FabSwingers.com forum: Royals

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

50 million quid taken from the tax payer including 2 and a half mill to renovate there cottage and then they abscond. Isn't it time we got rid of the whole lot of inbred squalid intellectually bereft freeloaders. How can you be genuflective because of an accident of birth. Outdated defunct undemocratic.Oh and where are the charges that should be brought against dimwit Andy.. given the same circumstances you or i would be clapped in irons.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *dward_TeagueMan
over a year ago

wolverhampton

Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers. "
I didnt say it did but the money stated did.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Travelling

I'm going to take a guess, now bare with me here, that you are not a fan.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong "
Paris has more visitors than uk and it had the good sense to execute there royals.tourists dont come for the royal family they dont get to see them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *dward_TeagueMan
over a year ago

wolverhampton

It strikes me that they’re either very badly advised or Harry is a bit of a petulant hot head.

As Charles takes on more of his mother’s duties, he’s trying to modernise/streamline the Monarchy which is a good thing. The sooner Harry realises that he’s slipping down the pecking order the better. They screwed up after their African tour last year and with this latest announcement they are isolating themselves even more.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No keep them they are our Micky Mouse and brink money into the country. Anyone with and intelligence realises their value to British industry. Said that we don't really need more than the core royals but the main ones leep them its a job and lie in any job you have holidays and time away from it.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *dward_TeagueMan
over a year ago

wolverhampton

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers. I didnt say it did but the money stated did."

The majority of Harry’s money comes from the Duchy of Cornwall not the state.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *andare63Man
over a year ago

oldham

"50 million quid taken from the tax payer including 2 and a half mill to renovate there cottage and then they abscond. Isn't it time we got rid of the whole lot of inbred squalid intellectually bereft freeloaders. How can you be genuflective because of an accident of birth. Outdated defunct undemocratic.Oh and where are the charges that should be brought against dimwit Andy.. given the same circumstances you or i would be clapped in irons."

Is that you Jeremy?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ustonce1Man
over a year ago

Leicester

95% comes from charles

5% from the queen

I SAY FAIR PLAY TOO THEM BOTH

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales

"It strikes me that they’re either very badly advised or Harry is a bit of a petulant hot head.

To be honest i’d say it’s Meghan who wears the trousers in that relationship and i think she’s currently wearing Harry’s balls as earrings.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *dward_TeagueMan
over a year ago

wolverhampton

"It strikes me that they’re either very badly advised or Harry is a bit of a petulant hot head.

To be honest i’d say it’s Meghan who wears the trousers in that relationship and i think she’s currently wearing Harry’s balls as earrings.

Indeed, that’s the impression I have.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"No keep them they are our Micky Mouse and brink money into the country. Anyone with and intelligence realises their value to British industry. Said that we don't really need more than the core royals but the main ones leep them its a job and lie in any job you have holidays and time away from it. "
cutting fucking cuttingribbons and squeezing flesh and having a flunky wearing brass eppollettes cleaning your hole after you defecate. I wonder what his job title is

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"No keep them they are our Micky Mouse and brink money into the country. Anyone with and intelligence realises their value to British industry. Said that we don't really need more than the core royals but the main ones leep them its a job and lie in any job you have holidays and time away from it. cutting fucking cuttingribbons and squeezing flesh and having a flunky wearing brass eppollettes cleaning your hole after you defecate. I wonder what his job title is"

It could be worse we have porkers also employed by the state who carry out institutionalised racism they are no better.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

It's a sort of collective hysteria that keeps them poncing and thriving at our expense . You dont have to be a socialist which I'm not to recognise the folly of this archaic outdated institution.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *cloversCouple
over a year ago

Hull

I am not a supporter of the Royals. AT all. The arguments about them creating wealth through tourism is not a reasonable for me.

Quirk of fate, inter marriage or whichever theory of enthronement put them there is also clearly irrelevant.

As individuals I would probably like some and detest others. As i would in every other sphere of my life.

However I understand they have a whole swathe of support for their ongoing institution from many quarters. I also understand their wrong doings are not met in the same as mine or yours would do. However our wrong doings will be lost in the midst of time and cross the boughs of only a fraction of people. They, like Andrew, will be known by millions of people and be recorded in the annals of history & forever be remarked upon by media repeatedly resurfacing stories for different generations. Punishment enough? I don't know - he hasn't been found guilty but he has been tried publically by his own admissions and is bearing the weight of the punishments that are being regally bestowed on him and sadly his children

Remember it's not their fault.

In regards to Harry and her - I've lost of respect for this young man who in his earlier days seemed a very affable young chap - royal or not. He is now as far up his bottom as he can get. Now I don't have an issue if they want to step back - but sit down as well!!! Be in or out - don't be dipping your toes when you feel like it, you are financially independent already - stop taking from the tax payers honey pot. Pay a fair rent for your cottage - its ours not yours. Financially independent don't get things for free including your security

Any how I'm on a rant I'd better stop!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it works out we give them like 50p a year each

I'm not against the royal family so I don't care

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"I am not a supporter of the Royals. AT all. The arguments about them creating wealth through tourism is not a reasonable for me.

Quirk of fate, inter marriage or whichever theory of enthronement put them there is also clearly irrelevant.

As individuals I would probably like some and detest others. As i would in every other sphere of my life.

Remember it's not their fault.

Any how I'm on a rant I'd better stop! "

Frogmore cottage belongs to the Queen, not us

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"I am not a supporter of the Royals. AT all. The arguments about them creating wealth through tourism is not a reasonable for me.

Quirk of fate, inter marriage or whichever theory of enthronement put them there is also clearly irrelevant.

As individuals I would probably like some and detest others. As i would in every other sphere of my life.

Remember it's not their fault.

Any how I'm on a rant I'd better stop!

Frogmore cottage belongs to the Queen, not us

"
she didnt pay for its renovation though did she.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong Paris has more visitors than uk and it had the good sense to execute there royals.tourists dont come for the royal family they dont get to see them."

Actually I see them quite often

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong Paris has more visitors than uk and it had the good sense to execute there royals.tourists dont come for the royal family they dont get to see them.

Actually I see them quite often"
you must live in Canada then

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury

Bring out the guillotine!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"Bring out the guillotine!"
I'd sharpen the blade and next would be the kardasians

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury

"Bring out the guillotine!I'd sharpen the blade and next would be the kardasians"

Not the house of lords?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

For all those going on about how much money they cost. Go research and read about the Crown Estate, the Sovereign Grant and the Duchy of Lancaster as examples, that will explain where the Queen gets her money, how it’s made up and where it ends up !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"I am not a supporter of the Royals. AT all. The arguments about them creating wealth through tourism is not a reasonable for me.

Quirk of fate, inter marriage or whichever theory of enthronement put them there is also clearly irrelevant.

As individuals I would probably like some and detest others. As i would in every other sphere of my life.

Remember it's not their fault.

Any how I'm on a rant I'd better stop!

Frogmore cottage belongs to the Queen, not us

she didnt pay for its renovation though did she. "

No the taxpayer did, still doesn't make it ours. As a taxpayer , I have private and dental healthcare and I have no children, but I'm happy for some of my taxes to go towards those things , as I am for a few pence to go towards our royal family, I don't get to choose either, where my taxes go

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers. "

Don’t speak facts. They don’t want to hear that.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

"I think it works out we give them like 50p a year each

I'm not against the royal family so I don't care "

You’d think it was half our yearly salary the way some are going on.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Don’t speak facts. They don’t want to hear that."

Then you shout until they have no choice but to listen.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Don’t speak facts. They don’t want to hear that.

Then you shout until they have no choice but to listen."

I wouldn’t waste my time personally.

It’s far more entertaining watching people virtually foam at the mouth at H&M.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rwhowhatwherewhyMan
over a year ago

Aylesbury

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Don’t speak facts. They don’t want to hear that.

Then you shout until they have no choice but to listen.

I wouldn’t waste my time personally.

It’s far more entertaining watching people virtually foam at the mouth at H&M."

I feel compelled to correct people myself. I cant stand misinformation.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hatYorkLadMan
over a year ago

York

What happens to the military if the monarchy is gone? Currently they swear allegiance to the crown, not the government, which is a good thing as it means they don't technically have to do the governments bidding in certain circumstances.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong Paris has more visitors than uk and it had the good sense to execute there royals.tourists dont come for the royal family they dont get to see them.

Actually I see them quite oftenyou must live in Canada then"

The poster lives in Norfolk, home of Sandringham house, which the Queen owns, she is seen out and about in the area. The house was bought in 1862 for the then Prince of Wales and has remained in the Royal family

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"I think it works out we give them like 50p a year each

I'm not against the royal family so I don't care

You’d think it was half our yearly salary the way some are going on. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *est Wales WifeCouple
over a year ago

Near Carmarthen

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers. "

Around £345 million of it does though.

How do you think historically the monarchy got rich? They stole it.

The concept of one family being genetically superior is bonkers and being entitled to castles and untold riches whilst people sleep on the streets is obscene (as is people being accepting of it).

The monarchy has never been funded like other public bodies, which are usually set an annual budget based on what they actually need to spend.

Until 2013, the costs of the monarchy – that's the Queen in her role as head of state and the other working royals – were funded by a civil list payment and a number of separate grants covering travel, property maintenance, communications and other expenses.

All these costs have now been rolled into one single annual payment called the “Sovereign Grant”. This has been set at 25% of surplus revenue from the crown estate - a publicly-owned property portfolio - resulting in a payment of £76.1m for 2017/2018.

However, the Sovereign Grant is just one part of the total cost of the monarchy. The royal family's security bill is picked up by the metropolitan police, for example, while the costs of royal visits are borne by local councils.

Meanwhile, income from the Duchy of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall – despite belonging to the nation - goes directly to the Queen and Prince Charles respectively, depriving the treasury of tens of millions of pounds every year.

