Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"The what? " My thoughts exactly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI A bit like when underweight guys brag about having abs?" Like myself, my BMI would put me on border line healthy and underweight, so due to this can see my abs. I do work out and eat healthy most time. Bit struggle to put on weight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not being funny but if I have a pair of tits in my face, the last thing I'm thinking about is the T to T ratio " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ooo this thread is going to be fun to watch ... where’s my popcorn " Stuck in between my T to T. Care to go looking ?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There has to be an equivalent for you men, I’ve seen short skinny guys with what looks like a huge cock but it’s not and then there’s the larger frame guys with solid thighs and not looking so blessed, it’s also down to way the pic is taken, think I’ve gone of on tangent here apologies " Not at all you just defined C to C - cock to carrier ratio | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There has to be an equivalent for you men, I’ve seen short skinny guys with what looks like a huge cock but it’s not and then there’s the larger frame guys with solid thighs and not looking so blessed, it’s also down to way the pic is taken, think I’ve gone of on tangent here apologies Not at all you just defined C to C - cock to carrier ratio " Well saved thank you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that's really relevant. They're posting pics of their tits regardless of whether they're big or small or anything else you want to call them. " Relevant to what? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits" Not at all | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to " Not to everyone | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to Not to everyone" To those that are open minded and enjoy them for what they are and not the carriage they are attached to they are | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should they have to consider anything other than what *they* are comfortable with posting OP? If they like the pic and are comfortable with it, that is all that matters surely? Pandering to a ridiculous (and frankly insulting) "ratio" shouldn't even come into it" Pandering to the "white knight" or "charming gentleman" image is just as ridiculous. Being insulted, frankly or otherwise, on someone else's behalf is also ridiculous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should they have to consider anything other than what *they* are comfortable with posting OP? If they like the pic and are comfortable with it, that is all that matters surely? Pandering to a ridiculous (and frankly insulting) "ratio" shouldn't even come into it Pandering to the "white knight" or "charming gentleman" image is just as ridiculous. Being insulted, frankly or otherwise, on someone else's behalf is also ridiculous." I'm sure men are allowed to be decent human beings without being white knights. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh, so... dressed up fat shaming? Ok. I'm not down with this." Ok. You don't have to be. Just so you know though, I never said their was any "shame" in any body size. You called it fat shaming. No one mentioned anyone should be shamed or feel ashamed. It's a general body proportion question. No different to asking "big tits or small tits?" "Big bums or small bums?" "Big dicks or small dicks?" "Dad bods or gym bods?" You get the idea? It's ok to not be ok with it though. You have the choice to stay or leave. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well that’s not very nice now is it" What isn't? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Flipping heck... Boobies are boobies... And what people choose to show / share is their prerogative? Don't like what you see.. Just block, delete, find another profile " I would never block anyone just because of their body shape or size. That is very shallow and very closeminded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI" Right. Charming. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There has to be an equivalent for you men, I’ve seen short skinny guys with what looks like a huge cock but it’s not and then there’s the larger frame guys with solid thighs and not looking so blessed, it’s also down to way the pic is taken, think I’ve gone of on tangent here apologies " Not at all a tangent. Its exactly the same. No one is shaming any body size or saying that there isnt a body shape or size out there for everyone. Like maybe when some profiles say "BBC ONLY". Yes its racist and "prejudice" but who is anyone to tell anyone else what they should be attracted to? Similarly with profiles looking for "VWE 10+" guys only or you will be blocked". Everyone has their thing they have and no one should judge. It that wasn't the original question. I mean I'm sure their are guys that are looking for instagram model type girls only or girls with huge tits big basses and abs. We all have our thing but still | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to Not to everyone To those that are open minded and enjoy them for what they are and not the carriage they are attached to they are " Ah the old "it's not what you have it's what you do with it" point of view? I get you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits Not at all" Size is relative - 10 metres squared is bigger than 1 metre squared. Doesn’t matter the size of the field it is sat in Bra sizes go up in size so big is big | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to Not to everyone To those that are open minded and enjoy them for what they are and not the carriage they are attached to they are Ah the old "it's not what you have it's what you do with it" point of view? I get you. " You don’t get me at all. As I stand by my first statement all boobs are beautiful.... it’s got nothing to do with what people do with them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits Not at all Size is relative - 10 metres squared is bigger than 1 metre squared. Doesn’t matter the size of the field it is sat in Bra sizes go up in size so big is big " A monster truck is a monster truck because it's a regular size truck with big wheels. A regular size truck with small wheels is just a truck. Don't listen to what the women tell you, wise does matter with some things. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits" This logic checks out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to " Sorry I have to disagree. Tits are only as beautiful as their owner. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI" That’s excellent, you carry on making some kind of league table and fuck the effect it has on people. I’d prefer not to | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to Not to everyone To those that are open minded and enjoy them for what they are and not the carriage they are attached to they are Ah the old "it's not what you have it's what you do with it" point of view? I get you. You don’t get me at all. As I stand by my first statement all boobs are beautiful.... it’s got nothing to do with what people do with them " To you. All boobs are beautiful to you. That's all that should matter though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Tits are beautiful no matter shape or size or the body they are attached to Sorry I have to disagree. Tits are only as beautiful as their owner. " Agree to a point. I like all shapes and sizes of tits and there isnt one shape or size I would say is the perfect pair but some nice tits are on horrible owners and vice versa. Horrible isnt just an aesthetic. It could be a personality or a mannerism. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI" Ohhhhhh I see your bored and want an argument | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on." Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits This logic checks out. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do women sometimes ignore the T to T ratio when creating profiles and posting pics of their "big tits" like it is the only big thing on them and is their defining feature? " its the only thing they can see when they look down to find the camera | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, you do realise if a woman wore a 38F and another wore a 34DD They're the same size? Roughly, I dont know the exactly about of size difference. But they're sister sizes. Each woman wearing a sister size regardless of their dress size weight whatever.... they're the same size titties. " Yes I do know this and that's why I never mentioned band size. Only cup size. Forgive me if I am mistaken but the 34 in 34DD is the measurement around the back in relation to the measurement over the breasts is it not? But yes you are correct. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ignoring the initial context of the post, I must say that the OP is an excellent debater. As this post grows in size he’s proving to be a very good mass-debater. I’ll get my coat rainbows " Ignoring the initial context of the post makes that comment redundant no? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Big tits are big tits" My sentiments exactly! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My T to T ratio isn't great but I've not hidden that in my pics. That's my choice though. People can post whatever they want and if they feel a particular asset is their best feature then why not. If you don't like it then move on. Trying to insult people isn't the way to go. However, it's also not fair to single our only women. It's really no different to men who only post pics of their dicks. " lol i get your point but i think in the great scheme of negative comments and threads guys get the brunt of criticism quite often deservedly so but quite often not so deservingly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Omg . What a load of tits. Tits are tits big small or flappy bananas... everybody loves different ones or all of them. When one is giving / receiving a good old rogering are we really thinking about T and fucking T . nope ! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on. Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. " An objective fact isn't the same as being objectified, OP. Mrs TMN | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My T to T ratio isn't great but I've not hidden that in my pics. That's my choice though. People can post whatever they want and if they feel a particular asset is their best feature then why not. If you don't like it then move on. Trying to insult people isn't the way to go. However, it's also not fair to single our only women. It's really no different to men who only post pics of their dicks. " I never made a judgement or even opined on whether it was good or bad I do not think. I have repeatedly said that there are body shapes and sizes out there for everyone. I haven't shared my personal preference but those who know me or have spoken to me know what I like and it is very varied. I never insulted anyone regardless of whether people took insult or not. I personally think it is irresponsible and irrational to take something that wasn't given to you. So if I didnt give an insult, it should have never been taken. Especially on someone else's behalf. That is highly ignorant if you ask me. I think it is fair to single out women in this post as it was specifically aimed at breasts. Most men dont have breasts. Also, I did mention that there are men who could do the same but less likely in later posts. Besides, are there not posts on the forums asking about dick size? That would single out men would it not? Fair is fair. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, you do realise if a woman wore a 38F and another wore a 34DD They're the same size? Roughly, I dont know the exactly about of size difference. But they're sister sizes. Each woman wearing a sister size regardless of their dress size weight whatever.... they're the same size titties. Yes I do know this and that's why I never mentioned band size. Only cup size. Forgive me if I am mistaken but the 34 in 34DD is the measurement around the back in relation to the measurement over the breasts is it not? But yes you are correct. " Yes OP you’re correct the number is relation to the band with or circumference around the ribcage and the letters are translated from inches to letters. My ribcage believe it or not measures 37inches (i just checked!) boobs are a J/K cup and yes I have a tummy. In my humble opinion i still have a decent T to T ratio but threads like this (not the first on this topic) make me wonder if I should be showing my body. But as said above if you put pics up expect to be judged good or bad as we all have preferences. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Omg . What a load of tits. Tits are tits big small or flappy bananas... everybody loves different ones or all of them. When one is giving / receiving a good old rogering are we really thinking about T and fucking T . nope ! " Some people are. Hence the reason there are a lot of profiles specifically requesting what body shape or size they want and also the reason fab requires you to select a body shape in your bio | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters." Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on. Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. An objective fact isn't the same as being objectified, OP. Mrs TMN " What is the objective fact about the top pics table that doesn't objectify? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve always thought it was more to do with the size of my hands. Like A through DD feel quite small (although I love small ) , E through to G a decent handful and H, J, K and above are big. Although back size can change this - 36DD seem very small compared to a 30C. " "Although back size can change this - 36DD seem very small compared to a 30C" This supports the T to T ratio exactly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP, you do realise if a woman wore a 38F and another wore a 34DD They're the same size? Roughly, I dont know the exactly about of size difference. But they're sister sizes. Each woman wearing a sister size regardless of their dress size weight whatever.... they're the same size titties. Yes I do know this and that's why I never mentioned band size. Only cup size. Forgive me if I am mistaken but the 34 in 34DD is the measurement around the back in relation to the measurement over the breasts is it not? But yes you are correct. Yes OP you’re correct the number is relation to the band with or circumference around the ribcage and the letters are translated from inches to letters. My ribcage believe it or not measures 37inches (i just checked!) boobs are a J/K cup and yes I have a tummy. In my humble opinion i still have a decent T to T ratio but threads like this (not the first on this topic) make me wonder if I should be showing my body. But as said above if you put pics up expect to be judged good or bad as we all have preferences. " You should be showing your body if you like to show your body regardless of size or what other people prefer to see. Every bodynshaoe organize is perfect tonat keastb1pnother people that look at it. This post is clearly bringing out the sensitive people that do want to ever feel like they are being judged. We are all being judged on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Omg . What a load of tits. Tits are tits big small or flappy bananas... everybody loves different ones or all of them. When one is giving / receiving a good old rogering are we really thinking about T and fucking T . nope ! Some people are. Hence the reason there are a lot of profiles specifically requesting what body shape or size they want and also the reason fab requires you to select a body shape in your bio " Whats next Labia to flabbier ! ... If we dont like what we see we just move along ...taking the pictures in the first place of any part of your body is brave if your not that comfortable..let alone thinking about sizes... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve got implants which I had 13 years ago. They were suited to me when I was a size 6 and weighed less than 8 stone. Now I’m bigger 8/10 and have more flab my boobs look smaller. The positive size is because my boobs have implants they’ll look bigger when I lose weight, whereas women tend to drop boob sizes when they lose weight as the majority of a boob is made up of fat. Fatter the woman the fatter the boobs, makes obvious sense. " I'd never say "fatter" but I salute your bravery for doing so in a post where so many people didn't understand the original question and decided to take offense and feel like they were being called fat. Not all big girls have big boobs. Some big girls have very small boobs too. It is what it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Your pictures are lovely by the way " thank you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Your pictures are lovely by the way thank you " Cheeky now ! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've got a fat belly and small boobs.. So how does that work? " I bet you rock that shit with confidence though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? " Yes, because the point of reference isn’t the wall, it’s the person looking through the window, and other windows they’ve seen previously. Similarly, boobs aren’t just compared relative to the person who has them, but also compared to all other people with boobs. Your argument is like saying that a man who is 8 feet tall with size 15 feet has small feet because they aren’t that big relative to the rest of him. Ask any shoe manufacturer and they’ll tell you: he has big feet. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah but something we can all agree on, is that tits are fun to play with and bring happiness! " Amen brother | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? " That’s actually the differential theory used to sell stuff, I use it all the time to sell on 2nd page in Amazon ! !! People will get pissed when a £50 item goes up to £55, but will happily pay £505 for a £500 item! But both are an extra £5 in my pocket to put towards a nice new bra for Mrs Hot Notts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? Yes, because the point of reference isn’t the wall, it’s the person looking through the window, and other windows they’ve seen previously. Similarly, boobs aren’t just compared relative to the person who has them, but also compared to all other people with boobs. Your argument is like saying that a man who is 8 feet tall with size 15 feet has small feet because they aren’t that big relative to the rest of him. Ask any shoe manufacturer and they’ll tell you: he has big feet." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The what? " Tact to Torso rating ratio | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. " You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If a boob is generally made up of upto 56% fat or fatty tissue to use the correct term, if you have a lot of fatty tissue on your body then that’s going to be extended to the boobs, arse, thighs, arms and everywhere else. It’s very rare to have a really slim woman with large natural breasts. All my friends say their boobs get smaller when they lose weight and bigger when they put on weight. " Ne careful, you are using logic to back up your opinion. That is frowned upon by some people. Best stick to emotions and personal anecdotal evidence. You do obviously have a greater understanding of physiology and the argument against spot reduction weight loss theory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh, so... dressed up fat shaming? Ok. I'm not down with this." I'm glad you saw it too... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. " When? Where did I absolutely shame a persons body? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. When? Where did I absolutely shame a persons body? " Well you are a delight | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh your T to T ratio reminds me of the B to B ratio that many men on Fab seem to forget too... brain to bollocks... " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? Yes, because the point of reference isn’t the wall, it’s the person looking through the window, and other windows they’ve seen previously. Similarly, boobs aren’t just compared relative to the person who has them, but also compared to all other people with boobs. Your argument is like saying that a man who is 8 feet tall with size 15 feet has small feet because they aren’t that big relative to the rest of him. Ask any shoe manufacturer and they’ll tell you: he has big feet." Very very true and the best logical argument against my original post. Although I dont think foot size to height is as relative to the ratio argument, I love your reasoning. Maybe the UR then is impression. Are all breasts then that have a screwed T to T ratio as impressive regardless of tit size? Are "big tits" as impressive" when the tummy is as large or larger? Again this is no negative judgement on larger ladies and after some thought, this can. Ot at all be compaired to guys and dick size. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think someone needs to take the spade away... poor bloke is in deep " Well what did he expect? Saying that the back size changes how the boobs are perceived is nonsense. And the going on to congratulate someone for using the word fatter really didnt help! We are all perfectly aware of intention and it was never a kind thing to say. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do women sometimes ignore the T to T ratio when creating profiles and posting pics of their "big tits" like it is the only big thing on them and is their defining feature? " You mean like all the dick pics guys post? I'm fat and I've got big tits, I don't really give a flying testicle if you agree with me or not, you simply don't have to look at my glorious fun bags. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have you ever been bra shopping OP? They don't go in to the larger sizes saying only if your this dress size do they class as big boobs. Boobs are boobs and are beautiful regardless but big boobs are big boobs, there's no changing that no matter what angle you try to swing it from" Yes I have | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh your T to T ratio reminds me of the B to B ratio that many men on Fab seem to forget too... brain to bollocks... " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ignoring the initial context of the post, I must say that the OP is an excellent debater. As this post grows in size he’s proving to be a very good mass-debater. I’ll get my coat rainbows Ignoring the initial context of the post makes that comment redundant no? " No, I’m referring to your replies | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think someone needs to take the spade away... poor bloke is in deep Well what did he expect? Saying that the back size changes how the boobs are perceived is nonsense. And the going on to congratulate someone for using the word fatter really didnt help! We are all perfectly aware of intention and it was never a kind thing to say." I’m not his defence counsel... just want to stop him digging deeper | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I cant believe 140 million sperm and you was the fastest one there " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should they have to consider anything other than what *they* are comfortable with posting OP? If they like the pic and are comfortable with it, that is all that matters surely? Pandering to a ridiculous (and frankly insulting) "ratio" shouldn't even come into it Pandering to the "white knight" or "charming gentleman" image is just as ridiculous. Being insulted, frankly or otherwise, on someone else's behalf is also ridiculous." Fully expected the "white knight" attempt at a get out - as usual thrown out to try and put down a rational response, so you've not disappointed - if that is what you want to think that is entirely your prerogative though - fortunately I know myself better, and stand by my comment. Who said I was insulted? I actually said it was insulting - there's a difference. Nice to see you chose to ignore the opening part of my comment too, says it all really | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? Yes, because the point of reference isn’t the wall, it’s the person looking through the window, and other windows they’ve seen previously. Similarly, boobs aren’t just compared relative to the person who has them, but also compared to all other people with boobs. Your argument is like saying that a man who is 8 feet tall with size 15 feet has small feet because they aren’t that big relative to the rest of him. Ask any shoe manufacturer and they’ll tell you: he has big feet. Very very true and the best logical argument against my original post. Although I dont think foot size to height is as relative to the ratio argument, I love your reasoning. Maybe the UR then is impression. Are all breasts then that have a screwed T to T ratio as impressive regardless of tit size? Are "big tits" as impressive" when the tummy is as large or larger? Again this is no negative judgement on larger ladies and after some thought, this can. Ot at all be compaired to guys and dick size. " If you want to convince us that this isn’t about body shaming you need to stop using phrases like “screwed T to T ratio”. If a ratio can be “screwed” then clearly your point is that you think some ratios are better than others, so you aren’t being anywhere near as neutral as you claim. Either you’re picking your words very poorly, or your mask is slipping. Either way, it isn’t just “women being touchy”, it’s because of what you’re writing and the clear implications of it. If you aren’t attracted to certain people, that’s fine. But what you’re trying to argue for is some sort of objective measurement that everyone else should get on board with. That’s not about you getting to have your preference, that’s about trying to get other people to care about it as well. To be honest I just find this whole thread bizarre, and it seems like you’re just trying to start an argument | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I cant believe 140 million sperm and you was the fastest one there " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh your T to T ratio reminds me of the B to B ratio that many men on Fab seem to forget too... brain to bollocks... " I prefer the BC to P- Brain Cell to Personality ratio | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. When? Where did I absolutely shame a persons body? Well you are a delight " To some yes. I am an acquired taste | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I cant believe 140 million sperm and you was the fastest one there " Grammar not your strong point then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think someone needs to take the spade away... poor bloke is in deep Well what did he expect? Saying that the back size changes how the boobs are perceived is nonsense. And the going on to congratulate someone for using the word fatter really didnt help! We are all perfectly aware of intention and it was never a kind thing to say." You are the type that sees your perception clearer than the words that were written and the intention in which they were used it seems | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? " No - you actually have small tits as a result. You can't claim they are large because they don't fit an imaginary ratio dreamt up by the OP. He has spoken | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do women sometimes ignore the T to T ratio when creating profiles and posting pics of their "big tits" like it is the only big thing on them and is their defining feature? You mean like all the dick pics guys post? I'm fat and I've got big tits, I don't really give a flying testicle if you agree with me or not, you simply don't have to look at my glorious fun bags. " I personally dont think you are fat. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why should they have to consider anything other than what *they* are comfortable with posting OP? If they like the pic and are comfortable with it, that is all that matters surely? Pandering to a ridiculous (and frankly insulting) "ratio" shouldn't even come into it Pandering to the "white knight" or "charming gentleman" image is just as ridiculous. Being insulted, frankly or otherwise, on someone else's behalf is also ridiculous. Fully expected the "white knight" attempt at a get out - as usual thrown out to try and put down a rational response, so you've not disappointed - if that is what you want to think that is entirely your prerogative though - fortunately I know myself better, and stand by my comment. Who said I was insulted? I actually said it was insulting - there's a difference. Nice to see you chose to ignore the opening part of my comment too, says it all really " Get out of what? I am ot trying to "get out". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? No - you actually have small tits as a result. You can't claim they are large because they don't fit an imaginary ratio dreamt up by the OP. He has spoken" I stand corrected | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do women sometimes ignore the T to T ratio when creating profiles and posting pics of their "big tits" like it is the only big thing on them and is their defining feature? You mean like all the dick pics guys post? I'm fat and I've got big tits, I don't really give a flying testicle if you agree with me or not, you simply don't have to look at my glorious fun bags. I personally dont think you are fat." I personally don't give a shit what you think | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. When? Where did I absolutely shame a persons body? Well you are a delight To some yes. I am an acquired taste" Well I'm glad I'm fat to keep people like you at bay. There is enough crap aimed at women's bodies without you making up ratios about them. Why can't everyone just be who they want? You should keep your small minded opinions to yourself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would " But he's telling us we ought to think about it before uploading pics, and that we can't call our tits big of we feel they are big, we must fit into this ratio that he's invented. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would " That's very generous. I think OP just doesn't like larger women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would " He clearly states that bigger women dont show all their bodies and just focus on tits, and if you read his profile he even rant on about it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would But he's telling us we ought to think about it before uploading pics, and that we can't call our tits big of we feel they are big, we must fit into this ratio that he's invented. " As I said, I don't think he has worded things in the best way possible, but I didn't see and orders or rules about what people can or can't do with their profile, merely the OP's opinion. Has nobody on here ever commented on one of the countless "why do some men only have pictures of their cock?" threads? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok I think there are a lot of women taking this personally because they dont understand the concept of the original post. Its simply a mathematical calculation. So I'll slightly change the hypothesis. Is a 5 ft wide window still a big window of if it's on a 100 ft wide wall compared to a 6 ft wide wall? I am not size shaming the wall. I'm just asking is big still big when surrounded by things just as big or bigger? Yes, because the point of reference isn’t the wall, it’s the person looking through the window, and other windows they’ve seen previously. Similarly, boobs aren’t just compared relative to the person who has them, but also compared to all other people with boobs. Your argument is like saying that a man who is 8 feet tall with size 15 feet has small feet because they aren’t that big relative to the rest of him. Ask any shoe manufacturer and they’ll tell you: he has big feet. Very very true and the best logical argument against my original post. Although I dont think foot size to height is as relative to the ratio argument, I love your reasoning. Maybe the UR then is impression. Are all breasts then that have a screwed T to T ratio as impressive regardless of tit size? Are "big tits" as impressive" when the tummy is as large or larger? Again this is no negative judgement on larger ladies and after some thought, this can. Ot at all be compaired to guys and dick size. If you want to convince us that this isn’t about body shaming you need to stop using phrases like “screwed T to T ratio”. If a ratio can be “screwed” then clearly your point is that you think some ratios are better than others, so you aren’t being anywhere near as neutral as you claim. Either you’re picking your words very poorly, or your mask is slipping. Either way, it isn’t just “women being touchy”, it’s because of what you’re writing and the clear implications of it. If you aren’t attracted to certain people, that’s fine. But what you’re trying to argue for is some sort of objective measurement that everyone else should get on board with. That’s not about you getting to have your preference, that’s about trying to get other people to care about it as well. To be honest I just find this whole thread bizarre, and it seems like you’re just trying to start an argument " Apologies, I meant skewed. Auto correct at its worst. A skewed ratio isna statistical term. Not an opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? " No. That is not at all what is being said in the original post. Or any if the other posts that followed. Regardless of other people's interpretations | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on. Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. An objective fact isn't the same as being objectified, OP. Mrs TMN What is the objective fact about the top pics table that doesn't objectify?" The "objective fact" referred to was your T to T ratio. Nothing to do with hot pics or objectification. Sorry if that went over your head, I was just trying to make sure you didn't make yourself look silly here. Mrs TMN | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Could someone please explain the question? The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI " Should larger women still be classed as having large boobs as a larger frame means said big boobs are actually proportionate to their bodies. Smaller frames with more breast tissue should truely hold the title of big boobed. (paraphrased) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would " Exactly Maybe inshouodnhave just got bored and shouted "tits out tuesday" and asked everyone to get their tits out eh? It seems like that is far more acceptable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? No. That is not at all what is being said in the original post. Or any if the other posts that followed. Regardless of other people's interpretations " Ach, why not just let it go mate? Whatever your thoughts were originally, your OP didn’t across very well. Save the fight for another day? Let’s get this to 175 as it’s upsetting too many who really don’t need the extra grief, intended or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah well, you can't beat a bit of body shaming, can you! Yes I have a tummy, yes, I have boobs, and yes my tummy should be smaller. I can live with it, as can the delicious men I meet. And that is all that really matters. Where did I shame anyone's body? My post was regarding size in proportion. Are you saying it is shameful to be a bigger lady? It is shameful to have a larger waist size than bra size? That is not very nice. You absolutely did. And now you are backtracking. When? Where did I absolutely shame a persons body? Well you are a delight To some yes. I am an acquired taste Well I'm glad I'm fat to keep people like you at bay. There is enough crap aimed at women's bodies without you making up ratios about them. Why can't everyone just be who they want? You should keep your small minded opinions to yourself. " You are internalizing this and not at all seeing that I never used the word fat and I never said that larger ladies were unattractive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would But he's telling us we ought to think about it before uploading pics, and that we can't call our tits big of we feel they are big, we must fit into this ratio that he's invented. " Everything regarding size fits into a ratio Me suggesting big tits are not as big as described in comparison to the rest of the body has nothing to do with body shaming or suggesting one size is better than the other. I never even said what size I think is best because that had no affect on facts on proportion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would That's very generous. I think OP just doesn't like larger women. " You are entirely wrong then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I personally think it is irresponsible and irrational to take something that wasn't given to you. So if I didnt give an insult, it should have never been taken. Especially on someone else's behalf. That is highly ignorant if you ask me. " Ah, I’ve spotted your other mistake and it’s the snippet above. Actually it doesn’t matter how you intended it, if it’s taken as insulting then it’s insulting. The only exception here is if you are talking to yourself. If you’re speaking or writing to someone else then how they receive the message and respond to it is the important thing; that’s how communication works. To think otherwise is either crass, ignorant or trying to avoid responsibility. Happy to help | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"He is a typical man im afraid ,keeps his brains in his underpants ! Please accept our apologies on his behalf x" I do not apologise and do not need anyone to apologise for me. You do not represent me. So just don't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"He clearly states that bigger women dont show all their bodies and just focus on tits, and if you read his profile he even rant on about it " No, the only thing he states is that that is his theory about why some ladies only show certain parts of their body. I'm not trying to defend his viewpoint, just the fact that I believe his words have been misconstrued. This is a forum, a place for open debate where people are allowed to have and express differing opinions | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would He clearly states that bigger women dont show all their bodies and just focus on tits, and if you read his profile he even rant on about it " You clearly didn't read my post and are clearly choosing to misquote me to support your interpretation of what I said rather than what I actually said. What I clearly said was "A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits" "A lot" not all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would But he's telling us we ought to think about it before uploading pics, and that we can't call our tits big of we feel they are big, we must fit into this ratio that he's invented. As I said, I don't think he has worded things in the best way possible, but I didn't see and orders or rules about what people can or can't do with their profile, merely the OP's opinion. Has nobody on here ever commented on one of the countless "why do some men only have pictures of their cock?" threads? " To be fair I chose my words to support my opinion and not to spare the sensitivity of strangers. I appreciate your honesty and your open mindedness | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on. Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. An objective fact isn't the same as being objectified, OP. Mrs TMN What is the objective fact about the top pics table that doesn't objectify? The "objective fact" referred to was your T to T ratio. Nothing to do with hot pics or objectification. Sorry if that went over your head, I was just trying to make sure you didn't make yourself look silly here. Mrs TMN " You said originally "an objective fact isn't the same as being objectified" did you not? Sorry if I am paraphrasing. Care to explain the objective fact and who is objectifying? Thank you for your concern though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Could someone please explain the question? The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI Should larger women still be classed as having large boobs as a larger frame means said big boobs are actually proportionate to their bodies. Smaller frames with more breast tissue should truely hold the title of big boobed. (paraphrased) " So this is where the confusion is because this is not what I am saying or what I intended to say it mean. My monster truck analogy earlier in the thread is more accurate | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I understand what the OP is trying to say and, while it perhaps worded in the best way possible, I don't think he was body shaming. Every woman will have their own "T to T ratio" (as he calls it) - so, if a woman who is a size 10 has small boobs, she will have a low ratio. If that woman then puts 5 stone in weight on, it's acceptable to assume that all parts of her body will become larger. So, even though her boobs will be bigger than they were previously, it's safe to assume that her ratio will be the same as before as the rest of her will also be bigger than before. Cut him some slack guys, I'm sure he's not the only person with too much time on their hands and thinking about random topics...I know I've certainly been doing that a lot more than I normally would Exactly Maybe inshouodnhave just got bored and shouted "tits out tuesday" and asked everyone to get their tits out eh? It seems like that is far more acceptable " I clearly should have proof read this to rectify the improper spelling and grammar. Apologies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? No. That is not at all what is being said in the original post. Or any if the other posts that followed. Regardless of other people's interpretations Ach, why not just let it go mate? Whatever your thoughts were originally, your OP didn’t across very well. Save the fight for another day? Let’s get this to 175 as it’s upsetting too many who really don’t need the extra grief, intended or not." Those people do not need to read or contribute. They can do as I have been told to do when I see a profile I do not like, simply ignore and over on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The T to T ratio. The Tits to Tummy ratio. Having "big tits" isnt simply about the size of the tits. It's the size of the tits in comparison to the rest of the body. A woman with E cup tits and a size 12 body has big tits. Even a size C with an 8-10 dress are big tits. A woman with E cup tits and a size 24 dress does not have big tits. She has small tits in comparison to the rest of her body. A lot women that post pictures of their "big tits" are big women with tits that are proportionate or small compared to their overall body size and probably why they do not post pictures of any other part of their body. Just tits. So remember the T to T ratio when thinking you have big tits. There is not a specific number to the ratio but it is based on common sense and maybe BMI" Fuck that’s deep, how long you been isolated dude? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok so what I get from this is that us larger ladies shouldn’t be claiming that we have big tits , just tits that happen to be larger because we’re overweight? No. That is not at all what is being said in the original post. Or any if the other posts that followed. Regardless of other people's interpretations Ach, why not just let it go mate? Whatever your thoughts were originally, your OP didn’t across very well. Save the fight for another day? Let’s get this to 175 as it’s upsetting too many who really don’t need the extra grief, intended or not. Those people do not need to read or contribute. They can do as I have been told to do when I see a profile I do not like, simply ignore and over on. " And many would I’m sure, under normal circumstances | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I personally think it is irresponsible and irrational to take something that wasn't given to you. So if I didnt give an insult, it should have never been taken. Especially on someone else's behalf. That is highly ignorant if you ask me. Ah, I’ve spotted your other mistake and it’s the snippet above. Actually it doesn’t matter how you intended it, if it’s taken as insulting then it’s insulting. The only exception here is if you are talking to yourself. If you’re speaking or writing to someone else then how they receive the message and respond to it is the important thing; that’s how communication works. To think otherwise is either crass, ignorant or trying to avoid responsibility. Happy to help " I that case, I find what you just said highly insulting and the most insulting thing I have ever read. I truly can't believe how insulting you are and I should make disparaging comments and judgments on your character based on my perception of what you said and not the intention with which you said it. You really should feel like such a despicable person and the lowest firm of life for being so shockingly insulting with your insulting words. Get my point?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . " I hate looking at my boobs when I’m leaning over the bath swishing the water, they look ducks beaks! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . " did you crack the tiles? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . did you crack the tiles? " No but i took out a bit of the grouting ... rather nice | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . did you crack the tiles? No but i took out a bit of the grouting ... rather nice " really saves the mold getting in | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . did you crack the tiles? No but i took out a bit of the grouting ... rather nice really saves the mold getting in " are they porcelain tiles? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think the original post means if women are big all over then they shouldn’t say they have big boobs they should just say they have boobs because they’d be in proportion with the rest of the body. If a slim woman has big natural boobs then she could say she has big boobs. Obviously people can say whatever they want about their bodies but that’s what I get from the thread. I don’t class myself as having big boobs because mine are enhanced so it’s cheating. " Well if a big woman has even bigger boobs then yes I'd say those are big boobs. For example larger ladies with macromastia. This is an extreme example of course. There are also a lot of women on here that have beautifully full and curvy figures with very large beautiful breasts that clearly have big boobs. There are also larger women with breasts that aren't that large co.oared to the rest of their body that are just as equally beautiful but in relation to the rest of their body, do not have big boobs. There are also my favourite type of women which have bot been mentioned here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey! Is this still going on ...ive had my tea ( tea and toast ) and a bath !!! Got out of the bath .. tits down to toes . Apologies . did you crack the tiles? No but i took out a bit of the grouting ... rather nice really saves the mold getting in " Rubbing my nips on the old porcelain tiles is as good as its going to get if i can clean up as i go ... superwoman!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"You're perfectly entitled to your preferences, OP. But dressing them up as though they're somehow objective fact isn't on. Tits on display on a website where you "fab" a pic and it gets put on a "top fab'd pics" league table and plenty of statuses saying "new pics uploaded go fab please" should not be objectified? And fab swingers is notable site for men and women looking for sexual attention I'm sure. An objective fact isn't the same as being objectified, OP. Mrs TMN What is the objective fact about the top pics table that doesn't objectify? The "objective fact" referred to was your T to T ratio. Nothing to do with hot pics or objectification. Sorry if that went over your head, I was just trying to make sure you didn't make yourself look silly here. Mrs TMN You said originally "an objective fact isn't the same as being objectified" did you not? Sorry if I am paraphrasing. Care to explain the objective fact and who is objectifying? Thank you for your concern though " Your original post about the T to T ratio was described by another poster as not being an objective fact. You responded to the poster talking about tit pics on here being objectified. I pointed out that they were not the same thing. It's all there in the reply and quote above. Happy to help. Mrs TMN | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |