Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! " im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM!as it's nearly new year I'll agree we need a better stronger government but that's as close as I'll go with you as for sks I hope labour never get in they moan when not in government and do fook all when they've been in government but good luck. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho " Same. KS is basically a Tory Lite. Doesn't offer any real change. The reality is, if there is a new government, they're inheriting post pandemic, post brexit Britain. They'd be lucky to get five years before the Tories got back in and austerity business would go back to normal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! " More chance of us beating covid next week and rejoining the EU. Enjoy this government for many years they will succeed | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho Same. KS is basically a Tory Lite. Doesn't offer any real change. The reality is, if there is a new government, they're inheriting post pandemic, post brexit Britain. They'd be lucky to get five years before the Tories got back in and austerity business would go back to normal." it’s basically a loose loose for the next pm | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho Same. KS is basically a Tory Lite. Doesn't offer any real change. The reality is, if there is a new government, they're inheriting post pandemic, post brexit Britain. They'd be lucky to get five years before the Tories got back in and austerity business would go back to normal.it’s basically a loose loose for the next pm " I agree. We're in agreement on something.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! " You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho Same. KS is basically a Tory Lite. Doesn't offer any real change. The reality is, if there is a new government, they're inheriting post pandemic, post brexit Britain. They'd be lucky to get five years before the Tories got back in and austerity business would go back to normal." I'm all for kicking out the tories but as you say, KS is much of the same. He's deeply compromised, a Masonic puppet, knight commander of the order of the Bath. You couldn't trust KS with anything. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! " I'm not convinced. I'm politically homeless as far as I'm concerned. Between the current shower of shit and an in-fighting opposition who don't know their ass from their elbow, there's not much for an intelligent person to choose from. All our major players are more obsessed with winning and power than actually improving the affairs of this country.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy." One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over!" sks will change whats happend ovee the last 40 years lol u do realise he is a blair baby lol a vote for kier is a vote for more of the same pmsl.as someone else pointed out he is tory lite lol.same morals as the torys just dosent come over as much of a cunt as a tory.thats really funny you think he would be a big change lol he is owned by moneymen | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over!" Can I have some of what you’re smoking ta | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! I'm not convinced. I'm politically homeless as far as I'm concerned. Between the current shower of shit and an in-fighting opposition who don't know their ass from their elbow, there's not much for an intelligent person to choose from. All our major players are more obsessed with winning and power than actually improving the affairs of this country. "This  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over!" You mean like Tony Blair did, I think your forgetting the fall out in labour hasn’t started yet, the unions aren’t happy with posh boy Kier (what is it with labour & posh privileged white men being their leader?) also don’t forget labour couldn’t beat that fuck whitt Major with all the shit he got wrong & that was after Thatcher, he had 2 terms in office before being beat, by a posh white privileged white man lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! You mean like Tony Blair did, I think your forgetting the fall out in labour hasn’t started yet, the unions aren’t happy with posh boy Kier (what is it with labour & posh privileged white men being their leader?) also don’t forget labour couldn’t beat that fuck whitt Major with all the shit he got wrong & that was after Thatcher, he had 2 terms in office before being beat, by a posh white privileged white man lol" Major only 1 won election..and if anyone wants an example of a centrist tory,its him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! sks will change whats happend ovee the last 40 years lol u do realise he is a blair baby lol a vote for kier is a vote for more of the same pmsl.as someone else pointed out he is tory lite lol.same morals as the torys just dosent come over as much of a cunt as a tory.thats really funny you think he would be a big change lol he is owned by moneymen" You’d think that, and you’ve been fed the same bs everyone else has courtesy of the groupthink machine. Time to change the record, you don’t know power and thankfully never will. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair." The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! im all for that just a pity it’s KS tho " Why pity for? Do you support the anti semite Jeremy Corbyn? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris." Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! You mean like Tony Blair did, I think your forgetting the fall out in labour hasn’t started yet, the unions aren’t happy with posh boy Kier (what is it with labour & posh privileged white men being their leader?) also don’t forget labour couldn’t beat that fuck whitt Major with all the shit he got wrong & that was after Thatcher, he had 2 terms in office before being beat, by a posh white privileged white man lol Major only 1 won election..and if anyone wants an example of a centrist tory,its him. " yes you are correct but he took over from thatcher (1st term) then he won an election (his (2nd term). I said 2 terms not 2 elections. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! You mean like Tony Blair did, I think your forgetting the fall out in labour hasn’t started yet, the unions aren’t happy with posh boy Kier (what is it with labour & posh privileged white men being their leader?) also don’t forget labour couldn’t beat that fuck whitt Major with all the shit he got wrong & that was after Thatcher, he had 2 terms in office before being beat, by a posh white privileged white man lol Major only 1 won election..and if anyone wants an example of a centrist tory,its him. yes you are correct but he took over from thatcher (1st term) then he won an election (his (2nd term). I said 2 terms not 2 elections. " but it’s a technicality yes he took over yes he won an election that he shouldn’t of done yes it was one term over 9 years? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris." I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris " Snowflake. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris " Quite right. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job." What about the left wing media? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris Quite right. " Can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? " As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris Quite right. Can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen "You know manners & respect cost nothing, why is it the left are so full of hate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over! sks will change whats happend ovee the last 40 years lol u do realise he is a blair baby lol a vote for kier is a vote for more of the same pmsl.as someone else pointed out he is tory lite lol.same morals as the torys just dosent come over as much of a cunt as a tory.thats really funny you think he would be a big change lol he is owned by moneymen You’d think that, and you’ve been fed the same bs everyone else has courtesy of the groupthink machine. Time to change the record, you don’t know power and thankfully never will. " hahahaha ur confusing me with someone who gives a fuck about the torys or labour.and groupthink lol you dont realise it but your just as bad as a rabid tory.they belive watever shit there party spews out and u belive everything labour spew out.i was just poinging out kier is more of the same.tory lite just a bit less of a cunt than boris.but you carry on cheering for kier he needs someone to do it because the left of labour really dont seem to like him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris "Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison." The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris Quite right. Can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen "Heat? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison." Left wing media? Where? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. " The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. " Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps."group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? " Yes. Loads of people here quote the Daily Mail. The country voted for Brexit based partly on years and years of misinformation about the EU in the Sun, Mail, Express etc. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate?"Fuck communism and momentum, it appears you seem to have some confusion on my thought. The tories and the former brexit party are just as bad as them stupid asswipes. The centre ground is where I stand, pragmatic and functional, not into false promises of either gobshite corbyn or that bullshitter boris. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate?
Fuck communism and momentum, it appears you seem to have some confusion on my thought. The tories and the former brexit party are just as bad as them stupid asswipes.
The centre ground is where I stand, pragmatic and functional, not into false promises of either gobshite corbyn or that bullshitter boris."Pragmatic
So what has Boris got right? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. " isn’t the express now owned by trinity mirror group now like the daily star? As for the BBC just my opinion but from the last time I watched it no way can you say they favour this government, they still miss Blair & won’t forgive the right wing racist who voted for independence from the EU. I just wish they would scrap the license fee, & let them see how they get on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? " What left wing media? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate?
Fuck communism and momentum, it appears you seem to have some confusion on my thought. The tories and the former brexit party are just as bad as them stupid asswipes.
The centre ground is where I stand, pragmatic and functional, not into false promises of either gobshite corbyn or that bullshitter boris."Sorry my mistake, I’m with you on this one | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? " 100% | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. isn’t the express now owned by trinity mirror group now like the daily star? As for the BBC just my opinion but from the last time I watched it no way can you say they favour this government, they still miss Blair & won’t forgive the right wing racist who voted for independence from the EU. I just wish they would scrap the license fee, & let them see how they get on. " Repeating rhetoric directly from the pages of the right wing media. Does not strengthen your argument that the right wing media is inaffectual | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100%" Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100%" I thought you only read links Lionel My mates tend to get the paper for the sport section a few for the racing pages more their favourite tipster rather than political reading. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. " Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail" Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. isn’t the express now owned by trinity mirror group now like the daily star? As for the BBC just my opinion but from the last time I watched it no way can you say they favour this government, they still miss Blair & won’t forgive the right wing racist who voted for independence from the EU. I just wish they would scrap the license fee, & let them see how they get on. Repeating rhetoric directly from the pages of the right wing media. Does not strengthen your argument that the right wing media is inaffectual " denying the truth does not make an untruth the truth. You believe your view & I mine. The left wing bias of the bbc is there to been seen by all who open their eyes to it, but if you keep your eyes closed just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there, & other can’t. x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% I thought you only read links Lionel My mates tend to get the paper for the sport section a few for the racing pages more their favourite tipster rather than political reading. " I'm guessing they still look at the front page headlines. Sky,the mail,the express,the sun,the times, the metro, the observer are all what you would class as right wing media. The bbc are very loathe to criticise the gmnt. Look what happened when the sun switched its support to Blair The media still have a huge impact in this country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.!" So in your view the guardian is unreliable? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. isn’t the express now owned by trinity mirror group now like the daily star? As for the BBC just my opinion but from the last time I watched it no way can you say they favour this government, they still miss Blair & won’t forgive the right wing racist who voted for independence from the EU. I just wish they would scrap the license fee, & let them see how they get on. Repeating rhetoric directly from the pages of the right wing media. Does not strengthen your argument that the right wing media is inaffectual denying the truth does not make an untruth the truth. You believe your view & I mine. The left wing bias of the bbc is there to been seen by all who open their eyes to it, but if you keep your eyes closed just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there, & other can’t. x" Anyway the BBC is a commercial tv station & should raise its own funds, not expect the uk to pay for say BBC Canada to be broadcast free | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means." so you name two left wing opinion generators & a central right tv journalist as evidence? When was the last time you watched QT. The last time I did & they had a studio audience it was certainly not a Tory one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means." Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. isn’t the express now owned by trinity mirror group now like the daily star? As for the BBC just my opinion but from the last time I watched it no way can you say they favour this government, they still miss Blair & won’t forgive the right wing racist who voted for independence from the EU. I just wish they would scrap the license fee, & let them see how they get on. Repeating rhetoric directly from the pages of the right wing media. Does not strengthen your argument that the right wing media is inaffectual denying the truth does not make an untruth the truth. You believe your view & I mine. The left wing bias of the bbc is there to been seen by all who open their eyes to it, but if you keep your eyes closed just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there, & other can’t. x" Not sure what you're on about. But yeah. Good hustle. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means.so you name two left wing opinion generators & a central right tv journalist as evidence? When was the last time you watched QT. The last time I did & they had a studio audience it was certainly not a Tory one. " 2 left wing opinion genenerators from where?the bbc? Qt now chooses its audience based on the results of the last election. Therefore in most places it will be conservative dominated | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP." They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means.so you name two left wing opinion generators & a central right tv journalist as evidence? When was the last time you watched QT. The last time I did & they had a studio audience it was certainly not a Tory one. 2 left wing opinion genenerators from where?the bbc? Qt now chooses its audience based on the results of the last election. Therefore in most places it will be conservative dominated " So if the BBC tell you something you believe it? Do you really think they need to apply the telly tax to pensioners? What even with all their commercial UKTV stations? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means." The BBC qt were criticised for constantly having a too left wing audience. They then had to introduce a more balanced audience. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. The BBC qt were criticised for constantly having a too left wing audience. They then had to introduce a more balanced audience." You’ll have to put a link up for Lionel | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.! So in your view the guardian is unreliable?" You're the one who has said people are 100% influenced politically by reading a newspaper? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means." Andrew Neill doesn't work for the BBC anymore. ThecQT audience is drawn on how that area politically leans. If its held in a Labour seat, then the audience will be slightly skewed that way. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x" Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. The BBC qt were criticised for constantly having a too left wing audience. They then had to introduce a more balanced audience." Criticised in the daily mail. And we're back to the original point that the right wing media has more sway in the UK. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Andrew Neill doesn't work for the BBC anymore. ThecQT audience is drawn on how that area politically leans. If its held in a Labour seat, then the audience will be slightly skewed that way. " Did he used too? You realise the tory gmnt has an 80 seat majority? Have qt always done this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. The BBC qt were criticised for constantly having a too left wing audience. They then had to introduce a more balanced audience." Who by? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means.so you name two left wing opinion generators & a central right tv journalist as evidence? When was the last time you watched QT. The last time I did & they had a studio audience it was certainly not a Tory one. 2 left wing opinion genenerators from where?the bbc? Qt now chooses its audience based on the results of the last election. Therefore in most places it will be conservative dominated So if the BBC tell you something you believe it? Do you really think they need to apply the telly tax to pensioners? What even with all their commercial UKTV stations?" You said the bbc were too left wing This is evidently incorrect | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening" The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. The BBC qt were criticised for constantly having a too left wing audience. They then had to introduce a more balanced audience. You’ll have to put a link up for Lionel " There are links online. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE." So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.! So in your view the guardian is unreliable? You're the one who has said people are 100% influenced politically by reading a newspaper? " I said people are influenced by newspapers You implied the guardian is unreliable. I'd like to see some evidence | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening" Because the left dont have a powerful voice in this country. The right do. Simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question." Yes but the right can use the same example. The centre right get called extreme right wing neo natzi, when in fact they are just to the right. In recent times since the success of Blair gaining the central ground has been crucial to all who want power. Labour under corbyn took a big step to the left like we hadn’t seen since Micheal Foot, & that is why SKS is trying to take them back there. As for support of the left what’s that multi billionaire called who owns Amazon & dodges paying fair taxes whilst giving his workers crap conditions. Jeff Bezo owner of just a few small media organisations x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question. Yes but the right can use the same example. The centre right get called extreme right wing neo natzi, when in fact they are just to the right. In recent times since the success of Blair gaining the central ground has been crucial to all who want power. Labour under corbyn took a big step to the left like we hadn’t seen since Micheal Foot, & that is why SKS is trying to take them back there. As for support of the left what’s that multi billionaire called who owns Amazon & dodges paying fair taxes whilst giving his workers crap conditions. Jeff Bezo owner of just a few small media organisations x" Link for Lionel https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/08/07/the-politics-of-jeff-bezos/?outputType=amp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.! So in your view the guardian is unreliable? You're the one who has said people are 100% influenced politically by reading a newspaper? I said people are influenced by newspapers You implied the guardian is unreliable. I'd like to see some evidence " You read it front page to back page every day so you should know where the evidence is. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X" Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question. Yes but the right can use the same example. The centre right get called extreme right wing neo natzi, when in fact they are just to the right. In recent times since the success of Blair gaining the central ground has been crucial to all who want power. Labour under corbyn took a big step to the left like we hadn’t seen since Micheal Foot, & that is why SKS is trying to take them back there. As for support of the left what’s that multi billionaire called who owns Amazon & dodges paying fair taxes whilst giving his workers crap conditions. Jeff Bezo owner of just a few small media organisations x" So now you're claiming that Jeff Bezos is British! Or has an impact on the British left wing media? That's a wild claim by anyone's standards. Can you give some indication of your outlandish claim that we're in a shift to the left, and what was once centre right is now reported as "neo natzi" sic? Because this is contrary to everything that's currently going on in British and world media/politics. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. I don't think many sane people would argue that Starmer isn't smarter or better than Boris. The problem for me is that he only offers a small incremental improvement, and no real change. The reality is that the right wing media in this country hold a huge sway over the electorate. No one who offers any challange to the establishment will be allowed anywhere near the PM job. What about the left wing media? As evidenced through brexit and 11 years of Tory austerity. The left wing media is weak and ineffective in comparison. The BBC are weak the Mirror group is weak? Far play the Guardian that suffering. The BBC have always favoured the government. Whoever is in charge. Claiming the BBC is leftwing is ridiculous. So the Guardian and the Mirror are weaker, in my opinion, than The Sun, Mail, Express, Times, Telegraph etc. You can see the impact the right wing media has on the electorate. As I mentioned. Brexit. And the Tories getting re-elected time and again. Do you really think anyone is influenced politically by reading a newspaper? 100% Have to agree that Lionel believes everything he reads in the guardian. Whereas you are a regular contributor to the daily mail Let's see how long it takes you to post a link from the guardian? I bet it will be in less than 24 hours from this post.! So in your view the guardian is unreliable? You're the one who has said people are 100% influenced politically by reading a newspaper? I said people are influenced by newspapers You implied the guardian is unreliable. I'd like to see some evidence You read it front page to back page every day so you should know where the evidence is. "I'll take that as a ..I dont have any. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question. Yes but the right can use the same example. The centre right get called extreme right wing neo natzi, when in fact they are just to the right. In recent times since the success of Blair gaining the central ground has been crucial to all who want power. Labour under corbyn took a big step to the left like we hadn’t seen since Micheal Foot, & that is why SKS is trying to take them back there. As for support of the left what’s that multi billionaire called who owns Amazon & dodges paying fair taxes whilst giving his workers crap conditions. Jeff Bezo owner of just a few small media organisations x Link for Lionel https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/08/07/the-politics-of-jeff-bezos/?outputType=amp" Jeff Bezos is nothing to do with this country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Most people tend not to take any notice of left wing media, including the BBC, because it's mostly bollocks. Simple" Replace most people with simpletons and you are bang on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Andrew Neill doesn't work for the BBC anymore. ThecQT audience is drawn on how that area politically leans. If its held in a Labour seat, then the audience will be slightly skewed that way. Did he used too? You realise the tory gmnt has an 80 seat majority? Have qt always done this." Yes, he's now semi-retired and doing other tbings elsewhere. Think his commute from his home in France got too much for him! Yes, QT have always done this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Andrew Neill doesn't work for the BBC anymore. ThecQT audience is drawn on how that area politically leans. If its held in a Labour seat, then the audience will be slightly skewed that way. Did he used too? You realise the tory gmnt has an 80 seat majority? Have qt always done this. Yes, he's now semi-retired and doing other tbings elsewhere. Think his commute from his home in France got too much for him! Yes, QT have always done this. " Jan 17th 2020 Fiona Bruce our audience has been selected to represent the current political situation depending on where we are.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate?
Fuck communism and momentum, it appears you seem to have some confusion on my thought. The tories and the former brexit party are just as bad as them stupid asswipes.
The centre ground is where I stand, pragmatic and functional, not into false promises of either gobshite corbyn or that bullshitter boris.
Pragmatic
So what has Boris got right? "Nothing at all, he’s a useless arsehole. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always find it quite amusing when people complain labour moved too far to the left and then whinge that ks is too much like blair. The hypocrisy is astounding, you know, those who support the right will continue the same groupthink, luckily things change and the tide is turning, SKS is better and smarter, instead of that thick fat cunt boris. Your vulgarity says more about you than about Boris
Cannot disagree with me? Can only agree with with the sheep. Bleet away, enjoy groupthink wimps. group think like communism you mean or like momentum the left wing group think group, or hate not hope group yes I know it should be the other way round, but say what you see is what I say. So why do the left have so much hate?
Fuck communism and momentum, it appears you seem to have some confusion on my thought. The tories and the former brexit party are just as bad as them stupid asswipes.
The centre ground is where I stand, pragmatic and functional, not into false promises of either gobshite corbyn or that bullshitter boris.
Pragmatic
So what has Boris got right?
Nothing at all, he’s a useless arsehole."Pragmatic | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah back to the " if you disagree with my views you must be thick/old/racist " from losers. Must be hard to be so much cleverer than the majority." Wanna point out where anyone has labelled someone racist? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah back to the " if you disagree with my views you must be thick/old/racist " from losers. Must be hard to be so much cleverer than the majority. Wanna point out where anyone has labelled someone racist? " I was called a racist for questioning Boris Johnsons leadership skills. But that was a different thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah back to the " if you disagree with my views you must be thick/old/racist " from losers. Must be hard to be so much cleverer than the majority. Wanna point out where anyone has labelled someone racist? " So you agree that people who have different views to yours are thick and old | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah back to the " if you disagree with my views you must be thick/old/racist " from losers. Must be hard to be so much cleverer than the majority. Wanna point out where anyone has labelled someone racist? So you agree that people who have different views to yours are thick and old " Ha ha Translation.. I just made that up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris?" I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x" I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why isn't there a strong left wing media in this country, what's stopping that happening The ongoing global shift to the right? What was once considered centre left is now reported on as being akin to communism. The left isn't supported by the establishment and corporate interests to the same degree? Maybe there's a historical reason for the lack of left leaning Media. But it's a good question. Yes but the right can use the same example. The centre right get called extreme right wing neo natzi, when in fact they are just to the right. In recent times since the success of Blair gaining the central ground has been crucial to all who want power. Labour under corbyn took a big step to the left like we hadn’t seen since Micheal Foot, & that is why SKS is trying to take them back there. As for support of the left what’s that multi billionaire called who owns Amazon & dodges paying fair taxes whilst giving his workers crap conditions. Jeff Bezo owner of just a few small media organisations x So now you're claiming that Jeff Bezos is British! Or has an impact on the British left wing media? That's a wild claim by anyone's standards. Can you give some indication of your outlandish claim that we're in a shift to the left, and what was once centre right is now reported as "neo natzi" sic? Because this is contrary to everything that's currently going on in British and world media/politics. " Did I say just British? So your saying he has no control or influence within the UK the guy who controls the US papers NYT Washington post. Lionel offers links up as proof from time to time from these papers. Point proved I’d say. Can you show me a jump to the right, the move to the left happened a while back. & the simple fact you or others call Boris is racist for being a wet central Tory again point proved I’d say x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time." Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple " I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! " Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X"Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me. But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020. https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
"& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
"I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on. Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help. "I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this? You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help. "& isn’t it the case of if one MP is voting one way, & unable to turn up they pair them up with a MP voting the opposite way. Just thinking how many times that has happened, with our honest hard working political representatives. X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x"You appear to be arguing with yourself now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
"just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X"As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x"Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults. I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make. I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain. And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks."what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! I'm not convinced. I'm politically homeless as far as I'm concerned. Between the current shower of shit and an in-fighting opposition who don't know their ass from their elbow, there's not much for an intelligent person to choose from. All our major players are more obsessed with winning and power than actually improving the affairs of this country. "
The opposition (socialist) must get their $hit together to give the UK a bright future. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow "There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion. But I did pick out a question about parliament working together. For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow
There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion.
But I did pick out a question about parliament working together.
For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version?
"who mentioned ERG? I said sensible ideas x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow
There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion.
But I did pick out a question about parliament working together.
For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version?
who mentioned ERG? I said sensible ideas x"Who decides what the sensible idea is? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now its done, time to kick that cocksucker boris out of power and his cadre of cunts also. Time to shape this country into something better than it is. SKS for PM! You have such a charming turn of phrase,if people wanted a labour government they could have voted one in at the GE, they get another chance in 2024, you know it's a little thing called democracy. One year down, three to go. We all know what the last GE was about, now that is over, tories are going to fall hard, the ppl will kick them out. Remember leaders should fear the people not the other way around. SKS will return the party to power, and the deal will provide Labour with the ability to do the things like 1946, our economy will be reforged and the imbalance of the past 40 years will disappear. Mark my words, the time of the tories is over!" What a load of bollocks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow
There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion.
But I did pick out a question about parliament working together.
For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version?
who mentioned ERG? I said sensible ideas x
Who decides what the sensible idea is?"Well surly we can agree that the ERG wouldn’t of come up with anything helpful x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow
There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion.
But I did pick out a question about parliament working together.
For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version?
who mentioned ERG? I said sensible ideas x
Who decides what the sensible idea is?