When all this hidden expenditure is included, the real cost of the monarchy to British taxpayers is likely to be around £345m annually.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Around £345 million of it does though.

How do you think historically the monarchy got rich? They stole it.

The concept of one family being genetically superior is bonkers and being entitled to castles and untold riches whilst people sleep on the streets is obscene (as is people being accepting of it).

The monarchy has never been funded like other public bodies, which are usually set an annual budget based on what they actually need to spend.

When all this hidden expenditure is included, the real cost of the monarchy to British taxpayers is likely to be around £345m annually."

And as my maths is crap, how much is that per capita?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Around £345 million of it does though.

How do you think historically the monarchy got rich? They stole it.

The concept of one family being genetically superior is bonkers and being entitled to castles and untold riches whilst people sleep on the streets is obscene (as is people being accepting of it).

The monarchy has never been funded like other public bodies, which are usually set an annual budget based on what they actually need to spend.

When all this hidden expenditure is included, the real cost of the monarchy to British taxpayers is likely to be around £345m annually."
here here

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

I reckon that's about 50p

yep off with their heads

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

That isn't the point 50 p or 500 quid...its the ethical conundrum that cant be justified when so many exist in poverty and deprivation.society should be a meritocracy that first and foremost takes care of those marginalised.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not too keen on them then no?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"That isn't the point 50 p or 500 quid...its the ethical conundrum that cant be justified when so many exist in poverty and deprivation.society should be a meritocracy that first and foremost takes care of those marginalised."

If you say so

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Watching this thread. Some of the judgements are simply

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

Fuck ..you again

If you say so

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"Watching this thread. Some of the judgements are simply

. "

Always sparks a good debate doesn't it!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

Fuck ..you again

If you say so

Sorry?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you think the poor would be better off without the monarchy, dream on, it would make no difference imo.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

If you think the poor would be better off without the monarchy, dream on, it would make no difference imo. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ensualbicockMan
over a year ago

liverpool wavertree picton clock

Booooooo !!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

Would you like your 50p refunded but cash or cheque? How will you spend it?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

Would you like your 50p refunded but cash or cheque? How will you spend it?

Haha

love it!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Watching this thread. Some of the judgements are simply

. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"Im not defending them but you need to check your facts. Most of their income does not come from the taxpayers.

Around £345 million of it does though.

How do you think historically the monarchy got rich? They stole it.

The concept of one family being genetically superior is bonkers and being entitled to castles and untold riches whilst people sleep on the streets is obscene (as is people being accepting of it).

The monarchy has never been funded like other public bodies, which are usually set an annual budget based on what they actually need to spend.

When all this hidden expenditure is included, the real cost of the monarchy to British taxpayers is likely to be around £345m annually."

and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year "

Would you rather the Royals had your £1.24, or somebody suffering from a painful and terminal illness? The bulk of the UK Royal's original funds come from the r*pe of other country's resources, slavery and drug sales.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year "

Yeah mine too

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I’m more Cromwellian in my Royalist views.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

The Duchy of Cornwall gets loads of money per year when people die intestate but it mostly all goes to charity.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

Interesting.......

They haven't taken any money from the taxpayer.

Prince Andrew will only be charged if there's evidence he's committed a crime.

Two down......

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t "

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

As for my £1.24 helping an individual with a terminal illness, it might if the government decided to spend it that way

Be grateful we have a free health care system, that provides the best treatment it can.

One day we will go the way of the rest of the world and pay for your treatment

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?"

Oh my face palm... not worth a response !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?"

How are the Royal Family continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales?

Evidence please.

Thanks.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"As for my £1.24 helping an individual with a terminal illness, it might if the government decided to spend it that way

Be grateful we have a free health care system, that provides the best treatment it can.

One day we will go the way of the rest of the world and pay for your treatment "

Yes

I have no idea where my taxes go, but hopefully they're helping someone

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

Other countries' resources, possibly at the time the whole of Europe spent time fighting between themselves cos they were greedy fuckers and believed they were entitled to be royal head of that state (and when Kings actually went to war). The same happened in this country.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?"

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

How are the Royal Family continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales?

Evidence please.

Thanks."

There's lots of evidence, but you'll have to look for it. Questioning it and demanding evidence that I can't link to because of site rules does not make my point invalid. Money gained from the methods I mentioned was invested in land and other resources that continue to provide revenue.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from? "

Education.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ok, so to appease the angry, bitter, brigade let's get rid of them.

I'm pretty sure you'll wake up the following day and feel absolutely no difference. Happy now?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn. "

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education."

Bwahahahahahahahaha

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

How are the Royal Family continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales?

Evidence please.

Thanks.

Feel free to PM your evidence.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education.

Bwahahahahahahahaha"

Why do you laugh at education? What's wrong with you?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel sorry for the Queen. Head of the country and head of the most disfunctional family in the UK.

Lets just hope when Harry fucks off he takes Uncle Andrew with him.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education.

Bwahahahahahahahaha

Why do you laugh at education? What's wrong with you?"

What's wrong with me?

I've just bust a rib......

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education.

Bwahahahahahahahaha

Why do you laugh at education? What's wrong with you?

What's wrong with me?

I've just bust a rib......"

I've sent you some links. When you've read them all please feel free to discuss it further like an adult, if you wish.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education.

Bwahahahahahahahaha

Why do you laugh at education? What's wrong with you?

What's wrong with me?

I've just bust a rib......

I've sent you some links. When you've read them all please feel free to discuss it further like an adult, if you wish."

Ta. I'll educate myself further later.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

The royal family exists because society accepted the idea over time of them giving up political power in exchange for titular power and retention of hereditary privilege.

Without the crown, they are just another aristocratic family with huge personal wealth.

An elected head of state probably would cost less.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago

Dudley

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Ok, let's punish people for something that happened way before they were born. Get a grip.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham

"The royal family exists because society accepted the idea over time of them giving up political power in exchange for titular power and retention of hereditary privilege.

Without the crown, they are just another aristocratic family with huge personal wealth.

An elected head of state probably would cost less."

Works in America .. oh .. wait .. hang on ...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The problem with today's world is that everyone believes they have the right to express an opinion AND have others listen to it.

The correct statement of individual rights is that everyone has the right to an opinion, but crucially that opinion can be roundly ignored and be made fun of particularly if its demonstrably nonsense!

Plaguirised.

But applies to some the nonsense statements on here!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Ok, let's punish people for something that happened way before they were born. Get a grip. "

Before who was born? The royal family? And what punishment are you talking about? I mentioned no punishment. People all over the world pay for things that were done by their ancestors in one way or another. White people in the US have payed reparations for slavery in many ways, and they certainly weren't born when slavery flourished there.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it "
,

Why take his passport?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

"We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it ,

Why take his passport?"

Probably because he dares mention he wants to live somewhere else other than the U.K.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it ,

Why take his passport?

Probably because he dares mention he wants to live somewhere else other than the U.K. "

Aah

I thought he'd become the devil incarnate!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *alcon404Man
over a year ago

London

" Ok, so to appease the angry, bitter, brigade let's get rid of them.

I'm pretty sure you'll wake up the following day and feel absolutely no difference. Happy now?"

This.

So many people who dislike Harry & Meghan wanted the media to stop posting about them, they wanted them to stand down or disappear.

And now they have decided to do so, the same people are still angry as fuck.

Can’t win.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

" Ok, so to appease the angry, bitter, brigade let's get rid of them.

I'm pretty sure you'll wake up the following day and feel absolutely no difference. Happy now?

This.

So many people who dislike Harry & Meghan wanted the media to stop posting about them, they wanted them to stand down or disappear.

And now they have decided to do so, the same people are still angry as fuck.

Can’t win. "

You can't

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side. "

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous"

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

I worked there too and no he’s not

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

I worked there too and no he’s not

I worked at Lloyds and wasn't either

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

I worked there too and no he’s not

Discreet

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

Yes they are rich. We all know that

As per the accounts published we are also fully aware of what she receives from the government from land that the crown owns and the royalty have owned for hundreds of years, it its there in black and white for all to see.

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

I worked there too and no he’s not

Discreet

Off with his head

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Oops

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous

Ooh are you allowed to divulge that information?

That the Royal family are multimillionaires?

RBS have enough troubles leaki g actually private data all on their own to call the pot black

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think it works out we give them like 50p a year each

I'm not against the royal family so I don't care "

Same here. As far as Harry and Meghan, as far as I can tell, they want to pay their own way in life by working independently so stepping back is a good thing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I blame the bloody French

a sneaky ‘pretend-to-run-way trick to win. Bad eggs!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"and the other 75% of the crown estate goes to...... ?

The Treasury. £343 million for 2018/2019 profit from the crown estate management of its portfolio

The Queen also pays tax on her private income from the Duchy of Lancaster and her private holdings, like her stud farm and other alike businesses and properties

I will say no more !

Hey look at me.... I paid tax like everybody else in the land.

On property that was given to my family for free.

Taxation is an act parliemnt (one she is actually exempt from) why should be treated differently.

These tax (payments) are made voluntarily. On a select part of her holdings not all of them.

Most of her wealth come from her mother... About (£70 mil) And guess how much inheritance tax she paid. Zilch

You said it. She voluntarily chooses to pay tax when she doesn’t need to

The two properties she owns were left to her by her father

I don’t begrudge them anything and changing history is never going to happen. Live with it .... the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Voluntary but in this case means... compromise

When labour got Into power and had a massive review on their finances.

The payments where made "In lieu" of tax. They never made a tax payment before this

The value of the payments are hidden and only The privy purse and only apply to gains of disposal of assets made after the 90s so even if they sold the lot tomorrow

. The govt would get bugger all

I worked for coutts where the queen's personal holdings are held. Even with a cursory glance of a few documents these people are stupendously rich

Their expensees are covered by the state and they have taxation rights that would have google and Starbucks cream their pants

Your are entitle to support them but to say they ONLY cost £1.24 (67 million) is disingenuous"

Seriously if you did work for Coutts I'd be messaging admin and asking for this to be deleted and hiding my profile.

It never fails to amaze me what people disclose on a swingers forum where the tabloids are known to sniff around

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Every country has a past and a bad history, ours is no different.

Do you really think if the crown estate and her public holdings we sold off the British public would see a penny if it .... of course they wouldn’t

So continuing to profit from slavery and drug sales is ok because they're royalty?

Where are you getting your "facts" from?

Education.

Bwahahahahahahahaha

Why do you laugh at education? What's wrong with you?

What's wrong with me?

I've just bust a rib......

I've sent you some links. When you've read them all please feel free to discuss it further like an adult, if you wish.

Ta. I'll educate myself further later.

Excellent. When you read the articles, bear in mind the following example. If a person robs another person, and uses that money to buy a car which they then use as a taxi. The money they earn in that taxi is profiting from the proceeds of a crime. If they then retire and give the car to their adult child who continues to use it to earn money, that person is still profiting from the proceeds of a crime. At what stage do you think this situation is no longer a crime? At what stage do you think that it would be morally reprehensible to knowingly continue to profit from the proceeds of a crime? Yes, many wealthy families and royals from other countries prosper in this way, but it doesn't make it right.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it "

Taking his passport from him is probably going to be counter productive if you want to send him packing though?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"We say sack them take there titles off em send them packing and get rid of his uknoassport while you are at it

Taking his passport from him is probably going to be counter productive if you want to send him packing though?"

D’oh!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *etite_delightWoman
over a year ago

BunnyLand

I believe they should have a right to withdraw themselves from Royal titles but few things they said sound like a fantasy talk to me.

What is even mean become financially independent? I honestly can not imagine neither of them gonna go to 9-5 or shift round jobs or work 24/7 for their own business- what kind of job they can do without the security of Royals anyway. That’s what it means to most of us , right?

So in basic sentence; They want to have a celebrity/Love Island couple lifestyle with few billion in their bank so the interest can keep them living a life of millionaires without the restriction of the Queen.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The problem with today's world is that everyone believes they have the right to express an opinion AND have others listen to it.

Plaguirised.

But applies to some the nonsense statements on here!"

Plagiarised? What is?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"I believe they should have a right to withdraw themselves from Royal titles but few things they said sound like a fantasy talk to me.

Spose she could go back to acting and advertising jeans

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki. "

The opium trade was conducted by the British East India Company, operating under Royal Charter. Wikipedia is a bit like education for dummies, it only shows a small vignette of the whole story. A granted Royal Charter means that a significant percentage of the profits went into the royal coffers.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to"

I’m sure your job at the MOD also had you sign a confidentiality agreement to, which prohibits most from stating they actually work there !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to

I’m sure your job at the MOD also had you sign a confidentiality agreement to, which prohibits most from stating they actually work there ! "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And we'll never be royals

It don't run in our blood

That kind of lux just ain't for us

We crave a different kind of buzz

Let me be your ruler, you can call me Queen B

And baby I'll rule (I'll rule I'll rule I'll rule)

Let me live that fantasy

Royals

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't blame them. The media have been nothing short of spiteful to Megan. Everything she has done has been criticised. And Harry is more aware than most of us, how the media will hound someone until their dying day. He just doesn't want that for his wife. Or his family growing up in a country where their mother is ripped apart in public. Both want to continue supporting their charities and performing royal duties. They just want a better life.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to

I’m sure your job at the MOD also had you sign a confidentiality agreement to, which prohibits most from stating they actually work there ! "

Right after I was issued my

Omega watch

Bironi tailored suit

Walther ppk

And 00 status

They name is bond... Bond trader.

Thats is the most up to date cv role anyway

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

Wiki isn't the greatest of sources but adequate in what I required, as in time line.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to

I’m sure your job at the MOD also had you sign a confidentiality agreement to, which prohibits most from stating they actually work there !

Right after I was issued my

Omega watch

Bironi tailored suit

Walther ppk

And 00 status

They name is bond... Bond trader.

Thats is the most up to date cv role anyway

No wrong building, that’s them down the road

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *tingly ByronMan
over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot

"Yes they are rich. We all know that

As for what you disclosed, you’ve just breached basic confidentiality !

Some people don't seen to have understanding of data protection

... the accounts published (sic)

If it publicly held information it is not afforded data protection how can it be.

It like mcdonald's sayingg you can't look at are (publicly) listed finances. Which shows we make millions

I'm more than happy to list my cv. Which includes the MOD which had me sign an oath to die if necessary for this family.

If you all want to support them that fine. I choose not to

I’m sure your job at the MOD also had you sign a confidentiality agreement to, which prohibits most from stating they actually work there ! "

True story.

One of the key phrases is "fit a proper".

One measure of "fit and proper" is not blabbing to half the world you work there.

As BM said ^^^^, the stuff people divulge on here is mind boggling.

Mostly in an attempt to be "more knowledgeable" than other people.

*Facepalm emoji please.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?"

Of course. I mentioned it in a post above, but I'll repeat it for you. From the profits of slavery, drug trade etc the British Royal Family purchased land, buildings, shares in various commodities - diamonds, gold etc. They still own the vast majority of these and still profit from them. If a person robs another person, and uses that money to buy a car which they then use as a taxi. The money they earn in that taxi is profiting from the proceeds of a crime. If they then retire and give the car to their adult child who continues to use it to earn money, that person is still profiting from the proceeds of a crime. At what stage do you think this situation is no longer a crime? At what stage do you think that it would be morally reprehensible to knowingly continue to profit from the proceeds of a crime? Yes, many wealthy families and royals from other countries prosper in this way, but it doesn't make it right.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ensualbicockMan
over a year ago

liverpool wavertree picton clock

Booo down with that sort of thing

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

But does it make it wrong ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

Actually, being pedantic, but it wasn't the British Royal family. Scotland had their own king. And what with, from Henry viii, going from Catholicism to Protestant to Catholicism and so on, until an act of Parliament decreeing no Catholic ascension (I think after James II), the current British monarch's relationship to Elizabeth I is as tenuous as me being a cousin to Elizabeth via an ancestor on her non Royal side.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lint-EverhardMan
over a year ago

Perpignan and cap

No, definitely not.

Otherwise we'd all become French and where would that lead us?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Believe me.. there is more to this than meets the eye and more to follow

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

Ok, so that's a fairly insignificant and debatable point so I won't dwell on it - what about the rest?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

Also, it's not relevant that there is little or no familial relationship between Elizabeth 1 and Elizabeth 2. Land titles, holdings, rights and privileges have largely been bequeathed from Royal Household to Royal Household.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

So one minute your giving example of father to son re profits of crime, then you're agreeing there are tenuous familial ties between the 2 lizzies. You can't have it both ways.

Also, there is no evidence of a crime... Or put it this way, put the Queen before a court and a decent solicitor will have her free in no time.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

They haven't repaid their debt to us yet, it should not be disbanded until that's been done.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

Yes I would but better still we get rid and build a whole heap of hospitals with the saved revenue

Would you like your 50p refunded but cash or cheque? How will you spend it?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

No, definitely not.

Otherwise we'd all become French and where would that lead us? "
toward greater sophistication

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lanemikeMan
over a year ago

Bolton

What a truly sick outlook. Our Royal family is truly wonderful and every citizen of the United Kingdom should be immensely proud of them...as I am.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Travelling

What a truly sick outlook. Our Royal family is truly wonderful and every citizen of the United Kingdom should be immensely proud of them...as I am. "

I'm in different, so don't really care either way.

But why should they? I often see this outlook from people with nothing really to back up their opinion or claim. Just that we should just be happy they are there.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

Ok, so the Queen does get a lot of money per annum. It takes a lot of money to look after the castles and estates. What would we do with those if we we became a Republic. That is our history, our tourism. Thousands of people flock to these sites every year to connect with England's past and would want to continue to do so. As they do in Versailles in France. Who picks up the check for the upkeep of these places? Currently it comes out of the Queens purse. When Windsor needs repairs the taxpayer does not pay the Queen does and she considers it her home and states that she should pay for repairs on her own home.

Historic estates and Castle are costly to upkeep and are being lost to time. The question I pit is do we want to loose the history that makes us?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

No, definitely not.

Otherwise we'd all become French and where would that lead us? toward greater sophistication"

Have you studied French history at all?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What a truly sick outlook. Our Royal family is truly wonderful and every citizen of the United Kingdom should be immensely proud of them...as I am.

I'm in different, so don't really care either way.

But why should they? I often see this outlook from people with nothing really to back up their opinion or claim. Just that we should just be happy they are there. "

Likewise here, indifferent. I like history, and that does include the monarchy, but I'm not proud as subject to the Queen. In fact, if my nan's great x5 uncle had been her ancestor instead of his brother, I'd probably be a Princess (margaret, for example

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So much misinformation, hot air and outrage blown around by people.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *hezuMan
over a year ago

London

I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I dont mind the royals. My life would probably be the same with or without them

They can keep my 50p a year. Chances are I lose more than that down back of the sofa and I'm more bothered about losing that than the royals

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *r_Jake70Man
over a year ago

London

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong "

This is a common misconception the royal household pretty much count everyone that walks past a royal residency in those figures. Relatively few people visit the UK purely because of the royal family, but many of them will take in Buckingham Palace because it’s there.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

Yup, there was a comedian I cant remember his name, who labelled her the nazi queen

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

The Hanover line

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *omerset tvTV/TS
over a year ago

Weston-super-Mare

I just hope Megan remembers to wear a seatbelt each time she goes out in a car now

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

Has been for a very long time !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ervent_fervourMan
over a year ago

Halifax

"I reckon that's about 50p

yep off with their heads

£345 million might provide homes for some of the people we have to step around sleeping in doorways.

