Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s good a fridge hide and seek. One thing he did well and with ruthless efficiently was dispose of Cameron and all others who were in his way. He just needs a white cat to stroke now. " Since coming to Power | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No" actually, he's done the best job at doing a shit job, if that counts? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership." I asked this about 6 weeks ago Unsurprisingly still waiting for an answer | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Domestic Abuse Bill “ This Bill will make a huge difference in supporting survivors of this devastating crime. From better protection in court to the "rough sex defence" ban - we are delivering a justice system that protects victims and ensures perpetrators answer for their despicable actions.” " Well he is an expert in that field. Allegedly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Domestic Abuse Bill “ This Bill will make a huge difference in supporting survivors of this devastating crime. From better protection in court to the "rough sex defence" ban - we are delivering a justice system that protects victims and ensures perpetrators answer for their despicable actions.” Well he is an expert in that field. Allegedly " Do you agree it is a good thing? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had " Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good article in Daily Mail about Boris after he'd been Prime Minister for a year. Suggest you read that. " Satire at it's best | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair?" Not worse than Thatcher Give him time on the other 2 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair? Not worse than Thatcher Give him time on the other 2" So not the worst since the war as some say | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair? Not worse than Thatcher Give him time on the other 2 So not the worst since the war as some say " Early days yet | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair? Not worse than Thatcher Give him time on the other 2 So not the worst since the war as some say Early days yet" Very true so trying to compare as some do is not an accurate assessment | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Domestic Abuse Bill “ This Bill will make a huge difference in supporting survivors of this devastating crime. From better protection in court to the "rough sex defence" ban - we are delivering a justice system that protects victims and ensures perpetrators answer for their despicable actions.” " The bill was stopped when Boris suspended Parliament so he wasn’t too fussed. It omits any funding for abuse to women without residential status so minorities who are vulnerable in the first place. Boris has also refused the requested increase in funding to support any real implementation of the rules nationally , (so far. ) So whilst the intention looks nice the reality is somewhat lacking. So you’re answer is 6 out of 10 for effort and 5 out of 10 for achievement . Conclusion, even something we would all support this lot fall short on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Domestic Abuse Bill “ This Bill will make a huge difference in supporting survivors of this devastating crime. From better protection in court to the "rough sex defence" ban - we are delivering a justice system that protects victims and ensures perpetrators answer for their despicable actions.” The bill was stopped when Boris suspended Parliament so he wasn’t too fussed. It omits any funding for abuse to women without residential status so minorities who are vulnerable in the first place. Boris has also refused the requested increase in funding to support any real implementation of the rules nationally , (so far. ) So whilst the intention looks nice the reality is somewhat lacking. So you’re answer is 6 out of 10 for effort and 5 out of 10 for achievement . Conclusion, even something we would all support this lot fall short on. " Like most things Johnson All bluster no substance | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership." He got Rishi Sunak as chancellor and we have the furlough scheme, small business loans, eat out discount, energy saving grants. He handled this guy’s oppointment. So he has done one thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He saw off that evil Corbyn who was planning to build a Communist Death Star or something like that." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership. He got Rishi Sunak as chancellor and we have the furlough scheme, small business loans, eat out discount, energy saving grants. He handled this guy’s oppointment. So he has done one thing." So the best thing Johnson did is stuff that somebody else did? Um... ok. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He saw off that evil Corbyn who was planning to build a Communist Death Star or something like that." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership." Yes, he dumped those medieval fascist bigots from the DUP and made clear they are on there own in the future, no more veto holding Britain and Rep by the bollocks, amazing how the black bigots of the DUP have come crawling to Dublin to be our new best friends since boris put them straight about there future in there "precious union " apart from that everything else his has said and done is one comic desaster after another | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Domestic Abuse Bill “ This Bill will make a huge difference in supporting survivors of this devastating crime. From better protection in court to the "rough sex defence" ban - we are delivering a justice system that protects victims and ensures perpetrators answer for their despicable actions.” The bill was stopped when Boris suspended Parliament so he wasn’t too fussed. It omits any funding for abuse to women without residential status so minorities who are vulnerable in the first place. Boris has also refused the requested increase in funding to support any real implementation of the rules nationally , (so far. ) So whilst the intention looks nice the reality is somewhat lacking. So you’re answer is 6 out of 10 for effort and 5 out of 10 for achievement . Conclusion, even something we would all support this lot fall short on. " also the rough sex defence was already taken care off under common law and other acts of law so nothing has changed at all just prittiusless claiming credit for something that's already therec | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had " Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won" Ah a variant of the "What about the other guy?" line I pointed out just above. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Ah a variant of the "What about the other guy?" line I pointed out just above." Its tragic. They cant even list 1 attributes that bumbling idiot has. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Worse than Thatcher Cameron and Blair? Not worse than Thatcher Give him time on the other 2 So not the worst since the war as some say Early days yet Very true so trying to compare as some do is not an accurate assessment" Well we can assess his achievements so far which have been akin to a car crash ,so he is off to a flyer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won" Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . " He will go down as 1 of the most inept PMs I'n history. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . He will go down as 1 of the most inept PMs I'n history. " Ah but what about Corbyn? I heard he was thinking about turning all of Trafalgar square into an organic allotment. And he was going to ban meat eating and tax farting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . He will go down as 1 of the most inept PMs I'n history. Ah but what about Corbyn? I heard he was thinking about turning all of Trafalgar square into an organic allotment. And he was going to ban meat eating and tax farting." See that headline in the mail yday? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . He will go down as 1 of the most inept PMs I'n history. Ah but what about Corbyn? I heard he was thinking about turning all of Trafalgar square into an organic allotment. And he was going to ban meat eating and tax farting. See that headline in the mail yday?" I read it sitting on the bog. The mail's my toilet paper of choice. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely not and it's highly unlikely that he ever will in my opinion. He and his shabby bunch of dishonest charlatans are the worst post war government this country has ever had Decided to blank out Wilson 76 to 79 then, but close second, however could have been worse if corbyn had won Sad isn’t it that the choices were so poor that we Boris was the best option . 70 million people and the best we can come up with is Boris. I thought David Davis came over better until I saw he’s taking £60k a year from JCB as an advisor. Strange how JCB’s owner is such a strong brexiteer but needs Davis’ advice on diggers so badly. He works 20 hours a year for that so must be bloody good advice . " Remember, the EU is corrupt and undemocratic. Let’s take back control of corruption. Let’s talk about peerages next! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Teachers, unions, immigrants, France, the EU, Public health England, Barnier, Corbyn, traitors from the Labour Party, traitors from the Conservative party, the Supreme Court, the Guardian, the Speaker of the Commons, care home staff etc... Is there anyone that these clowns haven’t blamed yet for their incompetence? What a punch of hypocrite and useless dishonest fuckers! " Nurses..Hancock's 'we cant pluck money from thin air, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Teachers, unions, immigrants, France, the EU, Public health England, Barnier, Corbyn, traitors from the Labour Party, traitors from the Conservative party, the Supreme Court, the Guardian, the Speaker of the Commons, care home staff etc... Is there anyone that these clowns haven’t blamed yet for their incompetence? What a punch of hypocrite and useless dishonest fuckers! Nurses..Hancock's 'we cant pluck money from thin air, " Well I think you’ll find that they are building 40 Hospitals with seed money . I am dying to see how they do that because I always thought seed money does the drawings. Maybe it’s a book of pop up hospitals ... yes that’s it of course | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Teachers, unions, immigrants, France, the EU, Public health England, Barnier, Corbyn, traitors from the Labour Party, traitors from the Conservative party, the Supreme Court, the Guardian, the Speaker of the Commons, care home staff etc... Is there anyone that these clowns haven’t blamed yet for their incompetence? What a punch of hypocrite and useless dishonest fuckers! Nurses..Hancock's 'we cant pluck money from thin air, Well I think you’ll find that they are building 40 Hospitals with seed money . I am dying to see how they do that because I always thought seed money does the drawings. Maybe it’s a book of pop up hospitals ... yes that’s it of course " Didnt they say 40 but it was actually 15? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Teachers, unions, immigrants, France, the EU, Public health England, Barnier, Corbyn, traitors from the Labour Party, traitors from the Conservative party, the Supreme Court, the Guardian, the Speaker of the Commons, care home staff etc... Is there anyone that these clowns haven’t blamed yet for their incompetence? What a punch of hypocrite and useless dishonest fuckers! Nurses..Hancock's 'we cant pluck money from thin air, Well I think you’ll find that they are building 40 Hospitals with seed money . I am dying to see how they do that because I always thought seed money does the drawings. Maybe it’s a book of pop up hospitals ... yes that’s it of course Didnt they say 40 but it was actually 15?" Yes the other seeds turned into a great big tree which reaches where the giants live with a golden goose . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Teachers, unions, immigrants, France, the EU, Public health England, Barnier, Corbyn, traitors from the Labour Party, traitors from the Conservative party, the Supreme Court, the Guardian, the Speaker of the Commons, care home staff etc... Is there anyone that these clowns haven’t blamed yet for their incompetence? What a punch of hypocrite and useless dishonest fuckers! Nurses..Hancock's 'we cant pluck money from thin air, Well I think you’ll find that they are building 40 Hospitals with seed money . I am dying to see how they do that because I always thought seed money does the drawings. Maybe it’s a book of pop up hospitals ... yes that’s it of course Didnt they say 40 but it was actually 15?" must have been prittiuseless anouncing that we all know how good she is with figures | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can u name any good politician. They all out for themselves. " Ironically, this is using exactly the tactic I wrote about above. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can u name any good politician. They all out for themselves. " Tony Benn Dennis skinner Corbyn was one of the most principled mps I've known and certainly wasnt in it for the money. Ken Clark is about the only decent tory there has ever been. Laura pidcock had a bright future but the electorate of Durham. With the attention span of a gnat..voted in a tory. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can u name any good politician. They all out for themselves. Tony Benn Dennis skinner Corbyn was one of the most principled mps I've known and certainly wasnt in it for the money. Ken Clark is about the only decent tory there has ever been. Laura pidcock had a bright future but the electorate of Durham. With the attention span of a gnat..voted in a tory. " Agree Dennis Skinner and Kenneth Clarke . Benn too left for me Whilst I didn’t agree with all of Dennis views he stuck by them and kept ranting on about the best club in the world needing reforming. Kenneth struck me as a man who listened and decided if something was right or wrong not what his party policy was . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can u name any good politician. They all out for themselves. Tony Benn Dennis skinner Corbyn was one of the most principled mps I've known and certainly wasnt in it for the money. Ken Clark is about the only decent tory there has ever been. Laura pidcock had a bright future but the electorate of Durham. With the attention span of a gnat..voted in a tory. " Pidcock paid the price for not listening to her constituents. Turns out she was on the fiddle with her expenses as well ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can u name any good politician. They all out for themselves. Tony Benn Dennis skinner Corbyn was one of the most principled mps I've known and certainly wasnt in it for the money. Ken Clark is about the only decent tory there has ever been. Laura pidcock had a bright future but the electorate of Durham. With the attention span of a gnat..voted in a tory. Pidcock paid the price for not listening to her constituents. Turns out she was on the fiddle with her expenses as well ! " Her constituents voted for a party who decimated their main economy. I wouldnt listen to them either. I didn't know about the expenses one but it's a bit od a weird one.Sending out literature that was partisan. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house." Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that." I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses" The duck house was the classic..I think he went on The radio to defend it. Not a wise move. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses The duck house was the classic..I think he went on The radio to defend it. Not a wise move." That move was quackers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses The duck house was the classic..I think he went on The radio to defend it. Not a wise move. That move was quackers." Groan | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses The duck house was the classic..I think he went on The radio to defend it. Not a wise move. That move was quackers. Groan " I will never regret that pun. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just looked up the Pidcock thing. She was ordered to repay about £4,000 she'd used to fund a letter attacking a welfare cut. So she did technically break the rules. Hardly a smoking gun when it comes to corruption. I still think the all time classic was an expenses claim for one MPs duck house. Yes it's not like she was refurbishing a 2nd home getting ready to sell it,or something trivial like that. I'm sure I remember one MP claiming for a new bath plug on their expenses The duck house was the classic..I think he went on The radio to defend it. Not a wise move. That move was quackers. Groan I will never regret that pun. " Sadly I will never forget it, no matter how hard I try! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership." He got the right hole with his girlfriend | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership. He got the right hole with his girlfriend " Probably just by mistake. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Simple answer to the OP,s question is a resounding NO. The guy cant utter a sentence without stuttering his way through it. If you shit it and need to hide in a fridge you are definitely not a leader. Just a laughing figure basically. " Definitely just a stooge to get Brexit done...then he will be ditched. He doesn't know what day of the week it is ffs.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him." Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her." Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening" There are still the hardy few fighting the good fight | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening" But but but, he got ‘Brexit done ‘ even though he will fuck off the minute he fucks that particular deal up | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening There are still the hardy few fighting the good fight " They are dwindling, even some of the die hard Boris fanboys are beginning to realise they voted for a moron | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening But but but, he got ‘Brexit done ‘ even though he will fuck off the minute he fucks that particular deal up " That is my favourite. I don't actually know what he has done apart from got a deal through that, he himself, voted against. After that, what? Just instructed Frost to effectively sit in meetings with the EU, fingers in ears, eyes closed, humming. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's just fascinating watching his supporters having to contort themselves into still pretending he is capable, stumbling to defend the next fuck up. In years to come, they will swear they didn't even vote for him. Happened with Thatcher didnt it?by The 1990s you would struggle to find anyone who admitted voting for her. Yep. It's brilliant watching them justify the utter shit shambles the man is. They are pretty quiet today, maybe they can't muster the energy to defend the bellend. It must be pretty disheartening There are still the hardy few fighting the good fight They are dwindling, even some of the die hard Boris fanboys are beginning to realise they voted for a moron " Even on here it's very noticeable Maybe they have just gone into hiding. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch" He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad " i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows" I think there came a point where Corbyn was incredibly likely to lose. He'd been smeared by the press for years. And, yes, even some within Labour were actively trying to make him lose. He also clearly misjudged the voting public by trying to talk about things other than Brexit. At that point, it seemed most only wanted to vote about Brexit. None of that changes the fact he was a better choice than Johnson. It's academic now, though, isn't it? He's gone for good. There's a new leader now. Only time will tell how the next election plays out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows I think there came a point where Corbyn was incredibly likely to lose. He'd been smeared by the press for years. And, yes, even some within Labour were actively trying to make him lose. He also clearly misjudged the voting public by trying to talk about things other than Brexit. At that point, it seemed most only wanted to vote about Brexit. None of that changes the fact he was a better choice than Johnson. It's academic now, though, isn't it? He's gone for good. There's a new leader now. Only time will tell how the next election plays out." he obviously wasnt the better choice.if he had of bren the better choice he would of won. both partys scrapped the barrel with there choice of leaders.i meen how the fuck did labour lose all those seats they had held for ever if he was so great.and lets be honest if he couldnt beat a halfwit like johnson he wouldnt of stood a chance against someone who actually knew what they were doing.both are liars botb have had a few wives and both have never actually done a proper days work in there live.carreer politiians the both of them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows I think there came a point where Corbyn was incredibly likely to lose. He'd been smeared by the press for years. And, yes, even some within Labour were actively trying to make him lose. He also clearly misjudged the voting public by trying to talk about things other than Brexit. At that point, it seemed most only wanted to vote about Brexit. None of that changes the fact he was a better choice than Johnson. It's academic now, though, isn't it? He's gone for good. There's a new leader now. Only time will tell how the next election plays out." I remember Johnson on 1 if those debates being asked a question..think it was about the NHS,something nothing to do with Brexit,and somehow he.managed to shoe horn the words get Brexit done,even the audience groaned,into the answer. Every Tory was doing it Clearly they had been briefed to answer every question with..get Brexit done. Its the sort of thing they get upto in n Korea. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows I think there came a point where Corbyn was incredibly likely to lose. He'd been smeared by the press for years. And, yes, even some within Labour were actively trying to make him lose. He also clearly misjudged the voting public by trying to talk about things other than Brexit. At that point, it seemed most only wanted to vote about Brexit. None of that changes the fact he was a better choice than Johnson. It's academic now, though, isn't it? He's gone for good. There's a new leader now. Only time will tell how the next election plays out. he obviously wasnt the better choice.if he had of bren the better choice he would of won. both partys scrapped the barrel with there choice of leaders.i meen how the fuck did labour lose all those seats they had held for ever if he was so great.and lets be honest if he couldnt beat a halfwit like johnson he wouldnt of stood a chance against someone who actually knew what they were doing.both are liars botb have had a few wives and both have never actually done a proper days work in there live.carreer politiians the both of them " If you are suggesting the British population always do the right thing..your logic Is flawed. It's a pointless argument..no one knows what time of leader corbyn would have made..its irrelevant. Johnson used to he a journalist. I don't really get that "career politician's. If you are going into politics.. that's your job surely? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont reakon they gone into hiding probably more to do with the fact that he is p.m till the next election so they dint feel the need to defend him.am sure they will all be back next GE. the defending him started falling away after the election.think most of the time now its just to get a reaction out of people.u dont think they actually belive what tjey say do you.well some di follow blindly but you can say that about some who backed jezza aswell.they cant accept wat everyone else can see either.like i said before to a lot of people bozo was the best of s bad bunch He wasn't the best of a bad bunch. That's always the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". Johnson was, and is, just bad i not a supporter of none of the clowns but he was the best of a bad bunch for more people than any of the others.most of the country could see corbyn. wasnt gona win but the purists in labour stuck there heads i. the sand and if any of labour even suggested he wasnt the right man they were either stuck on the back benches or hounded out the party.say wat you like about the tories when it comes to the party they will close rnks to protect it.labour on the other hand was like watcbing a car crsh in slow motion.oh well you all get a chance in 4 1/2 years for the circus to start again.roll up roll up and give us your votes.i know labour diehards dont like hearing it but if they dont appeal to middle ground voters they will lose again.mabey they will change tact who knows I think there came a point where Corbyn was incredibly likely to lose. He'd been smeared by the press for years. And, yes, even some within Labour were actively trying to make him lose. He also clearly misjudged the voting public by trying to talk about things other than Brexit. At that point, it seemed most only wanted to vote about Brexit. None of that changes the fact he was a better choice than Johnson. It's academic now, though, isn't it? He's gone for good. There's a new leader now. Only time will tell how the next election plays out. he obviously wasnt the better choice.if he had of bren the better choice he would of won. both partys scrapped the barrel with there choice of leaders.i meen how the fuck did labour lose all those seats they had held for ever if he was so great.and lets be honest if he couldnt beat a halfwit like johnson he wouldnt of stood a chance against someone who actually knew what they were doing.both are liars botb have had a few wives and both have never actually done a proper days work in there live.carreer politiians the both of them " I said this already, but you're ignoring it. So I'll say it again. Here's the last resort when Johnson's supporters have nothing good they can factually say about him. It's always "what about the other one?" or "they're all the same". That's the non-argument you're trotting out. And it's simply wrong. As for he'd have won if he'd been the better choice, that's patently nonsense. The worse choice is often elected. I've been through several reasons why Johnson beat Corbyn above. You can read them again if you want. At the time of the election, we were choosing between a man who had been sacked multiple times for lying. He had also tried to collude with a friend to have a journalist beaten up. He had publicly made comments that were racist, sexist and homophobic. He'd lied to the British public during the Brexit ref, with the aim to further his own career. He tried to shut down parliament when he wasn't getting his way, lying to the Queen in the process. He supressed the Russia Report into Russian influence on UK politics at a time it would have been rather nice to know these things ie an election. And on the other hand was a man who had a long history of standing up for people who needed it. So who was the worse choice and why? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership." Yes. He's had his Chancellor adopt socialist economic policy to prevent massive loss of life and immediate mass unemployment in March - but only because he was given no choice; not because he felt it was the right thing to do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"and i will explain to uou again i am not a tory or a boris fan.its your opinion that corbyn was the least worse and u will always belive that because you cant stand boris.im basing my opinion that bozo was the least worse choice because of the fact he ended up with a massive majority and labour lst the mist seats they ever have.your basing your opinions on feelings im basing mine on what happend at the election.....oh wait i can hear it now.thats only because murdoch the bogey man conned all them northern voters in the seats that labour had always held " I actually listed rather a lot of facts about Johnson just above. Facts. Do you realise facts aren't the same thing as feelings? And yes the Tories realised what would win and played the game more effectively. And yes Labour may well struggle in future unless they play the game better. I'm not sure what your point is. None of that means Johnson was the better candidate. I think I'll stop replying to you in this discussion here. Whenever I present facts or logic, you just don't listen to them. I wish you all the best, though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership. Yes. He's had his Chancellor adopt socialist economic policy to prevent massive loss of life and immediate mass unemployment in March - but only because he was given no choice; not because he felt it was the right thing to do." It is ironic, isn't it? It's a tacit acknowledgement socialist policies are important in a society. I'm sure the Tories will all be singing the Internationale any day now... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK.. politics forum so it is hard not to be political, however of you accept Blair, Brown and Thatcher did some good outside of your political views. Question: Has Johnson handled anything correctly since day 1 of his premiership. Yes. He's had his Chancellor adopt socialist economic policy to prevent massive loss of life and immediate mass unemployment in March - but only because he was given no choice; not because he felt it was the right thing to do. It is ironic, isn't it? It's a tacit acknowledgement socialist policies are important in a society. I'm sure the Tories will all be singing the Internationale any day now... " Didnt may do.it when labour called for people working for the company,to sit on the board. S"funny that corbyn was hailed as some far left marxist radical ..The tories pinch some of his policies. Maybe the policies were not su radical after all? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |