FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Civil Partnerships

Jump to newest
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

Bump!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Bump!! "

Ah!

In days of yore I might have got a conversation going on this one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roticGoddessXXWoman
over a year ago

Richmond


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

"

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

"

No I wouldn't. What's the point?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

It’s about time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

"

Nothing for some people and everything for others.

I have straight friends who felt they had to marry even though they are opposed to the institution of marriage. They wanted a civil partnership but it wasn't available to straight couples.

Technically, it means that friends living together or in a long term supportive relationship can enter a partnership to inherit from each other and get each other's pensions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well, this has all come as such a shock Lickety, I really wasn't expecting you to ask so soon.....

Ummmmmm.....

.....YES, I will! It'd make me the happiest man on fab!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Well, this has all come as such a shock Lickety, I really wasn't expecting you to ask so soon.....

Ummmmmm.....

.....YES, I will! It'd make me the happiest man on fab! "

You don't even have to put a ring on it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

No I wouldn't. What's the point? "

You and your partner would have the legal protection but without the faff (hopefully with a faf, though) and the vows.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roticGoddessXXWoman
over a year ago

Richmond


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

Nothing for some people and everything for others.

I have straight friends who felt they had to marry even though they are opposed to the institution of marriage. They wanted a civil partnership but it wasn't available to straight couples.

Technically, it means that friends living together or in a long term supportive relationship can enter a partnership to inherit from each other and get each other's pensions.

"

Exactly, and seems that's the reason so many actually get married these days. I might get around to it before I die, solely for tax purposes.

I still don't quite understand why there's marriage and civil partnership? Where I'm from (US), they are the same--it's a legal contract wherever it's done. Thank god it's mostly now accepted that same sex couples have the same rights as straight ones.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well, this has all come as such a shock Lickety, I really wasn't expecting you to ask so soon.....

Ummmmmm.....

.....YES, I will! It'd make me the happiest man on fab!

You don't even have to put a ring on it.

"

Nonnono, I need your ring!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

"

Did I no

Would I no never.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

Nothing for some people and everything for others.

I have straight friends who felt they had to marry even though they are opposed to the institution of marriage. They wanted a civil partnership but it wasn't available to straight couples.

Technically, it means that friends living together or in a long term supportive relationship can enter a partnership to inherit from each other and get each other's pensions.

Exactly, and seems that's the reason so many actually get married these days. I might get around to it before I die, solely for tax purposes.

I still don't quite understand why there's marriage and civil partnership? Where I'm from (US), they are the same--it's a legal contract wherever it's done. Thank god it's mostly now accepted that same sex couples have the same rights as straight ones."

Civil Partnerships were offered as a compromise to same sex couples instead of granting marriage. Now all the forms are equalised.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

Remember that if you get married or have a civil partnership it revokes your existing will so all your assets automatically go to your new partner and not to your children unless you make a new will after your union.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Remember that if you get married or have a civil partnership it revokes your existing will so all your assets automatically go to your new partner and not to your children unless you make a new will after your union. "

A very important point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"Remember that if you get married or have a civil partnership it revokes your existing will so all your assets automatically go to your new partner and not to your children unless you make a new will after your union. "

A will is something that should always be reviewed with any changes you make in your life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'd probably go for the marriage insread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

Nothing for some people and everything for others.

I have straight friends who felt they had to marry even though they are opposed to the institution of marriage. They wanted a civil partnership but it wasn't available to straight couples.

Technically, it means that friends living together or in a long term supportive relationship can enter a partnership to inherit from each other and get each other's pensions.

"

Is it available to straight couples now?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

Wouldn't marry (or similar) again for anything, no. But have straight friends who refused to marry until anyone could.

Seems it should all go both ways.

What's the actual difference, anyway?

Nothing for some people and everything for others.

I have straight friends who felt they had to marry even though they are opposed to the institution of marriage. They wanted a civil partnership but it wasn't available to straight couples.

Technically, it means that friends living together or in a long term supportive relationship can enter a partnership to inherit from each other and get each other's pensions.

Is it available to straight couples now?"

Yes. Yesterday was the first day that straight couples could register for a civil partnership.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *manaWoman
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Today was the day that mixed sex couples could apply for a Civil Partnership.

Did you? Would you?

"

I'd never get married or similar again. I'm far too cynical now.

But for others that want it? Good for them xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would.

I don't want my kid inheriting my dildo collection

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top