Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Mobile Web App feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is the definition of fabulous by the way?" I class myself as fabulous and that’s simply because it’s the larger choice I feel I’m bigger than curvy and it seems I’m forced to chose that box | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a fully comprehensive filter would be better. Not just body type. The data is there. " Users put a fair amount of details about themselves but only a fraction is available to be searched upon. It's silly and stops people finding others that are good matches as easily as it should be. Poor searches also likely help to clog up peoples inboxes, with messages from unsuitable users. It's a lose-lose situation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trouble is so many are not even familiar with what each body type actually means lol" True. Some are vague and we'd probably be better off with a wider range as well as brief help notes on what each one is. In the meantime, we can't search upon many of the user provided details anyway | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a fully comprehensive filter would be better. Not just body type. The data is there. Users put a fair amount of details about themselves but only a fraction is available to be searched upon. It's silly and stops people finding others that are good matches as easily as it should be. Poor searches also likely help to clog up peoples inboxes, with messages from unsuitable users. It's a lose-lose situation. " How would it help to reduce messages to unclog inboxes ? If you read someone's profile first you get all the information you need to decide whether and how to message them. Perhaps you mean to use them as a filter on incoming messages ? e.g " you are not tall enough to send a message to the user" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many people have so many different ideas on body types, height and age that I'm not sure filters would actually work because they just rely on the honesty of the person inputting the data ... which is frequently not accurate at time of input! " Yes there's going to be a small percentage who are either kidding themselves or deliberately deceiving. They'll soon get found out though. But for the majority of people who are honest in their profiles, this will save a lot of time if the filters are overhauled. Curvy is ambiguous to say the least. Ample is another term that some find offensive. But am guessing that someone somewhere will find a term that they don't like so I guess it's a difficult one for the admins. However, BBW should definitely be on there as a body type imo as many women on here fit that description and many men like them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |