FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Refugees arriving via approved route to UK to be given indefinite leave to remain

Jump to newest
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

https://news.sky.com/story/refugees-arriving-via-approved-route-to-be-given-indefinite-leave-to-remain-12252316

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

Makes sense why would a country welcome people who the first thing they have done is break the law?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

It's a bold move forward though as many things will be enshrined in Law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Cardiff


"It's a bold move forward though as many things will be enshrined in Law."

It could be the first thing that She has done right! But maybe she can start doing a better job

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust some cock suckerMan
over a year ago

Preston


"Makes sense why would a country welcome people who the first thing they have done is break the law?"

Because the Geneva Convention says so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

Ironically when we were in the eu ,there was an agreement in place where ,if necessary they could have been shipped back to the 1st safe country they landed in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust some cock suckerMan
over a year ago

Preston


"Ironically when we were in the eu ,there was an agreement in place where ,if necessary they could have been shipped back to the 1st safe country they landed in."

True but still breaking the Geneva Convention

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

There is no agreement anywhere including the Geneva Convention that refugees have to claim asylum in the first country they land in.

So there would be no agreement informal or otherwise to remove them to the country that they first landed in as this would set a Legal imperative on the country that they were returned to.

All refugees that land in this country are either accepted or rejected and returned to their country origin (if rejected) as long as the Law on return fits the Geneva Convention with regard to persecution (et al rules).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/explainers-53734793

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/explainers-53734793"

And ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

I thought we were paying France extra money to stop them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

An eu law called Dublin 3 allows asylum seekers to be tramsferred to the 1st member state they were proven to have entered

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"I thought we were paying France extra money to stop them. "

20 million at one point

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"An eu law called Dublin 3 allows asylum seekers to be tramsferred to the 1st member state they were proven to have entered "

That says allows - it doesn't say it was agreed that they would be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"An eu law called Dublin 3 allows asylum seekers to be tramsferred to the 1st member state they were proven to have entered

That says allows - it doesn't say it was agreed that they would be."

I apologise..I got confused when you said no agreement existed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

It has never been used - as it would set a legal imperative on te country excepting the return.

It was Treaty Talk for 'really, not really'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

The eu pay turkey to keep them there ,Greece has sent loads back to Turkey.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ust some cock suckerMan
over a year ago

Preston


"There is no agreement anywhere including the Geneva Convention that refugees have to claim asylum in the first country they land in.

So there would be no agreement informal or otherwise to remove them to the country that they first landed in as this would set a Legal imperative on the country that they were returned to.

All refugees that land in this country are either accepted or rejected and returned to their country origin (if rejected) as long as the Law on return fits the Geneva Convention with regard to persecution (et al rules)."

1st point, I never said there was

Second point is what our esteemed government is planning on doing goes against the Geneva Convention.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top