FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Fabswingers.com ratio

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

More men on this site than women?

True

Or

False

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Massively true

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aomilatteCouple
over a year ago

Midlands

Might be true. May have to do a survey to confirm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

False

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone."
not being moany personally it just seems to be fact. Unless a surveys done

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone. not being moany personally it just seems to be fact. Unless a surveys done"

I'm not calling you moany.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Does the pope shit in the woods?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How you gonna use this information OP?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"How you gonna use this information OP?"

Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"How you gonna use this information OP?

Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money. "

Why do a survey when you can just PEEK at the site STATS......... ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place


"How you gonna use this information OP?

Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money.

Why do a survey when you can just PEEK at the site STATS......... ?"

Where are they?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago

Manchester (he/him)

I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.

It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam1971Man
over a year ago

Bedford

Sydney University have this information

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.

It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples"

Dayyum

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place


"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.

It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples"

I thought it was higher than that. Probably double.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago

Manchester (he/him)


"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.

It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples

I thought it was higher than that. Probably double. "

Nope, some areas were a little higher but the average worked out as that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Massively true

P"

And anyone who answers "False" is a bit of a weapon really.

Unless they're doing it in an ironic humourous way of course (G-Crumps, we mean you!)

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely yes. Arent half of the women and couples men too?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.

It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples

I thought it was higher than that. Probably double.

Nope, some areas were a little higher but the average worked out as that. "

Depends when it was done and what areas. It's been done several times over the years and I won't have born witness to all of them, but the most recent I remember, the ratio was 12 to 1? With in theory the actual figure being anything up to 15 to 1, due to the amount of fake single female profiles.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoenixAdAstraWoman
over a year ago

Hiding in the shadows

Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'

Men 31

Women 3

Couples 11

TV/TS 2

So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebjonnsonMan
over a year ago

Maldon


"Sydney University have this information "

No we don’t. We just make it up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place


"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'

Men 31

Women 3

Couples 11

TV/TS 2

So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio "

There’s not a single woman on my who’s near!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoenixAdAstraWoman
over a year ago

Hiding in the shadows


"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'

Men 31

Women 3

Couples 11

TV/TS 2

So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio

There’s not a single woman on my who’s near! "

Considering where I live, I was quite surprised only 2 TV/TS!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eliWoman
over a year ago

.

There's a wise old man who posts about the numbers being far less when you remove those who are fake etc. I won't do him justice by paraphrasing so I'm not going to attempt to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'

Men 31

Women 3

Couples 11

TV/TS 2

So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio "

See I just got 41 blokes, 6 couples, 2 Tv/TS and not a single woman?? Which would pit the ratio at 42 or more guys to every woman which is bollocks.

The thing with 'who's near' is that it picks the nearby folk at random.

For a more accurate answer, use the old fashioned search, ut within as small a radius as you can. Only downside is when amounts reach 300+ in more populated areas, but in theory you could just take a certain age group to bring them under.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoenixAdAstraWoman
over a year ago

Hiding in the shadows


"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'

Men 31

Women 3

Couples 11

TV/TS 2

So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio

See I just got 41 blokes, 6 couples, 2 Tv/TS and not a single woman?? Which would pit the ratio at 42 or more guys to every woman which is bollocks.

The thing with 'who's near' is that it picks the nearby folk at random.

For a more accurate answer, use the old fashioned search, ut within as small a radius as you can. Only downside is when amounts reach 300+ in more populated areas, but in theory you could just take a certain age group to bring them under.

B"

Ah OK! Didn't realise it was random.

Assumed it showed everyone online within a certain radius.

You know I'm a geek when it comes to facts & figures.

I will have to do more research

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

See that's more accurate. Using Fab users aged 30 ONLY, search returns 16 women, 206 guys within 5 miles?

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"See that's more accurate. Using Fab users aged 30 ONLY, search returns 16 women, 206 guys within 5 miles?

B"

Check for 31 year olds and it's 18 women, 196 guys.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 01/12/19 13:18:43]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think so, based on casual observation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone."

It's not an excuse if it's true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.

It's not an excuse if it's true "

It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.

It's not an excuse if it's true

It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.

B"

At least once a week there's a couple complaining that they can't find a woman for an FFM threesome. It's not a male exclusive problem nor is it from a lack of effort.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate? "

Accurate in what way ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

42 men 2 ladies & 5 couples on who's near thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam1971Man
over a year ago

Bedford

If approaching half the women’s profiles are blokes then 20:1 seems possible in many areas

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If approaching half the women’s profiles are blokes then 20:1 seems possible in many areas"

In West Cornwall it's way higher than that!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?

Accurate in what way ?"

In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?

Accurate in what way ?

In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more. "

Nice tits on you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd guess 30% of the women on here are men pretending to be women anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?

Accurate in what way ?

In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more.

Nice tits on you "

You think you're cute, right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adame 2SwordsWoman
over a year ago

Victoria, London

Worked with a dating agency, ie long term exclusive relationships, and I had to filter out the married/partnered guys.

The ratio was about 5/1 women to men

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.

It's not an excuse if it's true

It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.

B

At least once a week there's a couple complaining that they can't find a woman for an FFM threesome. It's not a male exclusive problem nor is it from a lack of effort."

I never said moaning about getting meets was exclusive to males. Couples will moan too. There's even the female equivalent who moan constantly that they can't find the right kind of meets as their inboxes are drowned in a sea of shite?

Though most predominant moans about getting meets will be the men, simply because there's more of them.

The thing is the ratios create their own problems for each demographic. But there's things every demographic can do to improve their chances if the gripe is a big enough one. And those who moan the loudest or most often are frequently the ones who are doing sod all proactive.

Using men just as an example for a man to pop on the forum and say "Hi, I don't seem to be doing too well on here. Can anyone give me some advice in my approach or profile that might stand me in better stead?" is all well and good. He's being proactive merely by asking for that help as he wants some opinions about how he might go about changing things.

However for a man to come on kicking off with something along the lines of "This site is bullshit, I've messaged 100 women in the last couple of days and they're all up their own arses. Does anyone meet on here?" IS precisely a meaner as he's NOT being proactive, he's just having a gripe because ladies aren't falling into his lap.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Worked with a dating agency, ie long term exclusive relationships, and I had to filter out the married/partnered guys.

The ratio was about 5/1 women to men "

Yep. Most men's biological urges are pre-programmed to seek out sex with many partners at the very least on some subliminal level. Most women's biological urges are pre-programmed to seek out a monogamous relationship.

Which is why the ratios of each are so skewed. A lot of men seeking relationships are like most women on here, they don't need to join dating sites or be proactive in any way. Why would they? They can instead just sit back while the women put in the groundwork for them as they know sooner or later a woman who they consider suitable will come along and a relationship will fall right into their lap, so to speak.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top