Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same" Please provide an example of say Switzerland or Sweden breaking an international agreement? If all nations the same, you should do that easily. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same" Cat got your tongue? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same Please provide an example of say Switzerland or Sweden breaking an international agreement? If all nations the same, you should do that easily." Has Switzerland returned all that stolen Nazi gold yet? Or are they still arguing over its origin of ownership? But of course it’s only the UK that’s capable of breaking international agreements, well in your anti British conspiracy riddled mind again x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same Please provide an example of say Switzerland or Sweden breaking an international agreement? If all nations the same, you should do that easily. Has Switzerland returned all that stolen Nazi gold yet? Or are they still arguing over its origin of ownership? But of course it’s only the UK that’s capable of breaking international agreements, well in your anti British conspiracy riddled mind again x " I think you read something into this that wasn't said. No one said it's only the UK. And anyway, if it's damaging to the country, and wrong, why does it matter what anyone else is doing, that's out of our control. Just do what we should be doing, and honouring the agreements. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same Please provide an example of say Switzerland or Sweden breaking an international agreement? If all nations the same, you should do that easily. Has Switzerland returned all that stolen Nazi gold yet? Or are they still arguing over its origin of ownership? But of course it’s only the UK that’s capable of breaking international agreements, well in your anti British conspiracy riddled mind again x I think you read something into this that wasn't said. No one said it's only the UK. And anyway, if it's damaging to the country, and wrong, why does it matter what anyone else is doing, that's out of our control. Just do what we should be doing, and honouring the agreements. " I’m not disagreeing with you dude, I’m just pointing out as an example that Switzerland hasn’t stuck to the agreement on returning stolen Nazi gold from WW2, I just pointed out an example x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yea yea yea all nations the same Please provide an example of say Switzerland or Sweden breaking an international agreement? If all nations the same, you should do that easily. Has Switzerland returned all that stolen Nazi gold yet? Or are they still arguing over its origin of ownership? But of course it’s only the UK that’s capable of breaking international agreements, well in your anti British conspiracy riddled mind again x I think you read something into this that wasn't said. No one said it's only the UK. And anyway, if it's damaging to the country, and wrong, why does it matter what anyone else is doing, that's out of our control. Just do what we should be doing, and honouring the agreements. I’m not disagreeing with you dude, I’m just pointing out as an example that Switzerland hasn’t stuck to the agreement on returning stolen Nazi gold from WW2, I just pointed out an example x" I was giving Ema a chance to put her money where her mouth is. And by the way no conspiracy theories here, leave that shower of nonsense to others  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. " Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty" Telt lol  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty" I was expressing it in the common parlance of the proletariat | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty" And tort law is not common law as I doubt you're aware | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"UK-EU vs UK-China https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agreements-reached-between-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-and-the-european-union https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-56262527 https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8616/ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-security-britain-idUSKBN27S1E6" Sino-British Joint Declaration on Hong Kong: "The treaty contains no enforcement or dispute provisions. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, to which both the UK and China are States Parties, provides only for the suspension of the operation of a treaty in the event that it is breached." The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement: governance and dispute settlement: "Consultations Take place in “good faith” between the UK and EU where one party (the complaining party) feels that the other is in breach of the Agreement. Where a solution cannot be reached, the complaining party can request the establishment of an independent arbitration tribunal. Arbitration Arbitration tribunal: three members: one UK and one EU nominee, and a jointly agreed chair. should be established within ten days of the request. Tribunal Ruling The tribunal rulings are legally binding Where a tribunal finds that a party has breached the Agreement, the party (the responding party) has 30 days to set out compliance measures." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty And tort law is not common law as I doubt you're aware" Funny that, going back all those years to A level law, it is, but just for you " tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong (other than breach of contract) that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. It can include intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy, and many other things." From your favourite reference source x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty And tort law is not common law as I doubt you're aware Funny that, going back all those years to A level law, it is, but just for you " tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong (other than breach of contract) that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. It can include intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy, and many other things." From your favourite reference source x" A level law? Doesn’t cut much ice with me, come back when you’ve won a few cases like me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Brussels starting legal action according to the BBC: "Legal action will begin on Monday over the UK's alleged breach of the NI Protocol , an EU source has confirmed. A letter is to be issued laying out the grounds on which the EU believes a breach has taken place . A second "political" letter will be aimed at the arbitration procedures available under the protocol." They're sending us a letter. Oooohhhh scary lol. I'm a legal expert myself, I talk with top QCs about this sort of thing. In tort law you do actually need to prove a loss to have a chance with this sort of case. The complainent has suffered no loss therefore case should be chucked out. Your top QCs might advise you that this is a breach of an international agreement, not common law. Carry on Mr Mitty And tort law is not common law as I doubt you're aware Funny that, going back all those years to A level law, it is, but just for you " tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong (other than breach of contract) that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. It can include intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy, and many other things." From your favourite reference source x A level law? Doesn’t cut much ice with me, come back when you’ve won a few cases like me "Classic Captain lobster, completely ignores the quote and he tries to get personal. Still sniggering at your enlightenment comments by the way x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
