FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Honours

Jump to newest
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55414981

Literally no fucks given

Who would have through giving an over privileged fuck wit the keys to no 10 would result in this type of thing?

He literally couldnt give a fuck.

Red wall.

I salute you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester

Is our PM a narcissist?

He’s giving off all the traits.

He total lack of empathy and belief in his own wandering self indulgent rantings must get him clinically there!

Is he in need of a psychiatrist to tell him he’s actually wrong and the critics are right he’s a self serving twat!

His lowering of the already ground scr&ping bar in politics seems to know no bounds and he is downgrading his office daily.

Stunning corrupt incompetence with unrivalled entitlement.

He’s an embarrassment to our nation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"Is our PM a narcissist?

He’s giving off all the traits.

He total lack of empathy and belief in his own wandering self indulgent rantings must get him clinically there!

Is he in need of a psychiatrist to tell him he’s actually wrong and the critics are right he’s a self serving twat!

His lowering of the already ground scr&ping bar in politics seems to know no bounds and he is downgrading his office daily.

Stunning corrupt incompetence with unrivalled entitlement.

He’s an embarrassment to our nation.

"

Maybe he has no one to reign him in now?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ild_oatsMan
over a year ago

the land of saints & sinners

It’s good to see that good old fashioned naked cronyism is still alive and well in today’s Westminster politics....

Who ever said that this country was going to the dogs.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obka3Couple
over a year ago

bournemouth

Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them "
Totally agree with you there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them "

Who else has overruled the honours board?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool

The pm became the 1st pm to overrule the honours board =been going in for years.

Standard.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them

Who else has overruled the honours board?"
so do you think there should be a honors list as long as a board approves it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them

Who else has overruled the honours board? so do you think there should be a honors list as long as a board approves it?"

Specactually missing the point.

The while peerage honours system is an anachronism and should be abolished.

But borus has decided to over rule them, which is a first.

So it clearly hasn't been going on for ages

Is there nothing he can do,where he doesnt warrant an iota of criticism?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

The only scandal here, is that we now have over 830 Lords!

I have nothing against sending people who have had many years of public service to the Lords, to scrutinise and give opinion on Goverment policy. But that number should be well less than 200, and that 200 should turn up and put the work in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"The only scandal here, is that we now have over 830 Lords!

I have nothing against sending people who have had many years of public service to the Lords, to scrutinise and give opinion on Goverment policy. But that number should be well less than 200, and that 200 should turn up and put the work in. "

The lords should be abolished.

Have a 2nd chamber and fill it with a cross section of society.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham


"The only scandal here, is that we now have over 830 Lords!

I have nothing against sending people who have had many years of public service to the Lords, to scrutinise and give opinion on Goverment policy. But that number should be well less than 200, and that 200 should turn up and put the work in.

The lords should be abolished.

Have a 2nd chamber and fill it with a cross section of society."

Must be Christmas! We agree on something!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutz OP   Man
over a year ago

liverpool


"The only scandal here, is that we now have over 830 Lords!

I have nothing against sending people who have had many years of public service to the Lords, to scrutinise and give opinion on Goverment policy. But that number should be well less than 200, and that 200 should turn up and put the work in.

The lords should be abolished.

Have a 2nd chamber and fill it with a cross section of society.

Must be Christmas! We agree on something! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Been going on for years, all parties do it. Scrap the lot of them

Who else has overruled the honours board? so do you think there should be a honors list as long as a board approves it?"

I don't.

Scrap the whole thing. It's always been the same in my lifetime. They just award these things to their mates with a few token ones thrown out for some political point scoring.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago

Manchester

Who would support 200 non politically aligned members if an upper house ?

No party supporters allowed so if you give over £5000 in total over the last 10 years to any party you’re barred.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Chudleigh


"The only scandal here, is that we now have over 830 Lords!

I have nothing against sending people who have had many years of public service to the Lords, to scrutinise and give opinion on Goverment policy. But that number should be well less than 200, and that 200 should turn up and put the work in. "

... Ian Botham?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *bernathCouple
over a year ago

Gloucestershire


"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55414981

Literally no fucks given

Who would have through giving an over privileged fuck wit the keys to no 10 would result in this type of thing?

He literally couldnt give a fuck.

Red wall.

I salute you.

"

Well if I could give peerages to my friends I probably would. Let him, his political days are numbered

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top