Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do nice women out number nice men? " Yes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m nice  "Yes you are | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" Nice is in the eye of the beholder. I asked a question, it wasn't a marriage proposal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I know is, i am proper respectful  "Just before someone else asks - what exactly does 'proper' mean? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is." All well in good in theory, but when a group (men) are chasing a scarce resource (women who want no strings sex) it's those in charge of said scarce resource who have the power. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I know is, i am proper respectful
Just before someone else asks - what exactly does 'proper' mean?"Like, I'm not just respectful, but proper respectful
Hope this clear things up my friend | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ? Nice is in the eye of the beholder. I asked a question, it wasn't a marriage proposal." What does a 'nice' woman do ? ( im not asking for marriage ) Not got a scooby why you said that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" With the majority of men being filed in the scumbag category. And yes nice is vague and ambiguous and doesn't really mean anything.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I know is, i am proper respectful
Just before someone else asks - what exactly does 'proper' mean?
Like, I'm not just respectful, but proper respectful
Hope this clear things up my friend "It's cleared things up but didn't properly clear things up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would disagree, I would say simply men are far more upfront then woman, it's that that either one of us is nicer, just that men don't feel a need to pretend or hide it like a woman would so you see it more " Fallacy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" Sucks yer cock then makes you a cup of tea?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I know is, i am proper respectful
Just before someone else asks - what exactly does 'proper' mean?"Proper is in the eye of the beholder - he answered a question it wasn't a marriage proposal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would disagree, I would say simply men are far more upfront then woman, it's that that either one of us is nicer, just that men don't feel a need to pretend or hide it like a woman would so you see it more " I'd say its the other way round on here. Because of the ratios, women can be complete arses and still get blokes willing to shag them. If a man pisses off a woman, there's his chance of a shag gone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. All well in good in theory, but when a group (men) are chasing a scarce resource (women who want no strings sex) it's those in charge of said scarce resource who have the power. " I've never chased a woman for sex in my life and I'm not about to start now. However I have been quite aggressively chased by both men and women for sex. That might make me a more of a rare commodity on here but I don't think I should act with privilege just because I'm outweighed in that respect. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ? Sucks yer cock then makes you a cup of tea? "I guess a nice woman would | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" There are a few women who are all of those. I can’t say for men because I don’t really meet any but there must be mire than just me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ? Sucks yer cock then makes you a cup of tea? "You didn’t tell me I was nice | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. All well in good in theory, but when a group (men) are chasing a scarce resource (women who want no strings sex) it's those in charge of said scarce resource who have the power. I've never chased a woman for sex in my life and I'm not about to start now. However I have been quite aggressively chased by both men and women for sex. That might make me a more of a rare commodity on here but I don't think I should act with privilege just because I'm outweighed in that respect." Well done you, but it doesn't alter the basic reality that if a woman has fifteen blokes who want to have sex with her (the rough ratio of men to women on fabs) , she has far more power than any of those blokes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ? Nice is in the eye of the beholder. I asked a question, it wasn't a marriage proposal. What does a 'nice' woman do ? ( im not asking for marriage ) Not got a scooby why you said that." Nice things of course.
B | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is." You have to accept that men are the inferior being on here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A nice woman on here is someone who is aware of the control and power they have on here due to ratios but don’t use it.... A few on here (both sexes I’m sure) love the chase and the ego boost it gives them and don’t have the desire to meet up. " I couldn’t agree more actually | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. You have to accept that men are the inferior being on here. " I dont see any reason why. I'm certainly not inferior. I'm an egalitarian and proud. But I also don't act like life is a 1980s porno movie where's women are prizes to be fought over or won over with platitudes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question." When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A nice woman on here is someone who is aware of the control and power they have on here due to ratios but don’t use it.... A few on here (both sexes I’m sure) love the chase and the ego boost it gives them and don’t have the desire to meet up. " Dear god ... I’ve just read that back and my gramma is appalling .... I’m off to punish myself | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A nice woman on here is someone who is aware of the control and power they have on here due to ratios but don’t use it.... A few on here (both sexes I’m sure) love the chase and the ego boost it gives them and don’t have the desire to meet up. Dear god ... I’ve just read that back and my gramma is appalling .... I’m off to punish myself " You leave your poor granny alone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. You have to accept that men are the inferior being on here. " Are they hell. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. " Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" Love this GC! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. All well in good in theory, but when a group (men) are chasing a scarce resource (women who want no strings sex) it's those in charge of said scarce resource who have the power. I've never chased a woman for sex in my life and I'm not about to start now. However I have been quite aggressively chased by both men and women for sex. That might make me a more of a rare commodity on here but I don't think I should act with privilege just because I'm outweighed in that respect. Well done you, but it doesn't alter the basic reality that if a woman has fifteen blokes who want to have sex with her (the rough ratio of men to women on fabs) , she has far more power than any of those blokes " power to do what though lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? " We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A nice woman on here is someone who is aware of the control and power they have on here due to ratios but don’t use it.... A few on here (both sexes I’m sure) love the chase and the ego boost it gives them and don’t have the desire to meet up. Dear god ... I’ve just read that back and my gramma is appalling .... I’m off to punish myself You leave your poor granny alone." I’m not that brave to pick a fight I won’t win | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A nice woman on here is someone who is aware of the control and power they have on here due to ratios but don’t use it.... A few on here (both sexes I’m sure) love the chase and the ego boost it gives them and don’t have the desire to meet up. Dear god ... I’ve just read that back and my gramma is appalling .... I’m off to punish myself You leave your poor granny alone." shes hardly poor shes got gold gnashers apparently they don't rust in the glass | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. " Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. " Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . " Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"men may outnumber women but women rule remember sanitise between every text "They don't rule me. Speak for yourself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, " but 73.1% of all statistics are inaccurate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, but 73.1% of all statistics are inaccurate "Vic Reeves called from the 1990s, he wants his joke back. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, but 73.1% of all statistics are inaccurate
Vic Reeves called from the 1990s, he wants his joke back."omg hope he sanatises hes in the risk group | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, " No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. " lol its sunday get out in the sun all that math must be hurting your brain by now | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Contrafuckingversial......... 'nice' ....... is that even a word ? There are intelligent women here Sexy women here Respectful women here Kind women here Discerning women Independent women Thoughtful women Industrious Dirty Pervy Promiscuous Women with the ability to say no Women with the ability to take charge Doms Peggers World fucking leaders..... but nice....... hmmmmmmmmm Tell me what a 'nice' woman does ?" Be nice  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. " So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?" you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is." I reckon you've already fluffed it, because for the most part, women make MORE of an effort than men for a meet (well the meet itself) Numbers wise of course there are more nice men that women, purely because there are more men on here. Percentage wise fuck knows. Going on my own experience this far....I believe both sexes can be total cunts, it's down to each person as an individual. What I've found tho is some men will lie in your inbox, to get a foot in.... oh, and to their wives, girlfriends, fiancee. Some women will lie to your face, behind your back AND to their friends. Nice isn't gender specific. P | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"“Whether women are better than men I cannot say ... but i can say they are certainly no worse.” Golda Meir. There are no difference in niceness between the sexes. " I'm a white knight....... you look lovely | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be "Never chased or tried to chat a woman in my life, not about to start now. Oh, and I get more than enough, I have more respect for people than to white knight just to gain favour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be
