FabSwingers.com forum: Trump doesn't want conflict to end

By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago

West London

This is literally true.

A UN Security Council resolution for a global ceasefire to deal with Covid-19 has been blocked by the USA.

First because they didn't want WHO and then because they didn't even accept the term 'specialised health agencies'.

No ceasefire.

I'm interested in the case for this being a good thing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's good for Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Raytheon.

All of which donate heavily to the Republican party and to Trump's re-election campaign. Although I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The murder machine stops for nothing sadly.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

"This is literally true.

A UN Security Council resolution for a global ceasefire to deal with Covid-19 has been blocked by the USA.

First because they didn't want WHO and then because they didn't even accept the term 'specialised health agencies'.

No ceasefire.

I'm interested in the case for this being a good thing

So who does this ceasefire include?? Im pretty sure isis and all there off shoots aint taking there foot of the gas why all this is going on

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

It is nonsense as all the major players would ignore it anyway,the UN should be putting there time to better use

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago

West London

"This is literally true.

A UN Security Council resolution for a global ceasefire to deal with Covid-19 has been blocked by the USA.

First because they didn't want WHO and then because they didn't even accept the term 'specialised health agencies'.

No ceasefire.

I'm interested in the case for this being a good thing

So who does this ceasefire include?? Im pretty sure isis and all there off shoots aint taking there foot of the gas why all this is going on"

Conflicts involving nation states. They can stand-down large-scale active operations.

The UN self-evidently cannot speak for non-state actors.

Are you presenting this as a reason that the USA is correct to not endorse this?

If you cannot magically pause all conflicts in one SC declaration you shouldn't pause the ones that you can?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago

West London

"It is nonsense as all the major players would ignore it anyway,the UN should be putting there time to better use"

Would they? You know this do you?

Why do you think it was proposed unless the intention was to make some attempt to follow through.

By your logic, the only country actively intending to ignore it would be the USA.

Military strike to distract from domestic mishandling of the virus anyone?

I take it you think that the USA was correct to kill this resolution then because of the benefits that continuing these conflicts without pause bring?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This is literally true.

A UN Security Council resolution for a global ceasefire to deal with Covid-19 has been blocked by the USA.

First because they didn't want WHO and then because they didn't even accept the term 'specialised health agencies'.

No ceasefire.

I'm interested in the case for this being a good thing

Its quiet sad that a great country like the USA doesnt want peace. Trump obiviously gearing up to take some diversiorany action to stop Americans looking at his appalling record.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread