Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't worry...I won't shove them in your face " From what I see you’re trim n tidy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't worry...I won't shove them in your face From what I see you’re trim n tidy" You're not looking closely enough | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It depends on the person. On a woman it turns my stomach and I'm always clean shaven, but love a really hairy guy. F." Your man looks neat n trimmed  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" What's horrid about the natural human form? Nobody would think twice about pubes if it wasn't for porn creating these social expectations  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
I love it  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x " I look after mine like a royal gardener  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I take care and pride in my full on hairy natural bush.
I love it "Me to  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Eeeww. Dont like pubes especially face pubes. " Or pubes all over your face ha ha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" OMG I totally agree. It’s so off putting for me anyways | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x " I was going to write something but this says it better. Can we pretend I wrote it? Thanks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x I was going to write something but this says it better. Can we pretend I wrote it? Thanks "Unfortunately our appearance is always a subject of judgement! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. " In a way I agree, each to their own and I'm actually a fan of individuality and non conformity, but doesn't the filter stance make you the same as them in that you're judging ppl for judging you, purely based on WHAT THEY THINK OF PUBES rather than what they think of you as a person or what their more important views in life are....? 
Not having a go I promise, just trying to stem the usual them and us argument and allow ppl to think, pause, ignore or reply to a simple thread innit, but who am I....?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. " Why is it childish ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x I was going to write something but this says it better. Can we pretend I wrote it? Thanks
Unfortunately our appearance is always a subject of judgement!"So therefore you feel justified in perpetuating the problem? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! Being down on our natural state is tiring in this day and age. People should do what they please with their body without fear of judgement x I was going to write something but this says it better. Can we pretend I wrote it? Thanks
Unfortunately our appearance is always a subject of judgement!
So therefore you feel justified in perpetuating the problem? "Yes i do! I defy anyone who does not judge (good or bad btw) on others appearance! Bear in mind compliments are a form of judgement too! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I once met a guy who tried to dictate how I should have my public hair. I pointed out that it was none of his business what I choose to do with my body. I didn't meet him again. " Quite right he’s out of order. By all means have a preference, but that’s where it stops! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I once met a guy who tried to dictate how I should have my public hair. I pointed out that it was none of his business what I choose to do with my body. I didn't meet him again. " i went into the bush once god i was in there for days   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes I'm bald as a billiard ball, sometimes trimmed, sometimes bristly, sometimes full-on 1970s massive bush with more hair in my knickers than on my head. Depends on my mood, but it's ultimately my choice, and in exactly the same way I wouldn't dictate to a man what he ought to do with his pubes, I wouldn't let him dictate to me either." youre a grower then | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. Why is it childish ? " Because a reply of “ewwwwww” on a thread about something we all have (although some get rid of) is, in my opinion, childish. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. Why is it childish ? Because a reply of “ewwwwww” on a thread about something we all have (although some get rid of) is, in my opinion, childish. " hey lovely you are a bush lover are you not fancy coming on safari with me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. Why is it childish ? Because a reply of “ewwwwww” on a thread about something we all have (although some get rid of) is, in my opinion, childish. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. Why is it childish ? Because a reply of “ewwwwww” on a thread about something we all have (although some get rid of) is, in my opinion, childish. " if the subject matter was something else would you still class the eeewww as childish ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. " We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid! What's horrid about the natural human form? Nobody would think twice about pubes if it wasn't for porn creating these social expectations "100% agree !! "Industrial" porn, as opposed to amateur porn, has a lot to answer for. Amateur portrays real people. Brings to mind the old New of the World masthead "All human life is here" or words to that effect..!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't worry...I won't shove them in your face " Spoilsport | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm sorry i don't believe anyone who says they wouldn't get intimate with someone they fancy and have got to know because when they got intimate they discovered hair its the same premise as the size of a mans cock its about the person first and the other things fall into place "Agree !! If you fancy each other, matters progress naturally !! For me personality and sex appeal every time !! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" It's all down to personal choice, OP and a full on bush/smooth or groomed area does NOT define a person. My preference is, nether regions groomed or shaved. However, if I really fancied the bloke and there was a connection, a full bush wouldn't put me off him . Incidentally mines changes on whether I have time/can be bothered or on mood. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Each to their own,personally I prefer shaved A"I personally shaved, it feels nicer on the tongue | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm sorry i don't believe anyone who says they wouldn't get intimate with someone they fancy and have got to know because when they got intimate they discovered hair its the same premise as the size of a mans cock its about the person first and the other things fall into place
Agree !! If you fancy each other, matters progress naturally !! For me personality and sex appeal every time !!"yes this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view" Really? So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view "Agree A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Really? So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak "Tolerance and a "live and let live" attitude seems to be in an ever growing short supply. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view Really? So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak "Googling Woke and PC courses available near me. Bye x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view Really? So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak "try reading ewwwww but with a positive jokey bias its sounds different dont you think? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak "This is very well put. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why oh why do so many *still* assume if someone chooses to retain their pubes in a manner they don't find appealing (which is fine) that by default the person(s) concerned can't possibly be taking care of, or pride in, their appearance? I'm 'natural' almost always because my skin's very sensitive and the alternative is, for me, a time consuming chore I can't usually be arsed with that usually ends in an unattractive and/or painful skin rash, nasty ingrown hairs or cuts. Now *that's* 'horrid' and it wreaks havoc on my self esteem! People style/alter myriad aspects of their appearance in all sorts of different ways - from the hair on their head, to tattoos and piercings, to bodybuilding, cosmetic surgery or even their clothing and makeup choices. Obviously we all have personal preferences and may be turned off by some of them. Doesn't mean they're not taking care of themselves though. To start this thread off by saying 'in this day and age...' isn't simply an observation about different pube preferences but an implied criticism towards people (and it's women who get most stick about it usually) who have the temerity to keep a full on bush, as if there's 'no excuse' to do so and they're somehow being lazy or letting the side down! "Very well said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view Really? So expressing a preference by putting down those who don't match that preference with unnecessarily negative terms such as 'vile', 'yuck', 'revolting', 'disgusting', 'ewwww', or 'foul' - all of which I've regularly seen on threads about pubic hair is okay because it prevents the world becoming a 'fluffy wuffy place'? By all means have a preference but surely you can own it in a positive way without resorting to childish or body shaming remarks? There are many who only find slimmer people attractive for example. Would it therefore be acceptable for them to express that preference in the forums by referring to larger people as 'vile'? After all we can't decide how people speak "If that's what they think I am not going to argue with them about it and no it wouldn't bother me but then I am a hard bitch They are not being personal to you or me by saying this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In the same way we all take pride in our appearance (each of us with our own style and preference), I would think this should stretch to our pubes when these are being offered and on display." I take pride in my appearance but I chose not to shave or wax my pubes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Saying you prefer smooth is absolutely fine, saying you prefer smooth because you find hairy vile, repulsive or even eeewwww puts a totally different spin on that preference and it's no wonder people react to it. " I mean I wouldn't and never have said a bush is vile....but why can't someone say that they think a bush is vile for THEM ? They are not picking any one person out or being personal to anyone at all It might not suit how you speak but why do they have to conform to how you think they should speak? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find a fully shaved vagina quite pubescent a little Brazilian is the way to go go." I really hope you don't actually mean vagina | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find a fully shaved vagina quite pubescent a little Brazilian is the way to go go. I really hope you don't actually mean vagina "Pussy,cunt,minge ..you know what i mean . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Saying you prefer smooth is absolutely fine, saying you prefer smooth because you find hairy vile, repulsive or even eeewwww puts a totally different spin on that preference and it's no wonder people react to it. I mean I wouldn't and never have said a bush is vile....but why can't someone say that they think a bush is vile for THEM ? They are not picking any one person out or being personal to anyone at all It might not suit how you speak but why do they have to conform to how you think they should speak?" Because they don't say a bush is vile "for THEM" (and even that without some balance as to why *could* be seen as derogatory) the tendency is to say it's vile full stop - which is both derogatory and actually picking on anyone that does have a bush. I'm not saying anyone should conform to anything either, other than common decency and respect - and using derogatory terms to express a preference, I think we would both agree, is neither of those things. I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" I take pride in my Afro pubes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Saying you prefer smooth is absolutely fine, saying you prefer smooth because you find hairy vile, repulsive or even eeewwww puts a totally different spin on that preference and it's no wonder people react to it. I mean I wouldn't and never have said a bush is vile....but why can't someone say that they think a bush is vile for THEM ? They are not picking any one person out or being personal to anyone at all It might not suit how you speak but why do they have to conform to how you think they should speak? Because they don't say a bush is vile "for THEM" (and even that without some balance as to why *could* be seen as derogatory) the tendency is to say it's vile full stop - which is both derogatory and actually picking on anyone that does have a bush. I'm not saying anyone should conform to anything either, other than common decency and respect - and using derogatory terms to express a preference, I think we would both agree, is neither of those things. I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. " All of this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. In a way I agree, each to their own and I'm actually a fan of individuality and non conformity, but doesn't the filter stance make you the same as them in that you're judging ppl for judging you, purely based on WHAT THEY THINK OF PUBES rather than what they think of you as a person or what their more important views in life are....?
Not having a go I promise, just trying to stem the usual them and us argument and allow ppl to think, pause, ignore or reply to a simple thread innit, but who am I....? "You’re nippy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. " I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it " I don't like feet either, to the point where I physically gag if someone touches mine but people have feet so am much as I don't like mine or other people's they are there and if I want to have sex, I have to put up with feet being around me. It should be the same for body hair surely? Everyone's personal preference and not dictated by what other people like or don't like? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These threads always make great filters. The way some childishly react to body hair, which is a natural phenomenon, always surprises me. Thank fuck those that message me are a bit more worldly. Why is it childish ? " Because the way the preference has been expressed doesn't indicate a very grownup attitude towards sex | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" You are perfectly entitled to your preference, but you are not entitled to tell others what they should do. Each to their own. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it " You may consider them "vile": difficult to stand up without them, unless you have prosthetic limbs...!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it You may consider them "vile": difficult to stand up without them, unless you have prosthetic limbs...!!" PS, no offence to anybodies feet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it I don't like feet either, to the point where I physically gag if someone touches mine but people have feet so am much as I don't like mine or other people's they are there and if I want to have sex, I have to put up with feet being around me. It should be the same for body hair surely? Everyone's personal preference and not dictated by what other people like or don't like? " I think you have missed the point of my post. None of my posts say that people should or shouldn't have body hair | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In today’s day n age shouldn’t we all take a little bit of care and pride of our pubes? Personally seeing pubes au naturale is horrid!" OMG I hate to see shaved balls I love hairy men, chest, arms, back and especially when it’s surrounding a decent sized cock. The more hair and the wilder it is the better. Massive turn on for me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personal preference is obviously expressed in a different way to body shaming. It's all in the way that it's done. We can't decide how people speak the same way as we can't decide whether they have a full bush or not I am beginning to think that the world is going to be a fluffy wuffy place with no real substance if people keep getting shot down for having a view" There's a difference entirely from saying someone prefers shaven or trimmed but to say someone's unclean or disgusting, untidy, not self respecting for having a bush is not acceptable form of stating a preference. If you don't like the bush fine but can't shame a person for having one. Someone said on the forum about the bush being unnatural and disgusting... if it was unnatural it wouldn't be there in the first place. The disposable razor and marketing to increase purchases started all the shaming of body hair. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm all for freedom of speech and defend anyones right to hold whatever preference they want, but personally think that describing something as "vile" "disgusting" or worse goes beyond expressing a simple preference. I think feet are vile, I don't touch anyone else's and if anyone came near mine they would be told to sod off. I defend my right to say that no matter who agrees with it I don't like feet either, to the point where I physically gag if someone touches mine but people have feet so am much as I don't like mine or other people's they are there and if I want to have sex, I have to put up with feet being around me. It should be the same for body hair surely? Everyone's personal preference and not dictated by what other people like or don't like? I think you have missed the point of my post. None of my posts say that people should or shouldn't have body hair " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
