Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They don't exist.... they merged with liberals to form libdems....." Wrong! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? " Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. " I think you may well have just made the point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point." Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .." If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before." It has yes.. The greens look to be gaining some momentum, the current big parties need to be more aware of the pull they will have for the younger generations and those yet to reach voting age .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before." How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them." Go to their website. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website." Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you?" There is a lot to go through. But worth a read when you have the time. I wouldn't say there's much that's new, as such but I think they could appeal to some, given some of the reasons for labours failure recently. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you?" You'll find them insufficiently woke for you  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you "I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? There is a lot to go through. But worth a read when you have the time. I wouldn't say there's much that's new, as such but I think they could appeal to some, given some of the reasons for labours failure recently." It was interesting. Nothing exceptionally radical. Like most parties, some was good, some was okay. It's hard to judge without more details on how they would intend to achieve some of their policies. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? There is a lot to go through. But worth a read when you have the time. I wouldn't say there's much that's new, as such but I think they could appeal to some, given some of the reasons for labours failure recently. It was interesting. Nothing exceptionally radical. Like most parties, some was good, some was okay. It's hard to judge without more details on how they would intend to achieve some of their policies." Some good points made about where the other parties are thought, I felt. Left, center left, liberal policies etc. Be interesting to see whether they do ever make anything of themselves. Not starting from scratch, although close enough. Those saying that labour should divide, I just felt they could be an alternative. For someone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? There is a lot to go through. But worth a read when you have the time. I wouldn't say there's much that's new, as such but I think they could appeal to some, given some of the reasons for labours failure recently. It was interesting. Nothing exceptionally radical. Like most parties, some was good, some was okay. It's hard to judge without more details on how they would intend to achieve some of their policies. Some good points made about where the other parties are thought, I felt. Left, center left, liberal policies etc. Be interesting to see whether they do ever make anything of themselves. Not starting from scratch, although close enough. Those saying that labour should divide, I just felt they could be an alternative. For someone." It would be nice to have a party with policies not aligned with left/right/centre and just polices that they believed in. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them."Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street. "I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
"Just trying to help mate blimey | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey "Appreciated. Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP. I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? There is a lot to go through. But worth a read when you have the time. I wouldn't say there's much that's new, as such but I think they could appeal to some, given some of the reasons for labours failure recently. It was interesting. Nothing exceptionally radical. Like most parties, some was good, some was okay. It's hard to judge without more details on how they would intend to achieve some of their policies. Some good points made about where the other parties are thought, I felt. Left, center left, liberal policies etc. Be interesting to see whether they do ever make anything of themselves. Not starting from scratch, although close enough. Those saying that labour should divide, I just felt they could be an alternative. For someone." If labour do split..that will be where the 'right'side of the party will go. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They don't exist.... they merged with liberals to form libdems..... Wrong!" So the LibDems were formed how?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
"The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread. "I think the Whig party is a more natural home for disaffected Labour supporters | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread.
"Your agreement with Rod is duly noted | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread.
Your agreement with Rod is duly noted "So you were ridiculing me for not being racist. Now trying to make it look like I'm agreeing with someone who you allege is a racist. Meanwhile what has this exactly got to do with the thread? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the inquest and infighting continues inside the Labour party, are the SDP a natural home for those disalusioned with the current labour party. Given the historical reasons the party was formed in the first place, they might become relevant again? Why would any labour politician indeed any politician want to join a party that the original people who set up disbanded it, and since it was continued by people from it's lower echelons has never won a seat.. If your counting Flynn who jumped ship from the kippers it's hardly any sort of track record.. I think you may well have just made the point. Tbh I only got that from a well known search engine.. Valid question about labour if it gets to that, not sure it's at that point yet mind .. If you actually read their policies they could well resonate with those who aren't happy with labour. The chairman himself admits they are very small, but would rather model themselves on how the greens started. Slowly. Rather than MPs jumping ship. Grass roots. May take years but it's been done before. How do we find the new SDPs policies? I'll read them. Go to their website. Found it. There's a lot to get through. Did you like it in general, or what parts stood out to you? You'll find them insufficiently woke for you
I didn't find any pro-race hate policies. Must have missed them.
Well Rod Liddle campaigns for them... You might want to Google him, he won't be up your street.
I don't have time to trawl the internet looking for racist things that Rod Liddle has said. Do you want to be more specific?
Just trying to help mate blimey
Appreciated.
Although not sure exactly why you think only I would object to this alleged racism. I'm not the person starting a thread to discuss the SDP.
I just thought it was interesting thread, especially in the context of the local elections which saw Labours support drop.
The last paragraph was the reason I posted. If others want to bring other subjects in, that's up to them, it's an open forum. But racism, alleged or otherwise wasn't why I started the thread.
Your agreement with Rod is duly noted
So you were ridiculing me for not being racist. Now trying to make it look like I'm agreeing with someone who you allege is a racist.
Meanwhile what has this exactly got to do with the thread?"That the SDP is tiny (nothing wrong with that) and hence Rod Liddell is a fairly major player in it. I’ve simply given you a heads up on him. What you do with that information is upto you. Can’t help any further, you’re either curious or you aren’t. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