Never chased or tried to chat a woman in my life, not about to start now. Oh, and I get more than enough, I have more respect for people than to white knight just to gain favour. "lol hey white knighting is my forté  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be
Never chased or tried to chat a woman in my life, not about to start now. Oh, and I get more than enough, I have more respect for people than to white knight just to gain favour. "so the woman that was rude to you and created this thread contacted you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find "nice" is not a characteristic I can trust in either sex. Nice can be a way in acting to get something you want. That's my opinion. But I love, love, love a "Nice" biscuit especially one's with the cream in the middle. Yummy "custard creams oh no give me ginger nuts everytime | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason I'm bringing this up is because people are always under the impression that because guts outnumber women, then women should be the ones calling the shots. As someone deeply opposed to all forms of prejudice and discrimination, the idea that men are a second class sex on here (or at least they should act like such) really is the most off putting trait that I come across frequently. If a women isn't prepared to make exactly the same effort as a man when it comes to messaging, general conversation or for a meet, then I walk on by, glad in the knowledge that I've dodged a bullet. Also, I don't expect people just to agree with me, this is after all, a discussion not a dictatorship. No matter how many white knights come out to say it is. I reckon you've already fluffed it, because for the most part, women make MORE of an effort than men for a meet (well the meet itself) Numbers wise of course there are more nice men that women, purely because there are more men on here. Percentage wise fuck knows. Going on my own experience this far....I believe both sexes can be total cunts, it's down to each person as an individual. What I've found tho is some men will lie in your inbox, to get a foot in.... oh, and to their wives, girlfriends, fiancee. Some women will lie to your face, behind your back AND to their friends. Nice isn't gender specific. P" Ain’t that the truth!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be
Never chased or tried to chat a woman in my life, not about to start now. Oh, and I get more than enough, I have more respect for people than to white knight just to gain favour. so the woman that was rude to you and created this thread contacted you? "I created this thread. Keep up dear | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not convinced that women outnumber men on this site when it comes down to people that anyone wants to spend any time with. Yes there's a huge numbers of keyboard wankers coming and going but if these aren't even in the running as far as people's choices are concerned, then I think there's maybe a 50/50 split between the sexes. The old 15 guys to every woman trope falls away if you dismiss the 14 guys nobody would even look twice at. In my own personal experience I will talk to 15 guys with manners, mutual respect and no over inflated sense of self importance for every woman on here who I speak to with the same qualities. I really don't witness the reported reality others seem to accept without question. When we've put up a meet for the next day , we've had more than a hundred messages. Even if 3/4 of them are time wasters, we've still got loads to choose from. Put up a meet as a single guy avd you'll be lucky if you get one message. Thats not my personal experience. But even so, that has nothing to do with describing how many of those potential meets are people you'd even want to meet. It also doesn't mean that there isn't many women, it might just mean that they know that men will pander to them so they don't bother investing the effort, giving an inflated sense of entitlement as well as an over inflated ego. You example didn't provide any useful information. Also, am I to assume women never reply to your ads? We generally meet single guys. When we put out a meet it's for single guys. As I say we get loads of responses. If you think there are loads of women on here, look at the first hundred profiles near you. You'll find roughly 75 men, 20 couples and 5 women. Just to clarify what you've said.... If (for example) there are 16 men to every woman on here and 75% of the men are arse holes but the other 25% are decent blokes, then decent blokes would outnumber women (not just decent women) by 4 to 1. The figure would be even higher if you eliminated those women who were also arseholes. I don't think you meant to agree with my first comment but you have. Thanks maths. Unless you assume that women are less likely to be arse holes (which I don't think you are) then the ratios remain roughly the same This if 75% of the 75% of men on here are arses that gives us roughly 18.75% decent men. But if 75% of the 5% women are also arses that means about 1.5% are not . Thus still around a 13 to 1 ratio. For your argument to work, you'd have to assert that men are much more likely to be arses than women . Except you've just shown that 18.75% of fabbers are decent men and only 3.5% of fabbers are decent women (your math) roughly 5 times more decent men than decent women. Bravo - you didn't mean to do that did you, No. I'm assuming based on your figure that 75% of both sexes are arses. If that's correct, then assuming a global 75% men and 5% women that gives us 18.75% decent men 64.25% men who are arses 1.5% decent women 3.5% women who are arses. The only way you can make your 4 to 1 theory work is if you assume that 75% men are arses and only about 10% of women are. That would then give you 18.75% of decent men to 4.5% decent women. So is there more (not percentage more) decent men than decent women on here if we use any of these assumed figures?you're missing the point......... women rule here the sooner you realise that the more successful you will be
Never chased or tried to chat a woman in my life, not about to start now. Oh, and I get more than enough, I have more respect for people than to white knight just to gain favour. so the woman that was rude to you and created this thread contacted you?
I created this thread. Keep up dear "hey you're too good for me, happy fabbing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
