Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it mean labour are clean then " We dont know yet but the report isnt about labour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder." Are the Conservative Party being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Are the Conservative Party being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission?" Did you actually read my post? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder." how much evidence are we looking at? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. how much evidence are we looking at?" How much evidence do you need?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and find widespread evidence of Islamophobia in the Tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour is the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Are the Conservative Party being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission?" No, at the moment they actually trust the party to conduct their own internal inquiry. If it's not done right, the EHRC will go after them. Feels like efficient management of resources given they have their hands full with the ongoing investigation into antisemitism in the Labour party | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"(I posted too late. Ignored it is.) He ignored it  "I, for one, am amazed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"(I posted too late. Ignored it is.) He ignored it
I, for one, am amazed. "But but but, what about labour ??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it mean labour are clean then " if you have a look on the website that Lionel posted there is also the report there on labour,although not quite the same but if you read it the answer is no they are not clean at all in hope not hates eyes anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who the heck is hope not hate?  "If only there was some sort of link, recently posted on this thread. Or if only there was some sort of search engine where a person could look such a thing up... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who the heck is hope not hate?
If only there was some sort of link, recently posted on this thread. Or if only there was some sort of search engine where a person could look such a thing up..." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who the heck is hope not hate?
If only there was some sort of link, recently posted on this thread. Or if only there was some sort of search engine where a person could look such a thing up...". Smack my bum  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who the heck is hope not hate?
If only there was some sort of link, recently posted on this thread. Or if only there was some sort of search engine where a person could look such a thing up....
Smack my bum "No thanks. I'm more interested in ladies. There are plenty of guys on here who might smack your bum if you want, though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like some teenage pop band "You're thinking of Hear Say... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Are the Conservative Party being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission? Did you actually read my post?" Yep read your post and I asked a simple question which surprise surprise you failed to answer. So as it stands an independent body has wrote a report. But at this present time there is only one major political party being investigated by the EQHC and its not the party you have posted about. I think that sums it up? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"100% of the human race are racist in some way do not kid yourself it is part of human ignorance.The more politically correct some try to be the more racism will increase. Black lives matter does more harm to black races than good I am sure." This started off like it was going to be very philosophical, then I couldn't follow the middle part at all. And it ended with a confusing statement about BLM. I am interested in the all people are somewhat racist suggestion through. I take it you're suggesting we all need to look at our own behaviour and be introspective before we consider the actions of others? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"100% of the human race are racist in some way do not kid yourself it is part of human ignorance.The more politically correct some try to be the more racism will increase. Black lives matter does more harm to black races than good I am sure." Why? People who are not racists will accept and understand the BLM and it aims. Racists can’t or won’t accept or understand the BLM due to their ignorance and confusion. You don’t have to take the knee, or make a donation to accept their aims but why do the racists feel the need to criticise the people who do? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Conservative member, the publishing of this report. brings home some unpalatable truths. We must apologise and do better, and be seen to be doing better. There is no place for bigots in society, let alone a political party. Find tbem, and kick them out. Either learn and respect, or take your insulting views elsewhere. " Well said, let’s hope these reports and investigations help to highlight and eradicate bigotry in both parties | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Conservative member, the publishing of this report. brings home some unpalatable truths. We must apologise and do better, and be seen to be doing better. There is no place for bigots in society, let alone a political party. Find tbem, and kick them out. Either learn and respect, or take your insulting views elsewhere. "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"100% of the human race are racist in some way do not kid yourself it is part of human ignorance.The more politically correct some try to be the more racism will increase. Black lives matter does more harm to black races than good I am sure." ‘Islam’ isn’t a race. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder." Hope not hate, the far left radical , lying Marxists The daily sport is more credible. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Hope not hate, the far left radical , lying Marxists The daily sport is more credible. " Wait... you're saying you're not a fan of them? I'm stunned. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Hope not hate, the far left radical , lying Marxists The daily sport is more credible. " Hope Not Hate's mission is to oppose the likes EDL, BNP and other race hate groups. Is it now considered "far left" and "Marxist" to oppose racism? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Hope not hate, the far left radical , lying Marxists The daily sport is more credible. " What are you on about? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have published their report and and find widespread evidence of islmaphobia in the tory party. So the next time someone pipes up with..well labour are the only party to be investigated for racism..just a little reminder. Hope not hate, the far left radical , lying Marxists The daily sport is more credible. " They are left. And they do lie. Don’t know anything about Marxism claims tho. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) " nothing wrong with hateing Thatcher | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report requested by a tory finds widespread islsmaphobia in the conservative party and people choose to direct their criticism at the people who did the study Well blow me down." What is the background to them producing this report ? Did the Conservatives specifically ask them to look into their party, as part of the wider investigation, or have they done it themselves and offered their findings to the party? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) " Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report requested by a tory finds widespread islsmaphobia in the conservative party and people choose to direct their criticism at the people who did the study Well blow me down. What is the background to them producing this report ? Did the Conservatives specifically ask them to look into their party, as part of the wider investigation, or have they done it themselves and offered their findings to the party?" According to the guardian they invited them into but downgraded it from an enquiry into a report | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation?" Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh." I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? " I'm fairly sure they got invited in | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in" I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them." Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here." This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) " Pat, it's the mail isn't it..
The paper with a history of supporting fascists, demonising asylum seekers and hating the working class..
Interesting analysis my arse, biased right wing drivel more like..
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know " Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Pat, it's the mail isn't it..
The paper with a history of supporting fascists, demonising asylum seekers and hating the working class..
Interesting analysis my arse, biased right wing drivel more like..
"You write left wing crap | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Pat, it's the mail isn't it..
The paper with a history of supporting fascists, demonising asylum seekers and hating the working class..
Interesting analysis my arse, biased right wing drivel more like..
You write left wing crap"No answers again as usual Emma.. You must be spitting mad that you can't actually think if something to contribute.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up?" It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? " Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry." Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? " How else would they have done it? I cant find nothing online so I'm guessing there was some sort of selection process. I dont understand why the commission of racial equality didnt get involved | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? How else would they have done it? I cant find nothing online so I'm guessing there was some sort of selection process. I dont understand why the commission of racial equality didnt get involved " Can't bite the current hand that feeds? Maybe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? How else would they have done it? I cant find nothing online so I'm guessing there was some sort of selection process. I dont understand why the commission of racial equality didnt get involved Can't bite the current hand that feeds? Maybe" Maybe? Has this recieved any air time at all? I'm sure that anti semitic report will receive just as little coverage | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? How else would they have done it? I cant find nothing online so I'm guessing there was some sort of selection process. I dont understand why the commission of racial equality didnt get involved Can't bite the current hand that feeds? Maybe Maybe? Has this recieved any air time at all? I'm sure that anti semitic report will receive just as little coverage " Not seen it at all no.. In other news trump is having a medical evaluation on Fox.. Surreal.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One national newspaper published a very interesting analysis of both the tweets posted by people who support this organisation and the tweets that supporters liked. It certainly indicated that some of the members were full of the hatred which they claim to rigorously oppose. ( from memory it seemed to be perfectly acceptable by some supporters to hate people such as Mrs Thatcher ) Are you aware that there is a difference between hating an individual for their actions, and hating a group of people based on their skin colour, religion, country of origin or sexual orientation? Institutional racism..disliking a politician.. cant see the difference tbh. I think the party themselves downgraded the whole inquiry to a general investigation, but I’m still interested to know if this group were actually asked by the party to produce a report for the party inquiry/general investigation i.e how did they get the gig? I'm fairly sure they got invited in I would be interested to know why you think this is the case or which source specifically mentions the Conservatives have asked this group to do a report for them. Yeah you are probally right..they were probally walking about past tory hq one day and invited themselves in..and whilst they were there..they probably said..whilst we are here we night aswell do a study into institutional racism. The level of whataboutery is actually reaching surreal levels on here. This isn’t whataboutery. I’m genuinely interested why you think the Conservatives invited this group to do a report, or where you have read that the Conservatives invited the group to be part of their inquiry(general investigation) It’s not an opinion about their report, it’s an interest in finding out more about the commissioning of it. If you have more info about this I’m interested to know Of course it is. You are casting doubt on the legitimacy of the report. Do you serously think Tory just showed up? It is legitimate - I’ve read it - I’ve not commented on it and I’m not casting doubt on it. The commissioning is my interest. Have you read somewhere how the group became involved ? Apparently javid pushed Johnson into having an enquiry. Yes I know that bit, Javid made the challenge to all the contenders during the leadership debate. And so then Johnson opened a general investigation when he became leader. So how did Hope not hate get invited to do a report for this investigation - you mentioned you thought they were invited to do so by the party? How else would they have done it? I cant find nothing online so I'm guessing there was some sort of selection process. I dont understand why the commission of racial equality didnt get involved Can't bite the current hand that feeds? Maybe Maybe? Has this recieved any air time at all? I'm sure that anti semitic report will receive just as little coverage Not seen it at all no.. In other news trump is having a medical evaluation on Fox.. Surreal.." I do think I'm dreaming at times. A clown in no 10 and a vain psychopath in the White House. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
