't care about such things, and Starmer is failing at persuading those who do care. But it's funny, at least! " The Tory voters don’t care but people within the party will, the likes of Gove will be looking at any opportunity to get rid off Boris | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As ever, probably won't have any long term consequences as die hard Tory voters don't care about such things, and Starmer is failing at persuading those who do care. But it's funny, at least! " I'm not starmers biggest fan but I dont think anyone could cut through that mindset. He has the deaths of thousands of people on his debit list,and the bulk of the population have shrugged their shoulders. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. " Let them speak for Chesham and Amersham, they don’t speak for me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As ever, probably won't have any long term consequences as die hard Tory voters don't care about such things, and Starmer is failing at persuading those who do care. But it's funny, at least! The Tory voters don’t care but people within the party will, the likes of Gove will be looking at any opportunity to get rid off Boris " Gollum Gove will be rubbing his slimy little hands together no doubt - especially as one of the messages suggested putting him in charge instead of Hancock thus perpetuating the myth that he is capable of anything beyond delivering utter bullshit with a straight face, all the time looking like a slightly-surprised, dessicated toad. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As ever, probably won't have any long term consequences as die hard Tory voters don't care about such things, and Starmer is failing at persuading those who do care. But it's funny, at least! The Tory voters don’t care but people within the party will, the likes of Gove will be looking at any opportunity to get rid off Boris Gollum Gove will be rubbing his slimy little hands together no doubt - especially as one of the messages suggested putting him in charge instead of Hancock thus perpetuating the myth that he is capable of anything beyond delivering utter bullshit with a straight face, all the time looking like a slightly-surprised, dessicated toad." I think even G*ve was to clever to accept that job His acting skills & crocodile tears were not Up to scratch | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. " Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity" Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. " Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting "It's not really a shock though where tactical voting has been talked about  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over." Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down " 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
"Tick tock, it’s all falling into place | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
Tick tock, it’s all falling into place "Indeed | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting
It's not really a shock though where tactical voting has been talked about "I hardly think so Tories won 60 % in 2017 ib dems 13% Tories dropped 5% & lib dems went up To 26 % Labour just wejt back to there 2015 vote share . The biggest miss from 2015 was none other than the 2nd placed UKIP . You seem to forget chesham & Amersham is home To Glaxosmithklein biggest research place & has never really been a labour area . Tactical voting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think supporters of Johnson care about anything Cummings reveals. No matter how damning it is. So I'm not sure any of this will have any effect. It is entertaining, though. " You think that a Nation of people whose Majority voted in Bodge to cause so much damage & So much damage & death to so mamy families Is entertaining ? Blimey | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think supporters of Johnson care about anything Cummings reveals. No matter how damning it is. So I'm not sure any of this will have any effect. It is entertaining, though. You think that a Nation of people whose Majority voted in Bodge to cause so much damage & So much damage & death to so mamy families Is entertaining ? Blimey" Noooo I don't think that's entertaining. But I do think it's entertaining seeing rats like Johnson and Cummings fighting in a sack. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
Tick tock, it’s all falling into place
Indeed "I am still optimistic he will be gone this year, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting
It's not really a shock though where tactical voting has been talked about
I hardly think so
Tories won 60 % in 2017 ib dems 13%
Tories dropped 5% & lib dems went up
To 26 %
Labour just wejt back to there 2015 vote share .
The biggest miss from 2015 was none other than the
2nd placed UKIP .
You seem to forget chesham & Amersham is home
To Glaxosmithklein biggest research place &
has never really been a labour area .
Tactical voting
"60% of Green & Labour voters have said they would be willing to vote tactically. I'm pretty sure there will be tactical voting. They will still need to win over those who have voted Conservative in the last election though. Obviously that's very doable. Isn't it funny that when tactical voting is mentioned against the conservatives you brush it off but plenty of people shouted 'tactical voting' for the conservatives in 2019. It may be a shock to you but it isn't to me or many others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
Tick tock, it’s all falling into place
Indeed
I am still optimistic he will be gone this year, "It would be nice, wouldn't it? The thing is, though, there's been so much shit with Johnson already. And that hasn't lost him supporters. So I don't see why things that Cummings says will make enough of a dent. (Especially after Cummings' little trip to Barnard Castle pissed off so many people.) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over." Think he is playing it clever..he is shredding hancock but its damaging johnsons judgement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
Tick tock, it’s all falling into place
Indeed
I am still optimistic he will be gone this year,
It would be nice, wouldn't it?
The thing is, though, there's been so much shit with Johnson already. And that hasn't lost him supporters. So I don't see why things that Cummings says will make enough of a dent. (Especially after Cummings' little trip to Barnard Castle pissed off so many people.)"He is playing the long game, Boris can’t afford to be PM for much longer, it’s tactical | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting
It's not really a shock though where tactical voting has been talked about
I hardly think so
Tories won 60 % in 2017 ib dems 13%
Tories dropped 5% & lib dems went up
To 26 %
Labour just wejt back to there 2015 vote share .
The biggest miss from 2015 was none other than the
2nd placed UKIP .
You seem to forget chesham & Amersham is home
To Glaxosmithklein biggest research place &
has never really been a labour area .
Tactical voting
60% of Green & Labour voters have said they would be willing to vote tactically.
I'm pretty sure there will be tactical voting. They will still need to win over those who have voted Conservative in the last election though. Obviously that's very doable.
Isn't it funny that when tactical voting is mentioned against the conservatives you brush it off but plenty of people shouted 'tactical voting' for the conservatives in 2019.
It may be a shock to you but it isn't to me or many others."I think the lib dems won the council seat there recently so going to be very close and maybe some much needed good news for them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Feels like he's going for Hancock more than Johnson. Unless he's playing some sort of long game and Hancock is just the 1st domino he's trying to knock over. Definitely a long game, Boris is his ultimate ‘Prize’ he will bring them all down 6 and a half months to the end of 2021
Tick tock, it’s all falling into place
Indeed
I am still optimistic he will be gone this year,
It would be nice, wouldn't it?
The thing is, though, there's been so much shit with Johnson already. And that hasn't lost him supporters. So I don't see why things that Cummings says will make enough of a dent. (Especially after Cummings' little trip to Barnard Castle pissed off so many people.)
He is playing the long game, Boris can’t afford to be PM for much longer, it’s tactical "Johnson just needs to set up a tiny business selling Cornish pasties. Then he'd be all but guaranteed to get a billion pound contract to supply PPE. That'd sort out his touted financial woes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chesham and Amersham by election tomorrow. Let the people speak. Well timed by Cummings, he is the government's nightmare. As others have said people like Gove will be eyeing an opportunity Conservatives neck and neck with Libdems. HS2 being the main topic. Thats a shock as The story party had 55% of the vote in 2019 To the lib dems 26% . Neck & Neck you say Very interesting
It's not really a shock though where tactical voting has been talked about
I hardly think so
Tories won 60 % in 2017 ib dems 13%
Tories dropped 5% & lib dems went up
To 26 %
Labour just wejt back to there 2015 vote share .
The biggest miss from 2015 was none other than the
2nd placed UKIP .
You seem to forget chesham & Amersham is home
To Glaxosmithklein biggest research place &
has never really been a labour area .
Tactical voting
60% of Green & Labour voters have said they would be willing to vote tactically.
I'm pretty sure there will be tactical voting. They will still need to win over those who have voted Conservative in the last election though. Obviously that's very doable.
Isn't it funny that when tactical voting is mentioned against the conservatives you brush it off but plenty of people shouted 'tactical voting' for the conservatives in 2019.
It may be a shock to you but it isn't to me or many others."I haven't brushed it off at all Local London mews networks have Been talking to disillusioned Tories About the government cow towing to the Midlands & the north with HS2 investment & Turning there leafy idylic tory homes into Concrete train tracks & stations . What Labour votes do will not be the reson Why the story party fail ( if they do ) in Chesham & Amersham . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” " That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony." Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made?" Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself." The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. " The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha" The Select committee has either received evidence or they haven’t - they haven’t. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha The Select committee has either received evidence or they haven’t - they haven’t. " He'll prove it or he won't. I'm not sure what else there is to say there. I repeat, though, it is odd you demand proof when you're happy to quote from an unubstantiated source. And I also repeat, why hasn't Cummings been sued if his damaging claims are false? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a question. If Cummings' damaging claims are so untrue, why hasn't Johnson sued him? Why hasn't anybody sued him for these claims? I can make a guess..." They admitted today the leaked messages were genuine. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha" The chairman of the health and science select Committee is greg Clarke and he did state they had received no evidence from Cummings if you watch it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha The chairman of the health and science select Committee is greg Clarke and he did state they had received no evidence from Cummings if you watch it." Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha The chairman of the health and science select Committee is greg Clarke and he did state they had received no evidence from Cummings if you watch it. Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies " What?? Sorry but I don't get what you are on about, who's telling the lies? Hancock? Cummings? Greg Clarke?, Me?. Are you saying that Greg Clarke didn't say that because if so I suggest you watch the hearing and see for yourself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha The chairman of the health and science select Committee is greg Clarke and he did state they had received no evidence from Cummings if you watch it. Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies What?? Sorry but I don't get what you are on about, who's telling the lies? Hancock? Cummings? Greg Clarke?, Me?. Are you saying that Greg Clarke didn't say that because if so I suggest you watch the hearing and see for yourself." Ive watched the hearing Cummings said stuff Hancock said no its lies Clarke said there is no eveidence Cummings uploaded evidence to his blog . Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies Is just a song , one ive been humming for a while now.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Health Secretary answered many of Mr Cummings’ claims at a lengthy session in front of MPs. Mr Cummings has still failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims.” That's a direct quote from Kuenssberg where she's quoting "source close to Hancock". ie an unsubstantiated quote. Oh the irony. Has Mr Cummings provided evidence to the Select Committee in order to substantiate the claims he made? Has he? No idea. I think he showed some message where Johnson had called Hancock fucking useless recently. Was there anything else? I'm just rather amused that you're bashing unsubstantiated claims by using an unsubstantiated quote yourself. The chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee said Cummings had not provided concrete written evidence to back-up his explosive testimony given to MPs last month. The Chair eh? Let me look that up... Jeremy Hunt. That paragon of truth and virtue hahaha The chairman of the health and science select Committee is greg Clarke and he did state they had received no evidence from Cummings if you watch it. Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies What?? Sorry but I don't get what you are on about, who's telling the lies? Hancock? Cummings? Greg Clarke?, Me?. Are you saying that Greg Clarke didn't say that because if so I suggest you watch the hearing and see for yourself. Ive watched the hearing Cummings said stuff Hancock said no its lies Clarke said there is no eveidence Cummings uploaded evidence to his blog . Tell me lies tell me sweet little lies Is just a song , one ive been humming for a while now. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? " Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists?" Ay? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? " It's a simple question | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question " But rhetorical | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical " No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists?" why do you ask? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? " Because he cant address the other question so tries to deflect | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? " You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Priceless | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science " Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently asking about a point which has been made now constitutes deflection
Priceless "You asked a question which is not address the point made in the post you quoted. How many times have you stated that Boris deflects question at PMQ, yet you do it all the time, how about just once in a while address the point you quite thenby all means add to it with your point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it?" I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society?" Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk?" https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it" I'll ask again. Well known by who? What about Gove? Is he having people arrested or even banished for FOI requests? That's what the poster was asking, how long would Cummings last in those other countries. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To surmise Poster makes a point about us being a free society. I ask a question that in a free society ,do journalists get banned? Is Cummings a journalist? I was emphasising the difference between here and other, let’s say ‘tougher’ regimes / systems. Apparently this now constitutes deflection and asking questions not relevant to the point made " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it I'll ask again. Well known by who? What about Gove? Is he having people arrested or even banished for FOI requests? That's what the poster was asking, how long would Cummings last in those other countries." I think the golden rule on here is that when you ask a question more than once,and it's not answered,you have made your point. Enjoy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it I'll ask again. Well known by who? What about Gove? Is he having people arrested or even banished for FOI requests? That's what the poster was asking, how long would Cummings last in those other countries. I think the golden rule on here is that when you ask a question more than once,and it's not answered,you have made your point. Enjoy "Funny you should say that because I've asked you the same question twice in the last few posts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57513415" Jacob He's Smug . I forgot about that streak of Pish ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it I'll ask again. Well known by who? What about Gove? Is he having people arrested or even banished for FOI requests? That's what the poster was asking, how long would Cummings last in those other countries. I think the golden rule on here is that when you ask a question more than once,and it's not answered,you have made your point. Enjoy "Lol if that's the case then loads have made their point with your good self | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Makes you appreciate that we do live in a free society. How long would Cummings last if he was Cumminski in Moscow criticising Putin, or Kum Hings in Beijing ? Do free societies try to ban critical journalists? Ay? It's a simple question But rhetorical No it's not rhetorical It's a simple question In a free society does a gmnt try to silence dissenting journalists? why do you ask? You said we live in a free society. I asked in a free society do the press get sensored? Thos really isnt rocket science Why don't you just show us the press being censored in this country instead of beating around the Bush trying to work an angle. That's what you're getting at isn't it? I posed it as a question but I'm still waiting for an answer. It's well known no 10 tried to exclude journalists seen as critical several months ago. There was also a critical report into goves little operation the other week. I'm simply asking are these signs of a free society? Well known by who? Are you talking about Michael Gove trying to shut down the indyref2 talk? https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/uk-parliament-to-investigate-michael-goves-orwellian-foi-unit/ I'm sure gb news are running it I'll ask again. Well known by who? What about Gove? Is he having people arrested or even banished for FOI requests? That's what the poster was asking, how long would Cummings last in those other countries. I think the golden rule on here is that when you ask a question more than once,and it's not answered,you have made your point. Enjoy
Lol if that's the case then loads have made their point with your good self "Example? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/17/hancock-care-homes-health-secretary In a fully functioning country ,he would be on trial." Nah He'd already be in Jail Lionel . Trial would of happened way faster | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
