FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

New police bill 2021

Jump to newest
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool

Apparently would mean you get a longer sentence for damaging a statue than the starting point for r###

Labour have now decided to vote against it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliaChrisCouple
over a year ago

westerham


"Apparently would mean you get a longer sentence for damaging a statue than the starting point for r###

Labour have now decided to vote against it.

"

Statues are part of our glorious heritage and are important.

I will donate money for a statue of myself in my will.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

The bill was drafted long befor this weekend so could not possibly include the current situation,starmer is not showing any common sense more damage to Labour

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *or Fox SakeCouple
over a year ago

Thornaby


"The bill was drafted long befor this weekend so could not possibly include the current situation,starmer is not showing any common sense more damage to Labour"

"the new bill the way the bill is drafted has raised concerns about sweeping and vague wording, with the main focus of criticism being the criminalisation of making “noise” and causing “serious annoyance”. "

So if in the opinion of a policeperson, you are being noisy in your protesting, then they can lift you.

"The bill gives the police the power to impose conditions on “processions” and public assemblies if “the noise generated by persons taking part ... may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity”.

"It also widens the definition of a “public nuisance”, which is an offence if caused “intentionally or recklessly”, to include acts or omissions which cause someone to suffer “serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity”. The penalty for this offence includes jail sentences of up to 10 years."

sweepimg or what?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealthy_and_HungMan
over a year ago

Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney

home secretary Pretty Repellent appears to have just cut'n'pasted this crap from Hong Kong's new national security legislation. how very stalinist of the tory party.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uninlondon69Man
over a year ago

Tower Bridge South


"home secretary Pretty Repellent appears to have just cut'n'pasted this crap from Hong Kong's new national security legislation. how very stalinist of the tory party."

For which we extended an open invite to 3 million people to escape said legislation. They're in for a surprise when they arrive!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION

Have to say it does look an appalling addition to Law.

Now perhaps if labour had more power in Parliament, er . . .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealthy_and_HungMan
over a year ago

Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney

the trouble with tory voters is that they blame everyone else for the present governments stalinist ideology

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION

The trouble with Labour voters is that they just won't vote their party into power and take the responsibly of leadership.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"The bill was drafted long befor this weekend so could not possibly include the current situation,starmer is not showing any common sense more damage to Labour

"the new bill the way the bill is drafted has raised concerns about sweeping and vague wording, with the main focus of criticism being the criminalisation of making “noise” and causing “serious annoyance”. "

So if in the opinion of a policeperson, you are being noisy in your protesting, then they can lift you.

"The bill gives the police the power to impose conditions on “processions” and public assemblies if “the noise generated by persons taking part ... may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity”.

"It also widens the definition of a “public nuisance”, which is an offence if caused “intentionally or recklessly”, to include acts or omissions which cause someone to suffer “serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity”. The penalty for this offence includes jail sentences of up to 10 years."

sweepimg or what?"

Think Boris has finally got sick of Steve Bray yelling Stoooooooop Brexit! outside Parliament.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION


"T

Think Boris has finally got sick of Steve Bray yelling Stoooooooop Brexit! outside Parliament. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"The trouble with Labour voters is that they just won't vote their party into power and take the responsibly of leadership."

You are aware Tony Blair won 3 elections,?

A repressive legislation is brought in by the tories and it's still labours fault

Absolute genius.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION


"The trouble with Labour voters is that they just won't vote their party into power and take the responsibly of leadership.

You are aware Tony Blair won 3 elections,?

A repressive legislation is brought in by the tories and it's still labours fault

Absolute genius."

Wow. Three? lmao.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION

only the post above mine said it was labours fault

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool

Whilst the gmnt are making noises about protecting women..the new bill contains sections on protecting monuments.a section on protecting parliament.. just trying to find the section on protecting women..sure it's in there somewhere..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top