Well surly we can agree that the ERG wouldn’t of come up with anything helpful x "Yes. But we don't advise Parliament. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc employ laura lundberg,nick Robinson and andrew Neill. Even on qt the audience is weighted towards tories. If you think the bbc is left wing you have a very strange defeniton of what left wing means. Consistently give more airtime to the likes of Farage, ukip, brexit party over say The Greens, who actually have an MP. They will interview who they think will get them most viewers, it’s more the way they give the left an easy interview with no interruptions, compared say to the right. There are different ways to measure bias you know. Just my opinion x Your opinion is weird. They never give Johnson a hard time. They never challange any of the pro brexit MPs. Just look at the easy ride the Tories have had over the billions they gave to their friends and neighbors for unusable PPE. So no civil servant or senior NHS executives had anything to do with that. Stop the news the 1st time in UK history the PM has sole responsibility responsibility for ordering PPE for the NHS. What next Boris fault for ordering the wrong wheelchairs? Yes they did give Boris & the others a harder time the BBC wanted to remain in the EU, maybe as they got some funding from the EU. But who knows why the BBC where so pro remain. X Maybe because leaving the EU is a shit idea? So now you're suggesting that the BBC is left wing because it was all someone else's fault anyway, and don't even think about putting any blame on Boris? I blame Boris when it’s his fault, not for some cock not doing their own job. Blaming Boris because 52% of people voted to leave for many different reasons, just because it didn’t go the way you wanted, come on really? So you think everyone voted Brexit because of Boris, you blame Boris for the NHS you blame Boris for everything. Yes he’s a baffling idiot most agree but he has only been in charge since July 2019 then 6 months later we face the shit of COVID. We have highly paid civil servants who are there no matter what the government, the same with the NHS highly paid executives.when will you blame those? & no I am not having a go at all of those within the NHS the vast majority of which do a job no one else would in these circumstances to the very highest standards day in day out. Thank you to you all x I just saw the word "Boris" a lot in there. You seem to have made up a load of stuff about what I think, then got annoyed about it, then ranted about the NHS. I'm not sure how to help you. If it helps. I do blame Boris for voting against the deal, then faffing about, relabelling the deal and presenting it as his own. Which you seem to blame on "parliament" for wasting time. Parliament had one job to do in the 4 years since the referendum the failed simple I would suggest that Parliament had many jobs to do in the last four years. I agree that one of their main jobs was to get the least damaging version of brexit. And they failed. However you were all told before 2016 that it would be a long and complex process. Which you waved away as "project fear", and "easiest deal ever" rhetoric. Then proceeded to blame everyone else for. What can you do! Can you show me anything significant that parliament have done in that 4 years apart from arguing like us lot in here
But I for one never thought it would be a simple exercise, the EU didn’t want to, or couldn’t let it be, the remainders didn’t want it to be & the hard line brexit lot they just wanted no deal WTO from the get go.
So again I say they had one job to do & between the shower of shits they’ve fucked us all. X
Why you want to learn about parliament from a randomer on a swinging forum is beyond me.
But seeing as you ask there was 190 votes in 2020.
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons
And if you've noticed, there is a pandemic happening. They've also been spending time debating and dealing with this.
& in all of those 190 votes in a full year wow yes they worked really hard my Arsenal. only 33 bills pass royal accent on average per year. How many times do the full house turn out, all sides? Yes there is a pandemic that wasn’t the case in previous years. Teach me again please.
I don't think I can help you mate. You said there was only one issue. I just showed you there has been other stuff going on.
Being angry about it and asking me a host of unrelated questions about random topics won't help.
I’m not angry, there has been one MAIN issue to sort out, it’s so surprising that before we joined the EU our MP’s use to pass twice as many Bills on average & as we all know that means they even voted more. Being annoyed with MP’s because they have failed us is different than being angry. Do you think it is ok for them to play party politics on a major issue like this?
You do realise they will have to start working that hard again once we are gone or will you still say but they voted 190 times they’ve work so hard, & I’m guessing a couple of those votes related to pay rises & the subsidys on the bar for all their excellent work not done. Being angry because you don’t know the difference between a bill & a vote. Sorry I can’t help you with your issues there x
You appear to be arguing with yourself now.
just adding a point on to my other point. But seems not point pointing the obvious out to some, cause in less it’s their point of view it’s wrong. Mp’s voting is not a sign of them doing much work, it just shows they’ve done a part of their job. How many times throughout this has it been kicked down the road by all sides. Surely something this important should of been above that. You may not of wanted to leave the EU the majority did. Boris stud in an election with one main agenda & again it showed what most wanted. They should of been working on it from day one together as a top priority, who knows what the outcome may have been if there had been ideas & sense from both sides. X As an example: Anyway I’m of for a bj of the Mrs you on the other hand can only go play with yourself. See adding on another point not arguing with myself x love you all but we know what cums first x
Again. Arguing with yourself then throwing out some pathetic insults.
I've honestly no clue what point you're trying to make.
I see you mistakenly think that the majority of people voted for brexit. More people didn't vote, or were ineligible to vote, than voted leave. Never mind everyone who voted remain.
And you seem to think that brexit would have been quick and easy. You were all told from the start it would be a long and complex process. Which leavers wrote off as "project fear" because it would be the "easiest deal" and "we hold all the card" and other utterly meaningless bollocks. what insult? Sorry if I offended you, but you must have me mistaken with someone who gives a duck. I couldn’t resist No I am sorry if I have offended you x
So you went round & asked the people that couldn’t be arse to vote, & then went round all the kids & asked them & they all said they would of voted remain. Your argument falls at the first one to say I would of voted leave. Not a credible argument from the start, a bit like it’s only leave voters that have died since the referendum. Only fools would think trying to sort anything out with the EU would be easy it’s not the way they do it. But the other side said we wouldn’t get any trade deals with anyone else easily, but it’s been another thing proved to be wrong. So you still don’t think that if parliament had worked together come up with some sensible & reasonable ideas on this it wouldn’t of moved further faster, instead you lot got us Boris elected as PM, well you reap what you sow
There's a huge amount of waffle in there about me being offended (I wasn't) and then called leavers who think the deal should be easier (which is you), "fools". You then made up some stuff I didn't say about people who didn't vote, then argued with it. I'm not sure how you want anyone to respond to that clusterfuck of confusion.
But I did pick out a question about parliament working together.
For clarification, are you saying that parliament should have worked towards the ERG vision of brexit. Or a softer less damaging version?
who mentioned ERG? I said sensible ideas x
Who decides what the sensible idea is?
Well surly we can agree that the ERG wouldn’t of come up with anything helpful x
Yes. But we don't advise Parliament. "True but that’s the problem with such things.I’ve heard different arguments from different sides some good some bad, even some that got me thinking & questioning my own thoughts. Maybe we the people should of marched & demanded it. The elite don’t give a dam about us, they are alright Jack or alleft
How do you think we the people got rid of Thatcher, if we the people had not joined together left right & centre because of an important issue like the poll tax, they dropped her & we ended up Major. You might not of been there I was. there’s still a pic of me from the front page of the local paper somewhere to haunt me lol. Yes It effected me yes it affected my family, & I like many millions of others marched to right a wrong. The left & the unions didn’t get rid of Thatcher she destroyed them, it was an unpopular policy & the will of the people. Yet here we are 4 years & some kind of deal later still name calling each other, let’s try to move on. Anyway got to go, love & peace to you all. My Mrs says I owe her for a bj from before, any ideas on how I should repay her? lol x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm with you. We need to move on. Problem is we couldn't agree as a country which way to move on. Some people want to pretend everything is dandy, some people want to campaign to rejoin the EU, I think we still need to work to mitigate the impact of brexit before we can do anything. " very true if we rejoin later or not at all we need to be a better place. We have let the elite dived us for long enough. Politics is broken we need to fix it. None of us are to far apart it the path we take to bring us to a solution that is different x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corona will be a memory by next Xmas ...the economy will boom from June onwards...holidays and travel will restart and Boris and Co will be in for a long time.....Lets be honest is there any creditable alternative." You live in hope. But this is going to drag because boris is terrified of council elections and they will be postponed again, an affront to our democracy! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm with you. We need to move on. Problem is we couldn't agree as a country which way to move on. Some people want to pretend everything is dandy, some people want to campaign to rejoin the EU, I think we still need to work to mitigate the impact of brexit before we can do anything. " The biggest mitigation is to kick the tory cunts out! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm with you. We need to move on. Problem is we couldn't agree as a country which way to move on. Some people want to pretend everything is dandy, some people want to campaign to rejoin the EU, I think we still need to work to mitigate the impact of brexit before we can do anything. The biggest mitigation is to kick the tory cunts out!" A true wordsmith  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm with you. We need to move on. Problem is we couldn't agree as a country which way to move on. Some people want to pretend everything is dandy, some people want to campaign to rejoin the EU, I think we still need to work to mitigate the impact of brexit before we can do anything. " This. It's real now. So all the "facts" will become myths and "myths" will become facts. Personally, I want this to benefit the UK so we truly move on. However, I don't want to hear any excuses from people who championed this. No blaming Remainers, no blaming the EU and no blaming Covid-19. Brexit's success or failure is now on you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
