Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPO" Is this good or bad I can’t decide. Good companies backing is public. Does this leave a space for the slightly more sinister dodgy end of politics funding to take a firmer grip? Ie Alaska and oil? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPO Is this good or bad I can’t decide. Good companies backing is public. Does this leave a space for the slightly more sinister dodgy end of politics funding to take a firmer grip? Ie Alaska and oil? " I think it's good, they are showing that companies don't to be associated with politicians that openly undermine election results. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPO Is this good or bad I can’t decide. Good companies backing is public. Does this leave a space for the slightly more sinister dodgy end of politics funding to take a firmer grip? Ie Alaska and oil? I think it's good, they are showing that companies don't to be associated with politicians that openly undermine election results. " It’s good they are taking a stand I agree. I think the American system is beyond broken. The fact that it cost $14Billion to run the last election shows that money talks in America but I suspect the recipients don’t care who’s it is. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. " Now now, don’t be so haughty , your post was inaccurate and mine was pedantic  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Now now, don’t be so haughty , your post was inaccurate and mine was pedantic "i disagree. i was correct and you were pedanticaly wrong | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. " Joe Biden outraised Trump, somehow he managed not say outrageous things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPO" Facebook is the new cold war very dangerous | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPOFacebook is the new cold war very dangerous" That's a deep statement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Joe Biden outraised Trump, somehow he managed not say outrageous things." yes, and? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The funding of U.S. political campaigns is being rocked as major firms such as Facebook, BlackRock, Marriott and Dow announced plans to halt some or all political contributions as a result of last week’s insurrection at the Capitol — a sign of corporate America’s growing uneasiness with the election doubts and violent attacks inspired by President Trump. -WAPOFacebook is the new cold war very dangerous That's a deep statement." Yes on Sky news there was a big thing about this afternoon called the Grey war it is a pod cast not listened yet but my comment although small is part of the dangers the world faces in the near future | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Joe Biden outraised Trump, somehow he managed not say outrageous things. yes, and?" So it has more to do with the person, not their bank balance. If your premise was true then Mitt Romney would be king of the shitposters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Now now, don’t be so haughty , your post was inaccurate and mine was pedantic
i disagree. i was correct and you were pedanticaly wrong"Ah well, I am will give you that little victory, it sounds like you need it more than I do | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Joe Biden outraised Trump, somehow he managed not say outrageous things. yes, and? So it has more to do with the person, not their bank balance. If your premise was true then Mitt Romney would be king of the shitposters. " you appear to be attempting to make some kind of obtuse point over something which has not been said. i will you and fabtastic to your trolling. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i mentioned yesterday about those with the most money feeling entitled to say the most outrageous things in public and my post was subjected to a failed pedants revolt. Joe Biden outraised Trump, somehow he managed not say outrageous things. yes, and? So it has more to do with the person, not their bank balance. If your premise was true then Mitt Romney would be king of the shitposters. you appear to be attempting to make some kind of obtuse point over something which has not been said. i will you and fabtastic to your trolling." Don’t get upset wealthy , its only banter, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