Or free breakfasts in schools for children who havent eaten seei g as mum and dad had to put the heating on instead.

Just a few kids innit.

But. No. Who's going to miss a few pence in our taxes. Let the royals continue to eat cake.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I dont mind the royals. My life would probably be the same with or without them

They can keep my 50p a year. Chances are I lose more than that down back of the sofa and I'm more bothered about losing that than the royals "

But you need to be outraged over something

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lanemikeMan
over a year ago

Bolton

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares "

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I dont mind the royals. My life would probably be the same with or without them

They can keep my 50p a year. Chances are I lose more than that down back of the sofa and I'm more bothered about losing that than the royals

But you need to be outraged over something"

The amount of bountys in the celebration tin was abit high this year

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lanemikeMan
over a year ago

Bolton

"I dont mind the royals. My life would probably be the same with or without them "

That is quite likely true, mine would also probably not be much different but our nation would be much the poorer without our wonderful Royal Family.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

Only for the the last three hundred years, I'm surprised anyone noticed them sneek the German passports through passport control. Though they could have been using their French ones lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it. "

No bjt multiple woman have come forward to confirm it with credible evidence including pbotos

What's Andrew got... A receipt frorm pizza express

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The Royal family bring in so much tourism it won't disappear.

The way they've gone about it is very wrong

You are ill informed Buckingham Palace is by far the most popular tourist attraction in London, it attracts around 15 million tourists each year.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I actually feel very sorry for the Queen right now. Not only has she been made to look silly in her professional capacity by someone close to her. Harry is her grandson and the bond is fading fast and she must be quite hurt by that.

She is likely very torn and very sad. She's an old lady but won't get to deal with her family personally in the way she probably wishes she could.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it.

No bjt multiple woman have come forward to confirm it with credible evidence including pbotos

What's Andrew got... A receipt frorm pizza express"

So if I and a few other women on here claim you did the same ass Prince Andrew that automatically makes it true then! I could photo shop your head onto another torso then take a photo of that photo and hey presto proof.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I actually feel very sorry for the Queen right now. Not only has she been made to look silly in her professional capacity by someone close to her. Harry is her grandson and the bond is fading fast and she must be quite hurt by that.

She is likely very torn and very sad. She's an old lady but won't get to deal with her family personally in the way she probably wishes she could. "

Dont be fooled. I bet ol Liz can still swing a mean left hook

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares "

evidence?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

The present monarchy is. Due to what I mentioned before, about no catholics on the throne. Victoria was last line of Hanovers (German).

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

Multiple women were against Epstein. There are photos linking Andrew and the one woman but that is the only evidence released so far that I am aware of. I am not defending either parties but neither will I lynch someone by media mob

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I read somewhere the royal bloodline is actually german

Yup, there was a comedian I cant remember his name, who labelled her the nazi queen "

I think that might be cos of her mother's line.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it.

No bjt multiple woman have come forward to confirm it with credible evidence including pbotos

What's Andrew got... A receipt frorm pizza express

All photoshopped photos can be proven to be geniune or false it's inbeded into the code that makes up the picture.

I do know that if I had a personal protection force that keeps a diarised record of all my movements

I could give you a better excuse than

I was in Milton Keynes for a child's birthday party. Where no member of the public include the child parents who party it was... thought bloody hell that's prince Andrew let me take a photo

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

So one minute your giving example of father to son re profits of crime, then you're agreeing there are tenuous familial ties between the 2 lizzies. You can't have it both ways.

Also, there is no evidence of a crime... Or put it this way, put the Queen before a court and a decent solicitor will have her free in no time. "

Yes, I can have it both ways. The example I gave was just that. An example. The situation would be the same whether it were father and son (which I didn't specify), or one person to another, whether related or not. And no, of course the Queen wouldn't go before a court - that's just ridiculous. I haven't suggested that at all, I'm just continuing my assertation the the Royal's original funding came from the r*pe of other country's resources, slavery and drug sales. I'm talking about a moral responsibility to face the fact the monarchy is based on, and funded by those things. So far, you have been unable to refute those assertions. When you look at Buckingham Palace, you might think "Oh, how lovely - all those wealthy Royals make me proud". When I look at Bucking Palace I might think "I wonder how many of those bricks were purchased using the profits from the sales of my ancestors?"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

^^^^^

BuckingHAM Palace, not Bucking Palace

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *aton OP Man
over a year ago

barnet

"I dont mind the royals. My life would probably be the same with or without them

That is quite likely true, mine would also probably not be much different but our nation would be much the poorer without our wonderful Royal Family. "
no it wouldnt it would be 375 million quid a year better off. Go ahead and doff your cap at the royal gold embossed royal barge as it sails through london ...while her madge waves indifferently at her genuflective throng . I'm just as proud to be a Republican as you are a monarchist.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it.

No bjt multiple woman have come forward to confirm it with credible evidence including pbotos

What's Andrew got... A receipt frorm pizza express

All photoshopped photos can be proven to be geniune or false it's inbeded into the code that makes up the picture.

I do know that if I had a personal protection force that keeps a diarised record of all my movements

I could give you a better excuse than

I was in Milton Keynes for a child's birthday party. Where no member of the public include the child parents who party it was... thought bloody hell that's prince Andrew let me take a photo"

Not if they a photo of a photo which is the one in question for prince Andrew (no original) So the original that was taken on 35mm film as I understand it had embedded code that passed onto the photo of a photo! Can you feed the whole of London with 2 loaves and 5 fish next please.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *reya73Woman
over a year ago

Whitley Bay

Goodbye royals. Good on ya Harry n Megan and thingy, a way you go. Phase them all out slowly so as not to ruffle too many feathers.

Tra x

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *uesdaysfundayCouple
over a year ago

Sandbach

Victoria was the last of the Hanover line. Her Son was the Edward VII was the first King born in the line of Saxa Coburg and Gotha. It was thought in World War One 1917 that the royals link to European crown Princes would not look good, especially that of Germany. So, for moral, the Royal families name was changed to Windsor

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

Ok quick lesson. Our monachy has been born from German blood since all other contenders to the throne were catholic after Queen Anne, last of the Stuart line, died with no heir

This was the start of the Hanover line with George I and ended with Queen Victoria’ death

Her son Edward VII started the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in memory of his father a Prince Albert, who was also German

His son George V changed it to Windsor in 1917 due the rising temperament against Germans

So yes we have had a monarchy with german roots for nearly 400 years

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

So one minute your giving example of father to son re profits of crime, then you're agreeing there are tenuous familial ties between the 2 lizzies. You can't have it both ways.

Also, there is no evidence of a crime... Or put it this way, put the Queen before a court and a decent solicitor will have her free in no time.

Your original assertion may or may not be correct but you are also asserting the present monarchy continues to profit. The second assertion is much more tenuous than the first. You have yet to convince me. I know through history that the monarchy has "r@ped" THIS country of its assets, so to speak, when they ran the country, via taxes to pay for wars and buy luxuries (such as a certain Prince Regent). The monarchy has even been in debt I believe.

Oh, and as for being proud... Already stated my viewpoint.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *arksxMan
over a year ago

Leicester / London

"Constantly being attacked for simply trying to live their lives is the reason that they're stepping down.

Everyone is furious, yet prince Andrew fucks kids and no one cares

That has not been proven in any Court of Law. He also denies it.

No bjt multiple woman have come forward to confirm it with credible evidence including pbotos

What's Andrew got... A receipt frorm pizza express

All photoshopped photos can be proven to be geniune or false it's inbeded into the code that makes up the picture.

I do know that if I had a personal protection force that keeps a diarised record of all my movements

I could give you a better excuse than

I was in Milton Keynes for a child's birthday party. Where no member of the public include the child parents who party it was... thought bloody hell that's prince Andrew let me take a photo

Your arfument conveniently ommits the security protection force and their records of his whereabouts with them.

If he went to pizza express there would be report. So he should show it to support his case.

Your explanation about the photo is not clear?

If you like to have another go and refrain from personal insults I'm open to hearing what you have to say.

I dont share your opinion it is OK to disagree and I'm open to new information

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

and it’s done, dusted and closed !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago

Hull

Quite apart from all the way that Harry and Meghan decided to announce this decision to the world, I'm wondering just who actually wears the trousers in their relationship?

Methinks she is in control, has got herself placed into a financial nest-egg from which she can control her lifestyle, and has Harry wrapped round her little finger, as he coo's sweet nothings at her!

In time, she'll dump him and take him for every penny he has!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

" For approximately a can of Coca Cola and a mars bar a year, she and her direct family (who are mostly funded by a separate income from the Duchy of Cornwall) she can have my £1.24 a year

Drug sales?

Slavery? Probably. At the time rich landowners owned slaves.

That's my surmising... Your turn.

Never heard of the Opium Wars with China???????

Yes but knew nothing of them.

Now I know something, such as first opium war 1839. Did the monarch rule parliament at this time? Very succinct answer no! The monarch had no powers within Parliament during the time of George III.

Thanks wiki.

British East India company 1600-1874, received royal charter from QEI in 1600.

Now wanna explain how the royals are currently profiting?

So one minute your giving example of father to son re profits of crime, then you're agreeing there are tenuous familial ties between the 2 lizzies. You can't have it both ways.

Also, there is no evidence of a crime... Or put it this way, put the Queen before a court and a decent solicitor will have her free in no time.

Oh, and as for being proud... Already stated my viewpoint. "

Ok, I really don't think you know what the definition of "profit" is.

Profit - noun -"a financial gain, especially the difference between the amount earned and the amount spent in buying, operating, or producing something."

I'll try and make this simple. If something is purchased using funds gleaned from the sale of slaves, be it land, gold bullion, diamonds etc, whoever subsequently owns those items and makes a financial gain from them, is profiting from slave trading. It doesn't matter who first bought them or who they were given to, the current possessor of them has culpability.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately