FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Please enlighten me/us

Jump to newest
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *L RogueMan
over a year ago

London

Personally, I have family and friends there. A relative is worried about current events rallying Trump supporters in other states.

So yeah. It matters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

My life will be more content and I will feel safer that a lying , narcissistic, racist is no longer the leader of the most powerful country in the world .His pathetic behaviour since he lost the election shows what sort of man he is .

I don’t adore either Biden or Harris but they have more honestly and integrity than Trump.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heRazorsEdgeMan
over a year ago

Wales/ All over UK

Biden is a more sane option for a leader to do a trade deal with now that our own mini Trump has finally “got Brexit done”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

Fair enough, but you’re referring to fairly recent things, just as the MSM does. Before COVID, before the election BS, what was it then? He plays too much golf, he liked to get laid in his younger days, he’s rich? I’d argue that without the media pumping vile thoughts into people, few would wake up and realize their lives were being negatively affected by the US President, just as he didn’t affect them when he was just a businessman. Those that hate him refuse to appreciate anything positive accomplished by his administration.

Do you not think the efforts made in the Middle East are not a positive thing for the entire world?

Does enforcing decades old immigration laws by using a wall to prevent those who break the laws bad? Do you want boats of Somalis pulling up onto your shores to go unchecked?

One thing he has done is expose how little interest state representatives have in the representation of the states people, versus having power.

Trust me, I don’t like most of what he says or tweets, and he could be a lot more polished, but he is more genuine than the rest of them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Fair enough, but you’re referring to fairly recent things, just as the MSM does. Before COVID, before the election BS, what was it then? He plays too much golf, he liked to get laid in his younger days, he’s rich? I’d argue that without the media pumping vile thoughts into people, few would wake up and realize their lives were being negatively affected by the US President, just as he didn’t affect them when he was just a businessman. Those that hate him refuse to appreciate anything positive accomplished by his administration.

Do you not think the efforts made in the Middle East are not a positive thing for the entire world?

Does enforcing decades old immigration laws by using a wall to prevent those who break the laws bad? Do you want boats of Somalis pulling up onto your shores to go unchecked?

One thing he has done is expose how little interest state representatives have in the representation of the states people, versus having power.

Trust me, I don’t like most of what he says or tweets, and he could be a lot more polished, but he is more genuine than the rest of them. "

More genuine? does telling 20,000 lies in 4 years make him genuine? He didn’t build a wall, anything positive he did will be forgotten because off his pathetic behaviour since he lost

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job. "

Look at the way Trump is acting? He is pathetic,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

You live securely in the I hate him so much nothing else matters bubble.

Please list five lies of the 20,000 you claim. Just five.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Most presidents honestly dont do much. They are just a face for show. Id rather not deal with a lying and pompous asshole for the next 4 years. Our politicians are not supposed to be heard as much as they have been for the last 4 years. Give us a break. Kamala Harris is a career prosecutor, the republicans wont really mind her. I dont like Biden but he has the best chance at trying to unite this country as a whole, not just half of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You live securely in the I hate him so much nothing else matters bubble.

Please list five lies of the 20,000 you claim. Just five."

Just use google, I don’t hate the man , I don’t hate his supporters . He lost the election , he is history, hopefully he and his deranged fanatical fans can accept this fact and move on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *L RogueMan
over a year ago

London


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job. "

And what if that minority, sexuality or anything else that's touchy/geeky is the best person for the job?

Further more, what does the best person look and sound like? I'm assuming white, straight, male, rich, "jock," man's man?

Our world is represented by all kinds of people. Any properly functioning government would be wise to reflect that as best as they can with as much competence permitting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

And what if that minority, sexuality or anything else that's touchy/geeky is the best person for the job?

Further more, what does the best person look and sound like? I'm assuming white, straight, male, rich, "jock," man's man?

Our world is represented by all kinds of people. Any properly functioning government would be wise to reflect that as best as they can with as much competence permitting."

Completely agree, and I have no predetermined idea of what they should look like. It’s just a fear that there is so much of an effort to be accepting that qualifications and ability are overlooked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

Yeah, because google doesn’t lie...haha.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yeah, because google doesn’t lie...haha."

Try this

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/13/donald-trump-20000-false-or-misleading-claims

Or this

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/13/president-trump-has-made-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/

Or this

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-twitter-fake-news-false-lie-fact-check-a9616631.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

I’ll have a look.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

The US will rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement.

The leader of the most powerful country in the world won't spout anti science, conspiracy theory bullshit. Or egg on white supremacists.

I'm not a fan of Biden. So can't answer part two.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

what a choice the u.s had. A turd or a turd rolled in glitter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"what a choice the u.s had. A turd or a turd rolled in glitter"

Which was which?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood


"what a choice the u.s had. A turd or a turd rolled in glitter

Which was which? "

id say trump turd or biden turd rolled in glitter feel free to switch it up wichever way you want

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliaChrisCouple
over a year ago

westerham


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

Back to the OP, I wouldn’t dream of criticising or indeed praising an American voter for how they vote in an American election, or for that matter any other country.

Americas decline was going on long before Trump, in the eighties America was the place to go, to aspire to for many people around the world. That hasn’t been the case for many years now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job. "

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otPrinceHarryMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

I care about other human beings. I'd try explaining such a concept to you, OP, but you'd accuse me of being a communist or somesuch.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oan of DArcCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?"

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?"

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?"

Exactly

Which is why I threw the part of

There OP right back at them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it. "

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry

I'm a US citizen so I can't answer this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Fair enough, but you’re referring to fairly recent things, just as the MSM does. Before COVID, before the election BS, what was it then? He plays too much golf, he liked to get laid in his younger days, he’s rich? I’d argue that without the media pumping vile thoughts into people, few would wake up and realize their lives were being negatively affected by the US President, just as he didn’t affect them when he was just a businessman. Those that hate him refuse to appreciate anything positive accomplished by his administration.

Do you not think the efforts made in the Middle East are not a positive thing for the entire world?

Does enforcing decades old immigration laws by using a wall to prevent those who break the laws bad? Do you want boats of Somalis pulling up onto your shores to go unchecked?

One thing he has done is expose how little interest state representatives have in the representation of the states people, versus having power.

Trust me, I don’t like most of what he says or tweets, and he could be a lot more polished, but he is more genuine than the rest of them. "

Genuine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

Nope wont change my life one bit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

"

....what?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit. "

Not concerned about climate change?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what? "

You know

Dont come across all coy now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?"

Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

"

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference."

They're all on board, Russia, India, China. All except Trump's America.

The only other country not signed up is The Vatican.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference.

They're all on board, Russia, India, China. All except Trump's America.

The only other country not signed up is The Vatican.

"

thats good then we should see the benifit of that when ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference.

They're all on board, Russia, India, China. All except Trump's America.

The only other country not signed up is The Vatican.

thats good then we should see the benifit of that when ?"

"Benefit" what do you mean?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference.

They're all on board, Russia, India, China. All except Trump's America.

The only other country not signed up is The Vatican.

thats good then we should see the benifit of that when ?

"Benefit" what do you mean?"

The end of climate change or wont that happen without the usa or wont it happen even with the usa?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows "

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising ."

Ouch, touched a nerve it seems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?Nope wont change my life one bit.

Not concerned about climate change?Nope nothing will change there unless you get russia,china,india on board biden wont make a jot of difference.

They're all on board, Russia, India, China. All except Trump's America.

The only other country not signed up is The Vatican.

thats good then we should see the benifit of that when ?

"Benefit" what do you mean?The end of climate change or wont that happen without the usa or wont it happen even with the usa?"

Much greater chance of succeeding in limiting man made climate change with the US on board yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

On another note it's quite amusing seeing the gmnt furiously trying to distance themselves from the crackpot.

Even when he was contesting the election, they refused to condemn him.

No we werent that close at all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising .

Ouch, touched a nerve it seems. "

Touched a nerve .

Maybe a little as some of his

Co workers put a firearm in his mouth 1 night

Because he was the wrong type of religion .

Still lets not talk about police ever doing anything wrong eh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd. "

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

"

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

"

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

"

The police did open fire killing a female air force veteran from California.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

The police did open fire killing a female air force veteran from California. "

Yes i know , sorry for her loved ones.

Why was she involved in a Terrorist action against the United States of America & its political Hub ?

Have those details been released yet ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?"
only you could post that Lionel lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?only you could post that Lionel lol"

Well he did say he was a hero..just seems to have gone unusually quiet on the subject.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby


"I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?only you could post that Lionel lol

Well he did say he was a hero..just seems to have gone unusually quiet on the subject."

he’s irrelevant now know one cares lol I could of said a bit like your hero but I won’t lower myself lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?only you could post that Lionel lol

Well he did say he was a hero..just seems to have gone unusually quiet on the subject.he’s irrelevant now know one cares lol I could of said a bit like your hero but I won’t lower myself lol"

He wouldnt have been irrelevant if trump won

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/01/21 11:49:58]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if nigel has shown his support for his hero?only you could post that Lionel lol

Well he did say he was a hero..just seems to have gone unusually quiet on the subject."

Unbelievable considering he flew all the way to the states during covid to speak at one of trumpys covid spreading events

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country? "

I won't laugh as much each day, nor look through my fingers when I see what the dick has done every day - stop hearing an American friend saying just how embarrassed she is every time we talk.


"Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

Adore, would have nothing to do with how I felt about any Politician. Totally the wrong emotion. But let's face it, it can't be worse what the World has experienced under Trump. So feeling about them are hopeful that they would bring America back into to some form of recognisable harmony with itself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unnyPair OP   Couple
over a year ago

Seminole

I hope so too Cat

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

"

I’m baffled rather than triggered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered. "

Capital Police were defunded this year what you think was going to happen. You reap what you sow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered. "

I dont know why

Maybe a cup of tea & a spot of lunch will help you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/01/21 13:48:54]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered.

Capital Police were defunded this year what you think was going to happen. You reap what you sow."

Police have been defunded in the uk

People arent walking round with guns ready to kill each other .

Or is just governments dividing people ?

Surely people are just people & therfore you can choose to ignore division .

If you want to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered.

Capital Police were defunded this year what you think was going to happen. You reap what you sow.

Police have been defunded in the uk

People arent walking round with guns ready to kill each other .

Or is just governments dividing people ?

Surely people are just people & therfore you can choose to ignore division .

If you want to

"

We are not the UK now are we.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered.

I dont know why

Maybe a cup of tea & a spot of lunch will help you"

Probably got more to do with the fact you’re making utterly irrelevant points whilst insisting I send you, a random from a swingers site, proof of my employment history, before you’ll accept what I’m saying as accurate.

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh and I never said I used firearms. I said I was an ex cop. PSU level 2 and taser trained. Several riots and countless EDL and football matches policed. Firearms are my partners world, not mine. And I never asked what your experience with firearms was....which is odd.

You assumed your knowledge of firearms was greater than mine

Hence the Emasculation comment .

As for trying to defend an American Cops because you have experience with the English Defence League & a few

footy matches , well thats just daft .

Still you have a great day

I didn’t assume anything about your knowledge of firearms? But the fact you’ve got your knickers in a twist about it and trying to appeal to emotion is telling. I know I have a better working knowledge of use of force than you.

The deployment and use of firearms has the same rules of engagement in both countries love. Police don’t just shoot people for no reason, however much you want it to be true. There are the same applications and considerations when it comes to non lethal force too. We have the NDM, the US has the conflict resolution model. Same things, different names.

So to reiterate my original point - the police would not have just ‘opened fire’ on the crowd had it been anyone other than MAGA supporters.

Dont worry about te emotion

I made that it up , just to show what someone claims

Isnt to be trusted

It has triggered ( pun very much intended)

As for the "Love "

I think its really good that you are an ex officer

If you believe that lethal force & non lethal force are the same here as in the states .

It may have been once but that all changed the day the

Boys in blue shot Harry Stanley .

I’m baffled rather than triggered.

I dont know why

Maybe a cup of tea & a spot of lunch will help you

Probably got more to do with the fact you’re making utterly irrelevant points whilst insisting I send you, a random from a swingers site, proof of my employment history, before you’ll accept what I’m saying as accurate.

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see. "

It was the new defund the police policy. Try de-escalate then corralling. They did just that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising ."

What do the other guys do for a living who carry firearms?

Just curious

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/01/21 14:19:07]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see. "

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"As a Brit, how will your own life, wealth, health and future improve without Donald Trump as president of not your country?

Part two of the question, is this; how much do you adore Biden and Harris as the leaders of not your country?"

It will make no difference to me personally in the short term but he is a danger to democracy world wide

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising .

What do the other guys do for a living who carry firearms?

Just curious "

1 drives Big f*cking cranes

The other is a spark .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising .

What do the other guys do for a living who carry firearms?

Just curious

1 drives Big f*cking cranes

The other is a spark ."

What would you need firearms for in those capacities?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And on what planet does electing a woman Vice President, who had zero support from her party just sit without people raising eyebrows? Is it simply because of her color? It clearly had nothing to do with merit.

I just fear everyone is so anti trump that they are missing how pathetic the incoming team actually is.

And no I don’t want to see a Trump on the ticket in 2024, but I also don’t want to see someone just because they represent a minority, a sexuality, or anything else that’s touchy/geeky as opposed to the best person for the job.

Why is it so important for you to know or Speak about a

man who is the president of

NOT YOUR COUNTRY ?

Because we can

Do you only express opinions on things that affect you directly?

He’s had plenty to say elsewhere about the election so I wouldn’t bother engaging over it.

Not as Much as you with your

BIG GUNS so listen to me attitude .

....what?

You know

Dont come across all coy now

The debate in the other thread turned to the assumption that the police would’ve just opened fire on a crowd of protesters if they were for a different cause. My counter point was that’s not accurate because of use of force legislation, which I know, through personal experience, a lot about. You chose to call me a liar. I don’t know if it’s out of a feeling of emasculation because I’m a woman who knows more about a ‘male’ subject than you, or if you just don’t like anyone challenging your baseless assertions. Who knows

I didnt call you a liar .

You said you knew because you had experience in force .

I asked for proof which you still have not provided .

Unkess you load a photo of your firearm & licences

Then anything you say can be ignored .

As for emasculation because you know more than me

About a male subject .

Well that is just funny .

But just to let you know

Ive been around a firearm since i was born

My old man had one for work .

Was part of the only U.K force where all officers were armed

I know 2 other people who have nothing to do with law & order or the military who carry firearms & why they do so for work .

I bet you couldnt guess what either of them do for a living &

You would be shocked what they do for a living .

Still you carry on with your theorising .

What do the other guys do for a living who carry firearms?

Just curious

1 drives Big f*cking cranes

The other is a spark .

What would you need firearms for in those capacities? "

If the crane was attacked & someone decided to lift or drop "stuff" from heights or lifted weights that made the crane unstable it would cause major damage to life with collapse.

Remember the crane that went through the houses in bow east london ?

Well his are twice the size & weight at least of that one

Hence Guns are carried specifiaclly by the 2 operators

to stop any such attack

The Spark is a little bit more than a regular spark

He works at the biggest power station in London which

supplies nearly 40% of tfl .

During 7/7 there was a huge power surge , due to the bombs &

After an internal enquiry it was decided 5 people on the site should be armed as an attack on the power site could leave

Most of transport for London system disabled .

Highly unlikely scenarios , just erring on

the cautious side i think .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see.

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into "

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see.

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement. "

BLM were more than happy to use violence in the summer so fit the terrorist definition themselves. They were not a protest either. But they were permitted to carry on.

Your comments on 6th jan pt 2 thread poppet

What makes today’s nonsense white privilege? Or are you just using irrelevant talking points to show what a great person you are?

Yes, BLM got away with protesting in the middle of a global pandemic. Let’s not ignore that fact yeah?

What I will say is this - when it comes to using force I do know my shit, for reasons I won’t go into here"

Unless you prove it you are just

bullsh*tting ( my 1st comment to you)

Prove it how? My partner and I are ex cops and he’s an Iraq war veteran and internationally licensed private military operator. We know a thing or two about using force. That good enough for you? Or do you want me to try and dig out our old warrant cards to satisfy your curiosity?

You offered proof

I never asked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just speculation. But I’m willing to bet it was likely a justified lawful shooting. Just have to wait and see.

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement.

BLM were more than happy to use violence in the summer so fit the terrorist definition themselves. They were not a protest either. But they were permitted to carry on.

Your comments on 6th jan pt 2 thread poppet

What makes today’s nonsense white privilege? Or are you just using irrelevant talking points to show what a great person you are?

Yes, BLM got away with protesting in the middle of a global pandemic. Let’s not ignore that fact yeah?

What I will say is this - when it comes to using force I do know my shit, for reasons I won’t go into here"

Unless you prove it you are just

bullsh*tting ( my 1st comment to you)

Prove it how? My partner and I are ex cops and he’s an Iraq war veteran and internationally licensed private military operator. We know a thing or two about using force. That good enough for you? Or do you want me to try and dig out our old warrant cards to satisfy your curiosity?

You offered proof

I never asked "

Where in any of that have I said BLM would’ve been treated any differently to yesterday’s lot, poppet?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement.

BLM were more than happy to use violence in the summer so fit the terrorist definition themselves. They were not a protest either. But they were permitted to carry on.

Your comments on 6th jan pt 2 thread poppet

What makes today’s nonsense white privilege? Or are you just using irrelevant talking points to show what a great person you are?

Yes, BLM got away with protesting in the middle of a global pandemic. Let’s not ignore that fact yeah?

What I will say is this - when it comes to using force I do know my shit, for reasons I won’t go into here"

Unless you prove it you are just

bullsh*tting ( my 1st comment to you)

Prove it how? My partner and I are ex cops and he’s an Iraq war veteran and internationally licensed private military operator. We know a thing or two about using force. That good enough for you? Or do you want me to try and dig out our old warrant cards to satisfy your curiosity?

You offered proof

I never asked

Where in any of that have I said BLM would’ve been treated any differently to yesterday’s lot, poppet? "

4 years of non stop disorder in Portland and people say nothing

Why is the automatic assumption that police will always use lethal force against people? You clearly don’t know a thing about use of force. They don’t just shoot people, even if they’re breaking into a building. But this is going off on a tangent - what if’s and speculation. You can believe that BLM protestors would’ve been shot by police if they broke into federal buildings if you want. I disagree.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/31/americans-killed-protests-political-unrest-acled

At least 11 Americans have been killed while participating in political demonstrations this year and another 14 have died in other incidents linked to political unrest, according to new data from a non-profit monitoring political unrest in the United States.

Nine of the people killed during protests were demonstrators taking part in Black Lives Matter protests. Two were conservatives killed after pro-Trump “patriot rallies”. All but one were killed by fellow citizens

* * * * *

Maybe you should read a big more than

just flowing 1 narrative Pumpkin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtylittletramp100TV/TS
over a year ago

Notts

Bill Clinton on the Biden team side gave a pardon to his drug dealing half brother in his last week's as president.... I admit storming the capital building beats that lol

Politicians around the world are not to be trusted !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not sure it beats who Trampy has pardoned

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/article/trump-pardons-duncan-hunter-blackwater-murderer-and-more.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

Everyone one of the clueless simpletons are a ringer from cletus the slack jawed yoke from the Simpsons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ykmwyldTV/TS
over a year ago

Belpre

It's absolutely terrible that someone was shot and killed inside the capital yesterday !

But, make no mistake, every trump supporter there should count their blessings today and hug the ones they love !

Because, the fact is, once anyone by force breaches the inside of the capital, lethal force is authorized to stop that breach !

Dozens of people are EXTREMELY lucky they weren't killed for their idiotic actions !

Their also EXTREMELY lucky that the capital police didn't want to have to shoot American citizens that they knew was just following the insane ramblings of an unstable trump !

Many of these people will be arrested and serve serious time for domestic terrorism for being stupid enough to listen to trumps insane ramblings !

As I've said many times over the last 4 years, history is not going to be kind at all to trump, and with his latest actions, trump has sealed his fate

in history as a mentally unstable self serving president that should never have been president

in the first place !

This so called president needs to be held fully accountable for all his actions !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement.

BLM were more than happy to use violence in the summer so fit the terrorist definition themselves. They were not a protest either. But they were permitted to carry on.

Your comments on 6th jan pt 2 thread poppet

What makes today’s nonsense white privilege? Or are you just using irrelevant talking points to show what a great person you are?

Yes, BLM got away with protesting in the middle of a global pandemic. Let’s not ignore that fact yeah?

What I will say is this - when it comes to using force I do know my shit, for reasons I won’t go into here"

Unless you prove it you are just

bullsh*tting ( my 1st comment to you)

Prove it how? My partner and I are ex cops and he’s an Iraq war veteran and internationally licensed private military operator. We know a thing or two about using force. That good enough for you? Or do you want me to try and dig out our old warrant cards to satisfy your curiosity?

You offered proof

I never asked

Where in any of that have I said BLM would’ve been treated any differently to yesterday’s lot, poppet?

4 years of non stop disorder in Portland and people say nothing

Why is the automatic assumption that police will always use lethal force against people? You clearly don’t know a thing about use of force. They don’t just shoot people, even if they’re breaking into a building. But this is going off on a tangent - what if’s and speculation. You can believe that BLM protestors would’ve been shot by police if they broke into federal buildings if you want. I disagree.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/31/americans-killed-protests-political-unrest-acled

At least 11 Americans have been killed while participating in political demonstrations this year and another 14 have died in other incidents linked to political unrest, according to new data from a non-profit monitoring political unrest in the United States.

Nine of the people killed during protests were demonstrators taking part in Black Lives Matter protests. Two were conservatives killed after pro-Trump “patriot rallies”. All but one were killed by fellow citizens

* * * * *

Maybe you should read a big more than

just flowing 1 narrative Pumpkin

"

All but one were killed by fellow citizens......and you’re still maintaining I’m wrong about police and use of force??? Maybe you should read a ‘bit’ more and try actually taking in what others are saying before trying to be smarmy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Fact still stands - I am correct about the use of force from the police yesterday. It’s tragic they shot someone, but until there’s an enquiry everything is just

Changing your tune as you go i see .

1st, you responded to someone saying if it had been

BLM outside they wouldn have been treated much harder.

You claimed they wouldnt .

You claimed you had suprerior knowledge to

Such & such because of previous work .

I asked you to prove that .

you couldnt & Havent .

It is irrelevant to me as to whether or notyou can

prove it on here .

All i did was to chastise your response for the stupidity

That was contained in it .

I have no need of any photo proof of anything from you

I just know you can not prove what you claim .

All you are doing is wasting your time but

Giving me chuckles for the web you have wondered into

Haha I’m not changing my tune at all you oddball

I made a point - a valid one, which you implied I was a liar for, and you’ve since taken your bat and ball home. At no point have i changed form my original position that BLM would not have been treated any different by law enforcement.

BLM were more than happy to use violence in the summer so fit the terrorist definition themselves. They were not a protest either. But they were permitted to carry on.

Your comments on 6th jan pt 2 thread poppet

What makes today’s nonsense white privilege? Or are you just using irrelevant talking points to show what a great person you are?

Yes, BLM got away with protesting in the middle of a global pandemic. Let’s not ignore that fact yeah?

What I will say is this - when it comes to using force I do know my shit, for reasons I won’t go into here"

Unless you prove it you are just

bullsh*tting ( my 1st comment to you)

Prove it how? My partner and I are ex cops and he’s an Iraq war veteran and internationally licensed private military operator. We know a thing or two about using force. That good enough for you? Or do you want me to try and dig out our old warrant cards to satisfy your curiosity?

You offered proof

I never asked

Where in any of that have I said BLM would’ve been treated any differently to yesterday’s lot, poppet?

4 years of non stop disorder in Portland and people say nothing

Why is the automatic assumption that police will always use lethal force against people? You clearly don’t know a thing about use of force. They don’t just shoot people, even if they’re breaking into a building. But this is going off on a tangent - what if’s and speculation. You can believe that BLM protestors would’ve been shot by police if they broke into federal buildings if you want. I disagree.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/31/americans-killed-protests-political-unrest-acled

At least 11 Americans have been killed while participating in political demonstrations this year and another 14 have died in other incidents linked to political unrest, according to new data from a non-profit monitoring political unrest in the United States.

Nine of the people killed during protests were demonstrators taking part in Black Lives Matter protests. Two were conservatives killed after pro-Trump “patriot rallies”. All but one were killed by fellow citizens

* * * * *

Maybe you should read a big more than

just flowing 1 narrative Pumpkin

All but one were killed by fellow citizens......and you’re still maintaining I’m wrong about police and use of force??? Maybe you should read a ‘bit’ more and try actually taking in what others are saying before trying to be smarmy "

Sorry you sent me to sleep .

Exactly my point if plod werent there

The Patriots attacked them

If Plod were there they attacked Them .

Anyway you keep up those rather suspect

views you have ,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

Just one thing needs clearing up in this thread...

DC metro police come under the auspices of the mayor....

Capitol Police comes under the auspices of congress....

the national guard in DC (because it is not a state, different discussion) comes under the auspices of the department of homeland security....

So with 3 different sets of law enforcement running around the same ish small sector... you wonder why there might be communication issues.....

Carry on with your points scoring.........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just one thing needs clearing up in this thread...

DC metro police come under the auspices of the mayor....

Capitol Police comes under the auspices of congress....

the national guard in DC (because it is not a state, different discussion) comes under the auspices of the department of homeland security....

So with 3 different sets of law enforcement running around the same ish small sector... you wonder why there might be communication issues.....

Carry on with your points scoring........."

Agreed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No point scoring from me

Just triggering someones obsession

with being anti BLM posts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top