Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies." what so because u notice obvious details you have WHAT wow this world fucked | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Have you noticed that in television adverts " You actually watch television adverts? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Have you noticed that in television adverts You actually watch television adverts? " I know. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because if an advert had no white people, white people would lose their shit so they can't have them both be POC ." Perhaps he things there should be much more representation on tb adverts instead | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because if an advert had no white people, white people would lose their shit so they can't have them both be POC ." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because if an advert had no white people, white people would lose their shit so they can't have them both be POC . Perhaps he things there should be much more representation on tb adverts instead " What the OP thinks wasn't the question though. I'm sure he knows what he thinks already . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " " Because i don't want to have to take shit from posters who insist on reading something into a post that isn't there. And it detracts from the actual question. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " " I was waiting for the but I’ve got black Mates one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " I was waiting for the but I’ve got black Mates one " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting." Why do you find it interesting? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sure if you look on the BBC they made it the rule that every new show must have at least one none white person.And in most of any new retelling of a story. They have turned white people black and changed their sex. It's called being PC ." You mean the same way Hollywood and TV up-to the 1980s turned every story into White Caucasian. Such as an American playing an Egyptian woman and a Welshman playing an Italian | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sure if you look on the BBC they made it the rule that every new show must have at least one none white person.And in most of any new retelling of a story. They have turned white people black and changed their sex. It's called being PC ." It's called being inclusive and anti-oppresive | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? " would any one be that brave ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sure if you look on the BBC they made it the rule that every new show must have at least one none white person.And in most of any new retelling of a story. They have turned white people black and changed their sex. It's called being PC ." If you're going there...Let's add same sex, trans, women, disabled, elderly to the mix. All groups are catered for now, which in my opinion spoils some programmes. Was watching a recent film where a woman, the size of Victoria Beckham was holding her own in a fight with Dwayne Johnson: ridiculous! But hey...Let's just focus on race. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? " I rem_mber a couple proudly admitting to being racist. They went so far as looking at every verification from people who contacted them. If anyone had met a black person, or they had met someone who had met a black person, instant block. Don't know what happened to them though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sure if you look on the BBC they made it the rule that every new show must have at least one none white person.And in most of any new retelling of a story. They have turned white people black and changed their sex. It's called being PC ." Nah. THIS is defo of a prejudiced bent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting. Why do you find it interesting?" The question of why this is, particularly when it would be far more accurate to depict couples that are the same race regardless of colour. As i said, it's a tiny demographic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? " In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting. Why do you find it interesting? The question of why this is, particularly when it would be far more accurate to depict couples that are the same race regardless of colour. As i said, it's a tiny demographic." One in 12 is not a tiny demographic though is it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? " Nothing courageous in being racist or expressing those views. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? Nothing courageous in being racist or expressing those views. " He didn't say there was, he said they would be brave to openly admit it on here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies.what so because u notice obvious details you have WHAT wow this world fucked " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting. Why do you find it interesting? The question of why this is, particularly when it would be far more accurate to depict couples that are the same race regardless of colour. As i said, it's a tiny demographic. One in 12 is not a tiny demographic though is it?" Perhaps not but it's being depicted as though it's nearer 50/50. I was just eondering why. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? Nothing courageous in being racist or expressing those views. " my point was to admit it on a open forums perhaps used the wrong word maybe stupid I should of used | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? Nothing courageous in being racist or expressing those views. He didn't say there was, he said they would be brave to openly admit it on here" The word ‘brave’ could’ve been changed to stupid or ignorant a few others I could think of. Use brave and I’ll call you out on it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? Nothing courageous in being racist or expressing those views. my point was to admit it on a open forums perhaps used the wrong word maybe stupid I should of used " Agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’ve noticed this too OP and it’s just the company hedging their bets and covering a minority group or two. And to clear. I have brown skin. I fucking hate it when people say, oh I didn’t even notice your colour. Wtf? Are you blind? Are you not fucking seeing me? I much rather people say I’m not not being racist but... then asking a question. That to me is trying to learn and include." That's what i was getting at. There is no 'but' in my op because there's nothing overtly or covertly racist in it. It's nothing more than social commentary. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Even more controversial op adverts could have couples of the same sex imagine that " i am sure one of the car ads at the moment is a same sex female couple... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting." "The advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive?" This is the right answer. We have an online mob fighting about why the Friends series or Harry Potter didn't have diversity in major characters. You see the advertiser's point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Even more controversial op adverts could have couples of the same sex imagine that " That would be wrong its bad enough every other advert on channel 4 is 2 guys kissing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? I rem_mber a couple proudly admitting to being racist. They went so far as looking at every verification from people who contacted them. If anyone had met a black person, or they had met someone who had met a black person, instant block. Don't know what happened to them though. " i think they left when i shattered their dreams by telling them some of their friends were not as "pure" as they thought! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d suggest it’s to do with making minorities feel included where historically they have felt excluded. That’s why so much work is being done in recruitment from minority groups... we won’t get it right until we don’t notice it or need to specifically recruit from any groups " . Surly this in itself is racist? I would employ the best person for the job, no matter what their colour, religion or sex | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive." It’s neither. It’s to counter stereotypes in under represented demographic. I worked on some stuff to promote welding in 14-19 education and the advent used an attractive and interesting looking black female. Everyone said how PC because all the data from colleges shows it’s only thick white boys who study it. Well why is that black girls don’t feel like they can become a welder ? The advert is to challenge the stereotype | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d suggest it’s to do with making minorities feel included where historically they have felt excluded. That’s why so much work is being done in recruitment from minority groups... we won’t get it right until we don’t notice it or need to specifically recruit from any groups . Surly this in itself is racist? I would employ the best person for the job, no matter what their colour, religion or sex" It seems we just can't win. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies." I think this post here sums up the lack of tolerance and understanding of any kind of potentially useful dialogue regarding race and equality. The poster instantly jumps straight to a thinly veiled accusation of racism without discussion and with no knowledge of the poster he's responding to. Dialogue and discussion lead to tolerance, not unfounded and unwarranted accusations. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? I rem_mber a couple proudly admitting to being racist. They went so far as looking at every verification from people who contacted them. If anyone had met a black person, or they had met someone who had met a black person, instant block. Don't know what happened to them though. i think they left when i shattered their dreams by telling them some of their friends were not as "pure" as they thought! " Haha, you rock! I see this as a defence mechanism, I see other people do it too. You make yourself look and sound so thick, ignorant and nasty that no right minded person would even talk to you. Then you don't have to face people rejecting you because you can tell yourself it's because you deliberately set out to put them off. It's the only explanation I can think of for the way I've seen people present themselves. Nothing else makes any sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I think this post here sums up the lack of tolerance and understanding of any kind of potentially useful dialogue regarding race and equality. The poster instantly jumps straight to a thinly veiled accusation of racism without discussion and with no knowledge of the poster he's responding to. Dialogue and discussion lead to tolerance, not unfounded and unwarranted accusations." Without wanting to jump on the post i do think you're right and this kind of thing is unhelpful and divisive. Discussion is more useful than judgment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies." I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas." Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism " Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I think this post here sums up the lack of tolerance and understanding of any kind of potentially useful dialogue regarding race and equality. The poster instantly jumps straight to a thinly veiled accusation of racism without discussion and with no knowledge of the poster he's responding to. Dialogue and discussion lead to tolerance, not unfounded and unwarranted accusations." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this" Is this the ten minute argument or the full half hour ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d suggest it’s to do with making minorities feel included where historically they have felt excluded. That’s why so much work is being done in recruitment from minority groups... we won’t get it right until we don’t notice it or need to specifically recruit from any groups . Surly this in itself is racist? I would employ the best person for the job, no matter what their colour, religion or sex" Arguably, if you disagree with positive discrimination. Bit hard to feel equal if all represe rations you see on telly /in management at work are white. 84 % of the pop is white. So one in seven is non white. About time race shouldn't be an issue. And documented racism has increased 50% since 2016. Wonder why.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! " She makes many valid points to be fair | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this Is this the ten minute argument or the full half hour ?" Ooh. Bendy bananas? Racism AND homophobia..! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this" Yes! Let's have no bananas... Let's have no bananas today! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. " so if you’re not black you can’t have a say | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? I rem_mber a couple proudly admitting to being racist. They went so far as looking at every verification from people who contacted them. If anyone had met a black person, or they had met someone who had met a black person, instant block. Don't know what happened to them though. i think they left when i shattered their dreams by telling them some of their friends were not as "pure" as they thought! " That was a "fun" day on the forums. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d suggest it’s to do with making minorities feel included where historically they have felt excluded. That’s why so much work is being done in recruitment from minority groups... we won’t get it right until we don’t notice it or need to specifically recruit from any groups . Surly this in itself is racist? I would employ the best person for the job, no matter what their colour, religion or sex" Positive action is not racist, positve discrimination is... positive action is giving minorities the skills and abilities to provide them with the best opportunity to get the job... positive discrimination is giving them the job based on their minority status | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. " Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this Yes! Let's have no bananas... Let's have no bananas today! " Iv already had one, not up my bottom BTW | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this Yes! Let's have no bananas... Let's have no bananas today! Iv already had one, not up my bottom BTW " Did you know that bananas like the climate of a very, very tropical equator. So you should never put bananas in the refrigerator. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. I totally disagree. That's just like saying that anyone who used the word banana has a hidden dislike of bananas. Woooaaaaa don't you dare bring bananas into this Yes! Let's have no bananas... Let's have no bananas today! Iv already had one, not up my bottom BTW Did you know that bananas like the climate of a very, very tropical equator. So you should never put bananas in the refrigerator. " I haven't got a refrigerator or any bananas now,I have an advacado, shall I put that in? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Even more controversial op adverts could have couples of the same sex imagine that That would be wrong its bad enough every other advert on channel 4 is 2 guys kissing " Why are adverts showing 2 men kissing bad? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting." It's because they want our money, simple as. In the olden days when I was a kid growing up TV advertising was a sea of white faces. No one was interested in courting the black (or pink) pound. Now we are in a recession every sale counts and they want our dollar. Still rare to see an Indian or Chinese face represented tho. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so." Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf ... " I don't think i'm who they're pointing fingers at, but the implication seems to be the opposite of trying to think of people different to you... Should you not try and speak and act in a way that you earnestly believe is in the interests of people different to you as well as similar to you? "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out..." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. " My other half is white. He'll often ask "is such and such offensive? It was being discussed on lbc today..." My response is pretty much along similar lines: God save us from well meaning white people. Thing is certain white people get offended on behalf of minorities. Offended over things we really don't give a shit about. Conversely, we then get the flack for being over sensitive with chips on our shoulders when we've not uttered a word. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best." Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so. Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best." I'd actually value your opinion but you've already said you don't give a shit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so. Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best." I think you're being a bit unfair. You claimed yourself to speak for most black people. Don't do that. I haven't seen anything on this thread like you describe and I don't like the kind of self important virtue signalling you're talking about any more than you do. It's patronising and glib. But I don't see any of that here, just people trying to move things on. And... Not every victim of racism has black skin. I get what you're saying but I think you're seeing it where it doesn't exist is all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf ... I don't think i'm who they're pointing fingers at, but the implication seems to be the opposite of trying to think of people different to you... Should you not try and speak and act in a way that you earnestly believe is in the interests of people different to you as well as similar to you? "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out..."" You do know that verse was written by a Nazi don't you? It's meaning is quite different to what you think it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so. Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best. I think you're being a bit unfair. You claimed yourself to speak for most black people. Don't do that. I haven't seen anything on this thread like you describe and I don't like the kind of self important virtue signalling you're talking about any more than you do. It's patronising and glib. But I don't see any of that here, just people trying to move things on. And... Not every victim of racism has black skin. I get what you're saying but I think you're seeing it where it doesn't exist is all. " Just goes to show how we see things differently. I didn't see his comment as aimed at anyone on this thread, just a general comment that I, and every black person I know has said, and variations of at one point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best.Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours?" How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. Your behalf? you're an individual, no one is defending you as a single person, go nuts with your personal views and people trying to care about others will continue to do so. Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best. I think you're being a bit unfair. You claimed yourself to speak for most black people. Don't do that. I haven't seen anything on this thread like you describe and I don't like the kind of self important virtue signalling you're talking about any more than you do. It's patronising and glib. But I don't see any of that here, just people trying to move things on. And... Not every victim of racism has black skin. I get what you're saying but I think you're seeing it where it doesn't exist is all. Just goes to show how we see things differently. I didn't see his comment as aimed at anyone on this thread, just a general comment that I, and every black person I know has said, and variations of at one point." But it specifically mentions the posts on this thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf ... I don't think i'm who they're pointing fingers at, but the implication seems to be the opposite of trying to think of people different to you... Should you not try and speak and act in a way that you earnestly believe is in the interests of people different to you as well as similar to you? "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out..." You do know that verse was written by a Nazi don't you? It's meaning is quite different to what you think it is." Read your history. He was NOT a Nazi. Very much the opposite. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf ... I don't think i'm who they're pointing fingers at, but the implication seems to be the opposite of trying to think of people different to you... Should you not try and speak and act in a way that you earnestly believe is in the interests of people different to you as well as similar to you? "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out..." You do know that verse was written by a Nazi don't you? It's meaning is quite different to what you think it is. Read your history. He was NOT a Nazi. Very much the opposite. " He was a man who made a mistake and realised it and atoned for it and also suffered terribly for it, he was imprisoned in Auschwitz and Dachau. People make mistakes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best.Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours? How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. is it not a good thing that us pinky people do get offended? Perhaps if we didn’t us whities would probably still be watching the likes of Bernard manning and reruns of Alf garnett " Hang on, Bernard Manning yes but Alf Garnett, no. That was a satire, you weren't meant to agree with him | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. " Tbh I think you're talking back to the wrong person. I try and stay very much in the intelligent middle ground and have plenty of arguments with stupid ultra left idiots with purple hair about their bizarre view they adopted from a badly printed flyer on the issues I think your talking about. I reckon we'd probably agree here ultimately. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best.Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours? How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. is it not a good thing that us pinky people do get offended? Perhaps if we didn’t us whities would probably still be watching the likes of Bernard manning and reruns of Alf garnett Hang on, Bernard Manning yes but Alf Garnett, no. That was a satire, you weren't meant to agree with him " but some didn’t realise Alf was satire have you noticed it’s never been repeated on gold | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have noticed and said exactly the same thing myself. I'm mixed race and even I find it a bit pandering and virtue signalling. " My partner has noticed it and thinks the same. Advertising has always been pretty insidious, I guess I just didn't take much notice. It's all just manipulation to make money. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best.Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours? How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. is it not a good thing that us pinky people do get offended? Perhaps if we didn’t us whities would probably still be watching the likes of Bernard manning and reruns of Alf garnett Hang on, Bernard Manning yes but Alf Garnett, no. That was a satire, you weren't meant to agree with him but some didn’t realise Alf was satire have you noticed it’s never been repeated on gold " Yes and you're right in that sense, same with It Ain't Half Hot, Mum. Different time. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have noticed and said exactly the same thing myself. I'm mixed race and even I find it a bit pandering and virtue signalling. My partner has noticed it and thinks the same. Advertising has always been pretty insidious, I guess I just didn't take much notice. It's all just manipulation to make money. " Yeah that's true. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread " It's gone a bit off topic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. " People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair " Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid?" I’m not getting into this again | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dear White People, It pisses me off intensely when you get offended on my behalf on a subject that I, and most other black people, don't give a shit about. I have many other things to fill my life - your misplaced "right-on-ism" is of no use to me and you portray my race as petty and pedantic. Please think carefully before defending the colour of my skin. Get it wrong, and it's probably more offensive to my race than the original comment. Like many of the posts above. Thank you. " Yeah. To stand up to inequality is bad isn't it? There are 'one or two' non white people who seem to welcome support. So maybe don't presume to assume you know the thoughts and feelings of all? MLK and Malcolm X sure had a few words to say. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Thanks for that response. You demonstrate quite clearly how little you actually care about black peoples' feelings in comparison to your own narcissistic needs. I've always said, if you want a black person's opinion, ask a white person. They have always felt that they know best.Oh no no, you seem to just be doing the exact opposite of what you're complaining about, which is, therefore, pretty similar. I wouldn't dream for speaking on behalf of my entire demographic (or any one of the hundreds I could be said to be part of) yet you seem happy to do so for yours? How many black people saying a similar thing would it take to convince you? Google "white people being offended on behalf of black people" and read some of the results. Maybe it will have an effect on you, maybe it won't, but to be honest, I doubt you will read any. is it not a good thing that us pinky people do get offended? Perhaps if we didn’t us whities would probably still be watching the likes of Bernard manning and reruns of Alf garnett Hang on, Bernard Manning yes but Alf Garnett, no. That was a satire, you weren't meant to agree with him but some didn’t realise Alf was satire have you noticed it’s never been repeated on gold " Or love thy neighbour | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid?" Maybe her opinion on what type ofcoffin she wants? S | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Hang on, Bernard Manning yes but Alf Garnett, no. That was a satire, you weren't meant to agree with him but some didn’t realise Alf was satire have you noticed it’s never been repeated on gold Or love thy neighbour " Not a chance, and Mind Your Language. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Have you noticed that in television adverts You actually watch television adverts? " Do you rem_mber a time when the adverts were as entertaining or more so than the actual programmes? Sadly no more it seems. A constant round of charity appeals, numerous lotteries run for the benefit of various charities, online casinos and betting sites and of course not forgetting the ever present DFS sale. Bring back the Gold Blend couple, the Oxo family and the Milky Bar kid. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Have you noticed that in television adverts You actually watch television adverts? Do you rem_mber a time when the adverts were as entertaining or more so than the actual programmes? Sadly no more it seems. A constant round of charity appeals, numerous lotteries run for the benefit of various charities, online casinos and betting sites and of course not forgetting the ever present DFS sale. Bring back the Gold Blend couple, the Oxo family and the Milky Bar kid. " Linda Bellingham had very nice breasts. Apropos of nothing I just wanted to think about boobs to cheer meself up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums " Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I worked on some stuff to promote welding in 14-19 education and the advent used an attractive and interesting looking black female. Everyone said how PC because all the data from colleges shows it’s only thick white boys who study it. Well why is that black girls don’t feel like they can become a welder ? The advert is to challenge the stereotype Isn't this Flashdance?" Am thinking of the scene in the full monty now "Her mix is all to cock! Them joints won't hold fuck all!" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Linda Bellingham had very nice breasts. Apropos of nothing I just wanted to think about boobs to cheer meself up " I'm still wondering what she and Mr Oxo got up to in Preston. Hotel meet maybe? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected"" Race race race, its just a word, women aren't racist when they put "no blacks or Asians" on their profile, or are they? Hmmm anyway I'm going watching man utd get beat again | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid? I’m not getting into this again " Fair enough. Although I guess an unfortunate consequence of saying that the opinions of a well known hate preacher are valid but then won't/don't expand on that is that people can only really jump to one conclusion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " " Because he was expressing a view about something and in this pathetically ridiculous world, if anyone is offended in the slightest they will pull the "Racism" card! The Racism card is played so often these days, that real Racism is in danger of being overlooked or ignored. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " Because he was expressing a view about something and in this pathetically ridiculous world, if anyone is offended in the slightest they will pull the "Racism" card! The Racism card is played so often these days, that real Racism is in danger of being overlooked or ignored." And people are so ovine it's insulting to sheep to describe them thus. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid? I’m not getting into this again Fair enough. Although I guess an unfortunate consequence of saying that the opinions of a well known hate preacher are valid but then won't/don't expand on that is that people can only really jump to one conclusion." You did this in a previous thread, you didn’t manage to successfully undermine me or my views in that one either. How about you just accept differing view points without casting aspersions? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is massive difference between "Racism" and being "Offended". There is a massive difference between expressing an opinion and Racism! Do not play the Racism card unless it is actually Racism! " And i didn't even express an opinion, i just pointed something out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What if someone openly admits to being racist on here, what happens then, do the forum openly attack him/her? Do they get banned from fab? would any one be that brave ? In the main few are that stupid (interesting that you used brave) because most racists recognise that racism is vile and despite brexit empowering the right most people recognise that being openly racist unless surrounded by other racists gets the reaction it deserves. Not an "open attack" just being called out. So they hide behind it (because it's odd how people that inevitably claim to tell it how it is and dont care who it offends rarely actually see that through) and just stick to praising katie Hopkins or Tommy Robinson when their names get dragged on to the forums but still to cowardly to admit being a racist and wont actually say what it is they like about well know racists. And back on topic I didn't think that the OP was being overtly racist more just another 'PC gone mad' rant without recognizing that that inevitably comes with an element of casual racism Fricking love these comments. So firmly in a thoughtful, intelligent place than a knee jerk in any direction. Hmm yes Katie Hopkins. I was the one sitting on the naughty step last week for replying to some suggesting Hopkins "just says what we're all thinking"! She makes many valid points to be fair Which of katie hopkins opinions do you think are most valid? I’m not getting into this again Fair enough. Although I guess an unfortunate consequence of saying that the opinions of a well known hate preacher are valid but then won't/don't expand on that is that people can only really jump to one conclusion. You did this in a previous thread, you didn’t manage to successfully undermine me or my views in that one either. How about you just accept differing view points without casting aspersions? " Or how about to avoid confusion you expand on what it is about Katie Hopkins you like? Like a discussion, convince me that she's not just vile racist soundbites and share what other qualities I'm unaware of that you admire? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As others have said " why do you have to make it clear your not a racist ? " Because he was expressing a view about something and in this pathetically ridiculous world, if anyone is offended in the slightest they will pull the "Racism" card! The Racism card is played so often these days, that real Racism is in danger of being overlooked or ignored." I agree wholeheartedly with your second paragraph. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected" Race race race, its just a word, women aren't racist when they put "no blacks or Asians" on their profile, or are they? Hmmm anyway I'm going watching man utd get beat again" Many would argue that it may be an indicator that they may be. Practically the same as no blacks no Irish. And that isn't collectively thought of as racist is it..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting." Ad break at half time of Ireland v Scotland just now on STV had seven adverts, all but two of which only had white people in them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected" Race race race, its just a word, women aren't racist when they put "no blacks or Asians" on their profile, or are they? Hmmm anyway I'm going watching man utd get beat again Many would argue that it may be an indicator that they may be. Practically the same as no blacks no Irish. And that isn't collectively thought of as racist is it..?" I think with preferences it's often how they are presented. The more shouty and aggressive it's expressed the less I suspect it's just a preference | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. " Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. " Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’d suggest it’s to do with making minorities feel included where historically they have felt excluded. That’s why so much work is being done in recruitment from minority groups... we won’t get it right until we don’t notice it or need to specifically recruit from any groups . Surly this in itself is racist? I would employ the best person for the job, no matter what their colour, religion or sex Arguably, if you disagree with positive discrimination. Bit hard to feel equal if all represe rations you see on telly /in management at work are white. 84 % of the pop is white. So one in seven is non white. About time race shouldn't be an issue. And documented racism has increased 50% since 2016. Wonder why.. " . I know I am going to get a slating here but could it be that it is so easy for people to use the race card as s get out of jail free card. Get out of jail card is not literal | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all." Unless it affects proportions employed in a certain industry, then this can be reflected in numbers in reports regarding representation, and therefore it is, literally, positive of course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all. Unless it affects proportions employed in a certain industry, then this can be reflected in numbers in reports regarding representation, and therefore it is, literally, positive of course. " No-one should EVER be employed based on their skin colour at the expense of someone else better qualified. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected" Race race race, its just a word, women aren't racist when they put "no blacks or Asians" on their profile, or are they? Hmmm anyway I'm going watching man utd get beat again Many would argue that it may be an indicator that they may be. Practically the same as no blacks no Irish. And that isn't collectively thought of as racist is it..?" "my preference" but the question is why don't they prefer blacks and asians | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wow. What a horrible ignorant thread It's gone a bit off topic. People do love to jump in and twist things in a manipulative way in order to argue and belittle. Shame. Puts lots off the forums Indeed. Another thing i've noticed is that whenever a thread like this is posted it always seems to be whites that take the greatest offence. If there is social conditioning it appears to be working: "ooh, he mentioned race, i must decry him because that's what's expected" Race race race, its just a word, women aren't racist when they put "no blacks or Asians" on their profile, or are they? Hmmm anyway I'm going watching man utd get beat again Many would argue that it may be an indicator that they may be. Practically the same as no blacks no Irish. And that isn't collectively thought of as racist is it..?" Absolute CRAP! Saying no Blacks, Asians, Irish or whatever is a PREFERENCE, it is NOT RACISM! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all. Unless it affects proportions employed in a certain industry, then this can be reflected in numbers in reports regarding representation, and therefore it is, literally, positive of course. No-one should EVER be employed based on their skin colour at the expense of someone else better qualified. " People could be equally appropriate regardless of qualifications.bit harder to access higher education if you're of a certain skin colour. So qualifications are another barrier. Opportu ities and all that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all. Unless it affects proportions employed in a certain industry, then this can be reflected in numbers in reports regarding representation, and therefore it is, literally, positive of course. No-one should EVER be employed based on their skin colour at the expense of someone else better qualified. " As above, I disagree. If, for example, the police force policing an area looks more like the community the cover, offenders are more likely to realise they can't blame race for their offenses and may take more of a look at their choices. Stop oversimplifying things. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No-one should EVER be employed based on their skin colour at the expense of someone else better qualified. " Some industries are traditionally very demographic specific. In those industries it doesn’t hurt in the short term to prioritise other demographics in order to make that industry more overt in the mindset of those who may have been put off by the apparent lack of opportunity for their race/sex/age group etc. and thus provide a more balanced work force in the long term. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people have totally misunderstood the original post. Wouldn't the people in China feel odd when they see plenty of white people in their ads shown to be living in China? OP's point was that why are there so many interracial couples on ads when you don't see that many in real life? That's a perfectly valid point. That's just an attempt by ad makers to keep all sections of their society happy. Of course, some people will be triggered by seeing such posts and start shouting racism just like they do for every fucking thing that's happening around." It's called virtue signaling. Something western society has been very prolific in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some people have totally misunderstood the original post. Wouldn't the people in China feel odd when they see plenty of white people in their ads shown to be living in China? OP's point was that why are there so many interracial couples on ads when you don't see that many in real life? That's a perfectly valid point. That's just an attempt by ad makers to keep all sections of their society happy. Of course, some people will be triggered by seeing such posts and start shouting racism just like they do for every fucking thing that's happening around. It's called virtue signaling. Something western society has been very prolific in." Had to look up what it means. Yes. That's the apt term for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ask Google why. The answers are consistent. But it seems like the start of a new era in being group specific. Its targeted advertising, obviously. " But targeted at who? I doubt they are targeting mixed race couples. Instead I'd guess it's focussed on modern, young, engaged people with progressive outlooks..? Not exactly a bad motivation, but it still feels pretty artificial in the ads. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ask Google why. The answers are consistent. But it seems like the start of a new era in being group specific. Its targeted advertising, obviously. But targeted at who? I doubt they are targeting mixed race couples. Instead I'd guess it's focussed on modern, young, engaged people with progressive outlooks..? Not exactly a bad motivation, but it still feels pretty artificial in the ads." I think it's because advertisers want to be seen to be including ethnic minorities without excluding whites. Where couples are depicted, therefore, making them mixed race is the most obvious solution. And no, it's not a bad motivation. The entire ethos of advertising is artificial. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I want to make that clear before i continue. Have you noticed that in television adverts that depict couples it seems to be that in every second one the couple is mixed race. Given that this is such a tiny demographic (2018 figures show that only 7% of all couples were mixed race) one has to wonder why they're so commonly represented in this way. Could this be social conditioning or simply the advertisers cynical attempt to make their products appear more inclusive? Again, before i get shot down in flames, i know it's not that important and it certainly doesn't bother me. I just find it interesting." White people are the majority so by your logic only they should be represented in tv adverts? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's temporary. All adverts used to be just whites. This current phase of adverts is in recognition of non whites so when adverts reverts back to Whites only, no complaints will be made. " No one's complaining now and i'm not sure how it's possible that some suggest that i think advertising should be purely the preserve of whites. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Great filter thread BTW " Aye. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. " Allow me to suggest The noticing I do not think suggests racist tendencies however Starting a thread about something so trivial does | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. Allow me to suggest The noticing I do not think suggests racist tendencies however Starting a thread about something so trivial does" that is your suggestion, totally ignoring the OP who stated he is NOT. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. Allow me to suggest The noticing I do not think suggests racist tendencies however Starting a thread about something so trivial does that is your suggestion, totally ignoring the OP who stated he is NOT." 1. just because someone says they're not racist doesn't mean they aren't And 2. The fact that he is so bothered by something so trivial surrounding races does suggest that there are some underlying racist tendencies there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. Allow me to suggest The noticing I do not think suggests racist tendencies however Starting a thread about something so trivial does that is your suggestion, totally ignoring the OP who stated he is NOT. 1. just because someone says they're not racist doesn't mean they aren't And 2. The fact that he is so bothered by something so trivial surrounding races does suggest that there are some underlying racist tendencies there " 1 - Absolutely. It's not something you can assert about yourself. 2 - Absolutely not. He is not "bothered" by it from anything I can see, he was simply observing it. It's a pitiful place to live when you aren't allowed to be curious or observant without you being accused of whatever anyone wants to throw at you as a result. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m in market and I’m not white. The reason is to resonate with as much of your target audience as possible. Brands don’t target by race but their target consumer are different races, and they try to resonate with everyone." I’m in marketing I mean | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some would say that the fact you even notice is a sign you do have some racist tendencies. Allow me to suggest The noticing I do not think suggests racist tendencies however Starting a thread about something so trivial does that is your suggestion, totally ignoring the OP who stated he is NOT. 1. just because someone says they're not racist doesn't mean they aren't And 2. The fact that he is so bothered by something so trivial surrounding races does suggest that there are some underlying racist tendencies there 1 - Absolutely. It's not something you can assert about yourself. 2 - Absolutely not. He is not "bothered" by it from anything I can see, he was simply observing it. It's a pitiful place to live when you aren't allowed to be curious or observant without you being accused of whatever anyone wants to throw at you as a result." Starting a thread and asking why do they cater to mixed relationships when they only make up 7% of the uk seems bothered to me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What amuses me greatly is when mainstream media outlets cry "ONLY 9% OF BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THE BBC!" when there's like 4% of black people in the entire country. I think the only complaint anyone should have is an underrepresentation of white people. Yes, potentially seems reasonable. I think there are some good cases. For positive discrimination on certain circumstances, like community policing though. Positive discrimination is an oxymoron, because there's literally nothing positive about it at all. Unless it affects proportions employed in a certain industry, then this can be reflected in numbers in reports regarding representation, and therefore it is, literally, positive of course. No-one should EVER be employed based on their skin colour at the expense of someone else better qualified. " 'cos that has never happened in this white male dominated overpriviledged public schoolboy run country...oh wait.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |