Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobia" Yeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country." Course you can But it can often spill over...saw that with Brexit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. Course you can But it can often spill over...saw that with Brexit." Just because people wanted to leave the eu it does not make them xenophobic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. " Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. Course you can But it can often spill over...saw that with Brexit.Just because people wanted to leave the eu it does not make them xenophobic. " Surely you must be aware of some of the imflatory rhetoric that was used?not to mention the whole immigration issue. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you." Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. Course you can But it can often spill over...saw that with Brexit.Just because people wanted to leave the eu it does not make them xenophobic. Surely you must be aware of some of the imflatory rhetoric that was used?not to mention the whole immigration issue." As i said before a few does not mean the majority if that was the case i could say everyone who voted labour hates jews and i know thats not the case. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts." yeah well i can tell by just a few posts you are always looking at the minority and not the majority i prefer to see the good. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you." I said nothing of the sort. I was merely asking the people posting that they're proud of the UK. What specifically they were proud of. All seems a bit vague so far. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts.yeah well i can tell by just a few posts you are always looking at the minority and not the majority i prefer to see the good." Since where do you prefer to "see the good"? You mainly come here to slag off anyone who doesn't worship the Tories, anyone who dares to speak out or express dissent of any kind. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts.yeah well i can tell by just a few posts you are always looking at the minority and not the majority i prefer to see the good." Nothing like making blind assumptions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What makes this country great for me? Just some of them are; the people, the freedoms we enjoy, the healthcare, support structures, ability to suceed no matter what your back ground, education, tolerance, history, medicines, police, armed forces, political system, law and order, countyside, great cities, architecture, Arsenal, entrepreneurial opportunities, the fact so many want to live here and look at our establishment as the benchmark. In fact there are far too many reasons to list." Thank you. That's what I was asking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I always took 'British tolerance' to mean 'tolerating' immigrants - but now I think it means how tolerant the government and police are with miscreants, in view of how lenient our lockdown measures are compared with our countries." Makes note to use the word miscreant more often | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobia" ******************** Absolute bull*hit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts.yeah well i can tell by just a few posts you are always looking at the minority and not the majority i prefer to see the good. Since where do you prefer to "see the good"? You mainly come here to slag off anyone who doesn't worship the Tories, anyone who dares to speak out or express dissent of any kind. " ******************* And what do YOU do...?! Hypocrite. Grow up and read what ya print. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. For sure. There is a healthy correlation though. There seems to be some none specific patriotic people around though. Just stating it's great here. But no details of which bits about the UK they're proud of or what they're doing to contribute. Mate if you cant feel a sense of pride the way the country as a whole is handling this exceptional situation i feel sorry for you. Some people have been unsung heroes Some people have been utter cunts.yeah well i can tell by just a few posts you are always looking at the minority and not the majority i prefer to see the good. Since where do you prefer to "see the good"? You mainly come here to slag off anyone who doesn't worship the Tories, anyone who dares to speak out or express dissent of any kind. ******************* And what do YOU do...?! Hypocrite. Grow up and read what ya print. " Hi Eva, how are you doing? I post my points of view on the performance of the government. And other such things. I don't remember ever attacking anyone for expressing dissent. I do notice that you reply to my posts consistently throwing insults, so I always invite you to make a point. Which you rarely do. Hope you're well | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Since where do you prefer to "see the good"? You mainly come here to slag off anyone who doesn't worship the Tories, anyone who dares to speak out or express dissent of any kind. ******************* And what do YOU do...?! Hypocrite. Grow up and read what ya print. Hi Eva, how are you doing? I post my points of view on the performance of the government. And other such things. I don't remember ever attacking anyone for expressing dissent. I do notice that you reply to my posts consistently throwing insults, so I always invite you to make a point. Which you rarely do. Hope you're well" ******************** I absolutely refuse to engage in some half-baked 'debate' with anyone who, in the face of this current current crisis, still feels it's right and proper to constantly attack, scourn and deride ANY government doing it's level best under the circumstances. Also, anyone who thinks being proud of our magnificent country and ALL it's peoples of ANY...... sex, creed, colour, etc., etc...., is anything even remotely 'xenophobic' is, in my opinion, extremely short-sighted at the least. I know what I am, I have been honest and truthful for ALL of my adult life, I have NO secrets about my life as Derek or Eva. I know there are two and ONLY two kinds of people on Mother Earth. Good and bad. (Incidentally, I cannot accuse anyone I do not know personally on this site of being the latter, I know only good people) Also, I am well aware of just how fortunate I was to have been born in this country and not some brutal, corrupt regime, ruling it's poor citizens with REAL terror. Now, this indeed is my last ever comment in this political section of the forums, I have not the time nor the inclination to engage with anyone in cyberspace, I much prefer a real debate in real surroundings with real adversaries. Finally, sincere best wishes and Love to ALL (the good) people everywhere, please stay safe. Eva XXX | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Since where do you prefer to "see the good"? You mainly come here to slag off anyone who doesn't worship the Tories, anyone who dares to speak out or express dissent of any kind. ******************* And what do YOU do...?! Hypocrite. Grow up and read what ya print. Hi Eva, how are you doing? I post my points of view on the performance of the government. And other such things. I don't remember ever attacking anyone for expressing dissent. I do notice that you reply to my posts consistently throwing insults, so I always invite you to make a point. Which you rarely do. Hope you're well ******************** I absolutely refuse to engage in some half-baked 'debate' with anyone who, in the face of this current current crisis, still feels it's right and proper to constantly attack, scourn and deride ANY government doing it's level best under the circumstances. Also, anyone who thinks being proud of our magnificent country and ALL it's peoples of ANY...... sex, creed, colour, etc., etc...., is anything even remotely 'xenophobic' is, in my opinion, extremely short-sighted at the least. I know what I am, I have been honest and truthful for ALL of my adult life, I have NO secrets about my life as Derek or Eva. I know there are two and ONLY two kinds of people on Mother Earth. Good and bad. (Incidentally, I cannot accuse anyone I do not know personally on this site of being the latter, I know only good people) Also, I am well aware of just how fortunate I was to have been born in this country and not some brutal, corrupt regime, ruling it's poor citizens with REAL terror. Now, this indeed is my last ever comment in this political section of the forums, I have not the time nor the inclination to engage with anyone in cyberspace, I much prefer a real debate in real surroundings with real adversaries. Finally, sincere best wishes and Love to ALL (the good) people everywhere, please stay safe. Eva XXX " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobia ******************** Absolute bull*hit." Prove me wrong | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The suggestion that the UK government should not be scrutinised during a time of crisis is ludicrous. It's even more important that they're made to make the best decisions in the interests of the country. Can't for the life of me understand why anyone wouldn't want that. All the things that have been mentioned as things to be proud of in the UK have been fought for, and battled for over years and years, some people have died for these causes. Again, the suggestion that we should stop trying to work for a better UK now, seems silly to me." I agree. I love this country, and it’s a great one for the most part. However people should also be free to comment, or criticise properly if they feel the need to. No country or government is perfect. I remember I was telling my experience online of racism I had experienced in the U.K. even though I was born here and I was told “Shut up and deal with it this country is more tolerant than others you should be grateful” That’s not the right attitude to have! You can love a country and criticise it if you feel it’s not doing it’s best. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The suggestion that the UK government should not be scrutinised during a time of crisis is ludicrous. It's even more important that they're made to make the best decisions in the interests of the country. Can't for the life of me understand why anyone wouldn't want that. All the things that have been mentioned as things to be proud of in the UK have been fought for, and battled for over years and years, some people have died for these causes. Again, the suggestion that we should stop trying to work for a better UK now, seems silly to me. I agree. I love this country, and it’s a great one for the most part. However people should also be free to comment, or criticise properly if they feel the need to. No country or government is perfect. I remember I was telling my experience online of racism I had experienced in the U.K. even though I was born here and I was told “Shut up and deal with it this country is more tolerant than others you should be grateful” That’s not the right attitude to have! You can love a country and criticise it if you feel it’s not doing it’s best." It's not the right attitude at all. Surely if you love your country and the people, you want to do everything you can to make sure its the best country it can be. That's more patriotic than just saying it's the best country, and then shooting down anyone who speaks up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobiaYeah lots of people would like everyone to believe that.You can be a patriot without hating other nations just because a few don't does not mean its the norm for people proud of their country. Course you can But it can often spill over...saw that with Brexit.Just because people wanted to leave the eu it does not make them xenophobic. " aw it does to some loonies on here lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The suggestion that the UK government should not be scrutinised during a time of crisis is ludicrous. It's even more important that they're made to make the best decisions in the interests of the country. Can't for the life of me understand why anyone wouldn't want that. All the things that have been mentioned as things to be proud of in the UK have been fought for, and battled for over years and years, some people have died for these causes. Again, the suggestion that we should stop trying to work for a better UK now, seems silly to me. I agree. I love this country, and it’s a great one for the most part. However people should also be free to comment, or criticise properly if they feel the need to. No country or government is perfect. I remember I was telling my experience online of racism I had experienced in the U.K. even though I was born here and I was told “Shut up and deal with it this country is more tolerant than others you should be grateful” That’s not the right attitude to have! You can love a country and criticise it if you feel it’s not doing it’s best." 100% this! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When you see something wrong we want to fix it right ? everyone here gives a damn about our country. Therefore when we complain about things not going right It’s only because we care. Patriotism is about asking the hard questions, not burying you head in the sand and pretending nothing is wrong. We as citizens have to keep our leaders Open and honest. It’s called reciprocal democracy. " I completely agree. However it seems a lot of people think patriotism means - attacking and insulting anyone who wants to be critical of the government or who express dissent in any way. IE the type of people through history who have brought about most of the changes that are the good stuff about this country. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. " We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country." Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When you see something wrong we want to fix it right ? everyone here gives a damn about our country. Therefore when we complain about things not going right It’s only because we care. Patriotism is about asking the hard questions, not burying you head in the sand and pretending nothing is wrong. We as citizens have to keep our leaders Open and honest. It’s called reciprocal democracy. " Exactly. If you think that our government are beyond reproach, then you are part of the problem. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"When you see something wrong we want to fix it right ? everyone here gives a damn about our country. Therefore when we complain about things not going right It’s only because we care. Patriotism is about asking the hard questions, not burying you head in the sand and pretending nothing is wrong. We as citizens have to keep our leaders Open and honest. It’s called reciprocal democracy. Exactly. If you think that our government are beyond reproach, then you are part of the problem." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed?" Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer" This is great, nationalism breeds hatred. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee" I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer This is great, nationalism breeds hatred. " I’d tell that to all our International Sports People. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer This is great, nationalism breeds hatred. I’d tell that to all our International Sports People. " Conjure up images of English football fans abroad..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you" What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobia ******************** Absolute bull*hit." You may call it absolute bullshit but it's been very evident on these forums over the last few years | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the problem with patriotism is it can often spill over into xenophobia" Very true, just look at France. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I feel torn. Now I don't know if I'm a good British or bad Pole. Or the other way " Ohhh I’d say you are true European and have definitely been a asset to the UK and a wonderful Ambassador for your Birth Nation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I feel torn. Now I don't know if I'm a good British or bad Pole. Or the other way Ohhh I’d say you are true European and have definitely been a asset to the UK and a wonderful Ambassador for your Birth Nation. " I would say you're a lovely person who makes intelligent posts on this forum. Where you are from and what passport you carry is irrelevant in my book. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed?" Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer This is great, nationalism breeds hatred. " That's very true, just look at Scotland. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote?" Do you think we have a free press? What are your views of Boris Johnson dismissing journalists who were critical of him and the conservative party from Number 10? What are your views on the PM threatening channel four for their undercover reporting during yhe elections? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? Do you think we have a free press? What are your views of Boris Johnson dismissing journalists who were critical of him and the conservative party from Number 10? What are your views on the PM threatening channel four for their undercover reporting during yhe elections?" I think they are free to write anything. Some of it is even true! I think they are also free to spout on twitter example Piers Morgan with his 7m followers | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority Arthur Schopenhauer This is great, nationalism breeds hatred. That's very true, just look at Scotland." Or England. Now you're getting it. Did you have an epiphany? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote?" Racism is on a decline in the long term. But race hate crime spiked after Brexit. That's certainly not something I am proud of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc." Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? Racism is on a decline in the long term. But race hate crime spiked after Brexit. That's certainly not something I am proud of. " Yup. There’s actually an article about it, stating there’s been a rise. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. " I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. " Absolutely. It’s quite bad online sometimes, you express your opinion in regards to politics. And you get called a “parasite” or “you’re not British, you’re an invader, you’re an african” “A dog born in a stable isn’t a horse” “go home”, just some I remember, some which are very recent! This is usually unprovoked and from faceless accounts who follow nationalists or people like Mark Collett. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. " I think it's a mistake to link racism too closely to Brexit. Sure, racism and xenophobia were used heavily during the campaign to promote the leave vote. But racism has nothing to do with the actual purpose of Brexit. I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public. In any case, both the separate entities of Brexit and of the increase in race hate crime are good examples of specific things to not be proud of about modern UK life. There are plenty of other things that are fantastic about this country. The civil rights we have, the education system, the public rights of way in the countryside, NHS. But even these aren't perfect and if we don't fight to keep and improve them. They will be lost. Being generically "proud of the UK". Is meaningless if you don't qualify what's good, acknowledge that there are still things to work on, and to try to contribute in whatever way you can to make this country even better. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. I think it's a mistake to link racism too closely to Brexit. Sure, racism and xenophobia were used heavily during the campaign to promote the leave vote. But racism has nothing to do with the actual purpose of Brexit. I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public. In any case, both the separate entities of Brexit and of the increase in race hate crime are good examples of specific things to not be proud of about modern UK life. There are plenty of other things that are fantastic about this country. The civil rights we have, the education system, the public rights of way in the countryside, NHS. But even these aren't perfect and if we don't fight to keep and improve them. They will be lost. Being generically "proud of the UK". Is meaningless if you don't qualify what's good, acknowledge that there are still things to work on, and to try to contribute in whatever way you can to make this country even better. " All so very true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. I think it's a mistake to link racism too closely to Brexit. Sure, racism and xenophobia were used heavily during the campaign to promote the leave vote. But racism has nothing to do with the actual purpose of Brexit. I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public. In any case, both the separate entities of Brexit and of the increase in race hate crime are good examples of specific things to not be proud of about modern UK life. There are plenty of other things that are fantastic about this country. The civil rights we have, the education system, the public rights of way in the countryside, NHS. But even these aren't perfect and if we don't fight to keep and improve them. They will be lost. Being generically "proud of the UK". Is meaningless if you don't qualify what's good, acknowledge that there are still things to work on, and to try to contribute in whatever way you can to make this country even better. " Agreed. Especially this part - “I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public.” These people were always racist, they just feel more confident to express it now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote?" We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description." The weather is so unpredictable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable" Wow so the weather sucks. But you're cool with all the other problems on the county. Including racism? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Wow so the weather sucks. But you're cool with all the other problems on the county. Including racism?" Seriously... did you honestly think that was my serious answer? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable" Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Wow so the weather sucks. But you're cool with all the other problems on the county. Including racism? Seriously... did you honestly think that was my serious answer?" No idea. I don't know anything about you. You're allowed to avoid questions about things you don't like or are not proud of the UK for. No one is obligated to say anything. Seems like the other guy is interested, and your diversion tactic makes me more curious. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge " Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. " To me. That's much more powerful statement than your original post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. " Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis." There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. " If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think." Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer?" You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part?" Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Is this from personal experience or just what you believe to be the case? My experience differs, I’ve experienced more racism since Brexit than I can remember in my lifetime. I am only 26 though, still, just expressing my opinion (no confrontation) online has caused racism towards me. I don’t think those who voted Leave are racist, however I do think a minority used Brexit as a way to showcase their racism & still do. I don't think every brexit voter is racist but I think every racist was a brexit voter. And the rise in race related crime following brexit isn't a matter of opinion but fact. I think it's a mistake to link racism too closely to Brexit. Sure, racism and xenophobia were used heavily during the campaign to promote the leave vote. But racism has nothing to do with the actual purpose of Brexit. I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public. In any case, both the separate entities of Brexit and of the increase in race hate crime are good examples of specific things to not be proud of about modern UK life. There are plenty of other things that are fantastic about this country. The civil rights we have, the education system, the public rights of way in the countryside, NHS. But even these aren't perfect and if we don't fight to keep and improve them. They will be lost. Being generically "proud of the UK". Is meaningless if you don't qualify what's good, acknowledge that there are still things to work on, and to try to contribute in whatever way you can to make this country even better. Agreed. Especially this part - “I don't think it caused people to become more racist. But it certainly empowered already racist people enough so they felt more comfortable expressing their views in public.” These people were always racist, they just feel more confident to express it now. " This. Problem with racism is the basic way people view it. Just because some people tut when they hear racist language doesn't help acknowledge and deal with the systematic, structural and institutional racism that happens all the time. I do believe that we are never honest about the level of racism in this country. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. " You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no" 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution " Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly started there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. I’ll read the rest of your article over supper " He did not actually acknowledge that staff did not have the equipment that they needed, for whatever the reason. He has now, implicitly, accepted the lack of equipment being in the right place and there being a distribution problem. Would not say that clearly to begin with. My breast does not swell with pride. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/health-52253732/coronavirus-ppe-shortage-is-distribution-issue-says-hancock | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society." I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? " The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem " I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ " So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ " This is the reaction to his comments on "misuse" in the article that you linked to: 'In response to his comments, RCN chief executive Dame Donna Kinnair said on Saturday that no PPE was “more precious a resource than a healthcare worker's life, a nurse's life, a doctor's life”. “I take offence actually that we are saying that healthcare workers are abusing or overusing PPE,” she told BBC Breakfast, added that nurses were still telling her they did not have adequate PPE.' If there is or is not a problem with misuse (which seems extraordinary as there has been no other indication of this anywhere) you do not say this in a press briefing. The public does not need to know unless you are trying to shift blame. Perhaps you can explain why it was important to say this in public. Again at no point have the government directly acknowledged a shortage of PPE anywhere. They have said that there is no shortage. Except that there is a "delivery problem" and they will now get PPE to everyone who needs it. There was no problem though. This is dishonest doublespeak and shirking of responsibility. This does not make me proud. I do not think that you wish to see this behaviour as unacceptable so you will not, despite the video and the words that you posted a link to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This thread would be so much easier to read if the quotes were cut down! " So true!!! The problems with distribution are because the ppe is not held here but in most cases is on a slowboat from china or in Americas case the suppliers are selling to the highest bidder and subverting the supply chain which is why canada and germany have not received their orders from 3M for face masks. Still I guess if we still manufactured this stuff we would probably keep it for the nhs rather than flog it off to the highest bidder....wouldn’t we? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim!" I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. " When I say bean counter I mean the people who come up with the guidelines in the first place and they invariably are ill prepared for a non standard scenario such as this and blaming staff for overusing ppe just smacks of covering ones arse because one is out of ones depth. I understand your analogy with a factory but I see this situation as being rather more like when the supermarkets run out of ice cream in sunny weather. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. " We're the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. We're the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility?" Ive made my points enough times now and also played your yes no game. You are just trying to be a a smart alec | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. We're the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility? Ive made my points enough times now and also played your yes no game. You are just trying to be a a smart alec" This is trying to step through logic. You don't like where it takes you. OK. Done. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d say we are safer to live in the UK, however there idiots who attempt to ruin this country with their stupidity. They know who they are!" I'm really not sure that most of them do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? Do you think we have a free press? What are your views of Boris Johnson dismissing journalists who were critical of him and the conservative party from Number 10? What are your views on the PM threatening channel four for their undercover reporting during yhe elections?" A free press is not necessarily an unbiased press. A free press is simply a press that is not controlled by the state. I think we do have a free press but it's definitely under threat from both the left and the right who both seem to live under delusion that if the press doesn't agree with their view of the world then it must be that it's biased and they must stop it. It never seems to occur to either side that their views may actually be wrong and the bias may actually be in themselves. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. We're the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no " Yes " Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no " Yes " If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no " No - either you want transparency or you don't. " Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no " Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse. The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem. " Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no " No - I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place. " Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no " Yes " Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no " Yes " You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility?" No I don't see a contradiction. We have been told there is enough PPE but it's not being distributed either correctly or efficiently enough to meet the demand and that in some cases it's not being used correctly. Where's the contradiction. Whether it's all true or not only time may eventually be tell but if it is true then in the interests of truth and transparency he should definitely say so including if there is a problem with misuse. It's not about blame right now wherever it actually lies; it's about finding the problems and fixing them regardless who's to blame. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. When I say bean counter I mean the people who come up with the guidelines in the first place and they invariably are ill prepared for a non standard scenario such as this and blaming staff for overusing ppe just smacks of covering ones arse because one is out of ones depth. I understand your analogy with a factory but I see this situation as being rather more like when the supermarkets run out of ice cream in sunny weather. " Big difference, we get sunny days each year, they should be no surprise. This is a very very new unique world situation, people are learning everyday. If you want to help the situation you need to understand it fully first. There is sadly a very conceited know all element within our population I am not proud of that. There are sadly a high number of the population who despite being told the facts, will not change their communications because they are so entrenched in their political clubs that they will only object and obstruct. Im not proud of that either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am happy to be living in Rural Scotland at this moment in time I would be more happy if living in an Independent Scotland, cutting ties with england and all england stands for Hopefully after lock down is over many more Scots will vote for Independence especially after seeing the way English PPE suppliers act, refusing to send any supplies of PPE to Scotland nursing homes Every English person who claims to be British, part of the UK should hole their heads in shame. proud, yeh I am sure you are." As always there is a full story. Scotland trying to cut the corner and source directly. NHS UK is co-ordinating a balanced distribution across ALL the UK. Too right PPE manufacturers will not interfere by bucking the protocol. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am happy to be living in Rural Scotland at this moment in time I would be more happy if living in an Independent Scotland, cutting ties with england and all england stands for Hopefully after lock down is over many more Scots will vote for Independence especially after seeing the way English PPE suppliers act, refusing to send any supplies of PPE to Scotland nursing homes Every English person who claims to be British, part of the UK should hole their heads in shame. proud, yeh I am sure you are." Please provide evidence of this. Every CMO of the devolved regions, has stated that this is just not the case. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am happy to be living in Rural Scotland at this moment in time I would be more happy if living in an Independent Scotland, cutting ties with england and all england stands for Hopefully after lock down is over many more Scots will vote for Independence especially after seeing the way English PPE suppliers act, refusing to send any supplies of PPE to Scotland nursing homes Every English person who claims to be British, part of the UK should hole their heads in shame. proud, yeh I am sure you are. Please provide evidence of this. Every CMO of the devolved regions, has stated that this is just not the case. " If this speculation has any evidence of truth behind it, surely it will be used as a prime example of why Scotland should be independent and Nicola Sturgeon should be raising this at every opportunity. If it is, and she is not, there is a question to be asked there. Send in Ian Blackford he’ll get to the bottom if it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am happy to be living in Rural Scotland at this moment in time I would be more happy if living in an Independent Scotland, cutting ties with england and all england stands for Hopefully after lock down is over many more Scots will vote for Independence especially after seeing the way English PPE suppliers act, refusing to send any supplies of PPE to Scotland nursing homes Every English person who claims to be British, part of the UK should hole their heads in shame. proud, yeh I am sure you are." The claim about the ppe was rubbished, surprised sturgeon didn't do some research before that faux pas.. Then again her judgement with not sacking the CMO was poor too.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Were the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Yes Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no Yes If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no No - either you want transparency or you don't. Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse. The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem. Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no No - I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place. Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Yes Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no Yes You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility? No I don't see a contradiction. We have been told there is enough PPE but it's not being distributed either correctly or efficiently enough to meet the demand and that in some cases it's not being used correctly. Where's the contradiction. Whether it's all true or not only time may eventually be tell but if it is true then in the interests of truth and transparency he should definitely say so including if there is a problem with misuse. It's not about blame right now wherever it actually lies; it's about finding the problems and fixing them regardless who's to blame. " Of course you don't see a contradiction Why do you think there's such a controversy for so long? No - either you want transparency or you don't. You don't have to provide any information at all to take responsibility, apologise and fix a problem. You just get on and do it. You do not publicly insult your staff whilst in the middle of a crisis. So your initial assertion of the press asking "politically motivated" questions is not an issue. They are doing their jobs correctly here. The government have never accepted that staff have been short of PPE despite months of challenging but Hancock says that they are now delivering PPE to those who don't have it. No contradiction. "Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse." It is not unrealistic to believe that medical staff know how to use equipment. You think that the organisation is full of amateurs? It is irrelevant that he has offended everyone in the organisation in a time of crisis by calling them incompetent? You think that they are so dim that they use up so much PPE that they cannot see that they or their colleagues will be going without? Do you have any evidence for your certainty other than from the man who said that we'd have been doing 100,000 tests by last weekend? "The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem." Well how much and how relevant is it? Any numbers? One paid of gloves? A million? Are they throwing away imaginary face visors? Any numbers? "I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place." Nope. Oblique references. Not taking responsibility. Not apologising. Why is the statement now that there is a distribution problem? Did that not exist as the main issue before? They've solved a new problem? You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Were the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Yes Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no Yes If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no No - either you want transparency or you don't. Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse. The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem. Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no No - I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place. Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Yes Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no Yes You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility? No I don't see a contradiction. We have been told there is enough PPE but it's not being distributed either correctly or efficiently enough to meet the demand and that in some cases it's not being used correctly. Where's the contradiction. Whether it's all true or not only time may eventually be tell but if it is true then in the interests of truth and transparency he should definitely say so including if there is a problem with misuse. It's not about blame right now wherever it actually lies; it's about finding the problems and fixing them regardless who's to blame. Of course you don't see a contradiction Why do you think there's such a controversy for so long? No - either you want transparency or you don't. You don't have to provide any information at all to take responsibility, apologise and fix a problem. You just get on and do it. You do not publicly insult your staff whilst in the middle of a crisis. So your initial assertion of the press asking "politically motivated" questions is not an issue. They are doing their jobs correctly here. The government have never accepted that staff have been short of PPE despite months of challenging but Hancock says that they are now delivering PPE to those who don't have it. No contradiction. "Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse." It is not unrealistic to believe that medical staff know how to use equipment. You think that the organisation is full of amateurs? It is irrelevant that he has offended everyone in the organisation in a time of crisis by calling them incompetent? You think that they are so dim that they use up so much PPE that they cannot see that they or their colleagues will be going without? Do you have any evidence for your certainty other than from the man who said that we'd have been doing 100,000 tests by last weekend? "The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem." Well how much and how relevant is it? Any numbers? One paid of gloves? A million? Are they throwing away imaginary face visors? Any numbers? "I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place." Nope. Oblique references. Not taking responsibility. Not apologising. Why is the statement now that there is a distribution problem? Did that not exist as the main issue before? They've solved a new problem? You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different " Im proud we are different | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Were the press correct to ask about lack of PPE because health and care staff have experienced a lack of equipment? Yes/no Yes Has there been a lack of PPE in some areas putting lives at risk? Yes/no Yes If there was misuse of equipment it would have been more respectful and diplomatic and effective to state that in private rather than in public. Yes/no No - either you want transparency or you don't. Frontline staff dispute misuse of PPE. Yes/no Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse. The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem. Matt Hancock has not directly acknowledged any staff have laxked PPE in any circumstances. Yes/no No - I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place. Matt Hancock has indirectly acknowledged that staff have not had the equipment that they need. Yes/no Yes Matt Hancock has said that there have been problems distributing PPE. Yes/no Yes You see no contradiction in any of this and see no attempt to shift blame and not accept responsibility? No I don't see a contradiction. We have been told there is enough PPE but it's not being distributed either correctly or efficiently enough to meet the demand and that in some cases it's not being used correctly. Where's the contradiction. Whether it's all true or not only time may eventually be tell but if it is true then in the interests of truth and transparency he should definitely say so including if there is a problem with misuse. It's not about blame right now wherever it actually lies; it's about finding the problems and fixing them regardless who's to blame. Of course you don't see a contradiction Why do you think there's such a controversy for so long? No - either you want transparency or you don't. You don't have to provide any information at all to take responsibility, apologise and fix a problem. You just get on and do it. You do not publicly insult your staff whilst in the middle of a crisis. So your initial assertion of the press asking "politically motivated" questions is not an issue. They are doing their jobs correctly here. The government have never accepted that staff have been short of PPE despite months of challenging but Hancock says that they are now delivering PPE to those who don't have it. No contradiction. "Irrelevant - It is totally unrealistic to believe there has been no misuse." It is not unrealistic to believe that medical staff know how to use equipment. You think that the organisation is full of amateurs? It is irrelevant that he has offended everyone in the organisation in a time of crisis by calling them incompetent? You think that they are so dim that they use up so much PPE that they cannot see that they or their colleagues will be going without? Do you have any evidence for your certainty other than from the man who said that we'd have been doing 100,000 tests by last weekend? "The only question is how much and how relevant it is to the problem." Well how much and how relevant is it? Any numbers? One paid of gloves? A million? Are they throwing away imaginary face visors? Any numbers? "I'm pretty sure he has acknowledged that there is a problem getting the correct PPE to the right place." Nope. Oblique references. Not taking responsibility. Not apologising. Why is the statement now that there is a distribution problem? Did that not exist as the main issue before? They've solved a new problem? You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different " As we are in the midst of a national crisis it is inevitable that there may be problems in sourcing PPE as we are competing against a lot of other countries . Luckily we have people working non stop in an attempt to resolve the crisis. The keyboard warriors that we see on a variety of different internet forums are hardly doing anything to resolve the crisis. Those posting their analysis on various different internet forums are those with roo much spare time on their hands. It is probably best if we leave the government to resolve the issue on our behalf and anyone wishing to put words into action can of course volunteer their services. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. When I say bean counter I mean the people who come up with the guidelines in the first place and they invariably are ill prepared for a non standard scenario such as this and blaming staff for overusing ppe just smacks of covering ones arse because one is out of ones depth. I understand your analogy with a factory but I see this situation as being rather more like when the supermarkets run out of ice cream in sunny weather. Big difference, we get sunny days each year, they should be no surprise. This is a very very new unique world situation, people are learning everyday. If you want to help the situation you need to understand it fully first. There is sadly a very conceited know all element within our population I am not proud of that. There are sadly a high number of the population who despite being told the facts, will not change their communications because they are so entrenched in their political clubs that they will only object and obstruct. Im not proud of that either. " I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different Im proud we are different" Pride is usually the problem. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" As we are in the midst of a national crisis it is inevitable that there may be problems in sourcing PPE as we are competing against a lot of other countries . Luckily we have people working non stop in an attempt to resolve the crisis. The keyboard warriors that we see on a variety of different internet forums are hardly doing anything to resolve the crisis. Those posting their analysis on various different internet forums are those with roo much spare time on their hands. It is probably best if we leave the government to resolve the issue on our behalf and anyone wishing to put words into action can of course volunteer their services. " Pat, is that you back under yet another account? Why do you keep posting to tell us that your views are irrelevant? Why are we competing and not coordinating with a huge purchaser like the EU? We have been told that there is no shortage though. So why worry? Do you have a lot of spare time Pat? I think you must do reading the Telegraph from cover to cover and uncritically accepting every word. It is probably best if it is pointed out to the government when people are put at mortal risk due to its failings. Considering it has not managed to do so after weeks of pressure. In fact, does not acknowledge a problem at all. Perhaps we should trust trained medical staff, or are they just "so-called experts" who should be ignored? How do you know what actions people are undertaking? We are indeed fortunate that anything that you write in reply has no relevance to the real world or reference to reality whatsoever | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed? Easy acceptance of anyone vs rising racism Free health and education Vs lack of good health and life chance for the poorest Willingness to go out and help the poor in the world vs those who only want to help people like themselves Democracy vs mindless partisanship Fair play and meritocracy vs entitlement Politeness vs rising incivility Admiration for education vs anti-expert sentiment An investigative press that will dig up hidden scandals vs a partisan dumbed down press Efficiency planning and execution vs planning by committee I’d dispute many of those but, its a free country, so I respect your opinion. thank you What do you dispute? You see nothing to be ashamed of or that requires improvement in the UK or how it's governed? Tbh I didnt understand your point But I would strongly dispute comments about the free press. We have a very free press and also social media with no restrictions I would also dispute growing racism. Never in my lifetime has this country been less racist, in fact people are just british not brown, white,black, yellow, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Sikh etc. Efficiency planning v planning by committee dont understand... We live in a Democracy, not sure your point on this. Its not up for debate unless you are arguing for those who cannot vote? We have a free press except that the government has sought to deny access to some parts of it such as refusing to appear when difficult questions will be asked (BBC Today, Andrew Neil, hiding in a fridge), giving briefings to only some members of the press. Facebook and other social media channels used to target voters with highly partisan information without oversight. I will have to disagree with you with first hand experience of increased hostility directed to foreigners. That is not limited to British people of different ethnicities. It may not be that there are more racist individuals, but those that are more willing to express themselves more openly and more directly. This is hostile and intimidating. The UK at a company and a national level is capable of excellent planning and execution of highly complex projects and strategies. However, politics has progressively sought to influence this process more and more by trying to exert political control over the civil service. Again the question still remains if you are able to see anything about the UK that you are critical of. If you cannot that would be quite remarkable as it implies that we are living in a utopia of some description. The weather is so unpredictable Making a joke of it is a (amiable) way of avoiding self criticism. Better than others, but still a dodge Look of course there are things that annoy me about the country. In no order ; Wasted money People fiddling the system Pot holes Crime Racism Historical atrocities The National football Team But I would not swap being A UK citizen and living in England for any other country I feel I am very lucky living here. I feel proud of how we attempt to contribute to the world and how we generally welcome others. My choice my opinion, everyone is entitled to there’s too. Nobody should be asked to swap. Equally, they should not be told to consider their loyalty or to go and live somewhere else if they choose to question what their government in times of crisis or otherwise. Anyone should also expect their government to answer questions directly and in good faith, particularly in times of crisis. There are questions and questions If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of the people at a time when questions are limited ie during the daily briefing, they should be in the interest of the nation at that moment in time; simple to understand for both the answerer and viewers/listeners, clear questions which have opportunities for tangible answers. Ask a political point scoring question and get a political answer. Ask a non political question to get a clear fact, to clarify a plan, or to request a status on a pertinent topic and you have a chance of getting a good clear answer which will inform the public of good information which is important for us to know. I don't think all the press would do this as many of them have political leanings. Once this is over there will be plenty of opportunity to ask why, who and then hold people to account. If the question is if there is enough PPE available and the answer is "yes" but the clear indication from frontline staff contradicts that, is that a politically motivated question? If government ministers then appear to criticise medical staff for shortages or give half-hearted "apologies" is that a politically motivated question or answer? When government blames not buying equipment with the EU due to missing emails despite having sat in meetings about the subject is that a politically motivated question or an outright lie or complete incompetence response? You've narrowed the discussion so I have narrowed my reply. It is quite a long way from the unqualified praise of our country and all of its actions that you opened with. As it should be I think. Well as you more than most have steered the conversation to a narrow path lets use the PPE as a subject Lets create a problem statement and then approach the subject. Problem Statement: A Covid-19 Nurse has no PPE. Question 1 : Why? Can you answer? You really don't think that you narrowed the discussion? Also that this thread is not written in the context of others? Okay. It's not a nurse who has more PPE. It is many medical and care staff in many areas. Either this is true or it is not. First response is verify and explicitly acknowledge that the problem exists or explain why this is not true. The response from ministers has not ever been that it is not true. The response has always been that there is enough equipment. That is not denying that staff do not have adequate PPE. That is evasion. That goes to the heart of the point about answering important questions directly. The problem appears to be distribution. Some areas are okay and others are not. Some hospitals and ambulance crews are ok, some are not, many care workers are not. All that is necessary is to say that is the issue and they are trying to fix it as a matter of urgency. Otherwise what you do is tell frontline staff that they are imagining a problem which they can see in front of them or that they are causing it by misusing equipment on a vast scale. If that is the case then the government response is fine. Then all you need to do is indicate why the BMA the RCN and nursing homes and other care providers are saying that they don't have adequate equipment. Is it incompetence or conspiracy on their part? Your words are too difficult for me. No I dont think I narrowed the conversation down at all. I responded to one part of the essay you wrote down. You asked me to expand. I did. Then you discussed one part of the answer, so it narrowed. Now you claim my vocabulary is too difficult? I don't really believe that. Here is the simple version of the one aspect we got to: Should the government should provide clear answers to important questions? Yes/no Do you believe that medical staff and carers do not have adequate PPE in some parts of the country? Yes/no Is the contradiction between the government saying that there is no problem and frontline staff saying that there is a question that should continue to be pursued by journalists? Yes/no Does government refusal to acknowledge the problem and engage with it make you proud to be British? Yes/no 1Yes 2Yes 3Yes 4 i dont agree the statement is correct so i will not answer y/n Q3 yes very important, but it does not mean the supply is not there, there could be other reasons such as poor utilisation, application, or distribution Government have not acknowledged a problem at all. They obliquely reference misuse of equipment and distribution being a problem. If misuse is a problem you do not have any need to say that in a public forum. As a leader you acknowledge the issue and have a discussion with medical staff quietly. You do not demoralise them by blaming them. That does not make me proud of our government. There have been oblique references to distribution problems but no willingness to accept responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. There was an appearance of an apology without any sencerity whatsoever. That does not make me proud of our government. What I see is the government refusing to acknowledge a problem or take responsibility for it. That does not make me proud of our government. The problem has not been resolved, whatever the reason, for many months putting people in danger. That does not make me proud of our government. I do see groups that represent medical staff and carers raising the issue vocally. That does make me proud of our society. I also see journalists pushing the government for action. That does make me proud of our society. I disagree, Matt Hancock clearly stated there was enough PPE and was criticised when he said Guidelines are not being followed. In my opinion he is stating a problem is there. Why was he even talking about PPE? Because the press fuelled by NHS staff statements had raised this issue constantly, so do not say he should not answer in public when the people who its demoralised have brought it to the public domaine. Had no choice or would you prefer him not to speak freely and not tell the truth ? The press were correct to "constantly" raise the point because it was raised by frontline staff in a life threatening position. Now look at the post above your last one where he explains why PPE will now get to 'everyone' who needs it as there is a distribution problem I agree they are correct in raising it, And he was correct in answering it the way he did, flanked by the Chief Nurse Im sorry but if there is miss-use it cannot be swept under the carpet! No way This is also worth a detailed read. https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/policies-and-guidance/tension-grows-over-ppe-supply-after-government-reveals-national-plan-11-04-2020/ So the whole misuse thing is interesting because it may well be true that some staff use more ppe than the bean counters allow for and in some cases this may be habitual but often staff have to use above the allotted amount because they are dealing with multiple patients and complex conditions and need to avoid any possible cross contamination. Matt Hancock has said many stupid things in his career and he always strikes me as someone who is out of their depth whenever he needs to demonstrate empathy. Like many of the members of Dominic Cummings cabinet he is very good at following instructions but a bit crap at thinking on his feet and tends to spout the same old statements again and again ad infinitum to protect himself from having to engage in complex human interaction. As they used to say in the old days....he’s a bit dim! I dont think the bean counters have much to do with this tbf, PPE is at a premium worldwide so it does have to be used in accordance with the guidelines, as the planning teams have to schedule against the guideline scenario. They cannot just guess how much each hospital will consume. Its like scheduling components into factories. There is a certain amount manufactured, stored, in transit, in distribution, in ea hospital and in each ward. Can you imagine if a Nurse thinks they are doing the right thing and takes a box for the team on the ward, as does 2 others! sooner or later this will drive a shortage elsewhere, it will also drive reorder points too early. Again leaving others hospitals short. Its imperative that the guidelines are worked to, so the logistics team have any chance of balancing out the available products. Please please start understanding the wider picture, the amount of people working their souls off in the supply chain need everyones understanding and help and if that means telling nurses to just take what you need and trust it will follow im sorry but that has to be done, else a nurse or a doctor somewhere else will be unprotected. When I say bean counter I mean the people who come up with the guidelines in the first place and they invariably are ill prepared for a non standard scenario such as this and blaming staff for overusing ppe just smacks of covering ones arse because one is out of ones depth. I understand your analogy with a factory but I see this situation as being rather more like when the supermarkets run out of ice cream in sunny weather. Big difference, we get sunny days each year, they should be no surprise. This is a very very new unique world situation, people are learning everyday. If you want to help the situation you need to understand it fully first. There is sadly a very conceited know all element within our population I am not proud of that. There are sadly a high number of the population who despite being told the facts, will not change their communications because they are so entrenched in their political clubs that they will only object and obstruct. Im not proud of that either. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion." You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different Im proud we are different Pride is usually the problem." I’d say lack of Pride in what we do in our work, in the way we treat others, the way that we value laws and the Authorities is the fundamental issue. Sadly some take pride in trying to belittle those in charge and those who support them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. " First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different Im proud we are different Pride is usually the problem. I’d say lack of Pride in what we do in our work, in the way we treat others, the way that we value laws and the Authorities is the fundamental issue. Sadly some take pride in trying to belittle those in charge and those who support them. " I agree with this. Except the "taking pride in trying to belittle those in charge...". The "support them" part, I'm not sure who you mean. But it's our duty to hold those in charge to the highest level of scrutiny at all times. I don't trust any of them, so want to see opposition parties, the media and the general public question their policies and decisions. If not we're blindly following. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You are proud that the government has not taken responsibility for a failure, has refused to apologise and has insulted it's staff. I am not proud of that. We are very different Im proud we are different Pride is usually the problem. I’d say lack of Pride in what we do in our work, in the way we treat others, the way that we value laws and the Authorities is the fundamental issue. Sadly some take pride in trying to belittle those in charge and those who support them. " Off on a tangent now. Your "probablys" cannot be supported. Not taking responsibility is not something to be proud of. Shifting blame onto your team is not something to be proud of. Supporting people who do those things, without question, is not something to be proud of. Don't tie that to pride in someone's own work or behaviour. They are independent. Pride represented as the arrogance not to accept responsibility and not to apologise confers no merit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows." So if if we had just reacted to the the national cry of “ We have nurses without PPE WE need more THEY ARE DYING.” The uninformed gobby bloke in the pub would say.. “We just need to make more, yeah its simple” Would this of solved the problem? Or would we have just built up stocks that were sat in the wrong places | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. , and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and . It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. " There quite a bit of misdirection and conditional supposition in your post, 'If there is a problem with misuse' and then there's 'perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game' So does your statement about 'If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right' apply to those in charge or just those in the trenches? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. , and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and . It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. There quite a bit of misdirection and conditional supposition in your post, 'If there is a problem with misuse' and then there's 'perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game' So does your statement about 'If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right' apply to those in charge or just those in the trenches? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows." I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. , and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and . It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. There quite a bit of misdirection and conditional supposition in your post, 'If there is a problem with misuse' and then there's 'perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game' So does your statement about 'If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right' apply to those in charge or just those in the trenches? " It applies to both. I hope you're not saying that mistakes should not be put right. It is perfectly possible to put right mistakes and problems without blaming anyone; just correct the problems and put procedures in place to avoid the mistakes. It really isn't about blame but it is about identifying problems, and there definitely are problems, then putting them right. Blame can, and where justified, will come later. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was." The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. " I doubt that many if any health workers are reckless with PPE. In fact I doubt that misuse is actually a major problem but I don't know. However if there is misuse, whether accidental or not, and I'm sure there is some, this too needs to be put right. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. " So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. I doubt that many if any health workers are reckless with PPE. In fact I doubt that misuse is actually a major problem but I don't know. However if there is misuse, whether accidental or not, and I'm sure there is some, this too needs to be put right. " I absolutely agree. To say as such without evidence though is in my opinion disrespectful at best because it’s likely most NHS staff are using the PPE, as they’re supposed to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. I doubt that many if any health workers are reckless with PPE. In fact I doubt that misuse is actually a major problem but I don't know. However if there is misuse, whether accidental or not, and I'm sure there is some, this too needs to be put right. " So IF there is PPE misuse and its is a minor issue in the big picture, don't you think its misdirection on the part of the Minister in charge? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines." I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. " I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. The blame game from what I recall, started with the OP staying NHS workers are being reckless. “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” This was what some, including myself had an issue with. So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines." What are you basing your opinion on? If it's only what Hancock said you may wish to do some actual research before ranting that anyone using objectivity or actual experience of the issue is in your words putting others in danger.. The issue I see and that's based upon speaking to family in the NHS now, on duty during this and friends within the profession in the South and the Highlands is that there have been issues and still are.. As professionals for whom the correct ppe is important I have not thought to ask if they have to use your words been reckless with this resource.. Genuinely interested if you have spoken to any NHS and care worker staff and looked at the issues that have been raised now for weeks..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. " Equally as I’m sure the NHS staff who are speaking out and potentially risking their jobs for doing so, aren’t just saying it for the fun of it. Or the ones pictured using clinical waste bags as PPE. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. " So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful?" At times like this the stoning scene from the life of Brian is at the forefront of my mind in how some others think.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful?" I think he can ill afford not to be transparent. Being transparent and exposing the issue has landed him with all this abuse The guy cannot win with some quarters. Lets hope that once this is over, and if/when the Covid-19 crimes are investigated, those who need to be are exposed, if that really really is in the interest of the NHS. But sometimes you should be careful what you wish for! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? At times like this the stoning scene from the life of Brian is at the forefront of my mind in how some others think.. " Psst beard madam | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? I think he can ill afford not to be transparent. Being transparent and exposing the issue has landed him with all this abuse The guy cannot win with some quarters. Lets hope that once this is over, and if/when the Covid-19 crimes are investigated, those who need to be are exposed, if that really really is in the interest of the NHS. But sometimes you should be careful what you wish for! " Crimes? The police are dealing with them, maybe Hancock has passed on a dossier.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? I think he can ill afford not to be transparent. Being transparent and exposing the issue has landed him with all this abuse The guy cannot win with some quarters. Lets hope that once this is over, and if/when the Covid-19 crimes are investigated, those who need to be are exposed, if that really really is in the interest of the NHS. But sometimes you should be careful what you wish for! Crimes? The police are dealing with them, maybe Hancock has passed on a dossier.. " Well you know what i mean. If its the goverment it will be crimes If not it will be well we learn a lesson | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? I think he can ill afford not to be transparent. Being transparent and exposing the issue has landed him with all this abuse The guy cannot win with some quarters. Lets hope that once this is over, and if/when the Covid-19 crimes are investigated, those who need to be are exposed, if that really really is in the interest of the NHS. But sometimes you should be careful what you wish for! " So would you disagree or agree that scapegoating frontline health workers would a good deflection if it was a case that the issue was one of PPE shortages? I disagree with your statement that he can do no right for some people and counter that he can do no wrong for some quarters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. Equally as I’m sure the NHS staff who are speaking out and potentially risking their jobs for doing so, aren’t just saying it for the fun of it. Or the ones pictured using clinical waste bags as PPE. " I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was." This is about leadership and taking responsibility not blame. They are completely different things. Acknowledge a problem. "We understand that some medical and care staff do not have all of the equipment that they need. We know that you are under pressure and we will try to fix this as soon as possible." Fix the problem or at least explain how you will. "We have adequate quantities of equipment but we have not solved the complex problem of distributing it to where it is needed. We are working hard to resolve this. In the meantime please think carefully about using the available PPE as efficiently as possible until we can improve the supply process" Nothing more to discuss unless you cannot actually fail to deliver. This would be a non-issue if that had been done. It has not. This is not being an "armchair general". There are teams on "advisors" and speech writers and press secretaries. This is not one person alone. There is no government statement directly accepting that there has been a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in many areas and roles where it is necessary. Nothing. That is denying that your staff's concerns are valid. Nobody seems to think otherwise. All of the statements are worded to indirectly inply that some problems may exist but not take responsibility for it. They were repeating that there was no shortage whilst staff were complaining that they didn't have enough. It was only under pressure that they have, eventually admitted to a distribution problem. Can you accept that there is an issue in publicly criticising your staff for being unprofessional? Can you accept that presenting this as the reason, rather than possibly a minor reason without evidence, for the shortage is a form of deflecting responsibility? Why was this focused on in public at all rather than communicated internally? I am sure that the government is desperately trying to deliver PPE, but when running an organisation in crisis you don't tell them that they are imagining problems and if there are any they are to blame. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. Equally as I’m sure the NHS staff who are speaking out and potentially risking their jobs for doing so, aren’t just saying it for the fun of it. Or the ones pictured using clinical waste bags as PPE. I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. " I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. Equally as I’m sure the NHS staff who are speaking out and potentially risking their jobs for doing so, aren’t just saying it for the fun of it. Or the ones pictured using clinical waste bags as PPE. I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. " The dispute is about making a point of criticising your staff and the not clearly accepting the serious problem that their staff pointed out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. " Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. So your premise is based on the hope and assumption that Mr Hancock is being fully transparent and truthful. Do you think he might have any reason not be transparent and truthful? I think he can ill afford not to be transparent. Being transparent and exposing the issue has landed him with all this abuse The guy cannot win with some quarters. Lets hope that once this is over, and if/when the Covid-19 crimes are investigated, those who need to be are exposed, if that really really is in the interest of the NHS. But sometimes you should be careful what you wish for! So would you disagree or agree that scapegoating frontline health workers would a good deflection if it was a case that the issue was one of PPE shortages? I disagree with your statement that he can do no right for some people and counter that he can do no wrong for some quarters. " I think he can do both right and wrong. We're he's got it wrong it needs to be put right. However I can see no advantage in looking for resignations at this time. The last thing we need is someone else coming in and waisting time picking things up. I think a lot of people on both sides just don't seem to get that normal politics is over for the duration. People aren't going to thank either side if it looks like they're using this crisis to just score political points. They don't want whipping boys, they want solutions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. " Really If aspects of the NHS choose to use the Press and Social media to launch criticism of the Government because of PPE shortages, they open the door to having a public response. You would argue we have a right to free press and their job is to hold an government to account. Well they did, they have and the Nick Hancock replied. Or is free speaking only relevant when it suits your arguments? Im confused you appear to be arguing with yourself. Anyway im still proud, and I still feel reckless use of PPE by some, needs addressing to protect those who are doing the dangerous front line work. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. I think you are rather missing the point tbh People see a minister (or a president for that matter) trying to cover their arse by saying that people are wasteful or biased or thoughtless and they understand that this is wrong and weak minded but the partisan among us would rather blindly agree with this muddying of the waters and the implication that it is the nhs staffs fault in a time of crisis. Morally what Hancock said was wrong and at the very least inept but thats just my opinion. You seem to be saying that, even if part of the problem is actually misuse of PPE by health workers, we shouldn't be told so. I disagree. If there is a problem with misuse, and I don't know whether there really is or not but IF there is, it should not be hidden but investigated and put right. I have nothing but administration for all our health workers and believe they are doing a fantastic job under very difficult circumstances but they are not infallible beings, they are hard working humans and perfectly capable of making mistakes. This is not a blame game. It's about finding all the problems with getting PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. If anyone has made a mistake then it needs to be put right, not hidden. First - the government have not been taking responsibility or acknowledging a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in some areas. Note that they have not denied it either. They have used a form of words such as "there is no shortage of equipment" that does not deny that it may be in the wrong place. They are not taking responsibility although now they are quietly saying that there is a "distribution challenge" and obliquely indicating that PPE is being delivered to those who don't have any. There's no shortage according to the government though. The assertion that there is misuse of equipment has no evidence behind it to date. Widespread, isolated, not at all? The shortage of PPE is very clearly indicated from multiple sources. This is making unevidenced statements equivalent to reported data. If there is misuse of equipment it is not a leader's role to announce in public that his staff are unprofessional. That is what is being done. This is immediately demotivating for a workforce under high pressure. Especially if they feel that it is unjustified. You do not publicly criticise your team with an IF. If anyone has made a mistake it needs to be put right in a way that keeps the organisation functioning not in a way that creates conflict. Why focus on this piece of possible information when under pressure about the lack of PPE? On top of that another minister makes the most insulting non-apology about people feeling that they have not got the correct PPE. No senior ministers actually appear to have any experience of managing teams or organisations and it shows. I still think you're concentrating too much on who's to blame rather than how we solve the problems. Ultimately the government is responsible and must be held to account but IMHO the holding to account can and will come later. Right now we need to correct the problems whether the mistakes have been made by the government, the expert medical advisors, the health workers on any ground or anybody else. I don't accept that the government has not admitted that there is a problem with getting PPE to where it is required, I've heard then quite definitely say there is. That is the first problem we need to solve. There maybe others and, even if only due to the guidelines on there use being charged a number of times, I would be extremely surprised if there hasn't been a fair amount of mistaken and incorrect use. Even professionals make mistakes. I don't understand why you see this as a blame game. Problems can only be fixed if you identify them. My personal belief, and I think this will be confirmed in any lessons learnt exercise after this is all over, is that the government's attempt to control the supply of this equipment by centralisation through Public Health England is probably the main cause of the delays. We're also still seeing a similar problem with testing. For me right now the issue is how to we fix those problems not who's to blame but I will want to know when this is all over who was. This is about leadership and taking responsibility not blame. They are completely different things. Acknowledge a problem. "We understand that some medical and care staff do not have all of the equipment that they need. We know that you are under pressure and we will try to fix this as soon as possible." Fix the problem or at least explain how you will. "We have adequate quantities of equipment but we have not solved the complex problem of distributing it to where it is needed. We are working hard to resolve this. In the meantime please think carefully about using the available PPE as efficiently as possible until we can improve the supply process" Nothing more to discuss unless you cannot actually fail to deliver. This would be a non-issue if that had been done. It has not. This is not being an "armchair general". There are teams on "advisors" and speech writers and press secretaries. This is not one person alone. There is no government statement directly accepting that there has been a lack of PPE in the hands of staff in many areas and roles where it is necessary. Nothing. That is denying that your staff's concerns are valid. Nobody seems to think otherwise. All of the statements are worded to indirectly inply that some problems may exist but not take responsibility for it. They were repeating that there was no shortage whilst staff were complaining that they didn't have enough. It was only under pressure that they have, eventually admitted to a distribution problem. Can you accept that there is an issue in publicly criticising your staff for being unprofessional? Can you accept that presenting this as the reason, rather than possibly a minor reason without evidence, for the shortage is a form of deflecting responsibility? Why was this focused on in public at all rather than communicated internally? I am sure that the government is desperately trying to deliver PPE, but when running an organisation in crisis you don't tell them that they are imagining problems and if there are any they are to blame." I really don't know what you have been listening to but I really just don't recognise much of what you're saying. The government has accepted and said there have been problems getting PPE where it's needed. Should they have said there is a shortage when there wasn't? No of course they shouldn't. If the problem is getting the PPE from where it is to where it's needed that is what they should say and that is what they have said. I don't see that pointing out the limited amount of PPE that has got through to where it's needed must be used properly and in accordance with the guidelines is deflecting. If you want to believe that's deflection knock yourself out, I don't. I just want the problems sorted and I don't believe that questioning the honesty rather than the actions of those involved is helpful in achieving that. But way-hay, if you're ready successful you might get a resignation out of it and some political capital down the line, however it won't deliver a single extra piece of PPE to anyone and quite possibly would lead to further delay in sorting everything out. I think those that want to play politics with this on either side will and they too will be held to account for getting in the way of those, on both sides, who want to try and find solutions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So its my fault mmmmm Im still proud to be a UK Citizen and I feel lucky to live here! And i do still believe if NHS staff have been reckless in their use of the treasured PPE, it needs voicing. Guidelines are there for a reason Not following those is reckless, and results in front line Nurses having no clean PPE. I stand by what i say. Those who think I am wrong are supporting the people who by misuse are putting others in danger. Is that your intention? Is that what you want? I doubt it, so I urge you all to support the call to protect these people and support the guidelines. I didn’t state anything is “your fault”. I stated where the “blame game” started, which was essentially with your post I quoted above. You’ve changed your tune a bit as your post didn’t say “believe” or “if” you were adamant without evidence. Again your words were “That is the argument exactly, how are they getting through so much.... because they are being reckless and not following guidelines.” What you said, sounded like you had personal experience, hence why I asked if you have evidence to back up the above, to which you admitted, you don’t. I dont have the evidence, but I hope Nick Hancock was well briefed with all the facts before he made the statements live on TV. I am sure he does not go out and give opinions such as this and that they are factual, especially as he is flanked by the Chief Medical Officers team and the Chief Nurse. Equally as I’m sure the NHS staff who are speaking out and potentially risking their jobs for doing so, aren’t just saying it for the fun of it. Or the ones pictured using clinical waste bags as PPE. I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. " I think some people are saying there might also be a problem with the PPE that is getting through to where it is needed not being used properly, and there might be. If there is then that problem should also be made right too. It's not an "either or" thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. " Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? " I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. " Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. " In no particular order, Taiwan, South Korea and Vietnam have led by example. Within Europe, Germany has excelled with its testing programme. Even the UKs closest neighbour Ireland with quite a similar starting position has performed better than the UK Adjusted for population, there have been 7.4 deaths in Ireland for every 100,000 people. In the UK, there have been 17 deaths per 100,000. In other words, people are dying of coronavirus in the UK at more than twice the rate they are dying in Ireland. Your usage of the term cannon fodder is regrettably appropriate for those that unnecessarily lost their lives to corona virus. Cannon fodder, not heroes remember that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. In no particular order, Taiwan, South Korea and Vietnam have led by example. Within Europe, Germany has excelled with its testing programme. Even the UKs closest neighbour Ireland with quite a similar starting position has performed better than the UK Adjusted for population, there have been 7.4 deaths in Ireland for every 100,000 people. In the UK, there have been 17 deaths per 100,000. In other words, people are dying of coronavirus in the UK at more than twice the rate they are dying in Ireland. Your usage of the term cannon fodder is regrettably appropriate for those that unnecessarily lost their lives to corona virus. Cannon fodder, not heroes remember that. " Were they prepared or have they responded differently? I do recall Germany ring fencing all of their medical kit and suppliers to look after number 1 when their EU brothers were desperate! Germany we already fortunate to have test facilities available. Ireland, lets all pray they do avoid higher mortality rates. Fortunately all those 20,000 returning from Cheltenham have not caused a situation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. " Custer? Whilst that may sound flippant it's about the level you seem to be working from, it's clear you know as little about the military as you do the NHS.. Your use of the term canon fodder is frankly a bit telling.. Is it how you see some in this crisis? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. Custer? Whilst that may sound flippant it's about the level you seem to be working from, it's clear you know as little about the military as you do the NHS.. Your use of the term canon fodder is frankly a bit telling.. Is it how you see some in this crisis? " Oh I actually read a lot. I didnt bring the military into the convo and i actually laughed at the thought of it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. Custer? Whilst that may sound flippant it's about the level you seem to be working from, it's clear you know as little about the military as you do the NHS.. Your use of the term canon fodder is frankly a bit telling.. Is it how you see some in this crisis? Oh I actually read a lot. I didnt bring the military into the convo and i actually laughed at the thought of it" So you read a lot and you don't recognise a metaphor? But to be honest, its clear that you're somewhat resistant to facts and reality. There is little point in continuing this debate, you'll continue to distract, deflect and ignore, it is tiresome at this stage. But please do remember, cannon fodder not heroes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well I'm extremely proud to born and bred in Great Britain. There are a number of things that is great about this country and others that are not so good. We are lucky to live here with our freedoms compared to a lot of other countries around the world. Most people are proud of their country, no matter where they are and I believe rightly so. Be proud of your town, county and county. If you can't, stop moaning and do some positive about the things that make you feel that way. " The last sentence is key. And should apply to people who are proud too. We should all endeavour to make a positive influence. Some people feel the overwhelmed with how things have been getting worse and worse these last ten years or so and are set to continue on that downward trajectory. It can be hard to stay positive and it often feels like however hard you try, it makes no impact. But every small positive action does help, even if only in a small way. Personally I find lots of things about the UK to be proud of. But I don't really understand feeling proud of having been born in this geographic location. I had nothing to do with it. It was pure chance. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do great things. I feel lucky to be a UK Citizen. We do great things. We do terrible things. I sometimes feel lucky to be a UK citizen. I sometimes feel ashamed to be a UK citizen. I can see the good that we do. I can see the bad that we do. Both are possible. If you are unable to be self-critical then you are unable to improve either yourself or your country. Can you expand on what makes you ashamed?" How far do you wanna go back? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I don't think anyone is disputing the reality that there has been and still are problems getting the right PPE to the right people at the right time and in the right place. The issue is what do we do about it. I think there is someone disputing as such, or at least thinking there is PPE but it’s not being used properly. Yep, claiming its just logistics and NHS misuse sounds like wilful misdirection. Are you saying there have been no problems with logistics? If there has been no problem with logistics then what is the problem? Are you seriously trying to say that the government is deliberately trying to withhold this PPE. If not what are you trying to say? I'm saying they weren't prepared and that have attempted to deflect from this by blaming the misuse of PPE and logistical issues. Tasks can be delegated but not responsibility. Its a poor general that blames their troops., particularly when they're dying from the lack of equipment. Im sorry but I can only laugh at that. Could you identify who in this world was prepared? When you refer to a Bad General Oh my golly There is another statement I would like to share in response. To be a good leader you need good followers. Thats why Generals in history have been very selective of their regiments. Protected there prize fighting machines and used others for Canon fodder. Custer? Whilst that may sound flippant it's about the level you seem to be working from, it's clear you know as little about the military as you do the NHS.. Your use of the term canon fodder is frankly a bit telling.. Is it how you see some in this crisis? Oh I actually read a lot. I didnt bring the military into the convo and i actually laughed at the thought of it So you read a lot and you don't recognise a metaphor? But to be honest, its clear that you're somewhat resistant to facts and reality. There is little point in continuing this debate, you'll continue to distract, deflect and ignore, it is tiresome at this stage. But please do remember, cannon fodder not heroes. " No no far from it in fact i only ever deal in facts and the facts very rarely let me down. Others however, have opinions and usually unfounded. I went to great lengths to show you evidence supporting the facts on another topic on another post and you just dismissed them because you dont agree with them if you recall. I think you have actually not even read what ive been saying just jumped into the conclusion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |