FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

AIDS VACCINE

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

They've developed a vaccine that lessens the risk of getting Aids by a third.

While this is great news,they say a vaccine can't be used as such untill it has a preventative rate of 70-80%.

Still good news though.

However,they did trials on over 16,000 volunteers.

Some used placebo's etc,others the vaccine.

Wow,that took some bottle but what about the other 2 thirds of the volunteers that did contract Aids?

XXXX

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess

It's not quite that drastic. Of the 8,000 given the vaccine about 50 contracted the disease. Of the 8,000 given the placbo about 74 contracted the diesase.

I'm assuming neither group know which treatment they got and just went about their business normally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"It's not quite that drastic. Of the 8,000 given the vaccine about 50 contracted the disease. Of the 8,000 given the placbo about 74 contracted the diesase.

I'm assuming neither group know which treatment they got and just went about their business normally."

Reckon it'd be pretty drastic if you are one of the 50 or 74.

Guess they knew the risks at the outset though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Plenty of people that play bareback, so unless they changed their habits and usually wear condoms, they still had exactly the same risk. Regardless of the test, they would have contracted AIDs

The glass half full way to look at is that there are approximately 25 people that haven't contracted AIDs, but probably would have done had they not taken part

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imfromGlasgowMan
over a year ago

er...guess

Is a difference of 25 out of 16,000 statistically significant? Is that level of potentially saving lives worth the cost and effort?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel quite certain that they didn't take 16,000 Aids-free people and say to them, "Look, we're going to give you this vaccine for Aids and then deliberately expose you to the Aids virus to see how many of you get the disease."

This type of research has to be conducted over a specified length of time in an area where there is a high risk of contracting Aids during one's normal day to day life. The resulting figure then becomes indicative of of the overall population. Once a preventative rate of 80% is attained it can then be deemed as a vaccine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *itchfieldMan
over a year ago

Portsmouth


"Is a difference of 25 out of 16,000 statistically significant? Is that level of potentially saving lives worth the cost and effort?"

25 saved out of 8,000 wasn't it?

If we'd been able to save 30% of the HIV infected in Africa that'd be about 10 million people. There's 14,000 new infections every day.

This is promising news. It might not be a good enough vaccine to wipe out AIDS but it's progress nonetheless.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top