FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Sharia Marriage

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Court of Appeal have ruled that a Sharia marriage that happened in a restaurant was not a marriage because it was not an official premises, not carried out by a licenced person and not on the superintendent register (in layman's terms) This means she is not entitled to divorce law protection in terms of financial settlement etc..

Victory for the law or not a victory for common sense?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *omnlynneCouple
over a year ago

milton keynes

its merely a case of the law is the law if your marriage wasn't legal regardless of religion then a divorce of said marriage cannot be legal either all the court of appeal has done is uphold the law as it stands sharia courts in Islam or any other religious courts should not be exempt for the law of the land its that simple

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So.......she is single eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

Doesn't offer the woman much protection though, does it. She could be cast out on the streets if the "husband" wanted to do so and she'd have no redress. Bear in mind women might have come to this country to marry, may not speak English well. I hope these things have been considered, if they apply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The court upheld are law Sharia is not recognized here which is correct it's the lady I feel for no doubt she will be chucked out I believe the law should now check what the said husband will do and check she was here of her free will .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Victory for the husband it seems

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om and JennieCouple
over a year ago

Chams or Socials

Apparently it’s quiet common - the men promise to follow up with a legal civil ceremony but then never do. I really feel for the women, they must feel trapped. And as for the men, well this behaviour disgusts me. In this case they have 4 children & if I’m right he doesn't have to pay maintenance. He should be ashamed of himself

J x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Apparently it’s quiet common - the men promise to follow up with a legal civil ceremony but then never do. I really feel for the women, they must feel trapped. And as for the men, well this behaviour disgusts me. In this case they have 4 children & if I’m right he doesn't have to pay maintenance. He should be ashamed of himself

J x"

You see, this is what pisses me right off. More than likely the lady has either taken significant time off work to raise the children or is a stay at home mum. How is she supposed to house, feed, clothe etc her kids? And before anyone says "CSA" it doesn't exist anymore. The directive is to make your own private arrangements. Which I'm sure the "husband" would be keen to do. Not. This is not a victory for women and children's rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"its merely a case of the law is the law if your marriage wasn't legal regardless of religion then a divorce of said marriage cannot be legal either all the court of appeal has done is uphold the law as it stands sharia courts in Islam or any other religious courts should not be exempt for the law of the land its that simple "

This!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *HaRiFMan
over a year ago

Beyond the shadows.


"Court of Appeal have ruled that a Sharia marriage that happened in a restaurant was not a marriage because it was not an official premises, not carried out by a licenced person and not on the superintendent register (in layman's terms) This means she is not entitled to divorce law protection in terms of financial settlement etc..

Victory for the law or not a victory for common sense?

"

Although people refer to it as Sharia law it isn’t actually law. She seemed like a cleaver women she should know better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

I don't think anyone is suggesting that Sharia law should be accepted in British courts, but many are justifiably concerned at the consequences for a woman with 4 kids who may be left with nothing. I don't care what religion or background people are from; I care about people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The actual marriage in islam is very simple given that everyone is consenting. Forced marriages are a different topic and have no place in Islam. Sadly many south asian cultural traditions (which are not right) get confused with religion and of course the leaders in them countries twist the religion to fit their culture.

Many registries and officials are happy to attend a mosque or venue to officiate the marriage.

The issue is, as someone has said previously, that the families need to ensure they are getting legally married. I’ve never heard of men getting married (religious ceremony) and then not following through with at the registry. But I am sure there will be men out there who do it.

As has been said previously we do not live under sharia law. And what that also means is the men getting married religiously, have no sharia court or punishment system when they leave their wives in shit situations. So they end up being able to do whatever the fuck they want. And then due to the cultural norms and the woman is looked at as if it is all her fault.

It’s a complex situation and the responsibility is on both parties to make sure they’ve covered their backs. Arranged marriages can work out very happily but the whole approach is different than to a love marriage.

Like many of these debates it really comes down to a case by case review.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sharia marriage is kind of wrong in the sense that the woman have no rights or say of who they will get married too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sharia marriage is kind of wrong in the sense that the woman have no rights or say of who they will get married too."

Thats absolutely incorrect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"The actual marriage in islam is very simple given that everyone is consenting. Forced marriages are a different topic and have no place in Islam. Sadly many south asian cultural traditions (which are not right) get confused with religion and of course the leaders in them countries twist the religion to fit their culture.

"

Thank you.

You are spot on.

The problem is most people look at these South Asians and some African countries as the standard of the religion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"Sharia marriage is kind of wrong in the sense that the woman have no rights or say of who they will get married too."

Where did you get that from?

None of my sisters, nieces, cousins have to undergo that what you said.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is why we need to scrap marriage legislation and extend the protection to all co-habiting couples. Too many people slip through the cracks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Victory for the husband it seems "
Yes I would say the same as it doesnt give the woman any protection there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top