FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Vaccine Testing on Animals

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

US Scientists are ready to test a Coronavirus on animals (ferrets) Should this be allowed ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cant they test it on paedophiles instead?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? "

Don’t be silly. What about their human rights?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead?

Don’t be silly. What about their human rights?!"

You have to be human to have human rights

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wistedTooCouple
over a year ago

Frimley

if It’s ready for testing, just use it. The virus is spreading fast. No testing on animals who didn’t even have the damn virus. If we die out, we die out. Shouldn’t be using animals to test how to keep dragging this disgraceful species on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

What’s the alternative?

I’ve never met a nice Rat? Can’t we pick on them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
over a year ago

La la land


"US Scientists are ready to test a Coronavirus on animals (ferrets) Should this be allowed ? "

Where did you read this? Can't find any reference to it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? "
should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists. "

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes"
why not all murderers?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes why not all murderers? "
ok pre meditated murderers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I guess it's a process we as a species have utilised for years, with a necessary aim.

If you eat meat, and have never hunted, or use animal products and oppose this process you're a hypocrite?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes why not all murderers? ok pre meditated murderers."

Better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes why not all murderers? ok pre meditated murderers.

Better "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What’s the alternative?

I’ve never met a nice Rat? Can’t we pick on them? "

Rats are awesome. I'd like a pet giant Gambian pouched rat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What’s the alternative?

I’ve never met a nice Rat? Can’t we pick on them?

Rats are awesome. I'd like a pet giant Gambian pouched rat. "
Rats are one of the best pets for kids and are very clever. I'd love one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks


"What’s the alternative?

I’ve never met a nice Rat? Can’t we pick on them?

Rats are awesome. I'd like a pet giant Gambian pouched rat. "

Having googled a Pouched Rat I no longer think we should experiment on them. They look cool

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What’s the alternative?

I’ve never met a nice Rat? Can’t we pick on them?

Rats are awesome. I'd like a pet giant Gambian pouched rat.

Having googled a Pouched Rat I no longer think we should experiment on them. They look cool "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Animals are innocent, Serial killers, paedophiles, murderers are not. They shouldnt have human rights as they are evil. I think its them that the tests should be carried out on x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eesideMan
over a year ago

margate sumwear by the sea


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? "

This ^^^^^

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London

I'm intrigued. These paedophiles on whom it should be tested, does it include all of them? A bloke aged 60 who patted a boy on a bottom thirty years ago and hasn't offended since. Does he qualify?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London


" I guess it's a process we as a species have utilised for years, with a necessary aim.

If you eat meat, and have never hunted, or use animal products and oppose this process you're a hypocrite?"

Indeed. I wonder if all the people wanting to kill the paedos think we should stop killing innocent animals for food and eat paedos and murderers instead.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eastAndTheHarlotCouple
over a year ago

Hartlepool

It's against the human rights act to force people into medical procedures so no, you can't test on pedos.

We test every single drug on animals. That's how drug trials work.

Test on animals

Test on healthy humans

Test on humans with he medical condition you want to treat

Every single drug we take has been tested on animals. You can't just grab a criminal to test random chemicals and drugs on. The CIA already tried that one and it didn't go down well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London


"It's against the human rights act to force people into medical procedures so no, you can't test on pedos.

We test every single drug on animals. That's how drug trials work.

Test on animals

Test on healthy humans

Test on humans with he medical condition you want to treat

Every single drug we take has been tested on animals. You can't just grab a criminal to test random chemicals and drugs on. The CIA already tried that one and it didn't go down well."

And of course medical experiments on outcasts from society is one of the things we find most horrifying about the Nazis.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *spotpleasurerMan
over a year ago

Norwich


"It's against the human rights act to force people into medical procedures so no, you can't test on pedos.

We test every single drug on animals. That's how drug trials work.

Test on animals

Test on healthy humans

Test on humans with he medical condition you want to treat

Every single drug we take has been tested on animals. You can't just grab a criminal to test random chemicals and drugs on. The CIA already tried that one and it didn't go down well."

How often do you hear about clinical trials on humans going wrong? People dying or getting seriously ill?

The answer: Very rarely, and the reason is there is extensive animal testing beforehand for every drug.

If you have a problem with animal testing, that's fine. We can go straight to humans and kill them, it's one or the other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *affeine DuskMan
over a year ago

Caerphilly


"US Scientists are ready to test a Coronavirus on animals (ferrets) Should this be allowed ? "

Source link?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Sky news

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

I think its scientists at Imperial College London who have made the significant breakthrough in the race for the vaccine.

Animal testing due this week...

No harm in highlighting its British scientists ... in this new age of going it alone we should learn to promote and herald everything great about Great Britain

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

And the poor animals ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cant they test it on paedophiles instead? should be the law to test on convicted paedos murderers rapists.

Not all murderers. The sadistic ones yes why not all murderers? ok pre meditated murderers."

All murders are premeditated, otherwise they would be manslaughter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

But it is it right ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They've tested on ferrets for a very long time for many many many things that has saved many many many many lives.

They've been working on vaccines for all kinds of coronavirus; as well as many other types of viruses that you can only start developing vaccines for as they come up (however people like to say they were designed by whomever to make money, which is disgusting.)

Research is ugly but until people want to create humans specifically to test in laboratories, this is the only alternative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top